马刺 vs 猛龙 121 - 101 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-10-29 11:56:51
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
圣安东尼奥马刺队以121-103的最终比分击败多伦多猛龙队，将战绩提升至4胜0负。马刺队在首节结束时以41-29领先，尽管比赛中偶有松懈，但他们依然轻松取胜。比赛末段，马刺队打出了一波11-1的攻击波，彻底锁定胜局，也让比赛最后几分钟进入了垃圾时间。
数据统计：马刺 vs. 猛龙
马刺 vs. 猛龙 – 最终评分
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
尽管以文班的标准来看，文班亚马的基础数据乍一看平平无奇，但他在对阵猛龙队的比赛中实际上展现了惊人的统治力。这甚至可能是他本赛季防守端表现最好的一场比赛。他在禁区内的威慑力是如此巨大，以至于多伦多球员甚至没有勇气向他发起挑战。别被他只有一个盖帽的数据所迷惑——这位法国球员在护筐方面绝对是一头猛兽。文班亚马的轮转换位也很出色，并且能够在外线干扰投篮。进攻端，他仅出手8次就得到24分，投篮8投7中，罚球10罚10中。正如这些数据所示，他积极地寻找最佳的出手机会。尽管每次持球都遭到猛龙队球员的围堵，但文班亚马甚至没有尝试一次三分出手。他这种坚持追求效率的决心值得称赞。总而言之，文班亚马的表现堪称完美，在他上场的时间里完全统治了比赛。
评分: A
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
对瓦塞尔来说，这是一场表现稳健的比赛。我喜欢他的出手选择，这通常是他面临的最大挑战。他错失了几次传球（尤其是给文班亚马的传球），但这并非因为他打球自私——他只是没看到机会。防守端，他非常投入，在外线付出了极大的努力。瓦塞尔在攻防两端都犯了一些错误，但随着他逐渐找到自己在队内的角色，这样的表现是朝着正确方向迈出的一步。
评分: B
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
优点：卡斯尔在制造罚球方面继续展现出非凡的天赋。他的突破充满力量，善于制造并放大身体接触，且从不会被撞开自己的突破路线。卡斯尔的传球是一个加分项，我也很欣赏他在防守端的不懈努力。缺点：在过去三场比赛中，卡斯尔累计出现了20次失误。无论是控球还是组织战术，对他来说都是挑战。他显然打得有些急躁，结果导致他作为球队首发控卫的表现充其量只能说是不稳定。总而言之：卡斯尔的表现表明，从长远来看，他可能最适合担任第二组织者的角色。这未必是坏事，因为第二组织者同样非常有价值。此外，马刺队阵中已经有了福克斯和哈珀，他们都能轻松胜任控球后卫的位置。
评分: C
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
尽管马刺队从季前赛开始至今保持不败，但这些胜利与巴恩斯的发挥关系不大。他一直手感冰凉，在防守端的参与感也并不突出。值得庆幸的是，在对阵猛龙队的比赛中，巴恩斯展现出了复苏的迹象。他投篮7投6中，其中三分球5投4中。他在持球时做出了许多明智的决策，他精准的投射对于圣安东尼奥能够在第四节最终赢下比赛至关重要。防守端，巴恩斯的表现好坏参半。我认为他在外线的防守其实做得相当不错，但在靠近篮筐的区域则有所欠缺。总的来说，这是一个非常好的迹象，表明巴恩斯确实能为今年的这支球队带来积极的影响。
评分: B+
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼在23分钟内贡献了9分，同时很好地拉开了场上空间。防守端，他的表现给我留下了相当深刻的印象。他的移动比平时更好，并且在篮板球方面做得非常出色。猛龙队全场仅抢到一个进攻篮板，他功不可没。尚帕尼在攻防转换中全力奔跑的态度也值得称赞。
评分: B+
迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)
上半场，哈珀的表现非常出色。他投篮5投4中，传球也展现了高水准。事到如今，这孩子是个纯正的控球后卫，这一点已经显而易见。他还拥有突入篮下并完成终结的特殊能力。在对阵猛龙的下半场，哈珀似乎撞上了体能瓶颈。这可以理解，因为这是他NBA生涯的第一次背靠背比赛。但是，没错，哈珀在持续展现他天才的闪光点，而且对于一个青少年来说，他的成熟度简直爆表。
评分: B+
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
本赛季至今，约翰逊打出了非常扎实的篮球表现。从过往来看，他是一个在防守端容易注意力不集中的球员，并且在那一端容易犯错。本赛季，他变得专注得多，并且能清楚地理解比赛计划。约翰逊的篮板球抢得非常好，这为他增加了价值。进攻端，他被用作持球冲击篮筐的攻击手、定点三分射手以及禁区内的强打者。他基本没有偏离这一策略，目前正为马刺队贡献着非常高效的上场时间。
评分: B+
俾斯麦·比永博 (Bismack Biyombo)
我的天，比永博打得也太烂了。公平地说，部分原因在于文班亚马的表现太出色了，以至于任何人和他相比都会相形见绌。但是，我不知道该怎么说，无论从哪个角度看，比永博的表现都堪称糟糕。防守端，他无法阻碍对手突入禁区，抢不到篮板，在外线的移动也脚步沉重。进攻端，他总是碍手碍脚。可以肯定地说，一旦卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet) 和/或杰里米·索汉 (Jeremy Sochan) 回归，比永博就理所应当地会被按在板凳席的最末端。
评分: D-
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)
布莱恩特身上出现了一些积极的迹象。他仍然有些畏手畏脚、动作僵硬，但他正开始适应职业篮球的节奏。他命中一记三分球，得到了自己NBA生涯的第一分。老实说，他的投篮姿势看起来很棒。布莱恩特打球时带着很多紧张情绪，这在攻防两端都束缚了他的发挥。但很明显，他拥有最终取得成功所需的身体条件和技术天赋。
评分: B-
乔丹·麦克劳林 (Jordan McLaughlin)
麦克劳林永远不会成为超级巨星，但他在对阵多伦多的比赛中看起来相当不错。防守端，他更具侵略性，这让他不再那么成为防守漏洞。进攻端，他很好地执行了战术，命中了一记三分球，并且总能在正确的时间出现在正确的位置。作为控卫位置上的补充，圣安东尼奥的选择已经算很不错了。
评分: B
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
如果能想办法不让比永博上场，那将不胜感激。与此相关的是，感觉他本可以为布莱恩特争取更多的上场时间。但是，总而言之，约翰逊对球队的执教很出色。他让手下球员得到了充分休息，并且对多伦多的任何一波攻势都没有反应过度。他将文班亚马放在了有利的位置上。我喜欢约翰逊在球员处理球草率或犯下防守错误时所展现出的严格态度。到目前为止，在他作为主教练的第一个赛季里，他给我留下了非常深刻的印象。
评分: A-
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Toronto Raptors – Game #4
Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Toronto Raptors – Game #4
The San Antonio Spurs moved to 4-0 after defeating the Toronto Raptors by a final count of 121-103. The Spurs led 41-29 at the end of the first quarter and, despite a few lulls here and there, they were able to waltz to the win. A late 11-1 run by the good guys put the game to bed and led to a couple minutes of garbage time.
Stats: Spurs vs. Raptors
Spurs vs. Raptors – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
While Wembanyama’s raw statistics were relatively pedestrian at first glance by Wemby standards, he was actually incredibly dominant against the Raptors. This might have actually been his best defensive game of the season. He was such a towering presence in the paint that Toronto didn’t even have the courage to challenge him. Don’t let his one block fool you — the Frenchman was an absolute beast at defending the paint. Wembanyama also rotated well and challenged shots on the perimeter. Offensively, he scored 24 points on only eight shots by going 7-for-8 from the field and 10-for-10 at the line. As those numbers suggest, he aggressively found the best possible shot attempts. Wembanyama didn’t even attempt a three-pointer even though he was getting swarmed by Raptors whenever he had the ball. His steadfastness in emphasizing efficiency was applause-worthy. All in all, Wembanyama was fantastic and thoroughly dominated his minutes.
Grade: A
Devin Vassell
This was a solid outing for Vassell. I liked his shot-selection, which is typically his biggest challenge. He missed a few passes (particularly to Wembanyama) but it wasn’t due to him being selfish — he just didn’t see it. Defensively, he was engaged and putting in really good effort on the perimeter. Vassell had a handful of mistakes on both ends of the court but this type of play is a step in the right direction as he discovers his role on the squad.
Grade: B
Stephon Castle
The good: Castle continues to exhibit special talent when it comes to getting to the free throw line. He drives with power, accentuates contact well and never gets bumped off his line. Castle’s passing is a plus and I liked his relentlessness on the defensive end. The bad: Castle has now turned the ball over 20 times in the last three games. Both handling the ball and running plays are challenges for him. He’s clearly pressing and, as a result, his work as the team’s starting point guard has been spotty at best. Net-net: Castle is showing he’ll likely be best suited long-term as a secondary playmaker. That’s not necessarily a bad thing because secondary playmakers are very valuable. Plus, the Spurs already have Fox and Harper who can both play the point guard position with ease.
Grade: C
Harrison Barnes
Even though the Spurs have been undefeated dating back to the start of preseason, those wins didn’t have much to do with Barnes’ play. He’s been cold from the field and hasn’t been an especially notable defensive participant. Thankfully, against the Raptors, Barnes showed signs of life. He was 6-for-7 from the field, including 4-for-5 from three-point range. He made a lot of smart decisions with the ball and his marksmanship was vital to San Antonio being able to pull the game out in the fourth quarter. Defensively, Barnes was a mixed bag. I thought he actually did quite good out on the perimeter but he was lacking closer to the basket. Overall, this was a very good sign that Barnes can indeed have a positive impact on this year’s team.
Grade: B+
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie produced nine points in 23 minutes while adequately spacing the court. Defensively, I was pretty impressed. He was moving better than usual and did great work on the boards. He’s part of the reason why the Raptors managed just one offensive rebound. Champagnie also deserves credit for running the court hard both ways.
Grade: B+
Dylan Harper
In the first half, Harper was very good. He was 4-for-5 from the field and was passing the ball at a high level. It’s blindingly obvious at this point that this kid is a true point guard. He also has a special ability to get to the rim and finish. In the second half against the Raptors, Harper seemed to hit a wall. That’s understandable because this was his first back-to-back of his NBA career. But, yeah, Harper continues to show flashes of brilliance and his level of maturity is off the charts for a teenager.
Grade: B+
Keldon Johnson
Johnson is playing a solid brand of basketball so far this season. Historically, he’s a player who has floated defensively and he’s been prone to miscues on that end. This season, he’s much more locked in and he clearly understands the gameplan. Johnson is rebounding the ball very well, which is adding to his value. Offensively, he’s being used as a downhill driver, a spot-up three-point shooter and a bully in the paint. He hasn’t deviated much from that strategy and is providing the Spurs with very good minutes right now.
Grade: B+
Bismack Biyombo
My god, Biyombo has been so bad. To be fair, part of the problem is that Wembanyama looks so good that anyone would look feeble in comparison. But, I don’t know, Biyombo has been terrible by any metric. Defensively, he’s not hindering drivers to the paint, he’s not rebounding and his work on the perimeter is leadfooted. Offensively, he’s just always in the way. It’s safe to say that once Luke Kornet and/or Jeremy Sochan return, Biyombo will rightfully be buried deep on the bench.
Grade: D-
Carter Bryant
There were positive signs from Bryant. He’s still timid and robotic but he’s starting to get the hang of this professional basketball gig. He hit a three-pointer to score his first basket in the NBA. His stroke looks great, to be honest. Bryant plays with a lot of nervous energy and it’s holding him back on both sides of the ball. But it’s clear he has the build and the tools to eventually make it.
Grade: B-
Jordan McLaughlin
McLaughlin will never be a world-beater but he looked pretty good against Toronto. Defensively, he was more aggressive and that made him less of a liability. Offensively, he ran the plays well, hit a three-pointer and was consistently in the right spots at the right times. As point guard depth, San Antonio could do a lot worse.
Garde: B
Mitch Johnson
Finding a way not to play Biyombo would have been appreciated. In a related note, it felt like he could have carved out more minutes for Bryant. But, all in all, Johnson coached the team well. He kept his troops rested and didn’t overreact to any of Toronto’s runs. He put Wembanyama into advantageous positions. I like that Johnson is showing fire when his players are loose with the ball or make mistakes defensively. So far, I’ve been very impressed with him in his first season in the big boy chair.
Grade: A-
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk