马刺 vs 雷霆 110 - 104 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2024-11-20 18:07:53
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
这场比赛可以称作是圣安东尼奥马刺队本赛季最不可思议的胜利。面对西部联盟领头羊俄克拉荷马城雷霆队，马刺队缺少了他们的前三名得分王：维克托·文班亚马(Victor Wembanyama)（膝盖挫伤）、德文·瓦塞尔(Devin Vassell)（膝盖问题）和杰里米·索汉(Jeremy Sochan)（拇指手术）。尽管人手短缺，马刺队还是找到了击败雷霆队的方法，最终以110-104获胜。
上半场，圣安东尼奥马刺队勉强能够紧咬比分——这主要归功于凯尔登·约翰逊的出色表现。然而，马刺队在第三节打出了一波18-0的进攻高潮，取得了领先优势。雷霆队试图在第四节反击，但马刺队投进了足够多的关键球，最终赢得了比赛。
数据统计：马刺队对阵雷霆队
马刺队对阵雷霆队 – 最终评分
克里斯·保罗(Chris Paul)
保罗本场比赛表现非常出色。面对一支非常优秀的防守球队，他的组织能力非常出色。俄克拉荷马城雷霆队尤其擅长给外线球员制造麻烦，而保罗找到了在这种高压下取得成功的方法。他传球出色，并且在高压防守下投篮效率也很高。保罗在防守端也十分卖力。下半场他似乎伤到了左手拇指，但他还是完成了比赛。希望他接下来能保持健康。
评分：A-
哈里森·巴恩斯(Harrison Barnes)
本赛季巴恩斯大部分时间都是球队的第五选择——而且他似乎接受了这个角色。然而，由于今晚有如此多的火力点缺阵，巴恩斯承担了更多的责任，并且表现出色。他通过快速出手的三分球命中率很高。他带着目的性地突破，最终获得了八次罚球。巴恩斯也是唯一一个没有失误的首发球员。在防守端，他全神贯注，脚步移动迅速，并且积极参与篮板球的争夺。这种程度的参与不应该只发生在马刺队迫切需要巴恩斯的时候——他太好了，不应该被困在第五选择的位置上。
评分：A
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔(Stephon Castle)
不足之处：卡斯尔三分球7投1中，在三分线内的表现也没有好多少。他出现了7次失误，其中包括在第四节令人沮丧的几次失误。正如这些数字所显示的，他整晚的决策都非常值得商榷。优点：虽然他的数据看起来很糟糕，但卡斯尔实际上有很多亮点。他的球场视野开阔，并且送出了一些精彩的传球。他的一些传球没有到达预定的目标，但一个新秀能够尝试这些传球已经令人印象深刻。在防守端，他在外线付出了巨大的努力，并在第四节末完成了一次重要的盖帽。总结：这位新秀今晚学到了很多。卡斯尔有时会遇到困难，但他一直在战斗，一直在战斗，并且以一个更好的球员的身份结束了这场比赛。
评分：C+
朱利安·尚帕尼(Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼在防守端的活力极具感染力。他在防守端非常活跃，并不羞于尝试打断对手的进攻。本赛季，他在防守方面显然取得了进步。在进攻端，尚帕尼表现得体。他的投球命中率不高，并且出现了三次失误，但他在突破时展现了一些技巧。我也喜欢他一有机会就出手投篮。
评分：B
扎克·科林斯(Zach Collins)
科林斯今晚代替文班亚马的表现要好得多。他的投篮选择有了很大的改进；他没有强投高难度三分球，也没有试图用球做太多事情。科林斯传球出色，在26分钟的出场时间里只有一次失误和一次犯规。在防守端，他通过快速轮转和及时补防，成功地抵挡了比他矮小的球员。在攻防两端，科林斯都很好地利用了自己的身高优势。
评分：B+
凯尔登·约翰逊(Keldon Johnson)
上半场，马刺队苦苦挣扎。约翰逊挺身而出，几乎凭借一己之力成功地让圣安东尼奥马刺队保持竞争力。在前两节，他得到了全场最高的17分，三分球6投5中。他的热情、无畏和投篮能力令人鼓舞。当然，约翰逊下半场8投1中——但如果没有他上半场的英勇表现，马刺队甚至不可能保持在比赛中。
评分：A-
查尔斯·巴塞(Charles Bassey)
这肯定是巴塞职业生涯中表现最好的比赛之一。在雷霆队使用小个阵容的情况下，巴塞的出场改变了比赛的局势。在防守端，他盖帽、堵塞内线、抢下 contested rebounds。在进攻端，俄克拉荷马城雷霆队难以应付巴塞的身高和力量。他展现了出色的手感和令人印象深刻的球场意识，这对于一名第三替补中锋来说非常难得。巴塞在场上时的积极性是马刺队获胜的主要原因之一。
评分：A
特雷·琼斯(Tre Jones)
琼斯在很多实际方面都没有帮助球队。他投进了一个三分球，帮助球队处理球，并在防守端限制了自己的失误——但仅此而已。自从脚踝受伤复出后，琼斯的状态一直不好……希望他能尽快恢复。
评分：C
马拉基·布拉纳姆(Malaki Branham)
布拉纳姆的故事与琼斯的故事相似。他在场上的时间里并没有做太多的事情。和琼斯一样，布拉纳姆唯一命中的投篮是一个三分球。但布拉纳姆的控球和决策没有那么干净利落，他的防守也更差。
评分：C-
桑德罗·马穆克拉什维利(Sandro Mamukelashvili)
马穆克拉什维利只得到了五分钟的出场时间。今晚，教练组选择科林斯和巴塞作为内线球员的决定是正确的。
评分：B-
米奇·约翰逊(Mitch Johnson)
约翰逊继续给人留下深刻印象。他出色地完成了圣安东尼奥马刺队进攻的现代化改造，使他们更像一支三分球球队。我喜欢他对卡斯尔的信任。这种执教方式将在未来获得回报。给巴塞更多的上场时间也是一个很棒的决定。毫无疑问，这是约翰逊执教以来表现最好的一场比赛。
评分：A
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Oklahoma City Thunder – Game #15
Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Oklahoma City Thunder – Game #15
Call it the most improbable win of the season for the San Antonio Spurs. Going up against the Western Conference leading Oklahoma City Thunder, the good guys were without their top three leading scorers: Victor Wembanyama (knee bruise), Devin Vassell (knee issue) and Jeremy Sochan (thumb surgery). Despite being short-handed, the Spurs found a way to beat the Thunder by a final count of 110-104.
In the first half, San Antonio was just barely able to hang around — thanks mostly to Keldon Johnson’s handiwork. However, the Spurs went on an 18-0 run to capture a commanding lead in the third quarter. The Thunder tried to rally in the fourth quarter but the Spurs were able to hit enough big shots to prevail.
Stats: Spurs vs. Thunder
Spurs vs. Thunder – Final Grades
Chris Paul
It was simply a really fine outing for Paul. His playmaking was excellent against a very good defensive team. OKC is especially good at making life difficult for perimeter players and Paul found ways to thrive. He passed the ball well and was very efficient shooting the ball despite the heavy pressure. Paul also got his hands dirty on the defensive end. He appeared to hurt his left thumb in the second half but he was able to finish off the game. Let’s hope he’s healthy going forward.
Grade: A-
Harrison Barnes
Barnes has mostly been a fifth option this season — and he has seemingly accepted that role. However, with so much firepower on the sidelines tonight, Barnes took on an expanded role and did great. He shot well from three-point range on quick release jumpers. He drove the ball with purpose and ended up shooting eight free throws. Barnes was also the only starter to finish without a turnover. Defensively, he was locked in, he moved his feet well and he helped on the board. This level of involvement shouldn’t only happen when the Spurs desperately need Barnes — he’s too good to be stuck as the fifth option.
Grade: A
Stephon Castle
The bad: Castle was 1-for-7 from downtown and didn’t do much better within the arc. He turned the ball over seven times, including a frustrating number of miscues in the fourth quarter. As those numbers suggest, his decision-making was highly questionable much of the night. The good: While his stats look ugly, Castle actually had a lot of bright spots. His court vision was expansive and he had a handful of fantastic passes. Some of his passes didn’t reach the intended destination but a rookie even attempting some of those passes was impressive. Defensively, he gave great effort out on the perimeter and had an important block late in the fourth. Overall: The rookie was able to learn a lot tonight. Castle struggled at times but he kept battling, kept battling and came out of this game a better player.
Grade: C+
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie’s energy on defense was contagious. He was active on that end and wasn’t shy about trying to interrupt the proceedings. He has clearly taken steps forward as a defender this season. Offensively, Champagnie was decent. He didn’t shoot it the straightest and he turned it over three times but he exhibited some craft when it came to driving. I also liked that he shot whenever he was given a sliver of daylight.
Grade: B
Zach Collins
Collins did a lot better tonight filling in for Wembanyama. His shot-selection was much improved; he wasn’t forcing difficult three-pointers or trying to do too much with the rock. Collins passed the ball well and only had one turnover and one foul in 26 minutes. Defensively, he survived against smaller players by rotating quickly and recovering to shooters. On both sides of the court, Collins did well to use his size to his advantage.
Grade: B+
Keldon Johnson
In the first half, the Spurs were struggling to hang around. Enter Johnson, who almost single-handedly successfully kept San Antonio afloat. In the opening two quarters, he had a game-high 17 points and was 5-for-6 from three-point range. His enthusiasm, fearlessness and shotmaking was inspiring to watch. Sure, Johnson was only 1-for-8 from the field in the second half — but the Spurs wouldn’t have even been in the game without his first half heroics.
Grade: A-
Charles Bassey
This has to be one of Bassey’s best games of his career. With the Thunder rocking a small lineup, Bassey came into the game and changed things for the better. On defense, he was blocking shots, clogging the lane and pulling down contested boards. Offensively, OKC had difficulties handling Bassey’s size and strength. He showed off quality touch and an impressive amount of wherewithal for a third string center. Bassey’s activity level when he was on the court is one of the main reasons why the Spurs won.
Grade: A
Tre Jones
Jones didn’t help the cause in many tangible ways. He hit a three-pointer, he helped with ball-handling duties and he limited his mistakes defensively — but that was about it. Jones hasn’t looked right since returning from the ankle injury … hopefully he’ll bounce back soon.
Grade: C
Malaki Branham
Branham’s story is similar to the story written by Jones. He didn’t do a whole lot during his minutes on the court. Like Jones, Branham’s only made shot was a three-pointer. But Branham’s ball-handling and decision-making weren’t as clean and his defense was also worse.
Grade: C-
Sandro Mamukelashvili
Mamukelashvili only got five minutes. On this night, the coaching staff picked right by using Collins and Bassey as the bigs.
Grade: B-
Mitch Johnson
Johnson continues to impress. He has done a great job of modernizing San Antonio’s attack and making them more of a three-point shooting squad. I loved how much trust he showed in Castle. That’s the type of coaching that will pay dividends down the road. Giving Bassey extended minutes was also a great decision. This was, without question, Johnson’s best coaching since his move to the head chair.
Grade: A
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk