By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-02-26 17:24:51
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
周日，圣安东尼奥马刺队挥霍了对阵新奥尔良鹈鹕队17分的领先优势。今晚，马刺队又挥霍了19分的领先优势，最终以109-103的比分输给了鹈鹕队。圣安东尼奥马刺队本赛季的战绩现在是24胜32负。
对马刺队来说，比赛初期的情况再好不过了。第一节结束时，马刺队以30-16领先。第二节的情况也还不错，直到半场前几分钟。鹈鹕队在进攻端爆发，将分差缩小到两分，半场结束时比分为51-49。
马刺队一直在战斗，并能够在整个第三节和第四节的开始阶段保持领先。不幸的是，马刺队在最后一节的进攻陷入停滞，鹈鹕队再次完成了逆转。
这可以归类为马刺队的又一场令人失望的失利。圣安东尼奥马刺队正在努力争取胜利，但他们在攻防两端的表现都不够好——即使是面对像15胜43负的鹈鹕队这样一支弱队。
数据：马刺队 vs 鹈鹕队
马刺队 vs 鹈鹕队 – 最终评分
迪阿隆·福克斯(De’Aaron Fox)
优点：福克斯完成了六次抢断，并在球场的那一端付出了巨大的努力。他有一些高质量的传球，并以九次助攻结束了比赛。他在第四节命中了一个重要的三分球，给了马刺队一些希望。缺点：福克斯错失了其他八次三分球尝试。他在内线的效率也很低，只获得了三次罚球机会。在传球方面，他错过了太多空位的队友，并出现了六次失误。在没有 文班亚马(Victor Wembanyama) 的情况下，福克斯必须打得更好，马刺队才能赢得比赛。
评分：D
德文·瓦塞尔(Devin Vassell)
瓦塞尔上半场的表现很糟糕。半场结束时，他的投篮命中率是7投1中，几乎没有做其他事情。下半场，瓦塞尔终于展现出了一些活力。他开始冲击篮筐，并取得了更大的成功。希望他下半场的16分预示着好转的迹象，因为这家伙最近一直陷入可怕的低迷状态。
评分：C-
克里斯·保罗(Chris Paul)
保罗打得还算不错。在33分钟的上场时间里，他总共贡献了十次助攻，投进了三个三分球，并且在争抢松散球时表现积极。他合理地控制了球，并提供了充足的组织进攻能力，即使他主要打的是得分后卫。然而，防守通常是保罗的问题，因为鹈鹕队利用了他身材上的不足。
评分：B-
哈里森·巴恩斯(Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯在很大程度上完成了他的工作。他命中了八次三分球尝试中的一半。他很好地转移了球，比平时更努力地争抢篮板，并且打出了一场非常干净的比赛（没有失误，没有犯规）。巴恩斯不是特别出色，但他做了他应该做的事情。
评分：B
比斯马克·比永博(Bismack Biyombo)
比永博正在充分利用这些十天短合同。他连续第二次获得两双，而且是以一种很好的方式。他在篮板球方面表现出色，并且提供了禁区保护。他设置了很棒的掩护，很好地顺下，并在处理球时做出了不错的决定。比永博有时会很笨拙，但总的来说，他为马刺队提供了一些不错的上场时间。
评分：A-
凯尔登·约翰逊(Keldon Johnson)
约翰逊稍微降温了一点，但他再次打得相当不错。他的投篮命中率是7投4中，并且投进了几个三分球。他的决策能力不如最近那么敏锐，但在这方面他并不糟糕。他的防守比平时更好，他的能量水平也起到了帮助作用。
评分：B+
杰里米·索汉(Jeremy Sochan)
索汉倾尽了全力。他不知疲倦地冲抢篮板。他在进攻端有目的地切入。在防守端，他的站位和身体对抗都令人印象深刻。索汉有时确实会碍事，而且他本可以更好地控制球。
评分：B
朱利安·尚帕尼(Julian Champagnie)
对于尚帕尼来说，这是一个令人沮丧的夜晚。他的投篮命中率只有5投1中，即使他有很多机会帮助圣安东尼奥马刺队起势。在防守端，尚帕尼表现出了很多的勇气，但在晚上结束时并没有多少收获。
评分：C+
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔(Stephon Castle)
卡斯尔只打了12分钟。这一次，他被缩短的上场时间是应该的。他的投篮选择非常有问题。他的传球很马虎。他失误了三次，并且领到了四次犯规。这位新秀打得……好吧，就像一个新秀一样。
评分：D
桑德罗·马穆克拉什维利(Sandro Mamukelashvili)
马穆克拉什维利大部分时间都在生自己的气。他的沮丧很容易理解。他错失了全部五次三分球尝试。更糟糕的是，他开始在空位三分球上犹豫不决。马穆还在12分钟内只抢到1个篮板。从积极的方面来看，我喜欢他在攻防两端的努力，并且他能够在防守端完成几次表现。
评分：C
米奇·约翰逊(Mitch Johnson)
我的意思是，是的，对于马刺队来说，这两场失利都令人沮丧。教练组应该承担很大一部分责任。在比赛的大部分时间里，进攻都毫无章法。战术安排并没有起到帮助作用。今晚，防守在早期相当不错，但随着比赛的进行而陷入挣扎。最糟糕的是，约翰逊让他的老将们打了很长时间，而马刺队的表现仍然很糟糕。如果他在培养年轻球员的同时输球，那情况会有所不同——但事实并非如此。
评分：D
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs at New Orleans Pelicans – Game #56
Grades: San Antonio Spurs at New Orleans Pelicans – Game #56
On Sunday, the San Antonio Spurs blew a 17-point lead against the New Orleans Pelicans. Tonight, the Spurs blew a 19-point lead and ended up losing to the Pelicans by a final count of 109-103. San Antonio is now 24-32 on the season.
Things couldn’t have gone much better for the Spurs early on. At the end of the first quarter, the good guys had a 30-16 advantage. Things were going fine in the second quarter until a few minutes before halftime. The Pelicans exploded offensively to get within two points at intermission, 51-49.
San Antonio kept fighting and were able to stay ahead the entire third quarter and the beginning of the fourth period. Unfortunately, the Spurs saw their offense flatline in the final stanza as the Pelicans once again completed a comeback.
This classifies as another disappointing loss for the Spurs. San Antonio is trying to win but they’re not playing well enough on either end — even against a lowly team like the 15-43 Pelicans.
Stats: Spurs at Pelicans
Spurs at Pelicans – Final Grades
De’Aaron Fox
The good: Fox had six steals and gave really good effort on that end of the court. He had some quality passes and finished with nine assists. He hit a big three-pointer in the fourth quarter that gave the Spurs some hope. The bad: Fox missed his other eight three-point attempts. He was also inefficient inside of the arc and only shot three free throws. Passing-wise, he missed too many open teammates and tallied six turnovers. Fox has to play better than this for the Spurs to win games without Wembanyama.
Grade: D
Devin Vassell
Vassell was terrible in the first half. At halftime, he was 1-for-7 from the field and did almost nothing else. In the second half, Vassell finally showed some signs of life. He started attacking the basket and had much more success. Hopefully his 16 second half points are a sign of things to come because this dude has been stuck in a horrific slump lately.
Grade: C-
Chris Paul
Paul played decently well. In 33 minutes, he totaled ten assists, drained three three-pointers and was active in loose ball situations. He took reasonably good care of the ball and provided an ample amount of playmaking even though he was mostly playing shooting guard. Defense, though, was oftentimes an issue for Paul, as the Pelicans took advantage of his lack of size.
Grade: B-
Harrison Barnes
Barnes did his job for the most part. He hit half of his eight three-point attempts. He moved the ball well, battled on the boards more than usual and played a very clean game (no turnovers, no fouls). Barnes wasn’t great but he did what he’s supposed to do.
Grade: B
Bismack Biyombo
Biyombo is making the most of these ten-day contracts. He posted his second consecutive double-double and did so in fine fashion. He has been great on the boards and he’s providing rim protection. He sets mean screens, rolls well and makes decent decisions with the ball. Biyombo can be clumsy sometimes but, all in all, he’s giving the Spurs some good minutes.
Grade: A-
Keldon Johnson
Johnson cooled off a little bit but he played pretty well once again. He was 4-for-7 from the field and buried a couple threes. His decision-making wasn’t as crisp as it has been lately but he wasn’t terrible in that regard. His defense was better than normal and his energy level helped the cause.
Grade: B+
Jeremy Sochan
Sochan gave every ounce of his being. He crashed the glass with relentless effort. He cut with purpose on offense. Defensively, his positioning and physicality were both impressive. Sochan did get in the way sometimes and he could have been tighter with the ball, though.
Grade: B
Julian Champagnie
It was a frustrating night at the office for Champagnie. He was only 1-for-5 from the field even though he had plenty of opportunities to help San Antonio get going. Defensively, Champagnie exhibited a lot of moxie but didn’t have much to show for it at the end of the night.
Grade: C+
Stephon Castle
Castle only played 12 minutes. This time, his shortened leash was deserved. His shot-selection was highly questionable. His passing was iffy. He turned the ball over three times and picked up four fouls. The rookie played … well, like a rookie.
Grade: D
Sandro Mamukelashvili
Mamukelashvili was mad at himself most of the night. His frustration was easy to understand. He missed all five of his three-point attempts. To make matters worse, he started hesitating on open threes. Mamu also only pulled down one rebound in 12 minutes. On the positive side of the ledger, I liked his hustle on both ends and he was able to make a couple plays on the defensive side of the ball.
Grade: C
Mitch Johnson
I mean, yeah, these were two disheartening losses for the Spurs. The coaching staff deserves a healthy serving of the blame. The offense was rudderless for much of the game. The playcalling isn’t helping matters. Tonight, the defense was pretty good early but then struggled as the game progressed. The worst part is the fact that Johnson is playing his veterans heavy minutes and the Spurs are still doing bad. It’d be different if he was losing while building up the youngsters — but that’s not what’s happening.
Grade: D
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk