By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2026-05-26 06:15:10
圣安东尼奥马刺队从开场便展现出令人窒息的防守，在维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama) 充满进攻高光表现的带领下，以 103-82 轻松击败俄克拉荷马雷霆队，赢下了系列赛第四战。目前西部决赛大比分被扳成 2-2 平，双方第五场对决将于周二移师俄克拉荷马城进行。
数据统计：马刺 VS 雷霆
马刺 VS 雷霆 – 球员评分
维克托·文班亚马
在第三场表现相对温和之后，文班亚马在第四场强势反弹，奉献了一场令人过目难忘的表演。他全场斩获 33 分、8 个篮板、5 次助攻、3 次盖帽和 2 次抢断——而他在场上的实际影响力甚至比这些数据还要出色。他在半场结束前就砍下了 22 分，其中包括第二节末的一记半场压哨超远投篮，直接帮助马刺队扭转了势头。在进攻端，他冲击篮筐的决心更加坚决，没有丝毫的犹豫。他展现了开阔的球场视野，做出了极佳的决策。在防守端，文班亚马封锁了对手的轻松出手，让雷霆队在试图突破时不得不三思。总而言之，这位法国人在如此高压的局面下打出了现象级的表现。堪称完美。更重要的是，他本场只需出战 31 分钟——理论上，这有助于他在接下来的比赛中保持更充沛的体能。
评分：A
达龙·福克斯
考虑到当时的状况，达龙·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox) 的表现堪称伟大。尽管他显然饱受脚踝伤势的折磨，但他拼尽全力，找到了一条能为球队做出巨大贡献的途径。他得到了 12 分，但更重要的是，他抢下了全队最高的 10 个篮板，并贡献了水准之上的防守。考虑到他身材偏矮且行动不便，福克斯的防守表现简直令人惊叹。在进攻端，他最重要的贡献体现在失误控制上。在 31 分钟的出战时间里，他送出 5 次助攻且没有出现一次失误。福克斯几乎凭一己之力解决了马刺队在系列赛前几场中暴露的失误问题，从而证明了自己的价值。
评分：A
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle) 奉献了极其精彩的表演。他终于打出了一场攻防俱佳的完整比赛，其影响力简直爆表。在进攻端，他高效砍下 13 分，同时送出全队最高的 6 次助攻。他是马刺队场上最出色的组织者，而且全场仅有 1 次失误。在防守端，他是马刺队最棒的外线防守大闸。他在防守端犹如一头不知疲倦的猛兽，没有给 SGA 任何喘息的空间。总而言之，这是一场令人印象极深的比赛。
评分：A-
德文·瓦塞尔
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell) 如今的表现已经不仅仅是稳健了。他仅用 7 次运动战出手就高效拿下 13 分，同时还能策动进攻并减少失误。在防守端，他无处不在。他贡献了一次精彩的盖帽、一次关键的抢断，并在其余防守回合中表现得极为出色。瓦塞尔继续保持着高水平的发挥，他看起来完全是一个值得球队在未来多年里寄予厚望、表现可靠的季后赛核心球员。
评分：A-
朱利安·尚帕尼
天哪，如果朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie) 的手感能稍微回暖一点，马刺队的日子会好过得多。在第四战的 29 分钟出场时间里，他仅得 2 分，投篮 7 投 1 中，三分线外更是 5 投 0 中。他在投篮时显得毫无自信，这绝对是一个令人担忧的迹象。不过，也有一些好消息。他在防守端表现不错，没有让进攻端的低迷影响到防守。尚帕尼也在尽量减少自己的犯规和失误。但是，确实，希望他能尽快找到节奏，因为一旦他在外线找回手感，就能为马刺队偷得一场胜利。
评分：D+
迪伦·哈珀
自从遭遇伤病惊魂后，迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper) 的数据有所下滑，但我认为他在第四场的表现相当不错。首先看防守端，他在防守选位、强硬度以及纪律性上，都展现出了超越年龄的成熟。在进攻端，哈珀合理地选择出手时机，承担了组织和控球职责，并展现出了一些身体素质恢复的迹象，表明他的身体状态正变得越来越好。
评分：B+
凯尔登·约翰逊
我想这勉强算得上是朝着正确方向迈出的一小步。即便如此，凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson) 的表现依然相当糟糕。他全场 12 投仅 3 中，其中三分球 4 投 0 中，罚球 2 罚 0 中。约翰逊在篮板球上的表现也乏善可陈。防守端他的表现有所提升……但依然是外线防守中最薄弱的一环。唯一让人欣慰的是，他有几次强硬的突破，看起来更像我们熟悉并喜爱的那个 KJ 了。希望他能在为时已晚之前彻底摆脱这种低迷状态。
评分：D+
哈里森·巴恩斯
对哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes) 来说，这是一场有些奇特的比赛，但他至少发挥出了应有的作用，这在本届季后赛中并不多见。他 4 次运动战出手全部打铁，其中包括两次三分尝试。但他通过 6 罚 5 中的罚球弥补了投篮的低迷，在篮板球保护上比平时更出色，防守端也能在正确的时间出现在正确的位置，打得更有活力。虽然对巴恩斯的要求不算高，但嘿，马刺队现在需要替补席上能提供的一切火力。
评分：C+
卢克·科内特
好吧，这一规律今天依然奏效：当文班亚马在场时，马刺队表现优异；而当他坐在替补席上时，球队就陷入挣扎。不过在这场比赛中，这位替补中锋拿出了高水平的表现。在短短 13 分钟的出场时间里，卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet) 贡献了 6 分、7 个篮板和 2 次盖帽。科内特的双手变得更加可靠，拼抢也更加卖力，看起来比平时状态更好。
评分：B+
卡特·布莱恩特
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant) 被米奇教练训斥了几次——而且大部分是他自找的。在不到 7 分钟的时间里吃到 4 次犯规对球队毫无帮助。他在进攻端的表现有些脱节，缺乏自信。这位新秀似乎过于依赖蛮力，而缺乏冷静和策略。不过，嘿，我挺喜欢他身上那股不服软的劲头。长远来看，在年轻时经历这种高强度比赛环境的洗礼，对他只有好处。
评分：C-
米奇·约翰逊
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson) 教练值得极大的赞誉。文班亚马在极佳的位置接到了球，球队对他的战术喂球非常坚决。而让文班亚马只打 31 分钟，也许是他当晚最妙的执教决策。我赞同增加巴恩斯的出场时间，也喜欢他没有立刻放弃布莱恩特。防守战术的针对性调整起到了决定性作用。总的来说，米奇教练显然出色地完成了他的工作。
评分：A-
由生成式 AI 翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Playoff Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Oklahoma City Thunder – Game 4
Playoff Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Oklahoma City Thunder – Game 4
The San Antonio Spurs played stifling defense from the opening minutes, got an offensive highlight-filled lift from Victor Wembanyama and cruised to a 103-82 victory over the Oklahoma City Thunder in Game 4. The Western Conference Finals are now tied 2-2 with Game 5 to be played in OKC on Tuesday.
Stats: Spurs vs. Thunder
Spurs vs. Thunder – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
After a relatively docile showing in Game 3, Wembanyama bounced back in a big way with an instantly memorable Game 4. He totaled 33 points, eight rebounds, five assists, three blocks and two steals — and he was even better than those numbers indicate. He had 22 points before halftime, including a buzzer-beating halfcourt shot at the end of the second quarter that helped swing the momentum in San Antonio’s favor. Offensively, he was much more determined to get to the rim and didn’t play with an ounce of hesitation. He saw the floor well and made very good decisions. Defensively, Wembanyama was eliminating easy shots and making the Thunder think twice about penetration. All in all, the Frenchman had a fantastic performance in a pressure-packed situation. Outstanding job. Importantly, he only needed to play 31 minutes — which, in theory, should help him be fresher going forward.
Grade: A
De’Aaron Fox
Given the circumstances, Fox was great. Even though he’s in obvious pain due to his ankle injury, he scratched, clawed and found a way to be very beneficial to the cause. He scored 12 points but more importantly, he led the team with ten rebounds and played above average defense. For being small-ish and gimpy, Fox’s defense was awesome. Offensively, his most important contribution was in the turnover column. He didn’t turn the ball over in 31 minutes while handing out five assists. Fox has proven his worth by almost single-handedly solving San Antonio’s turnover issues from earlier in the series.
Grade: A
Stephon Castle
Great stuff from Castle. He finally put together a complete game and his impact was off the charts. Offensively, he had 13 loud points while leading the team with six assists. He was the best playmaker on the court for the Spurs and he did it while only turning the ball over one time. Defensively, he was San Antonio’s best perimeter defender. He was a relentless beast on that end and didn’t give SGA room to breathe. Very impressive game, all told.
Grade: A-
Devin Vassell
Vassell is beyond rock solid at this point. He scored 13 points on only seven field goal attempts while making plays and limiting his miscues. Defensively, he was all over the place. He had an impressive block, an important steal and was very good the rest of the way. Vassell continues to play at a high level and looks exactly like a reliable playoff performer the franchise can count on for years to come.
Grade: A-
Julian Champagnie
Man, if Champagnie could warm up just a little bit, the Spurs would find life to be a lot easier. In 29 minutes, he had only two points in Game 4 and was 1-for-7 from the field and 0-for-5 from downtown. He doesn’t look confident shooting the ball, which is definitely a troublesome turn of events. There are some glimmers of good news, however. He’s defending well and not letting his offensive woes bleed into that end of the court. Champagnie is also limiting his mistakes — both in terms of fouls and turnovers. But, yeah, hopefully he can find his rhythm soon because him having a big game from beyond the arc could steal a win for San Antonio.
Grade: D+
Dylan Harper
Harper’s numbers are down since his injury scare but I thought he was pretty damn good in Game 4. Let’s start on the defensive end. He’s playing wise beyond his years in terms of positioning, toughness and discipline. Offensively, Harper picked his spots well, handled playmaking and ball-handling duties, and showed some athletic signs that he’s feeling better and better.
Grade: B+
Keldon Johnson
I guess this could be considered a baby step in the right direction. That said, Johnson was still pretty darn bad. He was 3-for-12 from the floor, including 0-for-4 from three-point range and 0-for-2 at the free throw line. Johnson also wasn’t anything too special on the boards. Defensively, he was better … but still the weakest link on the perimeter. The silver lining is he had some powerful drives and looked more like the KJ we know and love. Let’s hope he can fully shake off this funk before it’s too late.
Grade: D+
Harrison Barnes
Weird outing for Barnes but he was good enough to be playable, which hasn’t been the case often this postseason. He missed all four of his field goal attempts, including two tries from deep. But he made up for those clanks by going 5-for-6 at the free throw line, rebounding better than usual, being in the right spots at the right times defensively and playing with more liveliness. It’s a low bar for Barnes but, hey, the Spurs need all the bench production they can muster right now.
Grade: C+
Luke Kornet
Well, the pattern held for another day: the Spurs are good when Wembanyama is in the game and bad when he’s on the bench. In this contest, though, the backup center produced at a high level. In just 13 minutes, he had six points, seven rebounds and two blocks. Kornet’s hands were more reliable, he battled with more gusto and he looked more blessed than usual.
Grade: B+
Carter Bryant
Bryant got an earful a couple times from Coach Mitch — and it was mostly deserved. Four fouls in less than seven minutes isn’t helping. His offensive play was disjointed and lacked self-assuredness. The rookie seemingly relied too much of burly vibes and not enough on calmness and strategy. But, hey, I like that he wasn’t soft. Long-term, playing in this type of environment at a young age should do nothing but help.
Grade: C-
Mitch Johnson
Coach Mitch deserves plenty of kudos. Wembanyama got the ball in great positions and the force-feeding was real. Playing him only 31 minutes was perhaps his best coaching move of the night. I agreed with the extended minutes for Barnes and I liked that he didn’t immediately give up on Bryant. The defensive gameplan adjustments were massive. Overall, Coach Mitch clearly did his part.
Grade: A-
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk