By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2026-01-15 20:09:36
本赛季早些时候，圣安东尼奥马刺曾在两周内三度击败俄克拉荷马城雷霆，此举引起了整个NBA的关注。周二晚，马刺与雷霆迎来了本赛季的第四次交手。这一次，卫冕冠军在主场球迷的助威声中，以119-98的比分取胜。
马刺在上半场表现不俗，但在第三节失控，被雷霆打出40-24的单节比分。此役过后，马刺的战绩下滑至27胜13负，而雷霆则提升至34胜7负。
数据统计：马刺 vs 雷霆
马刺 vs 雷霆 – 最终评分
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
看文班亚马对阵雷霆的比赛真是让人捏了把汗。他似乎每隔几分钟就会捂着不同的身体部位，看起来很痛苦。值得称赞的是，面对雷霆的身体对抗，文班亚马顶住了压力。不幸的是，他在攻防两端的影响力并未达到正常水平。防守端，雷霆找到了限制他护筐能力的方法。进攻端，文班亚马则缺乏往常的效率。他的投篮命中率不足五成，并且只送出了一次助攻。但是，他打得非常努力，而且只有一次失误——所以你很难对球队基石球员的表现感到太过失望。
评分: C
德阿隆·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)
福克斯在各个距离的投篮表现都不错，全场送出五次助攻，且仅有两次失误。尽管效率不错，但福克斯的表现还是有些令人失望。问题在于他需要做得更多。九次出手是远远不够的，尤其是在对阵俄克拉荷马城时，他的单打得分能力是圣安东尼奥最大的优势之一。福克斯在防守端表现尚可，但总而言之，马刺需要他们的明星后卫贡献更多。
评分: B-
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
在经历了近期的诸多挣扎后，卡斯尔在对阵卫冕冠军的比赛中强势反弹，打出了一场精彩的比赛。最亮眼的是，卡斯尔三分线外5投3中，砍下了20分、8次助攻和7个篮板的全面数据。他在防守端能量十足，展现了高水平的竞争性。遗憾的是，他出现了五次失误，且有时决策不佳，这让他的表现打了折扣。
评分: B+
朱利安·尚佩尼 (Julian Champagnie)
尚佩尼再次打出了出色的表现。他投篮时充满着肉眼可见的自信，他快速的出手也迫使对手不得不提早对他进行防守。他的防守和篮板都是加分项。此外，尚佩尼没有失误，并且基本避免了不必要的犯规。
评分: B+
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
我的天。比赛越重要，巴恩斯的表现似乎就越糟糕。最近的例子就是这场对阵雷霆的比赛，他在24分钟内7投1中，没有抢到一个篮板。这……是无法接受的贡献。巴恩斯在防守端有几次积极的拼抢，也控制了自己的失误，但马刺绝对需要这位老将领袖拿出更实在的贡献。
评分: D+
迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)
对哈珀来说，这是朝着正确方向迈出的一步。提醒一下，他打得并非特别出色，但比他近期的任何一场比赛都要好。哈珀在26分钟内三分球3投2中，送出3次助攻，打出了相当干净利落的篮球。希望他能尽快找回篮下终结能力，因为那曾是这位新秀在赛季初最大的优势。
评分: B
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
对约翰逊而言，这基本上是一个不值一提的夜晚。他三分线外5投仅1中，没有获得罚球机会，只抢下3个篮板，防守也低于水准。在对阵雷霆时，他在外线的脚步移动速度不足问题尤为突出。尽管约翰逊有这些不足，但他的努力程度毋庸置疑。
评分: C
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)
科内特在他的首段出场时间里表现出色。他统治了篮板，防守积极，在进攻端也从不放弃。不幸的是，随着比赛的进行，科内特的影响力逐渐下降。他依然打得很努力，但要影响比赛进程变得更加困难。
评分: B
林迪·沃特斯三世 (Lindy Waters III)
沃特斯打得比平时更具侵略性，但遗憾的是，这并未收到成效。他在13分钟内5投仅1中。他在防守端展现了智慧和韧性，但充其量也只是功过相抵。
评分: C
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
好吧，看来这支马刺输给雷霆也是有可能的。我认为从执教角度来看，约翰逊做得足够好了。轮换安排合理，他对文班亚马的上场时间限制处理得当，并且圣安东尼奥在攻防两端的比赛计划都很明智。
评分: B-
由生成式 AI 翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Oklahoma City Thunder – Game #40
Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Oklahoma City Thunder – Game #40
After the San Antonio Spurs defeated the Oklahoma City Thunder three times in a two week span earlier in the season, everyone in the NBA world took note. The Spurs and Thunder played for a fourth time on Tuesday night. This time, playing in front of their home fans, the defending champions pulled off a 119-98 victory.
The Spurs played well in the first half but lost their grip on the game in the third quarter, which saw OKC win the period by a count of 40-24. The loss dropped the good guys to a record of 27-13, while the Thunder improved to 34-7.
Stats: Spurs at Thunder
Spurs at Thunder – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
It was stressful watching Wembanyama play against the Thunder. It seemed like he was in pain while holding a different body part every few minutes. To his credit, Wembanyama held up pretty well against OKC’s physicality. Unfortunately, his impact on both ends wasn’t at his normal level. Defensively, the Thunder were able to find ways to neutralize his rim protection. Offensively, Wembanyama lacked his usual efficiency. He hit fewer than half of his shots from the field and had only one assist. But, yeah, he played hard and only turned it over once — so it’s difficult to be too disappointed with how the team’s franchise player performed.
Grade: C
De’Aaron Fox
Fox shot well from all ranges and only turned the ball over twice while totaling five assists. Despite the efficiency, Fox was somewhat underwhelming. The issue was that he needed to do more. Nine field goal attempts isn’t enough, especially when his one-on-one shot-making ability is one of San Antonio’s biggest strengths when going against Oklahoma City. Fox was pretty good defensively but, all in all, the Spurs simply needed more from their star guard.
Grade: B-
Stephon Castle
After a lot of recent struggles, Castle bounced back with a good game against the reigning champs. Most notably, Castle was 3-for-5 from three-point range to power his 20-point, eight-assist, seven-rebound performance. His defensive energy was relentless and he competed at a high level. Regrettably, he lost some value by turning the ball over five times and suffering from iffy decision-making at times.
Grade: B+
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie played well once again. He’s shooting the ball with a palpable amount of confidence and his quick trigger is forcing teams to pick him up early. His defense and rebounding were both plusses. Champagnie also didn’t turn it over and mostly avoided needless fouls.
Grade: B+
Harrison Barnes
Yikes. The bigger the game, the smaller Barnes seems to perform. The latest example saw him shoot 1-for-7 and finish without a rebound in 24 minutes against the Thunder. That … is not acceptable production. Barnes had a couple hustle plays on defense and limited his errors but the Spurs definitely need more tangible production from their veteran leader.
Grade: D+
Dylan Harper
This was a step in the right direction for Harper. He didn’t play particularly well, mind you, but he did better than he has in any recent game. Harper hit 2-of-3 three-pointers, handed out three assists in 26 minutes and mostly played a clean brand of basketball. Let’s hope he can get back to finishing at the basket soon because that was the rookie’s biggest strength early in his campaign.
Grade: B
Keldon Johnson
This was mostly a forgettable night at the office for Johnson. He was only 1-for-5 from three-point land, didn’t get to the free throw line, corralled just three rebounds and played sub par defense. His lack of footspeed on the perimeter was particularly glaring versus the Thunder. Despite Johnson’s shortcomings, his effort was never an issue.
Grade: C
Luke Kornet
Kornet played well in his first stint. He was dominating on the boards, active on defense and never gave up on offense. Unfortunately, Kornet’s impact decreased as the game went along. He was still playing hard but he had a more difficult time impacting the proceedings.
Grade: B
Lindy Waters III
Waters was more aggressive than usual but, sadly, it didn’t pay off. He was only 1-for-5 from the field in 13 minutes. He exhibited smarts and toughness on defense but he was at best neutral on that end of the court.
Grade: C
Mitch Johnson
Welp, I guess it is possible for these Spurs to lose to the Thunder. I thought Johnson did well enough from a coaching standpoint. The rotation made sense, he dealt with Wembanyama’s minutes restriction fine and San Antonio’s gameplans on both ends were smart.
Grade: B-
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk