马刺 vs 开拓者 114 - 95 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2026-04-30 20:04:40
圣安东尼奥马刺队在第五场比赛中击败了波特兰开拓者队，以大比分 4-1 赢下系列赛并晋级第二轮。马刺队仅用了不到三分钟就建立了两位数的领先优势。此后，开拓者队虽有过几次零星的反扑，但圣安东尼奥人始终轻松地将对手压制。最终，马刺队在主场球迷面前以 114-95 轻松取胜。
数据统计：马刺 vs. 开拓者
马刺 vs. 开拓者 – 球员最终评分
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
尽管文班亚马全场仅出手 7 次，但他彻底统治了第五场比赛。防守端，他的表现堪称惊艳。6 次盖帽和 14 个篮板仅仅是表象，他完全封锁了禁区，在单人对位中脚步移动极其出色，并能稳健地保护好篮板。进攻端，波特兰人竭尽所能想让文班亚马游离于体系之外。这位法国巨星并没有强行进攻，而是聪明地选择进攻时机，让队友们走上舞台中心。总而言之，文班打出了极其出色、无私且极具赢球特质的篮球表现，带领球队挺进第二轮。
评分：A
达龙·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)
福克斯连续第二场表现出色。他在系列赛初期起步较慢，但教练组做出了一些调整，让他能在空旷地带接球，福克斯也把握住了机会。他砍下全队最高的 21 分，且效率极高：两分球 9 投 6 中，三分球 5 投 2 中，罚球 4 投 3 中，外加全队最高的 9 次助攻且仅有 2 次失误。第四节，正是福克斯用一个接一个的关键进球彻底终结了开拓者的希望。再加上强硬且极具侵略性的防守，他的表现近乎完美。
评分：A
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
亮点：马刺队开局非常顺利，这在很大程度上归功于卡斯尔的表现。他开场便火力全开，几分钟内就让开拓者陷入困境。他两分球 5 投 4 中，三分球表现也尚可（6 投 2 中），让波特兰试图包夹他人而放空他的策略未能奏效。在整场比赛中，我很欣赏他的防守。不足：卡斯尔今晚也暴露出不少问题。他出现了 7 次失误，其中很多是非常粗心的传球。他罕见地在心理上出现了波动，最终犯满离场。卡斯尔打球很拼，但在第五场中，他让几次糟糕的判罚或失误引发了雪崩效应。随着比赛级别的提升，他需要更好地保持冷静。
评分：C-
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
瓦塞尔投进了几个及时的进球，防守表现也在水准之上，尤其是那次令人印象深刻的篮下封盖。我喜欢他的能量和竞争意识。然而，不可忽视的是，他三分线外 4 投 0 中，在篮板球保护上贡献寥寥，传球组织也并不理想。瓦塞尔虽有闪光点，但这场比赛的表现只能说是平平无奇。
评分：C+
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼一旦找到手感，开拓者的比赛基本就宣告结束了。随着他手感发烫，圣安东尼奥的进攻变得极具杀伤力。尚帕尼全场得到 19 分，其中三分球 7 投 5 中。此外，他在开局阶段抢下了 5 个篮板，传球选择合理，在 30 分钟的出场时间里没有出现一次失误。希望随着季后赛的深入，他能保持这种精准的投射。
评分：A
迪兰·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)
哈珀在第三场表现出色，第四场表现沉寂，而在第五场再次打出了极其亮眼的表现。他在 26 分钟内仅用 9 次出手就砍下 17 分。他敏捷的双手和防守端的拼劲也让他成为了地板球争抢中的怪兽。由于开拓者决定不对他进行过多协防，他的助攻数受到了限制。即便如此，他充分利用了波特兰的防守策略，高效地在得分端做出贡献。干得漂亮，菜鸟。
评分：A-
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
约翰逊的活力显而易见，但实际产出却非常有限。他用了 8 次出手仅得 7 分，失误数甚至超过了助攻数。约翰逊通过在篮板端的强硬表现以及在攻防两端的积极奔跑挽回了一些价值。防守端，他既有高光时刻，也有低级失误。
评分：C-
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)
科内特表现不错。他在稳住阵脚方面比第四场做得好得多。他两次运动战出手全部命中，在篮板端存在感十足，或许最重要的一点是，他在传球策应中做出了正确的判断。防守端，科内特的护筐虽然没有达到文班级别的威慑力，但也足以让开拓者在冲击篮筐时心存顾虑。
评分：B+
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯在首轮系列赛结束时竟然没有投进一个三分球。考虑到他在赛季初期曾是球队头号三分威胁，这确实是一次令人唏嘘的状态下滑。他在 13 分钟内仅抢到一个篮板——而且还是一个无人争抢的长篮板。虽然在某些时刻你仍能看到巴恩斯为球队注入的老将经验，但就目前而言，他确实没能提供太多实质性的帮助。
评分：D+
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
米奇教练显然让他的部下在开场就进入了战斗状态。马刺队在开局阶段的统治力如此之强，以至于他们后来似乎显得有些松懈。显然，在季后赛深入后这种情况不能发生，但在今晚是可以原谅的。在策略上，我不确定在现阶段让巴恩斯的出场顺位排在卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant) 之前是否正确。除此之外，我认同其他的轮换安排以及攻防两端的比赛计划。
评分：B+
由生成式 AI 翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Playoff Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Portland Trail Blazers – Game 5
Playoff Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Portland Trail Blazers – Game 5
The San Antonio Spurs won Game 5 versus the Portland Trail Blazers to win the series 4-1 and advance to the second round. It took less than three minutes for the Spurs to build a double-digit lead. From there on out, the Blazers made some halfhearted runs but San Antonio easily kept them at bay. When it was all said and done, the Spurs had a 114-95 victory in front of their home fans.
Stats: Spurs vs. Blazers
Spurs vs. Blazers – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
Even though Wembanyama shot the ball just seven times, he thoroughly dominated Game 5. Defensively, he was fantastic. His six blocks and 14 rebounds only tell part of the story. He completely shut down the lane, moved his feet well in individual matchups and then reliably cleaned up the glass. Offensively, Portland was doing all they could to take Wembanyama out of the equation. Instead of forcing the issue, the superstar Frenchman picked his spots smartly and let his teammates take center stage. All in all, Wembanyama played a brilliant, unselfish, winning brand of basketball that elevated the good guys to the second round.
Grade: A
De’Aaron Fox
For the second straight ballgame, Fox was very good. He had a slow start to the series but the coaching staff made some adjustments to get him the ball in space and Fox took advantage. He led San Antonio with 21 points and did so in uber efficient fashion: 6-for-9 on twos, 2-for-5 on threes, 3-for-4 at the line, a team-high nine assists and only two turnovers. In the fourth quarter, it was Fox putting the Blazers out of their misery with big shot after big shot. Add in strong, aggressive defense and he couldn’t have been much better.
Grade: A
Stephon Castle
The good: The Spurs got off to a great start and a lot of it was due to Castle’s play. He came out swinging and had the Blazers on the ropes within minutes. He was 4-for-5 on two-pointers and shot threes well enough (2-for-6) to keep Portland’s strategy of ignoring him from working. Throughout the affair, I liked his defense. The bad: There were quite a number of negatives for Castle on this night. He turned the ball over seven times — many of which were of the extremely careless variety. He uncharacteristically became unglued mentally and ended up fouling out. Castle plays hard but he let bad plays cause an avalanche in Game 5. As the stakes get higher, he needs to do a better job of staying composed.
Grade: C-
Devin Vassell
Vassell hit a couple timely shots and played above average defense that was highlighted by a memorable block at the rim. I liked his energy and competitiveness. However, it can’t be ignored that he missed all four of his shots from deep, didn’t do much on the boards and didn’t pass it especially well. Vassell had his moments but this outing was nothing to write home about.
Grade: C+
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie got it going and that basically ended the game for the Blazers. With him shooting flames, San Antonio’s offense was simply too deadly. Champagnie finished with 19 points powered by his 5-for-7 showing from three-point territory. Champagnie also pulled down five early rebounds, authored the right passes and didn’t turn the ball over in his 30 minutes of play. Let’s hope that he can keep shooting it this straight as the postseason progresses.
Grade: A
Dylan Harper
Harper was great in Game 3, quiet in Game 4 and once again really damn good in Game 5. He had 17 points in 26 minutes and needed only nine field goal attempts. His quick hands and defensive gumption also made him a monster in loose ball situations. The Blazers decided to not send much help his way so his assists were limited. That said, he took full advantage of Portland’s gameplan by efficiently putting points on the scoreboard. Well done, rook.
Grade: A-
Keldon Johnson
Johnson’s electricity was palpable but his tangible production was minimal. He needed eight shots to score seven points and had more turnovers than assists. Johnson salvaged some of his value by being stout on the glass and also running the court hard both ways. Defensively, there were both good moments and bad moments.
Grade: C-
Luke Kornet
Good stuff by Kornet. He did a much better job of holding down the fort than he did in Game 4. He made both of his shots from the field, was felt on the boards and, perhaps most importantly, made the right reads in the passing game. Defensively, Kornet’s rim protection wasn’t Wemby-esque but it was good enough to make the Blazers think twice.
Grade: B+
Harrison Barnes
Barnes finished the first round without a made three-pointer. That’s a long fall from grace considering he was once the team’s primary three-point threat early in the season. He also had only one rebound in 13 minutes — and that one was an uncontested board that bounced. There are some moments where you can squint and see Barnes’ adding veteran savviness to the mix — but he’s just not really helping out much these days.
Grade: D+
Mitch Johnson
Coach Mitch obviously had his troops ready to rock early on. The Spurs dominated so much early on that it looked like they eventually got bored. Obviously that can’t happen deeper into the playoffs but it was forgivable on this night. Strategy-wise, I’m not sure I can get behind playing Barnes over Carter Bryant at this point. Beyond that, I agreed with the rest of the rotation and the gameplans on both sides of the ball.
Grade: B+
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk