By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2024-11-01 17:22:57
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
圣安东尼奥马刺队在周四晚以 106-88 击败犹他爵士队 (0-5)，终结了两连败，将战绩提升至 2-3。文班亚马(Victor Wembanyama)凭借 5×5 的全面数据抢尽风头，这是他职业生涯第二次打出如此表现。
比赛初期，马刺队的表现并不顺利。事实上，未尝胜绩的爵士队在上半场大部分时间都处于领先地位。在第三节，圣安东尼奥打出一波 12-0 的进攻高潮，扭转了比赛的势头。爵士队在第三节最后两分钟未能得分，以 77-67 落后 10 分进入第四节。
在最后一节，马刺队轻松保持领先优势，最终以 18 分的优势获胜。
技术统计：马刺对阵爵士
马刺对阵爵士 – 最终评分
文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
在昨晚表现低迷之后，文班亚马今晚以传奇的方式强势反弹。这位二年级球员在 34 分钟内砍下 25 分、9 个篮板、7 次助攻、5 次抢断和 5 次盖帽，达成 5×5 的全面数据。这些数字实际上可能低估了文班亚马今晚的统治力，因为当他在场时，马刺队以 87-44 领先爵士队。在防守端，他异常活跃，不断破坏对手的进攻。在进攻端，我认为文班亚马的传球是他最好的属性。但是，是的，正如统计数据所示，他在几乎所有可以想象的领域都影响了比赛。在赛季初相对沉寂之后，这正是文班亚马所需要的表现。
评分：A
克里斯·保罗 (Chris Paul)
保罗的表现非常出色。他在中距离投篮中几乎弹无虚发，投进了三个三分球，并且以高水平掌控着比赛。他的传球精彩绝伦，挡拆配合也十分出色。尽管身处进攻的核心，保罗整场比赛只出现了一次失误。在防守端，他稳扎稳打，在传球路线上保持活跃，并抢下了 7 个篮板。保罗的年龄已经不允许他每晚都有这样的表现，但他证明了他仍然可以不时地打出精英级别的比赛。
评分：A
索汉 (Jeremy Sochan)
优点：索汉的活力依然十足。他打得很强硬，并且几乎在每个回合中都能找到影响比赛的方式。我喜欢他出手了四个三分球，尽管他只命中了一个。在这场比赛之前，他非常、非常犹豫是否要从三分线外出手。在防守端，他的基本功非常扎实。缺点：索汉本场比赛效率不高。如果他能放慢节奏，更有策略地打球，球队也会受益更多。
评分：C+
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
爵士队限制了尚帕尼的三分出手，但他仍然找到了贡献的方式。他在转换进攻中积极跑动，在人群中抢下篮板，并在 25 分钟内贡献了 3 次抢断。总的来说，我认为尚帕尼的防守高于平均水平，我很欣赏他在进攻端找到贡献的方式。话虽如此，如果他想要每晚都真正发挥作用，他需要重新找回三分球的手感。
评分：B-
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯的表现不佳。他在防守端有几次尴尬而缓慢的补防。在进攻端，他三次三分球全部投失。在攻防两端，巴恩斯基本上都只是在碍事。
评分：C-
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
约翰逊本赛季仍在等待一场爆发性的表现。对阵爵士队的比赛中，他获得了 7 次罚球机会，他的突破也一如既往地强硬。我还认为他的防守略高于平均水平。但他也只投进了 6 个三分球中的 1 个，并且在 28 分钟的出场时间内没有送出一次助攻。在瓦塞尔缺阵的情况下，人们会认为约翰逊会承担起额外的责任。但这并没有真正发生。
评分：C+
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
卡斯尔展现出了更多天赋的闪光点。在防守端，他在一对一防守时非常出色，并且在无球防守时也非常有意识。在进攻端，他可以控球并做出正确的传球。在得分方面，卡斯尔本场最值得注意的时刻是他投进了职业生涯的第一个三分球。希望我们能从这位新秀身上看到更多这样的表现。
评分：B-
马拉基·布拉纳姆 (Malaki Branham)
布拉纳姆带着火热的手感进入这场比赛，但在万圣节之夜最终冷却了下来。他 5 投 1 中，并且有一些投篮是勉强出手的。尽管如此，他命中的一球是三分球，他的传球比平时好了一些，而且他在防守端的活力也比平时高了很多。
评分：B-
扎克·科林斯 (Zach Collins)
对科林斯来说，这是一场糟糕的比赛。他投了一个三不沾，在防守端也没有什么贡献，甚至在进攻端他的传球也消失了。今晚，他和文班亚马之间的差距大得难以形容。
评分：D+
桑德罗·马穆克拉什维利 (Sandro Mamukelashvili)
为了寻找火花，教练组启用了马穆克拉什维利，而这一举动效果非常好。他替补出场，做好了战斗的准备。他投进了一个三分球，在无球状态下移动得很好，并帮助球队在转换进攻中快速推进。这样的表现可以让马穆获得一个轮换位置——尤其是在科林斯无法持续做出贡献的情况下。
评分：A-
布雷克·韦斯利 (Blake Wesley)
韦斯利在上半场替补出场，但他的表现很容易被人遗忘。爵士队没有对他进行严密的防守，但他投丢了两个三分球。他的决策能力不稳定，他在 6 分钟内两次失误就证明了这一点。在防守端，我喜欢他的活力，但他的实际影响并不特别明显。
评分：D
波波维奇 (Pop)
波波维奇在让文班亚马参与进攻方面做得更好。具体来说，我喜欢让这位法国大个子由较矮的后卫进行掩护的战术变化。由于爵士队无法换防，这使得文班亚马获得了操作的空间。我也很喜欢波波维奇在下半场给了卡斯尔更长的出场时间。启用马穆克拉什维利也为马刺队带来了很好的结果。
评分：B+
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Utah Jazz – Game #5
Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Utah Jazz – Game #5
The San Antonio Spurs snapped a two-game losing streak and improved their record to 2-3 with a 106-88 victory over the Utah Jazz (0-5) on Thursday night. Victor Wembanyama stole the show by posting a 5×5, the second time he’s done that in his career.
Early on, things weren’t going swimmingly for the Silver and Black. In fact, the winless Jazz led for a majority of the first half. In the third quarter, San Antonio’s 12-0 run allowed the Spurs to grab the momentum. The Jazz went scoreless in the final two minutes of the third quarter and trailed by ten points, 77-67, heading into the fourth.
In the final stanza, the Spurs had little trouble holding on for an 18-point victory.
Stats: Spurs at Jazz
Spurs at Jazz – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
After a feckless performance last night, Wembanyama bounced back in legendary fashion tonight against the Jazz. The sophomore notched a 5×5 with 25 points, nine rebounds, seven assists, five steals and five blocks in 34 minutes. Those numbers may actually undersell just how dominant Wembanyama was on this night, as the Spurs outscored the Jazz 87-44 when he was on the court. Defensively, he was insanely active and stayed busy breaking up plays. Offensively, I thought it was Wembanyama’s passing that was his best attribute. But, yeah, as the statistics suggest, he impacted the game in just about every conceivable area. This was exactly the type of outing Wembanyama needed after his relatively quiet start to the season.
Grade: A
Chris Paul
Paul was awesome. He was murder in the midrange, dropped three three-pointers and was orchestrating the show at a high level. His passing was spectacular and his pick-and-roll play was brilliant. Paul finished with only one turnover despite being in the middle of the action. Defensively, he more than held his ground, remained active in the passing lanes and pulled down seven boards. Paul is too well-aged to perform like this every night but he proved that he can still play at elite level from time to time.
Grade: A
Jeremy Sochan
The good: Sochan’s energy remains fantastic. He is playing physically and he finds a way to impact nearly every possession. I liked that he shot four three-pointers even though he only made one. Until this game, he was extra, extra hesitant to let shots go from deep. Defensively, his fundamentals were very sound. The bad: Sochan lacked efficiency on this night. The team would have also been better served if he slowed down a little bit and played with more strategy.
Grade: C+
Julian Champagnie
The Jazz took away Champagnie’s three-point looks yet he still found ways to contribute. He ran the court hard in transition, rebounded well in crowds and swiped three steals in 25 minutes. Overall, I thought Champagnie’s defense was above average and I appreciated him finding ways to contribute on offense. That said, he needs to get back to dropping threes if he’s truly going to be impactful on a night to night basis.
Grade: B-
Harrison Barnes
Barnes didn’t play well. He had a few awkward and slow closeouts defensively. Offensively, he missed all three of his long-range bombs. On both ends of the court, Barnes was basically just getting in the way.
Grade: C-
Keldon Johnson
Johnson is still waiting for a breakout performance this season. Against the Jazz, he did well by getting to the free throw line for seven attempts and his drives were about as burly as they come. I also thought his defense was a bit better than average. But he also hit only 1-of-6 three-pointers while finishing without an assist in 28 minutes. With Vassell out, one would have assumed that Johnson was going to pick up that slack. That hasn’t really happened.
Grade: C+
Stephon Castle
There were more flashes of talent for Castle. Defensively, he’s really good on the ball and very aware away from the ball. Offensively, he can handle the ball and make the right passes. Scoring-wise, the most notable moment of Castle’s night was when he hit his first three-pointer of his NBA career. Hopefully we see many more of those from the rookie.
Grade: B-
Malaki Branham
Branham entered this game red hot but he ended up cooling down on Halloween. He was only 1-for-5 from the floor and forced a couple of his shots. That said, his one made shot was a three-pointer, he passed the ball a little bit better than usual and he was much more energetic on the defensive end than usual.
Grade: B-
Zach Collins
That was a rough outing for Collins. He airballed a three-pointer by a mile, didn’t do much on defense and even his passing was missing in action on the offensive end. The drop off from Wembanyama to Collins was indescribably massive tonight.
Grade: D+
Sandro Mamukelashvili
In search of a spark, the coaches turned to Mamukelashvili and the move worked perfectly. He came off the bench and was ready to rock. He drained a three-pointer, moved very well without the ball and helped get the team hustling in transition. Performances like this could land Mamu a spot in the rotation — especially if Collins can’t contribute consistently.
Grade: A-
Blake Wesley
Wesley got off the bench in the first half but his play was very forgettable. The Jazz weren’t guarding him from deep but he missed a pair of threes. His decision-making was wonky, as evidenced by his two turnovers in six minutes. Defensively, I liked his vivacity but his actual impact wasn’t especially noticeable.
Grade: D
Pop
Pop did a much better job of getting Wembanyama involved. Specifically, I loved the wrinkle of the big Frenchman getting screens by smaller guards. With the Jazz unable to switch, that allowed Wembanyama to get space to operate. I also liked that Pop gave Castle a longer look in the second half. Going with Mamukelashvili also turned out really well for the good guys.
Grade: B+
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk