By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2026-01-28 21:23:52
在一场充斥着进攻高潮的比赛中，圣安东尼奥马刺最终以104-95的比分不敌新奥尔良鹈鹕。这场令人失望的主场失利让圣安东尼奥本赛季的战绩下滑至31胜15负，而鹈鹕的战绩则提升至12胜36负。
马刺队一度落后鹈鹕20分之多，但在第四节奋起直追。第四节伊始，马刺队打出了一波24-5的进攻高潮，一度反超5分。遗憾的是，新奥尔良队在比赛最后的20分中独得17分，最终锁定了胜局。
数据统计：马刺 vs. 鹈鹕
马刺 vs. 鹈鹕 – 最终评分
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
优点：文班亚马两分球6投4中，抢下16个篮板并送出4次盖帽。当他在内线打得足够强硬时，这位法国球员在攻防两端都能取得成功。不足：然而今晚，文班亚马打得强硬的时候并不多。更糟糕的是，他的三分球10投仅2中，罚球6罚2中。在31分钟的上场时间里，他也没能送出任何一次助攻。总结：文班亚马需要打出更坚决、更专注的篮球，马刺队才能取得持续的成功。
评分：C-
德阿隆·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)
这又是一场因福克斯侵略性不足而葬送圣安东尼奥的比赛。他命中了3记三分球（5投3中），但两分球只出手了3次，罚球线上则是4罚1中。福克斯没有在足够长的时间里将油门踩到底。雪上加霜的是，他还有4次失误。福克斯的传球不错（7次助攻），但马刺需要他在攻防两端拿出更多的冲击力。
评分：C-
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
卡斯尔的表现相当糟糕。他在比赛开始一分钟时完成一次扣篮，但之后再无运动战进球。在29分钟内，他仅得到5分。无论在组织进攻还是防守方面，他都毫无亮点。卡斯尔打得像是身心俱疲。
评分：D
朱利安·尚佩尼 (Julian Champagnie)
尚佩尼在三分线外7投仅1中。但值得称赞的是，他找到了其他方式来帮助球队。他在三分线内的两次出手全部命中，罚球线上6罚6中。他还抢下了几个关键篮板，防守也算中规中矩。
评分：C+
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯仍未走出低谷。他在19分钟内仅贡献了5分和1个篮板。他在外线的球的转移和决策做得还不错，但再加上低于水准的防守，这又是一个在赛场上令人失望的夜晚。
评分：C
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
优点：约翰逊在三分线内7投5中，并且在28分钟内没有出现失误。有几次，他的热情仅凭一己之力就让马刺得以续命。不足：约翰逊三分球5投1中，罚球4罚2中。他在篮板球方面也表现不佳（2个篮板），防守端更是有太多不尽如人意之处。
评分：B-
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
伤愈归来的瓦塞尔为马刺注入了一些活力。他在25分钟内得到13分，展现了出色的得分能力。不幸的是，瓦塞尔的效率不高，投篮选择也有些草率。防守端，他偶有不错的表现，但要恢复到最佳状态仍需努力。
评分：B-
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)
虽然数据上并不起眼，但科内特今晚的强硬和智慧帮助了马刺。他在进攻篮板上非常积极，带着明确的目的奔跑全场，并打出了聪明的防守。科内特用他的努力和无形资产为马刺带来了赢球的机会。
评分：B+
迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)
哈珀错失了几个本可以命中的投篮，但我对他的表现相当满意。他在篮板方面表现出色，传球也做得非常好，当他在场时为进攻端注入了一剂肾上腺素。我也认为他的防守真的很好。总而言之，哈珀绝对应该获得超过17分钟的上场时间。
评分：A-
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)
当马刺似乎已陷入绝境时，布莱恩特登场并为球队注入了活力。他命中了两个三分球，并在防守端满场飞奔。这场比赛很好地展示了布莱恩特未来能如何帮助球队。
评分：A-
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
马刺能从大坑中爬出来，约翰逊功不可没。他做出了许多正确的临场调度。遗憾的是，在关键时刻他犯了太多错误。最明显的一点是，当时场上的人本该是哈珀，而不是卡斯尔。
评分：C-
由生成式 AI 翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. New Orleans Pelicans – Game #46
Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. New Orleans Pelicans – Game #46
In what was a game of runs, the San Antonio Spurs ultimately lost to the New Orleans Pelicans by a final score of 104-95. This disappointing home loss dropped San Antonio’s record on the season to 31-15, while the Pelicans improved to 12-36.
The Spurs found themselves down 20 points to the Pelicans before battling back in the fourth quarter. To begin the fourth, S.A. went on a 24-5 to take a five-point lead. Sadly, New Orleans finished off their win by scoring 17 of the game’s final 20 points.
Stats: Spurs vs. Pelicans
Spurs vs. Pelicans – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
The good: Wembanyama was 4-for-6 from two-point range, corralled 16 rebounds and blocked four shots. When he was being forceful on the inside, the Frenchman was having success on both ends of the court. The bad: Wembanyama wasn’t being forceful often enough on this night. To make matters worse, he was only 2-for-10 on three-pointers and 2-for-6 at the free throw line. He also failed to record an assist in 31 minutes of play. Overall: Wembanyama needs to play a sturdier, more focused brand of basketball for the Spurs to have consistent success.
Grade: C-
De’Aaron Fox
This was another game where Fox’s lack of aggression doomed San Antonio. He hit 3-of-5 three-pointers but only attempted three two-pointers and was 1-for-4 at the charity stripe. Fox didn’t have his foot on the gas for enough minutes. To add to the negatives, he also had four turnovers. Fox’s passing was good (seven assists) but the Spurs needed more oomph on both ends.
Grade: C-
Stephon Castle
Castle was pretty darn bad. He had a dunk one minute into the game and then never made another field goal. He finished with just five points in 29 minutes. There was nothing special about his playmaking or his defense. Castle played like he was tired — both physically and mentally.
Grade: D
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie was just 1-for-7 from three-point territory. To his credit, he found other ways to help. He hit both of his shots inside of the arc and was 6-for-6 at the line. He also grabbed a couple contested boards and played acceptable defense.
Grade: C+
Harrison Barnes
Barnes still hasn’t found his way out of the doldrums. He chipped in only five points in his 19 minutes to go along with one rebound. His ball-movement and decision-making on the perimeter was pretty good but add in sub par defense and this was another disappointing night at the office.
Grade: C
Keldon Johnson
The good: Johnson was 5-for-7 inside of the arc and didn’t turn the ball over in 28 minutes. There were a few times where his enthusiasm single-handedly kept the Spurs afloat. The bad: Johnson was 1-for-5 from deep and 2-for-4 at the line. He also underperformed on the glass (two rebounds) and his defense left a lot to be desired.
Grade: B-
Devin Vassell
In his return from injury, Vassell gave the Spurs some life. His shotmaking ability was apparent on his way to 13 points in 25 minutes. Unfortunately, Vassell’s efficiency was lacking and his shot-selection was iffy. Defensively, he was decent at times but he still has work to do to get back into shape on that end.
Grade: B-
Luke Kornet
While his stats don’t jump off the page, Kornet’s ruggedness and smarts helped the Spurs on this night. He was super active on the offensive glass, ran the court with purpose and played heady defense. Kornet gave the Spurs a chance to win this game with his effort and intangibles.
Grade: B+
Dylan Harper
Harper missed a couple shots he could have made but I was pretty pleased with his play. He was great on the boards, passed the ball really well and gave the offense a dose of adrenaline when he was on the court. I also thought his defense was really good. All in all, Harper definitely should have played more than 17 minutes.
Grade: A-
Carter Bryant
When the Spurs appeared to be dead in the water, Bryant entered the game and gave the good guys life. He hit a pair of three-pointers and was flying around on the defensive end. This was a good example of how Bryant can help the team going forward.
Grade: A-
Mitch Johnson
Johnson deserves credit for helping the Spurs dig their way out of their hole. He pushed a lot of right buttons. Regrettably, he pushed too many wrong buttons down the stretch. Most notably, it was pretty clear that Harper should have been on the court instead of Castle.
Grade: C-
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk