马刺 vs 开拓者 103 - 106 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2026-04-24 20:18:17
圣安东尼奥马刺队在对阵波特兰开拓者队的第二场比赛中失利，这场比赛将因**维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)**的脑震荡而被人们铭记。马刺队在第四节曾领先两位数，但随后进攻陷入停滞，最终以 103-106 遗憾落败。在这场七场四胜制的系列赛中，圣安东尼奥和波特兰目前战成 1-1 平。
统计数据：马刺 VS 开拓者
马刺 VS 开拓者 —— 最终评分
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
本场比赛最大的新闻无疑是文班亚马在重摔倒地后遭遇了脑震荡。他随后退出了比赛，未来的出战状态尚不确定。在受伤之前，他的表现尚可，虽然还没到接管比赛的程度。但无论如何，现在的焦点都在他的健康状况上。
评分：无（时间不足）
德阿隆·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)
对于**德阿隆·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)**来说，这绝对是一个令人失望的夜晚。他全场 16 次出手仅得到 17 分。在 34 分钟的出场时间里，他只送出了 4 次助攻，却有 3 次失误。他在防守端的表现也低于水准。最致命的是，福克斯在第四节表现糟糕。马刺队指望他成为球队的“终结者”，但他却在第二场比赛中搞砸了。如果圣安东尼奥想要在本次季后赛之旅中走得更远，他们需要福克斯挺身而出，打出更好的表现——尤其是在文班亚马缺阵、需要有人扛起重任的情况下。
评分：D
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
**斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)**以 20 次出手领跑全队，但他的效率同样挣扎。他在 38 分钟内得到 18 分。和福克斯一样，卡斯尔在第四节也打得很艰难。我不喜欢他的投篮选择，他在几次关键投篮上偏得离谱。卡斯尔还很年轻，在压力巨大的情况下表现挣扎是可以理解的，但由于开拓者队对他采取“放空”策略，他得分能力的匮乏被进一步放大。如果波特兰和其他球队可以肆无忌惮地收缩防守，基本上无视他的存在，那将是未来一个重大的问题。卡斯尔在防守端和篮板球方面有一些亮点，但他的组织能力顶多算平庸，控球也太草率。展望未来，希望他能及时反弹，打出常规赛末段那样的表现。
评分：D+
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
**德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)**在三分线外 5 投 0 中，这对于一支三分命中率不足 30% 的马刺队来说显然没有提供帮助。但除了那失准的远程投射外，我认为瓦塞尔打得非常出色。他在两分球区域 11 投 6 中，罚球 5 投 4 中，且仅有 1 次失误。他的全方位努力值得称赞。他抢下了 12 个篮板——其中许多是高强度的拼抢篮板。瓦塞尔的防守积极性极高，他以 3 次抢断领跑全队，还记录了一次盖帽。就像第一场比赛一样，在某些时段，瓦塞尔显然是球队运转中最核心的齿轮。希望他能保持下去。
评分：B+
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
**朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)**表现得还算不错，尽管他的节奏因为罕见的犯规麻烦而被打乱。他在 27 分钟内得到 9 分，全场仅投丢一球。他的防守很好，拼抢积极，整体篮球智商也非常在线。但同样，犯规麻烦似乎让他难以找到手感。随着系列赛的进行，马刺队需要想办法为尚帕尼创造更多的出手空间。
评分：B
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)
**卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)**的表现显然是马刺队的一个亮点。在进攻端，他表现得非常出色。他在进攻端的 5 个篮板极具影响力，掩护扎实，他的顺下让波特兰的防线时刻紧绷，并且还送出了几次聪明的传球。防守端，科内特在禁区内守得很稳，他向外线的轮转补位速度也令人印象深刻。当文班亚马倒下时，马刺队需要替补中锋挺身而出。科内特做到了这一点，他的表现足以支撑马刺队赢球。
评分：A-
迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)
作为一名新秀后卫，**迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)**展现出了高素质的闪光点。即使在这种高强度的环境下，他依然能够到达自己想要的进攻位置。在第二场比赛中，他在 23 分钟内得到 10 分，投篮命中率超过五成，两次罚球也稳稳命中。我也很喜欢他的防守强度，他在防守端很少犯错。然而，并非一切都尽如人意。哈珀虽然有一些精彩的传球，但他的组织水平比平时要沉寂一些。他还出现了 3 次失误，决策并不总是可靠。总而言之，哈珀履行了自己的职责并展现了积极的迹象，但我不会说他已经是本系列赛中一个显著的优势点。
评分：B
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
这位 2025-26 赛季 NBA 年度最佳第六人奖项的获得者比第一场比赛有所进步。即便如此，他在第二场的表现依然平平。他得到 7 分 4 篮板，但投篮仅 7 投 3 中。防守端，虽然约翰逊贡献了两次抢断，但他造成的负面影响多于正面贡献——尤其是在外线防守上。如果约翰逊能对开拓者展现出他的冲击力，马刺队的处境会轻松很多。
评分：C
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
**哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)**在遭遇肩部刺痛后离场。好消息是他应该可以出战后续的比赛。看到巴恩斯痛苦的样子令人揪心，因为他一直是圣安东尼奥的“铁人”。在第二场比赛中，他在 15 分钟的出场时间里并没有造成太大杀伤。4 分 1 篮板的数据很难说能改变比赛走势。虽然有些时刻巴恩斯试图展现老将的稳健，但结果往往并不理想。
评分：C
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)
考虑到**卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)**被迫在某些时段出任中锋，再加上他的经验尚浅，我认为他打得相当不错。他在 12 分钟内得到 7 分，提供了空间支持、运动能力和活力，看起来相当自信。很有可能在接下来的比赛中他需要扮演重要的角色——让我们期待他能胜任。以这个目标来看，第二场比赛是朝着正确方向迈出的一步。
评分：B
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
当你的头号球星被迫离场时，很难找到有效的应对方案，但米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)教练仍需为第二场比赛的失利承担部分责任。他在第四节的轮换调整未能奏效。在没有文班和科内特的时段，球队的策略显得有些犹豫。关键时刻的战术跑位过于简单。希望米奇教练和几名球员在接下来的比赛中能有更好的表现。
评分：C-
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Playoff Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Portland Trail Blazers – Game #2
Playoff Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Portland Trail Blazers – Game #2
The San Antonio Spurs lost Game 2 to the Portland Trail Blazers in a contest that will be remembered for Victor Wembanyama’s concussion. The Spurs led by double-digits in the fourth quarter but saw their offense dry up and ultimately lose by a final count of 106-103. San Antonio and Portland are now tied 1-1 in this best of seven series.
Stats: Spurs vs. Blazers
Spurs vs. Blazers – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
The biggest story of this game was the fact that Wembanyama suffered a concussion after hitting the floor hard. He left the game and his status going forward is uncertain. Prior to the injury, he was playing at an acceptable level, though he hadn’t yet tried to take over the game. But, yeah, the focus right now is on his health.
Grade: Inc.
De’Aaron Fox
It was definitely a disappointing evening for Fox. He finished with only 17 points on 16 shot attempts. He tallied just four assists compared to three turnovers in 34 minutes. His defense was substandard. Most damning, Fox played poorly in the fourth quarter. The Spurs lean on him to be their closer and he laid an egg in Game 2. For San Antonio to have any lasting success in this postseason run, they’ll need Fox to step up and play much better — particularly in situations where Wembanyama is out and someone is needed to carry the load.
Grade: D
Stephon Castle
Castle led the team in field goal attempts with 20 but he too struggled with efficiency. He scored 18 points in 38 minutes. Like Fox, Castle struggled in the fourth. I didn’t like his shot selection and he missed badly on a few important shots. Castle’s young so it’s understandable that he’d struggle in a high pressure situation but his inability to score was made worse by the fact that the Blazers were laying off him. If Portland and other teams can sag and basically ignore his whereabouts, that’ll be a major problem going forward. Castle had some good moments on defense and on the boards but his playmaking was average at best and he was also too sloppy with the ball. Going forward, let’s hope he can bounce back and play more like the version of himself we saw down the stretch of the regular season.
Grade: D+
Devin Vassell
Vassell was 0-for-5 from three-point land, which obviously didn’t help matters for a Spurs team that shot worse than 30% from the deep. But outside of that wayward marksmanship from deep, I thought Vassell played pretty damn well. He was 6-for-11 from two-point range, 4-for-5 at the free throw line and turned it over just once. His all-around effort was commendable. He had 12 rebounds — many of which were of the highly contested variety. Vassell’s defensive energy level was sky high. He led the team with three steals and also recorded a blocked shot. Just like in Game 1, there were stretches where Vassell was clearly the most important cog in the wheel. Hopefully he can keep it up.
Grade: B+
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie played decently well, although his rhythm was discombobulated due to uncharacteristic foul trouble. He had nine points in 27 minutes and missed only one shot from the field. His defense was good, he efforted at a high level and his all-around basketball IQ was sound. But, again, foul trouble seemed to keep him from finding a groove. As the series progresses, the Spurs need to find a way to get Champagnie more shots.
Grade: B
Luke Kornet
Kornet’s play was clearly a bright spot for the good guys. Offensively, he was really good. His five boards on that end were impactful, he set mean screens, his rolling kept Portland occupied and he authored smart passes. Defensively, Kornet held up well in the paint and his rotations to the perimeter were impressively swift. When Wembanyama went down, the Spurs needed the team’s backup center to step up. Kornet did exactly that and played well enough for the Spurs to win.
Grade: A-
Dylan Harper
For being a rookie guard, Harper is showing quality flashes. Even in this dense setting, he’s still able to get to where he wants. In Game 2, he ended up with ten points in 23 minutes and hit better than half his shots from the field and both of his freebies. I also loved his defensive intensity and he rarely made a mistake on that end. It wasn’t all sunshine, however. Harper had some outstanding passes but his level of playmaking was more muted than usual. He also had three turnovers and his decision-making wasn’t always dependable. All in all, Harper is doing his role and showing positive signs but I wouldn’t say he has been a notable asset yet in this series.
Grade: B
Keldon Johnson
The 2025-26 NBA Sixth Man of the Year award winner improved on his Game 1 performance. That said, Game 2 was still underwhelming. He had seven points and four rebounds but was just 3-for-7 from the field. Defensively, while Johnson had a pair of steals, he did more harm than good — particularly out on the perimeter. If Johnson can make his forcefulness felt against the Blazers, that’d make life easier for the Spurs.
Grade: C
Harrison Barnes
Barnes left the game after suffering a shoulder stinger. The good news is he should be available going forward. Seeing Barnes in pain was jarring because he’s been such an ironman for San Antonio. In Game 2, he didn’t do much damage in his 15 minutes of playing time. Four points and a rebound isn’t exactly game-changing production. There were moments where it looked like Barnes tried to provide a steady veteran hand — but the outcomes were rarely positive.
Grade: C
Carter Bryant
Considering that Bryant was forced to play center for stretches and considering his rawness, I thought he did pretty well. He scored seven points in 12 minutes, provided spacing, athleticism and vivacity, and looked reasonably confident. There’s a good chance that he’ll need to play an important role going forward — let’s hope he’s up to the task. Game 2 was a step in the right direction with that goal in mind.
Grade: B
Mitch Johnson
It’s difficult to find working pathways when your main player is forced out but Coach Mitch deserves some of the blame for the Game 2 loss. He didn’t push the right buttons rotation-wise in the fourth quarter. The strategies during the non-Wemby, non-Kornet minutes were iffy. The playcalling in money time was too basic. Hopefully Coach Mitch and a handful of players have better games in the coming days.
Grade: C-
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk