By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-10-26 14:16:30
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
圣安东尼奥马刺队以120-116战胜新奥尔良鹈鹕队，战绩提升至2胜0负。在这场自始至终都十分胶着的比赛中，马刺队在第四节一度落后8分，但随后打出了一波14-0的攻势抹平分差。鹈鹕队顽强反击，将比赛拖入加时，但马刺队在加时赛中命中了足够的关键球，最终艰难取胜。
数据：马刺 vs 鹈鹕
马刺 vs 鹈鹕 – 最终评分
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
虽然不像对阵独行侠时那般具有统治力，但文班亚马的本场表现依旧相当惊艳。他总共贡献了29分、11个篮板和9次盖帽，尽管他遭遇了尺度不一的吹罚，并最终在加时赛中犯满离场。但总的来说，他的表现仍有太多可圈可点之处。文班亚马的防守非常强悍，尤其是在内线。进攻端，他积极拼抢位置，努力争取高质量的出手。这位法国球员送出了正确的传球，同时连续第二场比赛零失误。两场比赛过后，你很难对他有更多的苛求了。
评分：A
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
瓦塞尔的投篮准星不佳，但如果没有他那些关键时刻的得分，马刺队就会输掉这场比赛。就在文班亚马在加时赛犯满离场后，瓦塞尔命中一记三分球，为马刺队赢得了喘息空间。整场比赛，他投中了好几个关键球。瓦塞尔在防守端也有几次及时的表现。他的出手选择仍有待打磨，并且在失误和犯规方面有些挣扎……但是，重申一次，他对本场胜利至关重要。
评分：A-
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
对于斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle) 来说，这是个艰难的夜晚。他的十次失误准确地反映出他在进攻端的草率。他的传球一团糟，运球也遇到了麻烦。更糟糕的是，他在罚球线上表现挣扎，他在场时还影响了球队的空间，因为鹈鹕队在外线完全放空了他。值得称赞的是，卡斯尔没有放弃，持续拼搏，并最终尽其所能帮助马刺队锁定了胜局。当被放空时，他必须投进更多的三分，并且传球不能如此不稳定——但他的坚韧和毅力最终在关键时刻收到了回报。
评分：D+
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯在他出场的34分钟里大部分时间都表现沉寂。但值得庆幸的是，他在第四节的一个关键阶段打得很好。他在那段时间里命中了一记三分球和一次上篮，为马刺队带来了势头。我还认为巴恩斯的传球和防守强度都比平时水准更高。
评分：B
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
对阵新奥尔良队，投篮是尚帕尼面临的一大难题。他在常规时间三分线外5投0中，直到加时赛才命中了一次关键的三分出手。尽管准星失常，尚帕尼还是找到了其他方式为球队做贡献。他篮板抢得很好，传球不错，防守充满活力，并且控制了自己的失误。
评分：B
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)
现在看来，科内特真是一笔极佳的签约。他与文班亚马同时在场的时间段效果喜人。他的进攻篮板能改变比赛局势。他有出色的手感，终结能力强，是一个名副其实的优秀传球手，并且很少犯错。在对阵鹈鹕的防守中，我认为他在防守锡安·威廉姆森 (Zion Williamson) 时做得非常出色——无论是在单防还是协防时。
评分：A-
迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)
优点：在第四节那波至关重要的14-0攻势中，哈珀是当之无愧的MVP，当时比赛看起来即将失控。他先是命中一记三分，随后又打出了一系列聪明的战术，将马刺从悬崖边拉了回来。他的传球和突入禁区的能力名不虚传。缺点：哈珀在篮下终结方面表现挣扎，他的外线投篮弧度也太平。此外，他持球有些随意，也是马刺队中几个受犯规麻烦困扰的球员之一。总而言之：哈珀显然需要打得更高效，但在他职业生涯如此早期就能在比赛的关键时刻挺身而出，这着实令人振奋。
评分：B-
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
约翰逊在内线的身体对抗是本场比赛急需的特质。他在篮板方面表现出色，并用强硬的方式得分。不幸的是，他的身体对抗也付出了代价，他在仅仅19分钟的出场时间里就犯满离场。更好的防守意识本可以让他避免其中一些犯规。
评分：B+
乔丹·麦克劳克林 (Jordan McLaughlin)
麦克劳克林获得了六分钟的出场时间，表现符合预期：正确地执行战术，努力防守，并命中了一次空位三分。
评分：B
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)
布莱恩特出场三分钟，期间没有太多亮眼表现。
评分：未评级
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
我认为约翰逊教练做得很好。他明智地应对了犯规麻烦。给科内特更多时间是明智之举。在比赛的关键时刻信任哈珀，这一点很棒。他为瓦塞尔设计的空位三分战术很巧妙。总的来说，马刺队打得并非特别出色，但约翰逊尽其所能地指导球队走向了胜利。
评分：A-
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs at New Orleans Pelicans – Game #2
Grades: San Antonio Spurs at New Orleans Pelicans – Game #2
The San Antonio Spurs improved to 2-0 with a 120-116 victory over the New Orleans Pelicans. In what was a close game throughout, the Spurs fell behind by eight points in the fourth quarter before authoring a 14-0 run to erase the deficit. The Pelicans battled back to force overtime but the Spurs hit enough timely shots in the extra session to eke out the win.
Stats: Spurs at Pelicans
Spurs at Pelicans – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
While not quite as dominant as he was against the Mavs, Wembanyama’s encore was pretty darn impressive. He totaled 29 points, 11 rebounds and nine blocks even though he dealt with an uneven whistle that eventually led to him fouling out in overtime. All in all, though, there was a lot to like. Wembanyama’s defense was stout, particularly on the interior. Offensively, he fought for positioning and he battled to get high-quality shots. The Frenchman made the right passes while also finishing with zero turnovers for the second consecutive outing. After two games, it’d be difficult for anyone to have expected anything more out of him.
Grade: A
Devin Vassell
Vassell didn’t shoot it the straightest but the Spurs lose this game without his timely shot-making. Right after Wembanyama fouled out in overtime, Vassell hit a three-pointer to give the good guys some breathing room. In total, he hit a handful of big-time shots. Vassell also had a few timely plays on the defensive end. His shot-selection is a work in progress and he struggled a bit with turnovers and fouls … but, again, he was vital to this win.
Grade: A-
Stephon Castle
It was a rough evening at the office for Castle. His ten turnovers paint an accurate picture of how sloppy he was offensively. His passing was out of whack and he had trouble dribbling the ball. To make matters worse, he struggled at the line and his presence on the court was hurting the spacing because the Pelicans weren’t guarding him on the perimeter. To Castle’s credit, he kept battling and ended up doing enough to help the Spurs secure the victory. He has to hit more threes when left unguarded and he can’t be so inconsistent passing the ball — but his grit and perseverance ended up paying dividends when it mattered most.
Grade: D+
Harrison Barnes
Barnes was quiet for the majority of his 34 minutes on the court. Thankfully, though, he played well for a key stretch in the fourth quarter. He hit a three-pointer and a layup in that stretch to give the Spurs momentum. I also thought Barnes’ passing and defensive intensity were at higher than normal levels.
Grade: B
Julian Champagnie
Shooting was a struggle for Champagnie against New Orleans. He was 0-for-5 from three-point territory in regulation before nailing a key three-point try in the overtime period. Despite his wayward marksmanship, Champagnie found other ways to contribute. He rebounded well, passed the ball well, defended with vigor and limited his mistakes.
Grade: B
Luke Kornet
Kornet is looking like a damn good signing right about now. His minutes with Wembanyama are promising. His offensive rebounding is game-changing. He has good hands, he finishes well, he’s a legitimately good passer and he rarely makes mistakes. Defensively against the Pelicans, I thought he did great work against Zion Williamson — both when he was on him and when he offered helped.
Grade: A-
Dylan Harper
The good: Harper was the MVP of the vital 14-0 stretch in the fourth quarter when it looked like the game was going to slip away. He hit a three-pointer before authoring a series of smart plays to pull the Spurs back from the abyss. His passing and ability to penetrate the lane is as good as advertised. The bad: Harper struggled to finish and his outside shot looked flat. He was also a bit loose with the ball and was one of a few Spurs who dealt with nagging foul trouble. Net-net: Harper needs to be more efficient obviously but seeing him step up at a key moment of a game so early in his career was awesome.
Grade: B-
Keldon Johnson
Johnson’s physicality in the paint was a much-needed attribute on this night. He was great on the boards and bullied his way to points. Unfortunately, his physicality came with a price as he fouled out in only 19 minutes of action. Better awareness on defense could have saved him from a few of those fouls.
Grade: B+
Jordan McLaughlin
McLaughlin got six minutes and did what you’d expect him to do: run the plays right, try on defense and hit an open three-point look.
Grade: B
Carter Bryant
Bryant played three minutes and didn’t do anything too notable during that time.
Grade: Inc.
Mitch Johnson
I thought Johnson did well. He navigated the foul trouble wisely. Giving extra minutes to Kornet was smart. Trusting Harper in the guts of the game was cool to see. His plays to get Vassell open for three-point attempts were crafty. Overall, the Spurs didn’t play especially well but Johnson did his part to guide San Antonio to a win.
Grade: A-
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk