马刺 vs 爵士 114 - 127 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-12-29 08:20:56
在一场典型的状态回落之战中，圣安东尼奥马刺队在主场以114-127的比分不敌犹他爵士队。此前，马刺在两周内三胜俄克拉荷马城雷霆队，全世界都在对他们赞不绝口，但转过头来，他们却在对阵爵士时搞砸了。
实际上，马刺队开局时拿出了应有的能量。第一节结束时，马刺以40-32领先。不幸的是，在接下来的比赛中，球队进攻陷入停滞，全队的专注度充其量也只是昙花一现，而防守端则显得漫不经心。
数据统计：马刺 vs. 爵士
马刺 vs. 爵士 – 最终评分
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
优点：重回首发阵容的文班亚马在两分球方面17投12中，并且8次罚球全部命中。他对球的保护做得相当不错，还送出了几次巧妙的传球。防守端，他积极守护篮筐，贡献了5次盖帽。缺点：文班亚马的努力只是断断续续，他过于频繁地失去专注。他那平平无奇的篮板数据，主要是因为他在拼抢篮板方面缺乏往常的活力。此外，他的四次三分出手全部偏出。和他的许多队友一样，文班亚马显然没有像准备对阵雷霆那样，为迎战爵士做好充分准备。
评分: B
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
卡斯尔在第一节表现非常出色，但此后便急转直下。虽然他两分球10投8中，但他过多地选择在外线出手三分，而且控球太过随意。在关键时刻，卡斯尔似乎总是在投出一记糟糕的三分球，或是出现失误。他的防守也远不如以往那般强悍。尽管这场失利不能完全归咎于卡斯尔，但他自第一节后的糟糕表现很可能是最主要的原因。
评分: D-
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
在众多队友状态低迷的情况下，如果瓦塞尔能挺身而出填补空缺，那将大有裨益。不幸的是，这并没发生。他三分球9投仅2中，在三分线内也没能造成太大杀伤。更糟糕的是，瓦塞尔的防守也乏善可陈。他的一些额外的出色传球（尤其是在移动中的传球）和避免失误值得肯定——但总体而言，他的表现仍有许多不足之处。
评分: C-
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
哈里森·巴恩斯是另一位表现不佳的首发球员。他在23分钟内得到3分，表现得尤其无精打采。他在攻防两端都没有犯下明显的错误，但其努力程度的缺失显而易见。防守端，他只是在走过场。进攻端，除了隐身于无形之外，巴恩斯几乎毫无作为。
评分: C-
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼正式陷入了低迷期。在过去三场比赛中，他三分球12投0中——包括本场对阵爵士时的3投全失。我喜欢他在篮板上的拼搏精神，防守端也充满活力，但他的投射失准让马刺队打得十分艰难。值得称赞的是，尚帕尼或许是唯一一位没有明显表现出注意力不集中的首发球员。
评分: C
迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)
由于福克斯（Fox）因伤缺阵，哈珀扮演了更重要的角色。从某些方面来看，他很好地填补了空缺。他送出了全队最高的12次助攻。哈珀的组织进攻能力确实非常出色，他的传球决策也无可挑剔。他还贡献了7个篮板和3次助攻，看起来比平时更快一步。遗憾的是，他的得分低于标准水平。他三分球4投0中，并且在内线错失了几个本可以打进的球。总的来说，哈珀打得不错，但他本可以做得更多来拯救球队。
评分: B+
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
如果没有约翰逊的贡献，马刺队早就被打得溃不成军了。在不到25分钟的时间里，约翰逊得到27分和10个篮板，并且没有出现失误。他在三分线外（7投5中）和两分球区域（8投5中）都投得很好。在比赛的某些时段里，约翰逊试图凭借他永不放弃的精神、高昂的热情和非凡的动力，一己之力扛起球队。虽然他成功做到了这一点，但这并不足以帮助马刺赢下这场本可以拿下的比赛。
评分: A
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)
随着文班亚马重回首发，科内特从替补席出战。他在大部分时间里都尽职尽责。他篮板抢得很好，做出了高质量的掩护，并成功地终结了进攻。他在禁区外的防守有时会慢一拍，但在篮筐附近表现稳健。总而言之，科内特的表现足够稳健，足以帮助圣安东尼奥拿下这场胜利。
评分: B
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)
布莱恩特在对阵犹他队的14分钟里，整体影响力是积极的。他命中了一记三分球，防守充满活力，并且跑动积极且目的明确。不过，布莱恩特还有提升的空间。他在进攻端尝试终结时，有几次看起来有些不协调。防守端，布莱恩特有几次纪律性不足，这让他陷入了麻烦。尽管如此，对于这位新秀来说，这次出场是朝着正确方向迈出的一小步。
评分: B
杰里米·索汉 (Jeremy Sochan)
索汉获得了一些上场时间……但结果并不理想。他出现了两次失误，除此之外，在数据统计上几乎没有任何贡献。我不知道索汉出了什么问题，但他与曾经的自己判若两人。他缺乏自信、缺乏运动能力，看起来完全不在节奏上。希望索汉能尽快找回状态，因为目前这个版本的他根本不配获得任何上场时间。
评分: D
林迪·沃特斯三世 (Lindy Waters III)
沃特斯打了几分钟，但未能产生显著的影响。他的防守尚可，但在进攻端没有做出任何值得一提的贡献。
评分: 不计
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
约翰逊试图做出调整，但他没能及时唤醒他的球队。回过头来看，他本应给约翰逊更多的上场时间。两位新秀哈珀和布莱恩特也都可以多打一会儿。减少让卡斯尔担任主控的角色或许能帮助到马刺，尤其是在第四节。
评分: D+
由生成式 AI 翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Utah Jazz – Game #31
Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Utah Jazz – Game #31
In a classic letdown game, the San Antonio Spurs lost to the Utah Jazz at home by a final score of 127-114. With the whole world singing San Antonio’s praises after beating the Oklahoma City Thunder three times in two weeks, the Spurs laid an egg against the Jazz.
The good guys actually came out of the gates with the appropriate amount of energy. At the end of the first quarter, the Spurs led 40-32. Unfortunately, the rest of the way, the offense went stale, the team’s collective focus was fleeting at best and the defense was lackadaisical.
Stats: Spurs vs. Jazz
Spurs vs. Jazz – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
The good: Back in the starting lineup, Wembanyama was 12-for-17 from two-point range and hit all eight of his free throws. He took reasonably good care of the ball and authored a handful of smart passes. Defensively, he secured five blocks as he defended the hoop with gusto. The bad: Wembanyama had good effort in spurts but lost focus too often. His pedestrian rebounding numbers were mostly a result of him lacking some of his usual energy in that department. He also missed all four of his three-point attempts. Like many of his teammates, Wembanyama simply wasn’t as prepared for the Jazz as he was for the Thunder.
Grade: B
Stephon Castle
Castle was very good in the first quarter but then it was all downhill from there. While he was 8-for-10 from two-point range, he settled for three-pointers far too often and was way too loose for the basketball. In big moments, Castle was seemingly either shooting a bad three or turning the ball over. His defense was also far more pedestrian than usual. While this loss wasn’t completely on Castle, his poor play after the first quarter was likely the leading cause.
Grade: D-
Devin Vassell
With so many of his teammates having an off night, it would have been useful if Vassell stepped up to fill the void. Unfortunately, that didn’t happen. He was 2-for-9 from three-point range and didn’t do much damage inside of the arc. To make matters worse, Vassell’s defense was nothing to write home about. He deserves some credit for some extra good passing (particularly on the move) and avoiding turnovers — but there was still much to be desired.
Grade: C-
Harrison Barnes
Harrison Barnes is another starter who underperformed. He scored three points in 23 minutes and was particularly listless. He wasn’t making blatant errors on either end but his lack of effort was glaring. Defensively, he was simply going through the motions. Offensively, Barnes didn’t do much other than fade into the background.
Grade: C-
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie is officially in a slump. In his last three outings, he is 0-for-12 from three-point range — which includes missing all three of his three-pointers versus the Jazz. I liked his rebounding effort and he was energetic on defense but his lack of shooting made life difficult for the good guys. To his credit, Champagnie was possibly the only starter who didn’t outwardly appear to be unfocused.
Grade: C
Dylan Harper
With Fox out with an injury, Harper stepped into a bigger role. In some ways, he filled in well. He led the way with 12 assists. Harper’s playmaking was legitimately very good and his passing decisions were pristine. He also chipped in with seven rebounds and three assists, as he seemed to be a step quicker than usual. Regrettably, his scoring was sub par. He was 0-for-4 from three-point range and missed a couple of makeable shots on the interior. Harper played well, all things considered, but there was still room for him to come to the rescue even more than he did.
Grade: B+
Keldon Johnson
The Spurs would have been blown out of the water without Johnson’s production. In less than 25 minutes, Johnson had 27 points and ten rebounds without turning the ball over. He shot well from three-point range (5-for-7) and two-point territory (5-for-8). Johnson tried to put the team on his back for stretches at a time with his relentlessness, enthusiasm and uncommon drive. While he succeeded in doing so, it wasn’t enough to allow the Spurs to pull out a winnable game.
Grade: A
Luke Kornet
With Wembanyama back in the starting lineup, Kornet came off the bench. He did his job for the most part. He rebounded well, set good screens and successfully finished off plays. His defense was sometimes a step slow outside of the paint but he was solid near the rim. All in all, Kornet held up well enough for San Antonio to get this win.
Grade: B
Carter Bryant
Bryant’s overall impact was positive in his 14 minutes versus Utah. He hit a three-pointer, played energetic defense and ran the court with purpose. Bryant had room to be better, though. He looked uncoordinated a few times when trying to finish off plays offensively. Defensively, Bryant lacked discipline a few times and that got him in trouble. That said, this outing was a small step in the right direction for the rookie.
Grade: B
Jeremy Sochan
Sochan got some playing time … and it didn’t go well. He turned the ball over twice and barely dented the stat sheet otherwise. I don’t know what’s wrong with Sochan but he’s a shell of his former self. He lacks confidence, lacks athleticism and just looks completely out of rhythm. Hopefully Sochan finds himself soon because this version doesn’t deserve any minutes.
Grade: D
Lindy Waters III
Waters played some minutes but failed to make a notable impact. His defense was decent but he didn’t do anything of note on the offensive end.
Grade: Inc.
Mitch Johnson
Johnson tried to push some buttons but he couldn’t wake his team in time. In retrospect, he should have played Johnson more minutes. The rookies, Harper and Bryant, could have both played a bit more. Going away from Castle as the lead playmaker could have helped the Spurs, especially in the fourth quarter.
Grade: D+
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk