By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-03-17 14:47:48
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
圣安东尼奥马刺队以 119-115 战胜新奥尔良鹈鹕队后，本赛季战绩提升至 28 胜 38 负。鹈鹕队失利后，战绩降至 18 胜 50 负。
马刺队在第三节曾落后 7 分，随后一波 17-0 的攻势让圣安东尼奥队取得两位数的领先优势。鹈鹕队在第四节发起几次反击，但“好人们”再也没有落后。
总的来说，这是一场有趣的比赛，因为两队似乎都没有太大的取胜欲望。现在是赛季的某个阶段，一些球队会优先考虑选秀顺位——这场比赛可能就是这种情况。
数据：马刺队 vs. 鹈鹕队
马刺队 vs. 鹈鹕队 – 最终评分
德文·瓦塞尔(Devin Vassell)
优点：瓦塞尔三分球 9 投 4 中，并获得 7 次罚球机会，命中 6 次。他的防守高于平均水平，并且在 36 分钟的上场时间里没有失误。缺点：瓦塞尔两分球 8 投 2 中。他的一些尝试值得商榷，特别是考虑到他的组织能力非常平庸。一次助攻准确地说明了他对阵鹈鹕队的传球情况。
评分：B
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔(Stephon Castle)
在进攻端，卡斯尔的决策速度需要更快。他传出了一些好球——只是在比赛中很多时候都显得有点慢。得分方面，卡斯尔利用他的身体对抗能力，最终罚球 8 投 7 中。不幸的是，他三分球 5 投 0 中，两分球 10 投仅 5 中。卡斯尔还出现了 3 次失误。在防守端，这位新秀没有太多表现。他在防守端的努力程度非常有限。
评分：C-
克里斯·保罗(Chris Paul)
保罗三分球 3 投全失，但命中了他在弧内的两次尝试。这位经验丰富的控球后卫的组织能力是一大亮点，他在 22 分钟内贡献了 6 次助攻且没有失误。在防守端，保罗有几次积极拼抢，但在大多数情况下，他都是防守漏洞。
评分：C+
哈里森·巴恩斯(Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯为首发阵容带来了急需的效率。他三分球 6 投 3 中，两分球 3 投 3 中，罚球 4 投 4 中。他在 27 分钟内得到 19 分非常重要，他的队友在关键时刻也总会寻找他。在防守端，巴恩斯表现不算出色，但他的努力值得称赞。
评分：B+
俾斯麦·比永博(Bismack Biyombo)
比永博在 12 分钟的上场时间里未能发挥作用。比永博在防守端没有取得什么进展。在进攻端，这位首发中锋也没有对球队做出显著贡献。
评分：C
杰里米·索汉(Jeremy Sochan)
索汉表现不错。他 8 投 6 中，包括一个压哨半场超远投篮。他的传球比平时更好，但他控球也比平时更粗心。在防守端，索汉非常稳固。当他直接参与防守时，马刺队在那一端的表现是最好的。
评分：B+
凯尔登·约翰逊(Keldon Johnson)
约翰逊在全明星赛后的强势表现仍在继续。他看起来是球队中最有能力的进攻武器。他替补出场得到 19 分，并且在所有距离的投篮手感都很好。约翰逊巧妙地融合了手感、强硬和天赋，在马刺队依靠他的时候有所斩获。在那关键的第三节攻势中，他是带领球队发起冲击的人。在防守端，我认为约翰逊看起来非常强硬。虽然有失误，但他的专注度比平时更高。
评分：A-
朱利安·尚帕涅(Julian Champagnie)
这是尚帕涅一段时间以来表现最好的一场比赛之一。他命中了 6 次三分球尝试中的一半，并且罚球 4 投 3 中。尚帕涅以快速的节奏进行比赛，同时也传出了正确的球，并且投了该投的球。在防守端，尚帕涅在持球和无球状态下都表现出色。
评分：B+
桑德罗·马穆克拉什维利(Sandro Mamukelashvili)
很高兴看到马穆克拉什维利重新在场上表现出色。在仅仅 12 分钟的上场时间里，他得到 10 分和 7 个篮板。马穆自信地在外线投篮，并且毫不犹豫地将球带到篮下。在防守端，虽然有一些糟糕的时刻，但他通过篮板球和强硬的比赛风格来帮助他的队友。
评分：B+
布雷克·韦斯利(Blake Wesley)
韦斯利在进攻端的表现从数据上看并不理想。他错失了三分球、两次两分球和两次罚球。他在 10 分钟内也只得到一次助攻。然而，他的速度帮助他的队友加快了节奏，并打破了新奥尔良的防守。在防守端，韦斯利全身心投入，让鹈鹕队的日子不好过。
评分：B
米奇·约翰逊(Mitch Johnson)
约翰逊的轮换很有意义。我也没觉得他的战术安排有什么问题。有趣的是，教练在比赛最后阶段使用了一个年轻的阵容。老实说，这看起来像是约翰逊的一次隐蔽的摆烂行为。最终没有奏效，但我喜欢卡斯尔在比赛最后阶段获得领导球队的机会。
评分：B+
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. New Orleans Pelicans – Game #66
Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. New Orleans Pelicans – Game #66
The San Antonio Spurs improved to 28-38 on the season after a 119-115 victory over the New Orleans Pelicans. With the loss, the Pelicans dropped to a record of 18-50.
The Spurs were trailing by seven points in the third quarter before a 17-0 run gave San Antonio a double-digit advantage. The Pelicans made a few runs in the fourth quarter but the good guys never trailed again.
Overall, it was an interesting game because neither team looked too interested in winning. It’s the point in the season where some teams prioritize draft positioning — and that could have been the case in this contest.
Stats: Spurs vs. Pelicans
Spurs vs. Pelicans – Final Grades
Devin Vassell
The good: Vassell was 4-for-9 on three-points and went to the line seven times, hitting six of his free throw attempts. His defense was better than average and he didn’t turn the ball over in his 36 minutes. The bad: Vassell was 2-for-8 from two-point range. A couple of his attempts were questionable, especially because his playmaking was so underwhelming. One assist accurately tells the tale of his passing against the Pelicans.
Grade: B
Stephon Castle
Offensively, Castle’s decision-making needed to be faster. He made good passes — he was just delivering late a lot of the game. Scoring-wise, Castle used his physicality to finish the game 7-for-8 from the line. Unfortunately, he was 0-for-5 from three-point range and only hit half of his ten two-point attempts. Castle also turned it over three times. Defensively, the rookie didn’t do much. His effort level on that end was minimal.
Grade: C-
Chris Paul
Paul missed all three of his three-point attempts but connected on his two attempts inside the arc. The veteran point guard’s playmaking was a plus, as he totaled six assists and no turnovers in 22 minutes. On defense, Paul hustled a few times but he was a liability during most possessions.
Grade: C+
Harrison Barnes
Barnes brought some much-needed efficiency to the starting lineup. He was 3-for-6 from downtown, 3-for-3 from two-point range and 4-for-4 at the charity stripe. His 19 points in 27 minutes were important and his teammates sought him out during important moments. Defensively, Barnes wasn’t great but his effort was commendable.
Grade: B+
Bismack Biyombo
Biyombo failed to move the needle during his 12 minutes on the court. Biyombo didn’t get much done defensively. Offensively, the starting center didn’t help the cause to a noteworthy degree.
Grade: C
Jeremy Sochan
Good stuff from Sochan. He was 6-for-8 from the field, including a buzzer-beating halfcourt heave. His passing was better than usual, although he was also sloppier with the ball than normal. Defensively, Sochan was really solid. The Spurs looked their best on that end when he was directly involved in the action.
Grade: B+
Keldon Johnson
Johnson’s post All-Star break surge continues. He looked like the most competent offensive weapon on the team. He totaled 19 points off the bench and shot well from all distances. Utilizing a mix of touch, toughness and talent, Johnson produced when the Spurs leaned on him. During that key third quarter run, he’s the man who led the charge. Defensively, I thought Johnson looked very stout. There were mistakes but his concentration level was higher than usual.
Grade: A-
Julian Champagnie
This was one of Champagnie’s better games in a while. He hit half of his six three-point attempts and he was also 3-for-4 at the free throw line. Champagnie played at a fast pace but also made the right passes and shot the shots he needed to shoot. Defensively, Champagnie played well on the ball and off of it.
Grade: B+
Sandro Mamukelashvili
It was good to see Mamukelashvili back to being very productive on the court. In only 12 minutes, he put up ten points and seven rebounds. Mamu shot with confidence from the perimeter and didn’t hesitate to take the ball to the lane. Defensively, there were a few ugly moments but he aided his compadres by rebounding and playing a physical brand of basketball.
Grade: B+
Blake Wesley
Wesley’s offensive night looks suboptimal on paper. He missed his three-point attempt, both of his two-point attempts and both of his one-point attempts. He also only tallied one assist in ten minutes. However, his speed helped push the pace for his teammates and break down New Orleans’ defense. Defensively, Wesley was locked in and made life difficult for the Pelicans.
Grade: B
Mitch Johnson
Johnson’s rotations made sense. I also didn’t have an issue with his play-calling. Interestingly, the coach played a young lineup down the stretch. Honestly, it looked like a stealth tank job by Johnson. It didn’t end up working but I like that Castle got experience leading the charge down the stretch.
Grade: B+
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk