By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2024-11-27 17:43:22
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
圣安东尼奥马刺队取得四连胜，赛季战绩来到10胜8负。犹他爵士队奋力抵抗，但最终还是以4胜13负告终。
防守方面，马刺队的开局表现平平。半场结束时，比分定格在66-66。马刺队在第三节的防守有所改善，但直到第四节才真正锁死对手。在这一节中段，由朱利安·尚帕尼(Julian Champagnie)的两个三分球带动的一波10-0的攻势，帮助马刺队取得了13分的领先优势，并最终掌控了比赛。
虽然对手实力不强，但128-115的胜利足以保持球队的良好势头。
数据统计：马刺对阵爵士
马刺对阵爵士 - 最终评分
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
很难对文班亚马的表现吹毛求疵。他在比赛的几乎所有方面都表现出色。三分球14投6中，两分球9投7中，仅有两次失误和一次犯规，最终得到34分。他还送出了一些非常漂亮的传球，并在防守端贡献了几个精彩的镜头。文班亚马本可以在篮板上做得更好，在防守端更积极，在进攻端更具侵略性——但同样，他的优点远远超过了他的缺点。
评分：A-
克里斯·保罗 (Chris Paul)
保罗再次展现了稳健的发挥。他让队友承担了很多组织进攻的任务，但他仍然凭借高效的投篮得到14分，同时送出精妙的传球并减少失误。保罗在防守端也有一些非常精彩的表现，他利用自己的韧性和预判能力破坏了犹他队几次进攻。
评分：B+
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
虽然巴恩斯没有打出像他被评为西部周最佳球员时那样的表现，但他仍然找到了帮助球队的方法。他以8个篮板领衔全队，其中5个是进攻篮板。巴恩斯送出5次助攻，没有失误。（令人惊讶的是，他在四连胜期间总共127分钟的出场时间里没有出现任何失误。）他的投篮只有6投2中，防守也并不出彩——但巴恩斯在本场比赛中远非球队的累赘。
评分：B
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
卡斯尔本场比赛状态起伏不定，但总的来说，他又一次奉献了令人印象深刻的表现。比赛开始不到两分钟，他就已经命中了两个三分球。在比赛后期，他还通过突破上篮制造了混乱。然而，在其他时间段，卡斯尔在球的处理上做出了多次 questionable 的决定。上半场他在防守端的投入也略显不足。但是，嘿，这孩子表现一直都这么出色，以至于人们很容易忘记他还是个菜鸟。总而言之，卡斯尔表现不错，但他距离伟大只有一步之遥。
评分：A-
朱利安·尚帕尼
在第四节之前，尚帕尼对比赛并没有产生太大的实际影响。他在防守端展现了韧性，三分球3投1中——但仅此而已。然而，在最后一节，尚帕尼留下了自己的印记。他在第四节三分球6投4中，他的外线投射让爵士队无力招架。他还抢下了2个篮板和2次抢断。尚帕尼的状态一直起伏不定，但只要他坚持投篮，他似乎很有可能成为一名积极的贡献者。
评分：B+
布雷克·韦斯利 (Blake Wesley)
韦斯利是替补球员中出场时间最多的——这不是偶然的。这位速度极快的后卫在防守端绝对是一名恐怖的球员。从抢断传球路线到紧逼持球人，他有时以一己之力为圣安东尼奥提供了防守的支柱。在进攻端，韦斯利也是一名加分项。他积极地跑动，在无球状态下做出精妙的空切，并命中了一个三分球。韦斯利似乎正在逐渐明白如何在无球状态下更多地帮助球队。
评分：A-
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
优点：约翰逊几次利用强壮的身体突破到内线。他只有一次失误，篮板球也抢得不错。我喜欢他在三分线外出现空位时果断出手。缺点：约翰逊的三分球现在看起来很不稳定。他的投篮偏左、偏右、长、短都有。约翰逊的组织能力在今晚几乎隐形，他的防守也差强人意。总的来说，这只是一场表现笨拙的比赛。
评分：C-
特雷·琼斯 (Tre Jones)
得分仍然是琼斯本赛季的一个问题。他不仅没能把球投进篮筐，而且在选择投篮时机上也做得不好。更糟糕的是，对手对他采取放空策略，但他仍然没有找到如何惩罚对手的方法。值得称赞的是，琼斯很好地将球队带入了他们的进攻体系，并且传球也很有智慧。他在防守端的积极性也是一个加分项。但是，是的，如果琼斯想继续成为这支球队的重要组成部分，他需要在进攻端更有威胁。
评分：C
桑德罗·马穆克拉什维利 (Sandro Mamukelashvili)
马穆克拉什维利似乎正在成功地为自己找到一个定位。他在防守端和攻防转换中的活力极具感染力。在12分钟的出场时间里，他贡献了两次强力扣篮，一次快攻上篮和一个压哨三分球。在防守端，我认为他表现得相当不错，他在进攻端的跑动帮助球队保持了流畅的进攻节奏。
评分：A-
扎克·科林斯 (Zach Collins)
科林斯在6分钟的出场时间里几乎没有做什么。他最引人注目的表现可能是在一次抢篮板时不必要的犯规。科林斯平庸的表现使得教练在下半场将目光投向了其他球员。这是否会成为一个趋势，或者仅仅是科林斯梦游的结果，还有待观察。
评分：C-
查尔斯·巴塞 (Charles Bassey)
由于科林斯没有表现出什么，巴塞在下半场获得了出场机会。他远非出色，但他的表现比科林斯好。巴塞在防守端没有产生太大影响，他在进攻端本可以做得更多……但他打得很有活力。仅凭这一点就让他在本场比赛中有一定的价值。
评分：C+
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
约翰逊又一次展现了出色的执教能力。当然，他能安排文班亚马出场37分钟显然很有帮助，但他做出了一些明智的轮换选择。我喜欢他给了韦斯利更多的上场时间，以及他实际上给了巴塞在下半场一个机会。在第四节依靠尚帕尼也获得了回报。在战术方面，他为文班亚马创造了多种接球方式，这很有帮助。约翰逊也对卡斯尔表现出了很大的信任，这有助于他迅速成长为一名球星。
评分：A-
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Utah Jazz – Game #18
Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Utah Jazz – Game #18
The San Antonio Spurs won their fourth ballgame in a row to improve to 10-8 on the season. The Utah Jazz put up a fight but ultimately dropped to 4-13.
Defensively, the Spurs had a lackluster start. By halftime, the game was tied at 66-66. San Antonio’s defense was better in the third quarter but it wasn’t until the fourth quarter that the team really locked in. A 10-0 run in the middle of the period punctuated by a pair of Julian Champagnie three-pointers gave the Spurs a 13-point lead and the good guys were able to cost from there.
The 128-115 win wasn’t super impressive considering the opponent but it was certainly good enough to keep the team’s momentum heading in the right direction.
Stats: Spurs at Jazz
Spurs at Jazz – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
It would be difficult to nitpick Wembanyama’s performance. He was great in almost all facets of the game. He was 6-for-14 on three-pointers, 7-for-9 on two-pointers and committed only two turnovers and one foul on his way to 34 points. He had a few really good passes and a handful of great defensive highlights. Wembanyama could have been better on the boards, he could have been more active on defense and he could have been more physical on offense — but, again, his positives far outweighed his negatives.
Grade: A-
Chris Paul
Paul was solid once again. He let his teammates do a lot of the playmaking but he still scored 14 points on efficient shooting while making heady passes and limiting mistakes. Paul also had some really good defensive plays in which he used his toughness and anticipation to blow up a few of Utah’s offensive possessions.
Grade: B+
Harrison Barnes
While Barnes didn’t have the type of performance that got him named as the Western Conference Player of the Week, he still found ways to aid the cause. He led the team with eight rebounds, five of which were offensive. Barnes had five assists and no turnovers. (Amazingly, he has no turnovers during the four-game winning streak in a total of 127 minutes.) He hit only 2-of-6 shots from the floor and his defense was nothing to write home about — but Barnes was far from a liability on this night.
Grade: B
Stephon Castle
Castle had a streaky night at the office but, all in all, he put together yet another impressive performance. Less than two minutes into the game, he had already hit a pair of three-pointers. He also had a stretch later in the game where he was wreaking havoc by driving to the bucket. However, there were other stretches where Castle was making questionable decisions with the ball over and over again. He was also a bit decaffeinated on the defensive end in the first half. But, hell, this kid has been so good that it’s difficult to forget he’s a rookie. The bottom line is Castle was good but he was really close to being great.
Grade: A-
Julian Champagnie
Prior to the fourth quarter, Champagnie hadn’t made much of a tangible impact on the game. He was defending with toughness and was 1-for-3 from downtown — but that was about it. In the final stanza, though, Champagnie made his mark. He was 4-for-6 from three-point range in the fourth as his outside shooting put the Jazz to sleep. He also tallied two rebounds and two steals in the quarter. Champagnie has been streaky but as long as he keeps shooting, it appears likely that he’ll be a positive contributor.
Grade: B+
Blake Wesley
Wesley got the most minutes off the bench of any reserve — and that wasn’t by accident. The speedy guard was an absolute terror on the defensive end. From playing passing lanes to pressuring ball-handlers, he was at times single-handedly providing San Antonio with a defensive identity. Offensively, Wesley was also a plus. He ran the court hard, cut well without the ball and knocked down a three-pointer. It seems like Wesley is beginning to figure out how he can help his team while playing more without the ball than with it.
Grade: A-
Keldon Johnson
The good: Johnson was able to turn the corner a few times and drive to the paint with a healthy dosage of physicality. He had only one turnover and rebounded well. I like that he also shot when open from beyond the three-point line. The bad: Johnson’s three-point stroke looks wonky right now. He’s missing left, right, long and short. Johnson’s playmaking was nearly invisible tonight and his defense left a lot to be desired. Overall, it was simply a clunky outing.
Grade: C-
Tre Jones
Scoring remains an issue for Jones this season. Not only is he failing to put the ball in the basket, he’s also not picking his spots well. To add insult to injury, teams are sagging off of him and he’s still not figuring out how to make opponents pay. To Jones’ credit, he got the team into their sets well and passed the ball with intelligence. His hustle on defense was also a plus. But, yeah, Jones needs to be more of a threat on offense if he wants to remain a key part of this team.
Grade: C
Sandro Mamukelashvili
Mamukelashvili seems to be successfully carving out a niche. His energetic ways on defense and in transition are contagious. He had two powerful dunks, a breakaway layup and a buzzer-beating three-pointer in his 12 minutes. Defensively, I thought he held up fairly well and his movement on offense helped keep everything flowing smoothly.
Grade: A-
Zach Collins
Collins did very little in his six minutes of playing time. His most notable play might have been when he needlessly fouled on a rebound attempt. Collins’ lukewarm play caused the coaches to look elsewhere in the second half. It’ll be interesting to see if this will become a theme or if it was simply a result of Collins sleepwalking.
Grade: C-
Charles Bassey
With Collins not showing much of anything, Bassey was the beneficiary of second half minutes. He was far from great but he did better than Collins. Bassey didn’t make much of an impact on defense and he could have done more on offense … but he was playing with a palpable amount of energy. That alone gave him some value on this night.
Grade: C+
Mitch Johnson
It was another really good coaching job by Johnson. I mean, it obviously helps that he could play Wembanyama for 37 minutes but there were a number of wise rotation choices. I loved how he gave Wesley extended minutes and how he actually gave Bassey a chance in the second half. Leaning on Champagnie paid dividends in the fourth quarter. Playcalling-wise, the multitude of ways he got Wembanyama the ball was helpful. Johnson is also showing a lot of trust in Castle, which has helped to quickly turn him into a stud.
Grade: A-
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk