马刺 vs 开拓者 103 - 106 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2026-04-21 22:33:17
圣安东尼奥马刺队以 111-98 击败波特兰开拓者队，开启了他们的 2026 年季后赛征程。作为二号种子的马刺队在首节表现出色，但在第二节手感降温。第三节初，开拓者队几乎反超比分。所幸，在**德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)**的带领下，马刺队重新夺回了势头，并从此一路势如破竹。
统计数据：马刺 vs. 开拓者
马刺 vs. 开拓者 – 最终评分
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
文班亚马在自己的季后赛首秀中表现出色。他在进攻端简直就是一个不可阻挡的杀器。他在 33 分钟内砍下 35 分，其中三分球 6 投 5 中的表现尤为亮眼。季后赛的压力似乎完全没有影响到他。文班亚马从开场就充满激情，且从未松懈。尽管如此，这位法国新星仍有一些可以改进的地方。他出现了全队最高的四次失误，且仅有一次助攻。他只抢到了五个篮板，防守端的统治力也不如我们往常所见的那样强悍。总而言之，对于职业生涯首场季后赛来说，这是一次不错的表现，但仍有提升空间。
评分：B
达龙·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)
相比我们在常规赛看到的表现，达龙·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)此役对球权的掌控力更强，他在对阵开拓者的比赛中表现稳健。他送出 8 次助攻且没有失误，并得到 17 分。他的投篮表现虽不算惊艳，但全能的效率是一个加分项。他在防守端的表现也比平时更好。当福克斯展现出这种侵略性时，马刺队会变得更加难以对付。
评分：B+
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
亮点：**斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)**在 33 分钟内贡献了 17 分、7 个篮板和 7 次助攻。他在比赛初期表现出色，为球队奠定了基调。卡斯尔 8 次走上罚球线并全部命中，这是改变比赛走势的贡献。他的坚韧程度和勇气值得称赞。不足：卡斯尔在三分线外仅 5 投 1 中，两分球 8 投 3 中。他还出现了三次失误。这种低效的表现甚至比数据看上去还要糟糕，因为波特兰基本上完全放空他。此外，卡斯尔在防守端的影响力也低于他的正常水准。
评分：B-
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
仅看数据表，你可能会认为瓦塞尔打得很挣扎。然而，这场比赛的实际情况是，瓦塞尔可以说是球队最有价值的贡献者。当第三节局面陷入胶着时，正是他挺身而出。他用两次盖帽点燃了马刺队的斗志，随后在进攻端找回了手感。虽然这并非完全靠一己之力完成，但瓦塞尔在下半场的表现是马刺队能够拉开比分的主要原因。
评分：A
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
**朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)**表现不错。他在进攻端没有强行出手。虽然全场只有三次投篮，但他命中了其中的两记三分球。他的传球也做得很好。防守端，尚帕尼表现活跃。他积极冲抢篮板，并贡献了全队 6 次抢断中的 3 次。他正在证明，即使没有在三分线外火力全开，他依然能为集体做出贡献。
评分：B+
迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)
尽管过程时有波折，但迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)在他的首场季后赛中还是站稳了脚跟。进攻端，他逐渐稳住节奏并打进三球，同时胜任了组织球队的任务。防守端，我认为这位新星的表现甚至更好。他利用自己的力量、臂展和快手让开拓者队打得很艰难。希望哈珀能在接下来的比赛中延续这种表现。
评分：B
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
对于**凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)**来说，这大多是一个想让人忘掉的夜晚。他在 20 分钟内 4 投 1 中仅得 3 分。他出现了两次失误，防守表现也在水准之下。约翰逊唯一的亮点是他在篮板球方面的努力。他抢下了 7 个篮板，但感觉比实际数字更多，因为他在球场两端都抢下了一些强硬的篮板。
评分：C
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)在季后赛首场比赛中证明了自己的价值。总的来说，他看起来比常规赛收官阶段更有活力、更轻快。他在顺下冲击篮筐时展现了真正的威力。科内特在篮板球方面也做得很好，并出色地完成了护筐任务。他显然不是文班，但当他打出这种表现时，科内特完全有能力在衔接段镇守阵地。
评分：A-
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)的表现比他那几乎“隐形”的数据要稍好一些。他在 11 分钟内仅得到 2 分和 1 个篮板。但我喜欢巴恩斯在进攻端的侵略性；当他拿到球时，他的决策非常果断。防守端，我认为他比平时更加投入。尽管如此，如果他希望避免成为场上的负担，他需要在数据册上增加一些实质性的产出。
评分：C
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)
**卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)**初尝了季后赛的滋味。我认为他表现尚可。他在 4 分钟内抓下了几个篮板，防守表现也在平均水平之上。他唯一明显的挣扎点在于 4 分钟内就领到了 3 次犯规。
评分：C+
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)教练的表现大部分时间都很出色。他帮助文班亚马和福克斯在开场就进入状态。他给了替补席上的哈珀充足的上场时间。他甚至还为球队的另一名新秀找到了出场机会。马刺队此役打得并不完美，因此看看米奇教练能否做出必要的调整将会很有趣。
评分：B
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Playoff Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Portland Trail Blazers – Game #1
Playoff Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Portland Trail Blazers – Game #1
The San Antonio Spurs started their 2026 playoff run with a 111-98 victory over the Portland Trail Blazers. The second-seeded Spurs played well in the opening quarter before cooling off in the second period. Early in the third, the Blazers nearly gained the advantage. Thankfully, a charge led by Devin Vassell helped capture the momentum for San Antonio and the Spurs were able to roll from there.
Stats: Spurs vs. Blazers
Spurs vs. Blazers – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
Wembanyama did well in his playoff debut. He was simply a force offensively. He had 35 points in 33 minutes, highlighted by his 5-for-6 showing from deep. The pressure didn’t seem to get to him at all. Wembanyama came out of the gates with passion and never relented. That said, there were some areas where the Frenchman could improve. He turned it over a team-high four times and only had one assist. He pulled down just five rebounds and his defense wasn’t as dominant as we’ve seen. The bottom line is that it was a good performance for Game 1 of his postseason career — but there was room for improvement.
Grade: B
De’Aaron Fox
With his hands a little bit more on the reins than what we witnessed during the regular season, Fox posted a strong outing against the Blazers. He had eight assists, no turnovers and scored 17 points. His shooting was nothing too noteworthy but his all-around efficiency was a plus. He also played better than normal on the defensive end. When Fox is this aggressive, the Spurs become a more difficult team to contend with.
Grade: B+
Stephon Castle
The good: Castle totaled 17 points, seven rebounds and seven assists in 33 minutes. He played well early on to set the stage. Castle getting to the line eight times and hitting all eight was a game-changing contribution. His levels of tenacity and bravery were applause-worthy. The bad: Castle was only 1-for-5 from deep, 3-for-8 on two-pointers. He also turned it over three times. That inefficiency was even worse than it appeared on paper because Portland was basically leaving him open. Furthermore, Castle’s impact on the defensive end was substandard for his typical level.
Grade: B-
Devin Vassell
Just glancing at the statsheet, you’d assume that Vassell struggled. However, the reality of this game was that Vassell was arguably the team’s most valuable contributor. When things got dicey in the third quarter, it was he who came alive. He sparked the Spurs with a pair of blocks and then his shot got going on the other end. While it wasn’t done completely single-handedly, Vassell’s play in the second half was the main reason why the good guys were able to blow it open.
Grade: A
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie did well. He didn’t force anything offensively. While he only shot three times all night, he connected on a pair of three-pointers. He also passed the ball well. Defensively, Champagnie was active. He rebounded and also had three of the team’s six steals. He’s proving that he doesn’t need to be on fire from three-point land to be an asset to the collective.
Grade: B+
Dylan Harper
Although it was a bumpy road at times, Harper came out of his first playoff game with his head above the water. Offensively, he eventually slowed down and scored three baskets while also running the squad competently. Defensively, I thought the rookie was even better. He was using his strength, length and quick hands to make life difficult for the Blazers. Let’s hope that Harper can build on this performance going forward.
Grade: B
Keldon Johnson
It was mostly a night to forget for Johnson. He had only three points on 1-for-4 shooting in 20 minutes. He turned it over twice and his defense was below average. The only silver lining for Johnson was his work on the glass. He finished with seven caroms but it felt like more because he was grabbing contested boards on both ends of the court.
Grade: C
Luke Kornet
Kornet proved his value in the first playoff game. Overall, he looked more athletic and more spry than he had looked down the stretch of the regular season. He was a legitimate force rolling to the rim. Kornet also did good work on the boards and protected the rim well enough. He’s obviously not Wemby but when he played like this, Kornet is capable of holding down the fort for stretches.
Grade: A-
Harrison Barnes
Barnes was a little bit better than his almost invisible numbers would suggest. He had only two points and one rebound in 11 minutes. But I liked Barnes’ aggression on offense; when he got the ball, he made a purposeful decision. Defensively, I thought he was efforting more than usual. That said, he needs to actually add some tangible production in the books if he hopes to avoid being a liability.
Grade: C
Carter Bryant
Bryant got a taste of the playoffs. I thought he did okay. He grabbed a couple of rebounds in four minutes and played above average defense. His only area of outright struggle was the fact that he had three fouls in four minutes.
Grade: C+
Mitch Johnson
Mostly good stuff from Coach Mitch. He helped get Wembanyama and Fox going early. He gave legitimate playing time to Harper off the bench. He even found time for the team’s other rookie. The Spurs didn’t play that great so it’ll be interesting to see if Coach Mitch can make the needed adjustments.
Grade: B
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk