马刺 vs 魔术 105 - 116 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-04-02 16:48:13
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
圣安东尼奥马刺队在比赛的大部分时间里都表现出色，但最终在霜冻银行中心以116-105的比分输给了奥兰多魔术队。这场失利使马刺队的战绩降至31胜44负。
马刺队开局表现出色，第一节结束时以34-29领先。在魔术队将比分追平进入中场休息后，圣安东尼奥队几乎领先了整个第三节。凭借攻防两端的出色表现，马刺队似乎有可能爆冷获胜。
然而，第四节对主队并不友好。奥兰多队彻底掌控了比赛，并以37-21的比分赢得了这一节，最终轻松获胜。
总而言之，一支阵容不整的马刺队进行了一场精彩的战斗。没什么可不开心的。这肯定比马刺队在对阵勇士队的比赛中遭受的惨败要好得多。
数据：马刺 vs. 魔术
马刺 vs. 魔术 – 最终评分
德文·瓦塞尔(Devin Vassell)
在防守端，瓦塞尔实际上非常出色。他很有竞争力，并且在防守端非常扎实。在进攻端，感觉瓦塞尔需要更多的投篮机会。然而，他错失了大部分投篮尝试——包括七次三分球尝试中的六次。虽然他没有失误值得称赞，但瓦塞尔也没有送出助攻。
评分：B-
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔(Stephon Castle)
在很多方面，卡斯尔都表现不错。他投篮命中率很高，得到了16分。当他传球时，他展现了广阔的球场视野。他还积极冲抢篮板。不幸的是，失误是卡斯尔今晚的弱点。他正式失误了七次，还有几次控球不稳。这位新秀的防守也有待提高，尽管我喜欢他在防守端表现出的强硬。总而言之，卡斯尔的失误是一个很大的问题，他就像一台主要的摆烂机器，对抗奥兰多。
评分：C+
克里斯·保罗(Chris Paul)
保罗积极寻找自己的投篮机会，这使他以积极的效率获得了十分。他的传球非常好；他操纵防守的方式是一种美。保罗在防守端也很有效。他竭尽全力地抓挠，最终成为了球场上的一个资产。
评分：B+
哈里森·巴恩斯(Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯的得分是马刺队能够坚持下去的重要原因。他前八次投篮命中了七次，他的跳投看起来非常流畅。不幸的是，当圣安东尼奥队争夺爆冷时，他在最后阶段只有6投2中。虽然他在进攻端表现不错，但巴恩斯在防守端却是一个负担。他没有防守篮板，他在防守端的移动比平时更加摇摇晃晃。
评分：B
俾斯麦·比永博(Bismack Biyombo)
由于索汉(Sochan)背部痉挛缺席，以及巴锡(Bassey)为了让烦人的膝盖休息而缺席，比永博发现自己重新回到了首发阵容。这位32岁的球员很好地扮演了自己的角色。他在油漆区内以力量和运动能力终结进攻。他设置掩护，移动良好，并在进攻端避开干扰。在防守端，比永博积极地抢篮板和保护篮筐。马刺队真的不能再对他要求更多了——除了再投进一两个罚球。
评分：A-
朱利安·尚帕尼(Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼在对阵魔术队的比赛中找到了状态。他9投5中，命中了三分球，并且在无球移动时也表现出色。他有目的地跑动，并保持抬头。在防守端，他面临着一些困难的挑战，并且能够体面地坚持下来。
评分：A-
桑德罗·马穆克拉什维利(Sandro Mamukelashvili)
是的，不，这对马穆克拉什维利来说是一个值得遗忘的夜晚。在19分钟的出场时间里，他6投1中，没有抢到篮板。他错失了空位投篮，他的防守表现很差。马穆很努力，但他的实际贡献非常少。可悲的是，他的糟糕表现拖累了整个替补阵容。
评分：D-
凯尔登·约翰逊(Keldon Johnson)
约翰逊只打了18分钟，但他在场上的效率相当高。他得到7分、7个篮板和4次助攻。他处理了超出他应得的粗心大意，但他克服了困难，最终帮助了球队。他的传球继续看起来更好，约翰逊甚至在防守端也显示出了一些进步。
评分：B
布雷克·韦斯利(Blake Wesley)
韦斯利表现得还不错。他有一个漂亮的背身抛投，一次及时的抢断和几次聪明的传球。他的防守非常有效。在进攻端，他的速度和敏捷性有时给奥兰多队带来了问题。韦斯利本可以做得更多，但在最近一些不稳定的表现之后，这对他来说是朝着正确方向迈出的一步。
评分：B
米奇·约翰逊(Mitch Johnson)
这对马刺队来说是一次主要积极的经历。约翰逊执教得很好。我喜欢他把很多责任都放在卡斯尔的肩上，即使这位新秀在失误方面苦苦挣扎。给尚帕尼额外的上场时间是明智的，总体的比赛计划也很有意义。
评分：B+
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Orlando Magic – Game #75
Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Orlando Magic – Game #75
The San Antonio Spurs played well for the majority of the game but ultimately lost to the Orlando Magic by a final score of 116-105 at the Frost Bank Center. The loss dropped the Spurs to a record of 31-44.
Playing well early, the Spurs led after the end of the first quarter 34-29. After the Magic tied the game going into halftime, San Antonio led almost the entire third quarter. With the Spurs playing well on both ends, it looked possible that the good guys could pull out an upset victory.
The fourth quarter, though, wasn’t kind to the home team. Orlando thoroughly dominated the action and won the period 37-21 to coast to the victory.
All in all, though, a short-handed Spurs squad put up a good fight. There’s not much to be unhappy about. It was much better than the shellacking the Spurs suffered against the Warriors, that’s for sure.
Stats: Spurs vs. Magic
Spurs vs. Magic – Final Grades
Devin Vassell
Defensively, Vassell was actually pretty darn good. He competed and was very fundamentally sound on that end. Offensively, it felt like Vassell needed more shots. Then again, he missed most of the shots he attempted — including six of his seven three-point tries. While it’s commendable that he didn’t have a turnover, Vassell also failed to register an assist.
Grade: B-
Stephon Castle
In many ways, Castle was good. He shot well on his way to 16 points. When he passed the ball, he exhibited his expansive court vision. He also crashed the glass. Unfortunately, turnovers were Castle’s bugaboo on this night. He turned it over seven times officially and he was loose with the ball another handful of times. The rookie’s defense also left a bit to be desired, although I liked the toughness he demonstrated on that end. Add it all up and Castle’s turnovers were a big enough problem that he acted like a one main tanking machine versus Orlando.
Grade: C+
Chris Paul
Paul was aggressive looking for his own shots, which resulted in ten points on positive efficiency. His passing was really good; the way he manipulated the defense was a thing of beauty. Paul was actually effective on the defensive end, too. He scratched and clawed with all of his might and ended up being an asset on that end of the court.
Grade: B+
Harrison Barnes
Barnes’ scoring was a vital part of why the Spurs were able to hang around. He hit seven of his first eight shots from the field and his jumper was looking buttery smooth. Unfortunately, he was only 2-for-6 down the stretch when San Antonio was vying for the upset. While he was good offensively, Barnes was a liability on defense. He had no defensive rebounds and his movement on that end was more rickety than normal.
Grade: B
Bismack Biyombo
With Sochan out due to back spasms and Bassey out to rest his bothersome knee, Biyombo found himself back in the starting lineup. The 32-year-old played his role damn well. He was finishing in the paint with strength and athleticism. He set screens, moved well and stayed out of the way offensively. Defensively, Biyombo rebounded and protected the rim with vigor. The Spurs really couldn’t have asked for much more out of him — other than another made free throw or two.
Grade: A-
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie got it going against the Magic. He hit 5-of-9 three-pointers and also looked good moving without the ball. He ran the court with purpose and kept his head up. Defensively, he had some difficult challenges and was able to hang on decently well.
Grade: A-
Sandro Mamukelashvili
Yeah, no, this was a night to forget for Mamukelashvili. In 19 minutes of action, he was 1-for-6 from the field and didn’t grab a rebound. He missed wide open shots and his defensive play was poor. Mamu hustled but his tangible production was very minimal. Sadly, his poor play brought down the entire bench unit.
Grade: D-
Keldon Johnson
Johnson only played 18 minutes but he was rather productive while on the court. He had seven points, seven rebounds and four assists. He dealt with more than his share of sloppiness but he worked through it and ended up aiding the cause. His passing continues to look better and Johnson is even showing some growth on the defensive end.
Grade: B
Blake Wesley
Wesley was pretty okay. He had a nice reverse layup, a timely steal and a few smart passes. His defense was noticeably effective. On offense, his speed and agility gave Orlando issues at times. Wesley could have done more but this was a step in the right direction for him after some recent shaky performances.
Grade: B
Mitch Johnson
This was a mostly positive experience for the Spurs. Johnson coached well. I like that he put a lot on Castle’s back, even when the rookie was struggling with turnovers. Giving extra minutes to Champagnie was smart and the overall gameplan made sense.
Grade: B+
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk