马刺 vs 鹈鹕 126 - 119 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-11-09 23:48:09
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
圣安东尼奥马刺队取得两连胜，赛季战绩提升至7胜2负。马刺在第二节一度对新奥尔良鹈鹕队取得巨大领先，但鹈鹕队奋起直追，并始终紧咬比分。马刺始终未能彻底终结比赛悬念，但最终还是以126-119的比分险胜对手。
数据统计：马刺 vs. 鹈鹕
马刺 vs. 鹈鹕——球员最终评分
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
优点：这是文班亚马又一场稳健的防守表现。虽然他的防守积极性只能算平平，但他很好地保护了篮筐，统治了防守篮板，并且始终保持专注。进攻端，他在两分球区域10投7中，并多次成功冲击篮筐。缺点：防守端，文班亚马有几次轮转换位偏慢——这在他身上并不常见。进攻端，他的三分球9投仅2中。更糟糕的是，他没有获得一次罚球机会。尽管裁判的哨子本可以对他更有利一些，但文班亚马的身体对抗不够强硬，并且他在处理球时的犹豫不决直接导致了他全队最高的5次失误。总评：本场比赛有一些积极的亮点，但对于这位年轻的超级新星来说，这次的表现应当被视为一次退步。
评分：C-
德阿隆·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)
在经历了漫长的伤停之后，福克斯终于回归赛场，为球队披挂上阵。他的表现令人印象深刻，尤其是他看起来打得毫不费力。福克斯以24分领衔全队，并且在各个区域的投篮表现都很出色。虽然他在组织进攻方面贡献不多，但他将失误控制在最低水平，并且出手选择相当明智。防守端，福克斯表现不错。他充满活力地施压，并能很好地预判传球路线。总而言之，福克斯轻松得分的能力、在关键时刻挺身而出的表现以及让球队提速的作用，都极具价值。
评分：A-
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
有趣的是，即便福克斯回归阵容，卡斯尔依然是球队的主要外线组织者。他全场送出14次助攻，追平了个人生涯最高纪录，这让教练组的安排看起来如同神来之笔。在过去两场比赛中，卡斯尔总计送出了27次助攻。对阵鹈鹕，卡斯尔仅有两次失误，他显然充分利用了大部分防守注意力被文班亚马和福克斯吸引的优势。他在两分球区域7投5中，并且4次罚球全部命中。进攻端，他突破坚决，频频送出空中接力，并能用精准的传球找到处于空位的射手。防守端，卡斯尔的拼搏精神已拉到满格。不过，也存在一些不足之处。这位20岁的年轻人6次三分出手全部偏出，并且有时会运球过多而不是及时出球。但是，能在福克斯回归后看到他有如此高的参与度，着实令人欣喜。
评分：A-
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
瓦塞尔很好地恪守了自己的角色定位，而这恰恰是他过去常常难以把握的界限。他的投篮命中率不错，其中包括8次三分出手命中了一半。他有一两次不太合理的出手，但除此之外，他的投篮选择都很不错。防守端，他保持专注，并在攻防两端都控制住了自己的失误。
评分：B+
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯的投篮手感依旧火热。在过去六场比赛中，他场均得到15.7分，投篮命中率高达65.2%，三分命中率也达到了59.5%。他目前的外线投篮看起来尤其流畅，同时还能在冲击篮下时上演杂耍般的终结。在对阵火箭队打出了一场精彩的防守后，巴恩斯在面对鹈鹕队时没能延续同样的状态。他在防守端的表现尚可，但他在外线的移动本可以更快，在内线的对抗本可以更强硬。
评分：B+
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
随着福克斯的回归，尚帕尼被调整至替补席。他在新角色上表现出色。在26分钟的上场时间里，他高效地砍下14分，各项投篮数据都很亮眼。他命中了两记三分球，并且在攻击篮筐时显得比平时更加协调。防守端，他做得相当成功，并且在场上跑动积极、目的明确。如果尚帕尼能继续在替补席上打出这样的表现，他将能持续获得上场时间。
评分：A-
杰里米·索汉 (Jeremy Sochan)
优点：索汉全场6投5中，唯一投失的是一次轻松的扣篮机会。他还在转换进攻中送出了两次绝妙的传球。索汉在进攻端的意识和球商显而易见。缺点：我对索汉的防守不是特别满意。他很积极，但在每个回合中的防守站位都有很大的提升空间。他的努力程度毋庸置疑，但还有很多细节需要打磨。篮板方面，我对他目前的表现仍然感到失望。
评分：B
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
约翰逊的状态持续火热。教练组没有给他非常多的上场时间，但他在场上的影响力不容忽视。他在篮板拼抢上如同野兽，终结强硬，并且传球能力也达到了前所未有的高度。防守端，他一直保持着侵略性，并避免了那些以往一直困扰他的精神层面的错误。
评分：A-
林迪·沃特斯三世 (Lindy Waters III)
沃特斯的表现稳如磐石。他用投射为球队拉开空间，传球能力比预想的要好，而且在防守端也绝非软柿子。虽然他的技术武器库不算丰富，但沃特斯正证明自己是一名有用的轮换阵容球员。
评分：B+
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)
布莱恩特上场五分半钟，带来了显而易见的活力。他在防守端有几次失位，进攻端也有几次值得商榷的决策……但他敢于在场上竞争，不畏惧失败。这位新秀在场上的直观表现持续令人眼前一亮。
评分：B
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
约翰逊在使用教练挑战时需要更果断，尤其是在比赛末段。具体来说，眼看着卡斯尔因一次糟糕的判罚而犯满离场却不使用挑战，是一个糟糕的决定。我同样对文班亚马的接球位置不太满意。话虽如此，球队的轮换安排没有问题，而且在对手手感火热时，约翰逊总能通过正确的调整来遏制对方的得分高潮。
评分：B-
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. New Orleans Pelicans – Game #9
Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. New Orleans Pelicans – Game #9
The San Antonio Spurs won their second straight game to improve to a record of 7-2 on the season. The Spurs got up big on the New Orleans Pelicans in the second quarter but the Pelicans were able to rally back and hang around. The Spurs were never able to put them away but San Antonio was able to escape with a 126-119 victory.
Stats: Spurs vs. Pelicans
Spurs vs. Pelicans – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
The good: It was another strong defensive performance by Wembanyama. While his activity level was only mediocre, he protected the rim well, dominated the defensive glass and remained attentive. Offensively, he was 7-for-10 from two-point range and had a number of successful forays to the rim. The bad: Defensively, Wembanyama was slow to rotate a couple of times — which is rare to see. Offensively, he was only 2-for-9 from three-point range. To make matters worse, he didn’t get to the free throw line. Although his whistle could have been better, Wembanyama wasn’t physical enough and his lack of decisiveness led directly to his team-high five turnovers. Overall: There were some positive glimpses but this outing should be classified as a step backwards for the young superstar.
Grade: C-
De’Aaron Fox
After being sidelined for what felt like forever, Fox was back in action for the good guys. The production was impressive, especially because it seemed like he didn’t break a sweat. Fox led the way with 24 points and he shot well from all ranges. While he didn’t do a ton of playmaking, he kept his mistakes to a minimum and his shot-selection was wise. Defensively, Fox was good. He pressured with vigor and he read passing lanes well. All in all, Fox’s abilities to score with ease, come up big when needed most and make the squad even faster are very valuable.
Grade: A-
Stephon Castle
Interestingly, Castle was still the team’s primary perimeter playmaker even with Fox back in the lineup. He made the coaches look like geniuses by totaling 14 assists, which tied a career-high. Over his last two games, Castle tallied 27 assists. Against the Pelicans, Castle turned it over only twice, as he clearly took advantage of most of the attention going to Wembanyama and Fox. He was 5-for-7 from two-point territory and hit all four of his free throws. Offensively, he was driving with determination, throwing alleyoops left and right, and finding open shooters with pinpoint passes. Defensively, Castle had his effort level dialed all the way up. There were some negatives, though. The 20-year-old missed all six of his three-pointers and sometimes dribbled too much instead of giving the ball up. But, yeah, seeing this level of involvement with Fox back in the mix was great to see.
Grade: A-
Devin Vassell
Vassell stayed within his role well, which is always a line he has struggled to tiptoe. He shot well from the field, including hitting half of his eight three-point attempts. He had one or two questionable shots but otherwise he selected his launches well. Defensively, he remained focused and he limited his miscues on both ends of the court.
Grade: B+
Harrison Barnes
Barnes remains red-hot from the field. Over his last six games, he’s averaging 15.7 points on 65.2% shooting from the field and 59.5% shooting from three-point land. His perimeter stroke looks especially clean right now and he’s also adding in acrobatic finishes in the lane. After a great defensive game against the Rockets, Barnes didn’t have the same fire going against the Pelicans. He was still decent-ish on that side but he could have been quicker on the perimeter and burlier in the paint.
Grade: B+
Julian Champagnie
With Fox back, it was Champagnie who got moved to the bench. He did well in his new role. In 26 minutes, he poured in 14 points on quality shooting across the board. He hit a pair of three-pointers and looked more coordinated than usual when attacking the rim. Defensively, he was rather successful and he ran the court with purpose. If Champagnie can keep performing like this from off the bench, he’s going to keep getting minutes.
Grade: A-
Jeremy Sochan
The good: Sochan was 5-for-6 from the field; the only shot he missed was an easy dunk attempt. He also had a pair of fantastic passes in transition. Sochan’s awareness and smarts on offense were plain to see. The bad: I wasn’t super impressed with Sochan’s defense. He was active but his positioning from possession to possession left a lot to be desired. The effort is there but he has a lot to clean up. Rebounding-wise, I continue to be underwhelmed by what I’m seeing from Sochan.
Grade: B
Keldon Johnson
Johnson continues to thrive. The coaches aren’t playing him a ton of minutes but his impact is impossible to miss. He’s a beast on the boards, he’s finishing with toughness and his passing has been better than ever. Defensively, he has been aggressive and he’s been avoiding the mental mistakes that have historically plagued him.
Grade: A-
Lindy Waters III
Waters was rock solid. He spaces the floor with his shot, he passes better than advertised and he’s not a pushover on the defensive end. While there’s not a whole lot of depth to his game, Waters is proving to be a useful depth piece.
Grade: B+
Carter Bryant
Bryant played five and a half minutes and brought a palpable amount of energy. He got lost a couple times on defense and had a couple questionable decisions on offense … but he’s out there competing and being unafraid to fail. The rookie continues to pass the eye test with flying colors.
Grade: B
Mitch Johnson
Johnson needs to be quicker on the trigger when it comes to challenges, particularly late in games. To be specific, allowing Castle to foul out on a bad call was a poor decision. I also wasn’t thrilled with where Wembanyama was getting his touches. That said, the rotation was fine and Johnson continues to push the right buttons when it comes to stifling runs when the other team gets hot.
Grade: B-
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk