马刺 vs 开拓者 110 - 115 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2026-01-06 19:21:18
圣安东尼奥马刺队在以110-115不敌波特兰开拓者队后，战绩下滑至25胜10负。在缺少维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama) 和德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell) 的情况下，马刺队开局慢热，一度落后多达15分。圣安东尼奥在下半场奋起直追，并在第四节几乎上演翻盘，但开拓者队命中足够多的关键球，最终守住了胜利。
数据统计：马刺 vs. 开拓者
马刺 vs. 开拓者 – 最终评分
德阿隆·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)
优点：福克斯高效地砍下19分。第四节，他发挥出最佳状态，拼尽全力试图带领马刺队取胜。福克斯全场零失误，并且他的防守比平时更加出色。
缺点：福克斯在整场比赛中的组织策应能力有所欠缺。尽管他在第四节独得10分值得称赞，但他在前三节仅得到9分，这也是马刺队陷入挣扎的主要原因之一。
评分：B-
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
有所回暖。在经历了一系列不稳定的表现后，卡斯尔在本场对阵开拓者的比赛中有所进步。他的投篮选择好了很多，这让他获得了7次罚球机会，且仅有1次三分出手。卡斯尔送出了全队最高的9次助攻，正如这个数字所显示的，他的传球非常出色。他无疑是马刺队场上最好的组织者。防守端，卡斯尔表现不错，但我们见过他在防守端做得更好。
评分：B
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼打出了他本赛季表现较好的比赛之一。他贡献了20分、10个篮板和4次助攻，其中三分球9投4中，两分球5投4中。防守端，尚帕尼非常稳固，并通过拼抢篮板为球队在防守端增添了更多价值。进攻端，他同样是一个非常积极的贡献点。尚帕尼出手果断，能在移动中得分，传球出色，并且始终保持着高昂的自信。他现在的状态真的很好……希望他能将此势头保持下去。
评分：A-
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
考虑到巴恩斯近期的低迷状态，这次的表现必须被视为朝着正确方向迈出的一步。尽管圣安东尼奥希望巴恩斯能投出比7中2更好的三分表现，但他本场比赛的其他方面已经足够好了。他的两分球4投3中，打得有合理的侵略性，并且在防守端很努力。
评分：B
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)
科内特打得相当出色——尽管不像他的数据所显示的那么完美。这位七尺长人在31分钟内得到23分、8个篮板、5次盖帽和3次助攻。他全场12投10中，罚球线上3罚3中。进攻端，他的活力和不懈的拼劲为马刺队注入了生机。防守端，科内特送出了5次盖帽，但他的表现因为让多诺万·克林根 (Donovan Clingan) 拿下了24分、12个篮板和6次盖帽而打了折扣。尽管科内特今晚表现出色，但他和克林根的表现基本上相互抵消了。
评分：A-
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
尽管约翰逊一如既往地打得很努力，但他在进攻端的挣扎导致整个替补阵容都受到了影响。他全场6投仅1中，不过通过4罚3中在进攻端提供了一些帮助。约翰逊的活力体现在他24分钟内抢下8个篮板上——但如果今晚能在进攻端有更多产出，情况会好得多。
评分：C
迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)
哈珀本场的表现再次显得像个新秀。不幸的是，这种情况最近发生的频率越来越高。哈珀的9次两分球出手全部偏出——其中许多次被盖帽、干扰或是投篮弧度太平。对于这位年轻人来说，在这场本该被遗忘的比赛中，还是有几个亮点的：他送出3次助攻且没有失误，防守端有2次盖帽和1次抢断，并且即使在结果令人沮丧时，哈珀也一直在坚持冲击篮筐。
评分：D+
凯利·奥利尼克 (Kelly Olynyk)
开拓者队放空了奥利尼克，但他就是没能让他们付出代价。奥利尼克5次三分出手全部投失。他在内线有一些不错的时刻，传球也很好，防守端也有几次贡献……但他无法命中外线投篮的弱点实在太扎眼了。不过，奥利尼克确实通过在每个机会下聪明地假摔和夸张的身体动作帮助了球队。
评分：C
林迪·沃特斯三世 (Lindy Waters III)
沃特斯出战了六分钟，但没有对比赛产生任何影响。事实上，除了投丢了几个球，他几乎什么都没做。
评分：C-
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)
布莱恩特投失了一记扣篮和一记三分球。希望他在开放进攻中能表现得更协调一些，因为他现在的动作实在有点难看。
评分：C-
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
对于球员或教练来说，这都不是一场令人印象深刻的比赛。约翰逊进行了一些调整，但始终没有找到致胜的组合。整场比赛球队的活力都很欠缺。防守战术给了对方太多空位射手的机会。进攻战术则缺乏想象力。
评分：D+
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Portland Trail Blazers – Game #35
Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Portland Trail Blazers – Game #35
The San Antonio Spurs dropped to a record of 25-10 after a 115-110 defeat at the hands of the Portland Trail Blazers. Playing without Victor Wembanyama and Devin Vassell, the Spurs got off to a slow start and trailed by as many as 15 points. San Antonio rallied in the second half and nearly stole the game in the fourth quarter before the Blazers hit enough big shots to hold on.
Stats: Spurs vs. Blazers
Spurs vs. Blazers – Final Grades
De’Aaron Fox
The good: Fox efficiently put 19 points on the board. In the fourth quarter, he was at his best as he desperately tried to lift the Spurs to the win. Fox finished the game without a turnover and his defense was better than usual. The bad: Fox’s playmaking throughout the game was lacking. While it was great that he scored ten points in the fourth, the fact that Fox only scored nine points in the first three quarters was a leading cause for why the Spurs were struggling.
Grade: B-
Stephon Castle
Better. After a series of iffy outings, Castle was improved against the Blazers. His shot-selection was much better and the result was seven free throw attempts and only one three-point attempt. Castle led the way with nine assists and, as that number suggests, his passing was very good. He was easily the best playmaker on the court for the Spurs. Defensively, Castle was good but we’ve seen him do better on that end.
Grade: B
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie authored one of his better outings of his campaign. He had 20 points, ten rebounds and four assists on 4-for-9 shooting from three-point range and 4-for-5 shooting inside of the arc. Defensively, Champagnie was really solid and he added even more value on that end by rebounding. Offensively, he was also a very positive force. Champagnie shot without hesitation, scored on the move, passed the ball well and kept his confidence high. He’s playing really well right now … let’s hope he keeps it rolling.
Grade: A-
Harrison Barnes
Considering Barnes’ recent slump, this performance has to be considered a step in the right direction. While San Antonio would appreciate better three-point shooting from Barnes than 2-for-7, the rest of his outing was good enough. He was 3-for-4 from two-point territory, played with reasonable aggression and efforted on defense.
Grade: B
Luke Kornet
Kornet was pretty darn great — although not quite as great as his stats would suggest. The seven-footer had 23 points, eight rebounds, five blocks and three assists in 31 minutes. He was 10-for-12 from the field and 3-for-3 at the charity stripe. Offensively, his energy and relentlessness gave the Spurs life. Defensively, Kornet had five blocks but his performance got dinged for Donovan Clingan going for 24 points, 12 rebounds and six blocks. As good as Kornet was on this night, he and Clingan basically cancelled each other out.
Grade: A-
Keldon Johnson
While Johnson played hard once again, his struggles on offense caused the entire bench unit to suffer. He was only 1-for-6 from the field, although he managed to help out a bit on offense by going 3-for-4 at the line. Johnson’s energy can be seen by the fact that he had eight rebounds in 24 minutes — but more production on offense on this night would have really helped matters.
Grade: C
Dylan Harper
Harper had another outing in which he looked like a rookie. Unfortunately, that has been happening a lot more often recently. Harper missed all nine of his two-point attempts — many of which got blocked, altered or were flat. There were a couple silver linings in what was otherwise a forgettable outing for the teenager: he had three assists and no turnovers, he had two blocks and a steal on defense, and Harper kept attacking even when the results were frustrating.
Grade: D+
Kelly Olynyk
The Blazers were leaving Olynyk open and he just couldn’t make them pay. Olynyk missed all five of his three-point attempts. He had good moments on the interior, passed the ball well and made a few plays on defense … but that inability to knock down a perimeter shot was glaring. Olynyk did help the cause though by wisely flopping and flailing at every opportunity.
Grade: C
Lindy Waters III
Waters played six minutes but didn’t move the needle. In fact, he barely did anything at all other than miss a couple shots.
Grade: C-
Carter Bryant
Bryant missed a dunk and a three-pointer. Let’s hope he starts looking more coordinated in the open court because it’s pretty ugly right now.
Grade: C-
Mitch Johnson
This wasn’t an impressive showing for the players or coaches. Johnson pressed a couple buttons but never found a winning combination. The energy was lackluster throughout. The defensive gameplan left open too many shooters. The offensive gameplan lacked imagination.
Grade: D+
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk