By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2024-10-31 18:08:08
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
圣安东尼奥马刺队在俄克拉荷马城迎战雷霆队，这是一场艰苦的比赛。遗憾的是，今晚没有奇迹发生。由于文班亚马(Victor Wembanyama)表现挣扎，马刺最终以93-105落败。圣安东尼奥的战绩下滑至1胜3负，而俄克拉荷马城的战绩则提升至4胜0负。
马刺在开局阶段实际上表现强劲。可惜的是，他们的进攻逐渐哑火，在进入第二节时，马刺队以19-26落后。从那以后，圣安东尼奥一直没能组织起有效的进攻，雷霆队轻松取胜。
数据统计：马刺对阵雷霆
马刺对阵雷霆 – 最终评分
文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
令人失望。文班亚马的得分被限制在职业生涯最低的6分，并且在下半场的12分钟内甚至没有尝试过一次投篮。他在进攻端的贡献微乎其微，似乎满足于在外线游荡，几乎无所事事。文班在防守端有一些积极的时刻，但他很少付出令人满意的努力。公平地说，他在比赛中途去了更衣室，所以也许他的低迷表现有合理的解释。希望文班亚马没事，能迅速反弹，因为这真是一场糟糕的比赛。
评分：F
索汉 (Jeremy Sochan)
与文班亚马不同，索汉在对阵雷霆的比赛中，他的努力程度毋庸置疑。在防守端，他表现出色，承担了防守亚历山大(Shai Gilgeous-Alexander)的重任，并且做得很好。他在内线的对抗也很积极，篮板球保护也很到位。在进攻端，他得到17分并送出4次助攻。但说实话，他在很多时候都显得失控。此外，他用了16次投篮才得到17分，因此他的效率不高。
评分：B
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
这是巴恩斯身披马刺战袍的最佳比赛。如果没有他的进攻输出，马刺将会陷入困境。他最终得到18分，并且在球场上的各个区域都有不错的命中率。他对球的快速反应以及在内线的爆发力比我们之前看到的要好。我还认为他的防守比本赛季前三场比赛要好。
评分：A-
克里斯·保罗 (Chris Paul)
保罗表现出色。虽然有一些失误，但他的组织能力贯穿全场。当马刺在半场阵地战中获得轻松投篮机会时，几乎都是由于保罗的精心策划。这位首发控球后卫在26分钟的出场时间内也贡献了急需的14分。在防守端，他坚如磐石。有时甚至可以看到保罗在内线人丛中奋力拼抢，以争取防守成功。
评分：B+
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼连续第二场比赛投篮挣扎。更糟糕的是，他开始垂头丧气，让投篮不中影响了他的防守。如果尚帕尼希望保住轮换阵容中的主要位置，这种情况就不能再发生。
评分：C-
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
数据看起来并不太令人鼓舞，但我认为这对约翰逊来说是一个小小的进步。他在几次突破中传球了，这是我们本赛季很少看到的。约翰逊的篮板球也很出色，防守也很积极。显然，马刺需要比11投9中更高的效率……但希望这是一个他正在重新找回自己在球队中角色的迹象。
评分：B-
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
是的，不，这对卡斯尔来说只是一场糟糕的比赛。他的外线投篮看起来和传闻中一样糟糕；他有几次三分球的出手都偏得离谱。他的组织能力没有什么特别之处，控球也不太好，在他20分钟的出场时间里，他大部分时间看起来都像个菜鸟。卡斯尔需要开始在外线命中投篮，否则其他球队很快就会停止防守他。马刺不能再在轮换阵容中容纳另一个不会投篮的球员。
评分：D-
马拉基·布拉纳姆 (Malaki Branham)
虽然过程并不总是赏心悦目，但布拉纳姆在20分钟内贡献了15分，完成了自己的任务。他三分球4投3中，并且在移动中完成了几次漂亮的得分。布拉纳姆的一个三分球是擦板命中的，还有一些不太好看的投篮选择，但圣安东尼奥迫切需要进攻输出，他毫不犹豫地尝试在这方面提供帮助。
评分：B+
布雷克·韦斯利 (Blake Wesley)
优点：韦斯利的防守很强硬。他的压迫性防守在几次球权中扰乱了雷霆的进攻。他在另一端的推进速度也很有帮助。缺点：韦斯利的跳投缺乏手感。他的传球慢了一拍，并且经常传不到位。总而言之，韦斯利缺乏敏锐度。
评分：C+
扎克·科林斯 (Zach Collins)
科林斯今晚的帮助不大。在防守端，他慢了一步，导致雷霆不断地利用空隙得分。他的篮板球不错，还投进了一个三分球，但在进攻端，科林斯经常成为障碍。
评分：C
桑德罗·马穆克拉什维利 (Sandro Mamukelashvili)
教练组派上马穆克拉什维利，看看他能否激发球队活力。但这并没有发生。他犹豫不决，直到比赛进入垃圾时间才开始有所表现。马穆必须要有侵略性才能体现价值——而今晚直到为时已晚才做到这一点。
评分：C
西迪·西索科 (Sidy Cissoko)
西索科在垃圾时间打了三分钟。
评分：Inc. （Incomplete，未完成）
波波维奇 (Gregg Popovich)
是的，雷霆是目前NBA最好的防守球队，但波波维奇必须更好地让文班亚马在有利的位置拿到球。马刺今晚有很多回合的进攻看起来没有明确的计划。其中一些必须归咎于教练组。
评分：C-
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Oklahoma City Thunder – Game #4
Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Oklahoma City Thunder – Game #4
The San Antonio Spurs were faced with a difficult game in Oklahoma City against the Thunder. Sadly, there were no surprises on this night. With Victor Wembanyama struggling, the Spurs lost by a final score of 105-93. San Antonio dropped to 1-3 on the season, while OKC improved to 4-0.
The Spurs actually got off to a strong start in the opening minutes. Regrettably, their offense dried up and the good guys were down 26-19 heading into the second period. From then on, San Antonio was never able to put together a sustained run and the Thunder cruised to an easy win.
Stats: Spurs at Thunder
Spurs at Thunder – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
That was disappointing. Wembanyama was held to a career-low six points and didn’t even attempt a field goal in 12 second half minutes. His effort to produce on offense was minimal. He seemed content to float on the perimeter and do next to nothing. Wembanyama had a few positive moments on defense but he rarely efforted on a satisfactory level. To be fair, he went to the locker room during the middle of the game so perhaps there’s a reasonable explanation for why he was off of his game. Let’s hope Wembanyama is okay and bounces back quickly because this was a really bad performance.
Grade: F
Jeremy Sochan
Unlike Wembanyama, Sochan’s effort was never in question against the Thunder. Defensively, he was outstanding. He took on SGA and did good work. He was also being physical in the paint and rebounding at a high level. Offensively, he scored 17 points and handed out four assists. But, truth be told, he was out of control a lot of the time. Plus, he needed 16 field goal attempts to score 17 points, so his efficiency was lacking.
Grade: B
Harrison Barnes
This was Barnes’ best game in Silver and Black. Without his offensive production, the Spurs would have been in a world of hurt. He finished with 18 points and shot well from every area on the court. His quickness to the ball and his explosiveness in the paint was better than we’ve seen previously. I also thought his defense was better than it was in the season’s first three contests.
Grade: A-
Chris Paul
Paul played well. He had some turnovers but his playmaking was a strength throughout. When the Spurs got an easy shot in halfcourt situations, it was almost always due to Paul’s machinations. The starting point guard also put 14 much-needed points on the board during his 26 minutes of playing time. Defensively, he was rock solid. Paul could even be found sometimes leaping among the trees in an effort to get stops.
Grade: B+
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie struggled to shoot for a second consecutive contest. To make matters worse, he started hanging his head and he allowed his missed shots to negatively impact his defensive play. That’s something that can’t happen if Champagnie hopes to keep a main spot in the rotation.
Grade: C-
Keldon Johnson
The numbers don’t look too encouraging but I thought this was a small step in the right direction for Johnson. He actually passed the ball on a few of his drives, which is something we haven’t seen much of this season. Johnson was also good on the boards and active on defense. Obviously, the Spurs need better efficiency than nine points on 11 shots … but hopefully this is a sign that he’s rediscovering his role on this team.
Grade: B-
Stephon Castle
Yeah, no, this was just a poor outing for Castle. His outside shooting looked as bad as advertised; a couple of his misses from deep were way off. His playmaking wasn’t anything special, his ball-handling wasn’t that good and he actually looked like a rookie for most of his 20 minutes. Castle needs to start hitting outside shots or else teams will soon stop defending him. The Spurs can’t afford to have yet another non-shooter in the rotation.
Grade: D-
Malaki Branham
I mean, it wasn’t always pretty but Branham did his job by pouring in 15 points in 20 minutes. He hit 3-of-4 shots from three-point land and had a few slick buckets on the move. Branham banked in one of his threes and had a few unsightly shot selections but San Antonio was in desperate need of offensive production and he didn’t hesitate to try to help in that area.
Grade: B+
Blake Wesley
The good: Wesley’s defense was stout. His pressure disrupted the Thunder on a handful of possessions. His pushing of the pace was helpful on the other end. The bad: Wesley’s jumper lacked touch. His passing was a beat late and he missed his target too often. All in all, Wesley lacked sharpness.
Grade: C+
Zach Collins
Collins wasn’t too helpful this evening. Defensively, he was a step slow and that resulted in the Thunder exploiting lanes relentlessly. He was good on the boards and knocked in a three-pointer but Collins was too often in the way on the offensive end.
Grade: C
Sandro Mamukelashvili
The coaches called on Mamukelashvili to see if he could spark the team. It didn’t happen. He was hesitant and didn’t start producing until the game devolved into garbage time. Mamu has to be aggressive to be valuable — and that didn’t happen tonight until it was too late.
Grade: C
Sidy Cissoko
Cissoko had three minutes of garbage time.
Grade: Inc.
Pop
Yes, the Thunder are the best defensive team in the NBA right now but Pop has to do a better job of getting Wembanyama the ball in advantageous areas. The Spurs had too many possessions tonight where it appeared as if there was no plan of attack. Some of that has to be on the coaching.
Grade: C-
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk