马刺 vs 爵士 110 - 111 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2024-11-10 17:02:33
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
周六，圣安东尼奥马刺队主场迎战联盟战绩最差的犹他爵士队，本有机会将胜率提升至五成。可惜的是，马刺队错失了良机。最终，圣安东尼奥以110-111不敌实力较弱的爵士队，目前战绩为4胜6负。
这场比赛自始至终都非常胶着。最后，马刺队 simply犯了太多错误。他们全场出现20次失误，并且在防守端多次漏人。在第四节末段，失误和防守漏洞依旧存在，爵士队最终守住了胜果。
技术统计：马刺 vs. 爵士
马刺 vs. 爵士 – 最终评分
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
优点：考虑到文班亚马本场比赛之前的三分命中率只有22.6%，看到他9投6中的表现着实令人欣喜。在篮板上，他从比赛一开始就展现出统治力。凭借着在篮筐附近的出色防守，他还送出了7次盖帽。缺点：两分球6投2中并不能帮助球队赢球。文班亚马显然仍在学习如何在三分线内高效得分。对阵爵士的比赛中，他的随意性也是一个问题。他没有保护好球，传球也四处乱飞，这也是他全场没有助攻的原因。总体而言：文班亚马的数据很漂亮，但他对比赛胜利的实际影响并没有数据所显示的那么大。
评分：B
克里斯·保罗 (Chris Paul)
保罗的组织调度非常出色。他送出了9次助攻，并且积极地与多名队友分享球权。即使球不在他手中，他也能掌控比赛的节奏。在防守端，马刺队试图把他藏起来，但这在面对犹他的比赛中实际上很难做到。虽然保罗在进攻端贡献良多，但他的投篮6投0中。当他无法在外线构成威胁时，圣安东尼奥的进攻空间就会变得拥挤。
评分：B-
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
这是一场典型的巴恩斯式比赛。他命中了几记三分球，耐心地持球突破到内线，并且做出了许多明智的决定。遗憾的是，巴恩斯出现了3次失误——对于一个触球次数不多的球员来说，这太多了。在防守端，他比以往更加积极，我认为他在防守端的表现相当不错。
评分：B-
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
优点：尚帕尼的防守很稳固。他付出了很大的努力，并且通常都能出现在正确的位置上。尚帕尼的篮板球也抢得不错。缺点：尚帕尼的投篮失准。他在比赛后期命中了一记三分球，但如果他在比赛的关键时刻能投进三分，那就更有用了。今天他似乎在外线出手有些仓促，本可以多传一两下球。尚帕尼是又一位马刺球员，他在失误和犯规方面犯了太多错误。
评分：C
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
对于一名只打了十场职业比赛的新秀来说，卡斯尔的这场表现相当出色。最引人注目的是，他在这场对阵爵士的比赛中投进了他职业生涯的前三个三分球。在本场比赛之前，他本赛季的三分球是24投3中。所以，没错，从24投3中到3投3中，这是一个相当值得注意的进步。遗憾的是，他在比赛中最后四次三分出手都未能命中。但除了三分球之外，卡斯尔充满活力地冲击篮筐，并且在球的处理上做出了明智的决定。事实上，他可能是圣安东尼奥本场比赛中最可靠的决策者。在防守端，他的表现有起有伏。他的人盯人防守做得很好，并且能够准确地判断传球路线，但他的轮转有时会出错，并且在比赛后期犯了一个糟糕的犯规，这帮助爵士队赢得了比赛。
评分：A-
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
优点：约翰逊在寻找队友和传球方面做得更好。这是马刺队未来需要他展现出的无私打法。他强硬的突破为他赢得了一些上篮机会和6次罚球。在防守端，约翰逊非常积极。缺点：约翰逊的三分球看起来仍然不在状态。他的跳投现在缺乏柔和的手感。马刺队承担不起 another没有投射能力的球员，所以希望他能尽快走出低迷。在防守端，虽然他的积极性很高，但他经常走神，并且在他防守下丢了好几个简单的球。
评分：C+
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
欢迎回来。瓦塞尔在本场比赛中完成了赛季首秀，并在22分钟内得到了21分。瓦塞尔在第一节比赛中一分未得，显得有些生疏。然而，一旦他再次回到场上，他就开启了得分模式。他的进攻状态迅速回升，他的跳投看起来一如既往地轻松自如。虽然他的回归令人欣喜，但瓦塞尔确实打乱了球队的节奏——尤其是在防守端。他的团队防守很差，并且在换防时犯了很多错误。在进攻端，球队花了大量时间站在原地看他单打，而不是参与到进攻中。
评分：B
布雷克·韦斯利 (Blake Wesley)
韦斯利的表现不稳定。他有几次精彩的篮下终结和几次漂亮的传球。不幸的是，他也 contributing to 了球队的低级失误，而且他有时会在场上松懈。韦斯利不是马刺输掉这场比赛的原因，但在他的19分钟出场时间里，他本可以为球队提供更多帮助。
评分：C+
扎克·科林斯 (Zach Collins)
科林斯的传球非常好，他的4次助攻和0次失误就是证明。他还命中了一记三分球，并且在内线展现出了强硬的对抗。遗憾的是，科林斯在防守端遇到了一些问题。由于爵士队在进攻端使用了大量的跑动，圣安东尼奥的替补中锋有时会跟丢对手，并且试图弥补时为时已晚。他的篮板球也本可以比现在更好。
评分：C+
桑德罗·马穆克拉什维利 (Sandro Mamukelashvili)
马穆克拉什维利在护框方面表现得还算可以，但这几乎就是他本场比赛的全部积极贡献了。他的两次投篮都未能命中，而且他的整体防守表现也不尽如人意。他 usual在攻防两端的高昂斗志今晚并不明显。
评分：C-
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
优点：我喜欢约翰逊给了卡斯尔35分钟的出场时间。这位新秀有时打得风生水起，所以给他更多的上场时间应该有助于他的成长。给他的球队在外线无限开火权是一个积极的信号。看到马刺队打出现代NBA篮球——这实际上很奇怪，但这是马刺队最终必须去做的。缺点：约翰逊似乎并没有做太多事情来帮助文班亚马在进攻端找到感觉。此外，他对瓦塞尔的使用也不是最佳的。当瓦塞尔在场上的时候，攻防两端都显得有些脱节——这其中一部分原因要归咎于教练。
评分：C
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Utah Jazz – Game #10
Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Utah Jazz – Game #10
The San Antonio Spurs had a great opportunity to get to .500 when they hosted the Utah Jazz on Saturday, the team with the worst record in the NBA. Sadly, the Spurs blew the opportunity. Instead, San Antonio is now 4-6 after losing to the lowly Jazz by a final score of 111-110.
This contest was incredibly close throughout. At the end, the Spurs simply made too many mistakes. They finished with 20 turnovers and numerous defensive lapses. Late in the fourth quarter, the turnovers and lapses continued and the Jazz were able to hold on.
Stats: Spurs vs. Jazz
Spurs vs. Jazz – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
The good: Considering Wembanyama was shooting 22.6% from three-point land coming into this game, it was great to see him sink 6-of-9 shots from deep. On the boards, he was a monster from the opening minutes. He also finished with seven blocks due to his insane defensive presence around the rim. The bad: Going 2-for-6 from two-point range isn’t going to win many games. Wembanyama is still obviously learning how to be efficient from within the arc. Sloppiness was also an issue against the Jazz. He wasn’t taking care of the ball and his passes were all over the place, which is also why he finished the game without an assist. Overall: Wembanyama put up great numbers but he actual impact on winning wasn’t as great as the stats suggest.
Grade: B
Chris Paul
Paul’s running of the show was sublime. He finished with nine assists while actively sharing playmaking duties with a variety of teammates. He was running the show even when the ball wasn’t in his hands. Defensively, the Spurs tried to hide him but that was actually difficult against Utah. While Paul did a lot of good on offense, he was 0-for-6 from the field. When he’s not a perimeter threat, San Antonio’s spacing gets tight.
Grade: B-
Harrison Barnes
This was mostly a standard Barnes outing. He hit a couple three-pointers, drove the ball to the paint with patience and made a lot of smart decisions. Unfortunately, Barnes turned the ball over three times — and that’s too much for a player who doesn’t get many touches. Defensively, he was more involved than usual today and I thought he actually did a pretty good job on that end.
Grade: B-
Julian Champagnie
The good: Champagnie’s defense was solid. He gave good effort and could usually be counted on to be in the right spots. Champagnie also rebounded well. The bad: Champagnie’s shooting was off. He hit a late three-pointer but it would have been useful if he drained a long-ball in the guts of the game. He seemed to be rushing his perimeter shots today and could have made an extra pass or two. Champagnie is another Spurs player who had too many errors in the form of turnovers and fouls.
Grade: C
Stephon Castle
Castle was pretty darn good for a rookie playing his tenth professional game. The headline news is that he hit his first three three-pointers against the Jazz. Coming into this game, he was 3-for-24 from three-point territory on the season. So, yeah, 3-for-3 after 3-for-24 is quite notable. Sadly, he missed his final four three-point attempts of the game. But beyond his perimeter shooting, Castle was driving to the hoop with gusto and was making smart decisions with the ball. In fact, he might have been San Antonio’s most reliable decision-maker on this night. Defensively, there were a lot of ups and downs. He played good man-to-man defense and read passing lanes right but his rotations were sometimes wrong and he had a bad foul late that helped the Jazz win the game.
Grade: A-
Keldon Johnson
The good: Johnson was much better about finding teammates and passing the ball. That’s the type of unselfish play the Spurs need from him going forward. His rugged driving got him some layups and six free throw attempts. Defensively, Johnson was really active. The bad: Johnson’s three-point shot continues to look off. There’s just not much touch on his jumper right now. The Spurs can’t afford another non-shooter so hopefully he can snap out of this funk. On defense, while his activity level was very good, he lost focus too often and gave up a handful of easy buckets under his watch.
Grade: C+
Devin Vassell
Welcome back. Vassell made his season debut against the Jazz and finished with 21 points in 22 minutes. Vassell looked rusty in his scoreless first stint on the court. However, once he hit the court again, it was on. His offense came roaring back to life and his jumper looked as effortless as ever. While it was great to have him back, Vassell did disrupt the flow — particularly on the defensive end. His team-defense was poor and he made a lot of mistakes when it came to switching on the fly. Offensively, the team did a lot of standing around and watching him operate instead of joining in.
Grade: B
Blake Wesley
Wesley had an inconsistent outing. He had a couple awesome finishes at the rim and a couple slick passes. Unfortunately, he too was contributing to the sloppy play and he sometimes took his foot off the gas. Wesley wasn’t a reason why the Spurs lost this game but he could have aided the cause more than he did during his 19 minutes on the court.
Grade: C+
Zach Collins
Collins passed the ball really well, as evidenced by his four assists and his zero turnovers. He hit another three-pointer and was physical in the paint. Regrettably, Collins had some issues on defense. With the Jazz using a lot of movement in their offensive sets, sometimes San Antonio’s backup center got lost and had tried to catch up a step too late. His rebounding could also have been better than it was.
Grade: C+
Sandro Mamukelashvili
Mamukelashvili protected the rim reasonably well but that was about the extent of his positive contributions on this night. He missed both of his shots and his overall defense left a lot to be desired. His usual high-level hustle on both ends wasn’t as noticeable tonight.
Grade: C-
Mitch Johnson
The good: I like that Johnson gave Castle 35 minutes. The rook had it rolling at times so giving him extra time should aid his growth. Giving his team the ultimate green light from three-point land was a positive. It’s actually weird watching the Spurs play modern NBA basketball — but it’s what the Spurs eventually have to do. The bad: Johnson didn’t seem to do a whole lot to help Wembanyama establish himself on the offensive end. Plus, his usage of Vassell wasn’t the greatest. Everything was disjointed on both ends with Vassell on the court — and some of that comes down to coaching.
Grade: C
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk
