马刺 vs 雷霆 108 - 123 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2026-05-24 08:14:34
圣安东尼奥马刺在第三战开局打出15-0的高潮。遗憾的是，这也是弗罗斯特银行中心球馆今晚唯一的甜蜜时刻。此后，俄克拉荷马雷霆接管了比赛，最终以123-108的比分客场取胜，在西部决赛中大比分2-1领先。
比赛数据：马刺 VS 雷霆
马刺 VS 雷霆 – 球员评分
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
在第三场失利后，文班亚马试图主动揽责，但实际上他打得不错。事实上，当他在场时，马刺净胜雷霆4分。他两分球10投6中，三分球5投2中，罚球10罚8中。他在传球表现出色的同时，仅出现了两次失误。防守端，文班亚马再次在禁区展现出强大的威慑力，并且在外线的移动也十分迅速。不过，他今晚有两个短板。首先，在39分钟的出场时间里仅抢到4个篮板（且没有前场篮板）是远远不够的。马刺若想在这轮系列赛中突出重围，文班亚马必须在篮板端展现统治力。其次，我认为他整场的能量感有些不足。感到疲惫并不令人意外，但如果马刺想要让这轮系列赛继续保持悬念，他必须想办法重新找回活力。
评分：B
德阿隆·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)
考虑到实际情况，我认为福克斯的表现非常出色。显而易见，高位脚踝扭伤依然让他备受疼痛折磨，起跳对他来说似乎尤为痛苦。但尽管身体受限，福克斯依然交出了相当不错的答卷。他迅速砍下11分，让雷霆防守端一筹莫展。虽然随后他的得分势头有所放缓，但他依然在31分钟内贡献了15分、7个篮板和6次助攻。在防守端，福克斯咬牙坚持，即便脚踝似乎几次轻微复发，他仍旧在场上拼尽全力。希望他能坚持下去并打完这轮系列赛。没有他，圣安东尼奥恐怕机会渺茫。
评分：A-
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
他的过山车表现已经连续延续了三场。好的一面：卡斯尔的侵略性立竿见影，为他赢得了14次罚球机会。他还在35分钟内送出了7次助攻。或许最令人印象深刻的是，卡斯尔仅有1次失误。考虑到他在前两场比赛中一共出现了20次失误，这无疑是巨大的进步。防守端，他的拼抢也十分积极。坏的一面：卡斯尔全场8投仅1中，其中三分球5投1中。他有时运球过多，破坏了球队的进攻流畅性。虽然失误减少了，但卡斯尔仍需学习如何在球队的进攻体系内去惩罚雷霆的防守。在防守端，他不像往常那样纪律严明，出现了几次不必要的犯规。总体而言：这小伙子已经拼尽全力，但他还无法打出一场真正意义上的完整比赛。
评分：C+
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
从这次季后赛之旅中，我们可以得出一个结论：瓦塞尔是一位天生为季后赛而生的球员。即便在身边队友普遍挣扎的情况下，他面对雷霆依然表现得游刃有余。在第三场比赛中，他12投6中（其中三分球6投3中，罚球5罚5中），高效砍下20分。此外，他还抢下全队并列最高的7个篮板，且没有出现一次失误。防守端，瓦塞尔的表现同样可圈可点。全队共完成8次抢断，他一人便独占半数，无论是个防还是协防都十分出色。
评分：A
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼两分球2投全中，篮板保护得不错，传球选择合理，且整场没有出现失误。防守端他也表现不俗，基本没有犯错。然而遗憾的是，他三分线外8投仅2中的手感让他的场上价值大打折扣。尽管他在其他方面表现出色，但马刺需要他投进三分球才能发挥出他的最大价值。在接下来的几场比赛中，一次外线手感的热火朝天可能就会决定一场比赛的胜负。
评分：B-
迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)
哈珀在第二场比赛受伤后，本场出战成疑。这位新秀最终选择带伤披挂上阵，并在第三场比赛中倾其所有。然而在17分钟的出场时间里，他的表现遗憾地低于正常水准。他全场7投2中，助攻与失误持平（各有2次），防守端也显得不够敏捷。哈珀带伤作战的精神值得赞扬，但马刺在季后赛中已经越来越依赖他，因此他状态的任何下滑在当下都会对球队造成极大的伤害。
评分：C
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)
我的意思是，这并不完全是他的错，但当文班亚马休息时，科内特必须挺身而出，因为当马刺的超级巨星不在场时，球队根本无法阻止对手得分。无论如何，科内特必须帮助球队完成防守。如果文班下场时，雷霆每次进攻都能稳稳得分，那么其他一切努力都毫无意义。
评分：C-
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
唉。不幸的是，约翰逊的表现真的很糟糕。在防守端，他脚步迟缓、防守定位混乱。篮板抢得不好，场上局势的判断力也很差。进攻端，约翰逊5投仅1中，还错失了空档传球的机会。他试图大包大揽，却偏离了让他在常规赛中大放异彩的角色定位。如果凯尔登继续成为场上表现最差的球员，马刺将很难赢球。
评分：D-
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)
布莱恩特在出场的10分钟内投进了一记三分球，但他的整体影响力乏善可陈。他犯规过多，个人防守也很难给球队带来帮助。他现在显得过于毛躁，在场上打得有些紧张。我喜欢布莱恩特的身体对抗，但他需要稍微控制一下自己的节奏。
评分：C-
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯投丢了一记三分球，除此之外，在他上场的3分钟时间里没有其他值得提及的表现。
评分：暂无
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
我不认为应该把大部分责任归咎于米奇教练，但他确实没能解决问题。他几次不合时宜的换人似乎打断了球队追分的势头。他至今未能找到解决“非文班”时间球队崩盘的办法。替补阵容在场上毫无头绪，被对手彻底击溃。与此相关的是，主力球员的出场时间可能有些过长了。如果马刺想要走出目前的困境，米奇教练可能必须重新制定战术了。
评分：C-
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Playoff Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Oklahoma City Thunder – Game 3
Playoff Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Oklahoma City Thunder – Game 3
The San Antonio Spurs scored the first 15 points of Game 3. Unfortunately, that was the end of the good times in the Frost Bank Center. The Oklahoma City Thunder dominated the rest of the way to win the game by a final count of 123-108 to take a 2-1 lead in the Western Conference Finals.
Stats: Spurs vs. Thunder
Spurs vs. Thunder – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
Wembanyama tried to shoulder some of the blame following the Game 3 loss but he played well. In fact, the Spurs outscored the Thunder by four points when he was on the court. He was 6-for-10 from two, 2-for-5 from three and 8-for-10 at the line. He also only turned it over twice while passing well. Defensively, Wembanyama was once again a force to be reckoned with in the paint and moved well on the perimeter. Two areas were weaknesses on this night. First of all, four rebounds (and no offensive boards) in 39 minutes was not enough. Wembanyama needs to be dominating on the glass for the Spurs to thrive in this series. Secondly, I thought his overall energy level was lacking. It’s not surprising that he’s tired but he’ll need to summon energy from somewhere if the Spurs are going to make this a competitive series going forward.
Grade: B
De’Aaron Fox
Given the circumstances, I thought Fox was really good. He’s clearly still in a lot of pain due to the high ankle sprain. Jumping appears to be particularly painful for him. But despite the physical limitations, Fox produced quite well. He scored 11 points rather quickly and the Thunder had trouble containing him. His production slowed but he still finished with 15 points, seven rebounds and six assists in 31 minutes. Fox gutted it out on the defensive end and kept competing even though he seemed to reinjure his ankle a couple times. Hopefully he can keep it up and make it through the series. Without him, San Antonio probably doesn’t have much of a chance.
Grade: A-
Stephon Castle
The rollercoaster ride continued for the third consecutive affair. The good: Castle’s aggression paid immediate dividends with 14 free throw attempts. He also handed out seven assists in 35 minutes. Perhaps most impressively, Castle only had one turnover. Considering he had 20 turnovers in the first two games, that was a huge improvement. Defensively, he competed well. The bad: Castle was 1-for-8 from the field, including 1-for-5 from deep. He sometimes dribbled too much and he sometimes took away from the team’s offensive flow. While he turned it over less, Castle still needs to learn how to attack the Thunder within the framework of the offense. Defensively, he wasn’t as disciplined as usual and had a few unnecessary fouls. Overall: The guy is trying his hardest but he hasn’t been able to put together anything resembling a complete game.
Grade: C+
Devin Vassell
One thing we can take away from this postseason run is the fact that Vassell is a player who is made for the playoffs. He’s doing really well against in Thunder even when there is a lot of struggling going on around him. He finished Game 3 with 20 points on 6-for-12 shooting from the field, including 3-for-6 from deep and 5-for-5 at the free throw line. He also tied for the team lead in rebounds with seven and didn’t turn the ball over. Defensively, Vassell was really good. He had half of the team’s eight steals and played well individually and team-wise.
Grade: A
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie hit both of his two-point attempts, rebounded pretty well, made the right passes and finished the game without a turnover. He also played well defensively while avoiding mistakes on that end for the most part. Sadly, though, he lost a lot of his value by going 2-for-8 from three-point territory. As good as Champagnie is elsewhere, the Spurs need him to hit threes for him to be near peak value. A hot three-point shooting game could be the difference between a win and a loss in the next few games.
Grade: B-
Dylan Harper
Harper was questionable after getting hurt during Game 2. The rookie suited up and gave it his all in Game 3. In 17 minutes, the outcome was regrettably substandard. He was 2-for-7 from the field, had as many assists as turnovers (two), and his defense wasn’t as spry. Harper should be commended for playing through an injury but the Spurs have grown to lean on him in the playoffs so any dip in his level of play really hurts right about now.
Grade: C
Luke Kornet
I mean, it’s not completely his fault but Kornet needs to step up when Wembanyama rests because the Spurs can’t get any stops when their superstar is off the floor. One way or another, Kornet needs to help generate stops. Nothing else really matters if OKC is getting a guaranteed bucket every time up the court when Wemby sits.
Grade: C-
Keldon Johnson
Ugh. Unfortunately, Johnson was really bad. Defensively, he was slow and confused. He didn’t rebound well. His situational awareness was poor. Offensively, Johnson was 1-for-5 and missed open passing lanes. He’s trying to do too much while getting away from the role that made him so valuable during the regular season. It’s going to be hard for the Spurs to win if KJ continues to be the worst player on the court.
Grade: D-
Carter Bryant
Bryant hit a three-pointer in his ten minutes, but his impact was nothing to write home about. He fouled too much and his individual defense was rarely an asset. He’s too jumpy and playing with too much nervous energy right now. I like Bryant’s physicality but he needs to rein it in a bit.
Grade: C-
Harrison Barnes
Barnes missed a three-pointer but otherwise didn’t do anything notable in his three minutes on the court.
Grade: Inc.
Mitch Johnson
I don’t think a large amount of blame should be directed at Coach Mitch but he wasn’t exactly helping matters. He seemed to kill a couple runs via untimely substitutions. He hasn’t been able to figure out a way to keep the non-Wemby minutes from killing the squad. The bench unit is aimless and getting run out of the building. On a related note, the starters are probably playing too much. Coach Mitch probably has to go back to the drawing board if the Spurs are going to climb out of this hole.
Grade: C-
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk