By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2026-04-28 07:56:10
在对阵波特兰开拓者的第四场比赛中，圣安东尼奥马刺在半场结束时落后17分。然而，下半场的情况却截然不同。马刺在下半场伊始便打出一波进攻高潮，并在第四节开始前扳平了比分。几分钟后，马刺已经开启了对开拓者的“吊打”模式。尘埃落定之时，圣安东尼奥在客场以114-93大胜，并在系列赛中取得了3-1的领先。
数据统计：马刺对阵开拓者
马刺对阵开拓者 – 最终评分
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
比赛初期，文班亚马看起来有些兴奋过度。由于因脑震荡缺席了第三场比赛，这是他职业生涯的首场客场季后赛。他在比赛开局阶段的投篮选择有些值得商榷，而且试图承担过多任务。不过，文班亚马最终稳住了阵脚，并展现了绝对的统治力。防守端，他在下半场接管了比赛。他全场贡献了7次盖帽、4次抢断和12个篮板，他的移动能力令人惊叹。进攻端，文班亚马在下半场重回正轨，彻底击溃了波特兰。他全场17投9中，罚球8罚8中。他在篮筐附近的进攻比平时更具侵略性，身体对抗也更强。当文班亚马能将这种激情与球商结合在一起时，他就是一个极其难缠的对手——这还是保守的说法。
评分：A-
德阿隆·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)
我得承认，在福克斯季后赛开局表现平平之后，我曾一度为他感到担心。他当时看起来更像是一名角色球员，而不是一个能扛起核心重任的球星。但值得庆幸的是，福克斯在第四场比赛中打消了许多疑虑。他非常出色地掌控了全局，送出了7次助攻以及多次高质量的传球。得分方面，福克斯在各个距离都找到了手感。他的突破极具杀伤力，三分球更是8投4中。全场比赛，他在39分钟内砍下了全队最高的28分。如果这位速度型后卫能持续打出这样的表现，马刺队将很难被击败。
评分：A
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
亮点：卡斯尔三分球6投3中，显然波特兰放空他的策略并没有奏效。他还送出了8次助攻，且仅有1次失误。当马刺在下半场发力时，很大程度上是卡斯尔在梳理进攻。我非常喜欢他的防守强度和那股初生牛犊不怕虎的闯劲。卡斯尔似乎是为季后赛篮球而生的——这已经是我能给出的最高评价了。不足：卡斯尔全场只获得了一次罚球，两分球8投3中。他需要提高终结能力来最大化自己的价值。防守端，卡斯尔有时会因为陷入犯规麻烦而缩减上场时间。
评分：A-
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
很难不爱瓦塞尔现在的打球方式。防守端，他表现得极其活跃，身体对抗非常强硬。他在冲抢篮板时跳得更高，身体对抗也更奋不顾身。他在传球方面表现出色，同时减少了失误。当比赛陷入僵局时，战术开始围绕瓦塞尔展开，而他也始终能给出回应。这种充满灵性、活力且勇敢的球风，是我们以前在他身上不常看到的。请保持下去。
评分：A-
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼的情况与他整个赛季的表现如出一辙。他在进攻端的产量不高，但效率却很出色。他在防守端付出了巨大的努力，但有时与场上的其他球员相比，他显得运动能力稍逊一筹。尚帕尼相当不错地完成了自己的角色任务，但感觉他正处于一场进攻端大爆发的前夜。
评分：B
迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)
在第三场比赛抢尽风头并展现出未来巨星潜质后，哈珀在第四场比赛回归平庸。不过，唉，这就是一名菜鸟轮换球员在季后赛中的常态。他全场6投1中，在25分钟内仅有1次助攻。尽管如此，我认为哈珀的表现要比这些数据反映出的更好。他承担了不少持球职责，防守端表现稳健，并且始终是一个让开拓者不敢掉以轻心的威胁。但是，没错，相比于第三场的爆发，这场比赛确实打得比较挣扎。
评分：C-
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
这位年度最佳第六人在本系列赛中大部分时间都毫无存在感，但在第四场比赛中展现出了一些复苏的迹象。他投进了一个关键三分，并有几次强硬的持球突破。约翰逊在防守端有一些令人印象深刻的表现，但在防守持续性和整体篮板保护上还可以做得更好。圣安东尼奥目前并不太依赖他，但如果他能打出一场爆发性的表现，将有助于拉开分差并彻底终结开拓者。
评分：C
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)
科内特全场7投1中的表现清楚地表明，这位七尺长人在今晚无法为文班亚马守住阵地。当法国人下场休息时，科内特很少能起到止血的作用。他唯一的救赎是篮板球，他在球场两端的篮板拼抢都非常出色。
评分：D+
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯完成了一次突破扣篮……在11分钟的上场时间里，基本也就只有这一个亮点了。他目前的防守和篮板表现明显在水准之下。再加上他在进攻端极其有限的产出，现在很难再为巴恩斯争取上场时间找到借口。我不知道他是不是一夜之间变老了，但他现在确实无法为球队做出太多贡献。
评分：D+
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)
布莱恩特打了大约6分钟，其中90秒是在垃圾时间。他的两个三分球中有一个是在垃圾时间投进的。在第三场表现出色后，他没有获得更多的出场时间有点令人意外，但我认为他在有限的时间里打得相当不错。布莱恩特显然是一个能改变季后赛走势的球员——这对一名新秀来说是非常罕见的特质。
评分：B
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
无论米奇教练在中场休息时说了什么，那简直是金玉良言。马刺在下半场以73-45的比分碾压了开拓者。马刺在下半场的执行力极强，并在攻防两端都坚持了比赛计划。虽然轮换阵容在某些节点有些值得商榷，但圣安东尼奥的天赋最终让这些问题变得无关紧要。不过公平地说，米奇教练也必须为上半场糟糕的表现承担一部分责任。
评分：C+
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Playoff Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Portland Trail Blazers – Game 4
Playoff Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Portland Trail Blazers – Game 4
The San Antonio Spurs were behind 17 points at halftime against the Portland Trail Blazers in Game 4. However, the second half was a completely different story. The Spurs went on an immediate run after halftime and knotted the game by the start of the fourth period. Minutes later, the Spurs were in the process of blowing out the Blazers. When the smoke cleared, San Antonio had a 114-93 road win and a 3-1 lead in the series.
Stats: Spurs at Blazers
Spurs at Blazers – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
Early on, Wembanyama looked too hyped up. Due to missing Game 3 with a concussion, this was his first ever road playoff game. His shot-selection was iffy in the beginning section of the game and he was trying to do too much. Eventually, though, Wembanyama settled in and was absolutely dominant. Defensively, he took over the game in the second half. He finished with seven blocks, four steals and 12 boards and his movement was amazing. Offensively, Wembanyama righted the ship and killed Portland after halftime. He finished 9-for-17 from the floor and 8-for-8 from the line. He was aggressive and more physical around the rim than usual. When Wembanyama is playing with this mixture of passion and smarts, he’s a tough cookie — to put it gently.
Grade: A-
De’Aaron Fox
I’ll admit, I was a bit worried for Fox after his slow playoff start. He looked more like a role player than a player capable of carrying a starring role. Thankfully, though, Fox put a lot of those worries to rest in Game 4. He ran the show damn well, finishing with seven assists and a number of other quality passes. Scoring-wise, Fox had it going from all distances. He was lethal on the drive and hit 4-of-8 three-point attempts. All told, he scored a team-high 28 points in 39 minutes. If the speedy guard can play like this on a consistent basis, the good guys will be difficult to defeat.
Grade: A
Stephon Castle
The good: Castle was 3-for-6 from three-point range, as Portland’s strategy of not guarding him isn’t really working. He also authored eight assists to only one turnover. When the Spurs got it going in the second half, a lot of it was Castle orchestrating the proceedings. I loved his defensive intensity and his chutzpah. Castle appears to be built for playoff basketball — and that’s about as high of a compliment as I can give. The bad: Castle shot only one free throw and was 3-for-8 from two-point range. He needs to finish better to maximize his value. Defensively, Castle was sometimes slowed due to foul trouble.
Grade: A-
Devin Vassell
It’s hard not to love how Vassell is playing right now. Defensively, he’s super active and extra physical. He’s jumping higher and throwing his body around more going for rebounds. He’s passing well while limiting mistakes. When the going gets tough, the plays start running through Vassell — and he’s been delivering. It’s just a smart, bouncy, courageous style of play we usually don’t see out of him. Keep it up.
Grade: A-
Julian Champagnie
The story for Champagnie is similar to how it’s been all season. His volume is low offensively but his efficiency has been high. He’s giving good effort on defense but sometimes he looks unathletic compared to the others on the court. Champagnie is playing his role reasonably well but it feels like he’s due for a breakout game offensively.
Grade: B
Dylan Harper
After stealing the show in Game 3 and looking like a future superstar, Harper came floating back to earth in Game 4. But, alas, that’s how it’ll be for a rookie contributor in the postseason. He was 1-for-6 from the field and only had one assist in 25 minutes. That said, I would say that Harper was better than those numbers suggest. He handled quite a bit of ball-handling duties, he defended well and he remained a threat that the Blazers needed to account for. But, yeah, no, this was a struggle compared to his Game 3 explosion.
Grade: C-
Keldon Johnson
The Sixth Man of the Year has largely been a nonfactor in this series but showed some signs of life in Game 4. He hit a big three-pointer and had a couple drives going hard to the rim. Johnson had some impressive defensive possessions but could have been more consistent in that area and rebounding in general. San Antonio isn’t leaning on him too much but a breakout performance could help blow a game open and put the Blazers to bed.
Grade: C
Luke Kornet
Kornet finishing the game 1-for-7 paints a pretty clear picture that the seven-footer was unable to hold the fort for Wembanyama on this night. When the Frenchman sat, Kornet was rarely able to stop the bleeding. His saving grace was rebounding, which he excelled at on both ends of the court.
Grade: D+
Harrison Barnes
Barnes had a driving dunk … and that was about it in 11 minutes. His defense and rebounding are noticeably substandard right now. Add in his very limited production offensively and it’s getting really difficult to justify Barnes getting any minutes. I don’t know if he got old overnight but he’s just not a player who does much anymore.
Grade: D+
Carter Bryant
Bryant played about six minutes, 90 seconds of which came in garbage time. One of his two threes came in garbage time. It was a little bit surprising he didn’t get more run after a great Game 3 but I thought he played pretty well in the time he got. Bryant is clearly someone who can be a difference-maker in a playoff game — and that’s a pretty rare attribute for a rookie.
Grade: B
Mitch Johnson
Whatever Coach Mitch said at halftime was gold. The Spurs outscored the Blazers 73-45 after intermission. The Spurs executed extremely well in the second half and stuck to their gameplans on both ends. The rotation was iffy at spots but San Antonio’s talent eventually made that a moot point. To be fair, though, Coach Mitch deserves some of the blame for the poor first half.
Grade: C+
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk