By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-02-25 16:26:05
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
在一场跌宕起伏的比赛中，圣安东尼奥马刺队最终以114-96的比分惨败给新奥尔良鹈鹕队。这场失利使马刺队的战绩降至24胜31负。
比赛初期，一切对马刺队来说都进展顺利。圣安东尼奥的防守在上半场表现出色，马刺队在第二节一度领先多达17分。
不幸的是，中场休息后风向突变。马刺队在第三节初段进攻端突然哑火，而圣安东尼奥的防守似乎也越来越差。新奥尔良队保持了 momentum 并且一度领先多达21分，最终轻松获胜。
说实话，这对马刺队来说是一场令人沮丧的比赛。鹈鹕队并没有打得特别好，只是圣安东尼奥队在下半场攻防两端都表现得非常糟糕。
数据：马刺队 vs 鹈鹕队
马刺队 vs 鹈鹕队 – 最终评分
迪阿隆·福克斯(De’Aaron Fox)
这显然是福克斯身穿马刺队球衣以来打得最糟糕的一场比赛。他在比赛开始不到两分钟时命中了一个三分球，但之后一切都走下坡路。他最后15次投篮只命中了2次，失误4次，在防守端也没有取得太多成功。引进福克斯是为了让马刺队的进攻更具活力。但在对阵鹈鹕队的这场比赛中，他只是让原本丑陋的局面变得更糟。
评分：D-
德文·瓦塞尔(Devin Vassell)
我不记得见过瓦塞尔打得如此糟糕。在过去的五场比赛中，他场均出场28.6分钟，得到7.8分，投篮命中率为27.5%，三分球命中率为16%。在对阵新奥尔良队的比赛中，他打出了一个9投1中的糟糕表现。他在过去的三场比赛中总共只有一次助攻，并且完全没有组织能力。瓦塞尔的防守在这个令人难忘的夜晚也很糟糕。
评分：D-
克里斯·保罗(Chris Paul)
保罗本应该是一个冷静的因素。但在对阵鹈鹕队的比赛中，他却是焦虑的主要来源之一。他10投1中，并且一直在强投不必要的困难球。他的组织能力还可以（7次助攻，1次失误），但他的决策能力却异乎寻常的平庸。保罗在防守端也很糟糕，尤其是在下半场。
评分：D
哈里森·巴恩斯(Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯的投篮手感并不特别好，但与首发阵容中的其他外线威胁相比，他看起来像库里兄弟一样。他是少数几个拿到球后表现得好像有计划，并且真正努力跑出空位的马刺队球员之一。巴恩斯在防守端甚至也表现得可以接受。
评分：B
比斯马克·比永博(Bismack Biyombo)
比永博打得很好。十分，十个篮板，四个盖帽和两个抢断？是的，没错，对于一个签十天合同的球员来说，这绝对是很棒的表现。正如数据所显示的那样，比永博在冲击篮板，保护篮筐，并且在内线把握住了机会。而数据没有显示的是他非常出色的挡拆和永不放弃的拼搏精神。
评分：A-
凯尔登·约翰逊(Keldon Johnson)
约翰逊在最近的三场比赛中状态火热。在这段时间里，他场均出场26.4分钟，得到20.3分，投篮命中率为77.4%，三分球命中率为62.5%。约翰逊不仅外线投篮出色，而且还充满侵略性地冲击篮筐，并且以无可挑剔的手感完成终结。他在传球方面的决策也很出色，而且他的努力程度也体现在防守端。
评分：A-
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔(Stephon Castle)
和之前的保罗和瓦塞尔一样，这位年轻人也无法命中任何投篮。卡斯尔10投1中，失误两次。这位新秀的投篮选择很差，他在篮筐周围的手感也很笨拙。卡斯尔在防守端也没有做太多事情。
评分：D-
杰里米·索汉(Jeremy Sochan)
优点：索汉是一名出色的篮板手，传球也相当不错，并且控制了自己的失误。在防守端，索汉是少数几个为马刺队付出大量努力的球员之一。缺点：在得分方面，索汉令人失望。他错失了所有两个三分球和两个罚球，并且没有足够频繁地冲击篮筐来产生太大的影响。
评分：B
朱利安·尚帕尼(Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼的投篮是马刺队在第一节取得巨大领先的重要原因。他命中了前四次三分球尝试，并且充满了信心。可悲的是，他的火热状态并没有持续下去。在火热开局之后，他的投篮只有9投2中。值得赞扬的是，尚帕尼在各个方面都打得很努力，传球很好，并且在防守端表现出了一些斗志。
评分：B+
桑德罗·马穆克拉什维利(Sandro Mamukelashvili)
马穆克拉什维利几乎总能让人感受到他的存在。遗憾的是，在对阵鹈鹕队的比赛中，情况并非如此。他并不缺乏活力，但他对比赛的实际影响却微乎其微。
评分：C+
查尔斯·巴锡(Charles Bassey)
巴锡打得相当不错，但随后又遭遇了膝盖伤病。看起来他的膝盖越来越不可能让他成为一名长期的NBA球员了。
评分：B-
米奇·约翰逊
糟糕。这很糟糕。圣安东尼奥的后卫们真的太糟糕了……教练组应该承担一些责任。战术安排并没有起到帮助作用，而且应该更早更频繁地使用替补席上的球员。
评分：D
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs at New Orleans Pelicans – Game #55
Grades: San Antonio Spurs at New Orleans Pelicans – Game #55
In a topsy-turvy affair, the San Antonio Spurs ended up getting blown out by the New Orleans Pelicans by a final score of 114-96. The loss dropped the Spurs to a record of 24-31.
Early on, things were going well for the good guys. San Antonio’s defense was cooking in the first half and the Spurs led by as many as 17 points in the second quarter.
Unfortunately, the tide turned after intermission. The Spurs went cold early in the third quarter offensively and San Antonio’s defense seemingly got worse and worse. New Orleans kept the momentum the rest of the way and led by as many as 21 points before easily waltzing to victory.
Honestly, this was a demoralizing game for the Spurs. The Hornets weren’t playing too well — it was just San Antonio playing terribly on both ends of the court in the second half.
Stats: Spurs at Pelicans
Spurs at Pelicans – Final Grades
De’Aaron Fox
This was quite clearly Fox’s worst game in a Spurs uniform. He hit a three-pointer less than two minutes into the game but then everything was downhill after that. He connected on two of his final 15 shots from the floor, turned the ball over four times and didn’t have a whole lot of success on the defensive end. Fox was acquired to make the Spurs more dynamic offensively. In this game against the Pelicans, he just made ugly matters even worse.
Grade: D-
Devin Vassell
I don’t think I’ve ever seen Vassell play this poorly. Over his last five games, he’s averaging 7.8 points in 28.6 minutes per game while shooting 27.5% from the field and 16% from three-point range. Versus New Orleans, he put together a 1-for-9 clunker. He has one total assist in his last three games and is doing absolutely no playmaking. Vassell’s defense was also bad on this forgettable evening.
Grade: D-
Chris Paul
Paul is supposed to be a calming influence. Against the Pelicans, he was one of the main sources of angst. He was 1-for-10 from the field and was forcing needlessly difficult shots. His playmaking was fine (seven assists, one turnover) but his decision-making was uncharacteristically pedestrian. Paul was also bad on defense, particularly in the second half.
Grade: D
Harrison Barnes
Barnes didn’t shoot it especially straight but he looked like a Curry brother compared to the other perimeter threats in the starting lineup. He was one of the few Spurs players who acted like he had a plan when he got the ball and who actually tried hard to get open. Barnes was even acceptably good on the defensive end.
Grade: B
Bismack Biyombo
Biyombo played well. Ten points, ten rebounds, four blocks and two steals? Yes, yeah, affirmative, that is damn good work for a guy on a ten-day contract. As the numbers suggest, Biyombo was crashing the boards, protecting the rim and finishing opportunities in the paint. What the numbers don’t show were his very good screens and his relentless hustle.
Grade: A-
Keldon Johnson
Johnson has been on fire in his last three games. In that time span, he’s averaging 20.3 points in 26.4 minutes per game, while shooting 77.4% from the field and 62.5% from three-point range. Not only is he shooting it great from the outside, Johnson is also attacking the rim with ferocity and finishing with impeccable touch. His decision-making passing-wise has also been outstanding and his effort level is carrying over to the defensive end.
Grade: A-
Stephon Castle
Like Paul and Vassell before him, this youngster couldn’t hit the broadside of the Frost Bank Center. Castle was 1-for-10 from the field and turned the ball over twice. The rookie’s shot-selection was poor and his touch around the rim was clumsy. Castle also didn’t do much of anything on the defensive end.
Grade: D-
Jeremy Sochan
The good: Sochan was a strong rebounder, passed the ball reasonably well and limited his errors. Defensively, Sochan was one of the few players in Silver and Black who put forth a noteworthy amount of effort. The bad: Scoring-wise, Sochan was a letdown. He missed both threes and both freebies and wasn’t getting to the rim often enough to make much of a difference.
Grade: B
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie’s shooting was a big reason why the Spurs got out to a big lead in the first half. He hit his first four three-point attempts and was brimming with confidence. Sadly, his hotness didn’t last. He was only 2-for-9 from the field after his hot start. To Champagnie’s credit, he played with effort in all facets, passed the ball well and showed some fight on defense.
Grade: B+
Sandro Mamukelashvili
Mamukelashvili almost always makes his presence felt. Regrettably, against the Pelicans, that didn’t happen. He didn’t lack electricity but his tangible impact on the game was minimal.
Grade: C+
Charles Bassey
Bassey was playing pretty well but then suffered yet another knee injury. It’s looking more and more like his knees aren’t going to allow him to be a long-term NBA player.
Grade: B-
Mitch Johnson
Ouch. That was an ugly one. San Antonio’s guards were really bad … and the coaching staff should shoulder some of that blame. The playcalling wasn’t helping matters and the bench should have been used earlier and more often.
Grade: D
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk