By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2026-04-26 16:43:31
圣安东尼奥马刺队在第三场比赛中以120-108的比分成功抢下了一场关键的客场胜利。在维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama) 因脑震荡缺阵的情况下，马刺队在第三节一度落后达到两位数。所幸，圣安东尼奥人稳扎稳打，奋起反击，并在进入第四节前追平了比分。
在最后一节，马刺队锁死了防守，特别是迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper) 和斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle) 命中了一些关键投篮。这是一场令人难忘的比赛，可能有助于这支球队在季后赛中走得更远。
数据统计：马刺对阵开拓者
马刺对阵开拓者 – 最终评分
德阿隆·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)
对福克斯而言，这并不是一场打得多么具有观赏性的比赛。他在比赛的大部分时间里手感冰冷，有时控球也显得吃力，早早陷入了犯规麻烦，在防守端也没有太多存在感。马刺队指望他来稳住局面，但他确实没能做到——开拓者的防守让他难以招架。两个亮点：我认为福克斯的竞争意识很强，这种斗志帮助马刺队挺了过来。其次，他在关键时刻命中了一些投篮，彻底杀死了比赛。
评分：C-
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
卡斯尔的表现相当出色。他在34分钟内砍下33分，投篮（18投10中）和罚球（11罚10中）都极具效率。或许最重要的一点是，卡斯尔惩罚了开拓者放空他的策略，三分球4投3中。防守端，我也认为他在水准之上。尽管如此，卡斯尔的表现并没有得分数据看起来那么完美。他只有两个篮板，组织进攻方面也乏善可陈（5次助攻伴随4次失误），有时还试图大包大揽。卡斯尔肩负了巨大的压力并最终交出了答卷——但这位年轻人仍需在扛起球队和过度表现之间找到平衡。总而言之，这是一次值得称赞的表现。
评分：A-
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
优点：瓦塞尔三分球7投3中，抢下了7个强硬的篮板，传球比平时更好，防守端也非常积极。自季后赛开始以来，他的努力程度和运动能力都有所提升。缺点：瓦塞尔在两分线内5投仅1中，这主要是因为投篮选择存在问题。他还罚丢了唯一的罚球。虽然我欣赏他在进攻端的无畏，但更好的决策能力会更有利于球队。
评分：B-
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼三分球4投2中，目前系列赛的三分命中率高达60%。球队非常需要这样的射术。他在第三场比赛中的篮板表现也不错，防守稳健。然而，在季后赛中，他缺乏顶级运动能力的弱点变得更加明显。在这个系列赛中，尚帕尼有时看起来慢了半拍，因此教练组很难让他长时间留在场上。
评分：B-
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)
在文班亚马缺阵的情况下，科内特出色地完成了填补空缺的任务。他在30分钟内得到14分、10个篮板、2次助攻和2个盖帽。他还投中了本赛季的第一个三分球。进攻端，他的掩护、传球、篮板和顺下都为圣安东尼奥创造了实实在在的价值。防守端，科内特的脚步移动、篮板和护筐都做得很好。如果没有他，马刺队现在会陷入巨大的困境。
评分：A-
迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)
哇。这是我见过的马刺新秀表现最出色的比赛之一。当第三节形势看起来不妙时，正是哈珀挺身而出，带领球队走出了泥潭。他三分球5投4中，冲击篮筐时像头猛兽，他深厚的进攻武器库得到了充分展示。他敏捷的双手、隐蔽的运动能力和顶级的强韧度在抢下10个关键篮板时展露无遗。底线是，哈珀看起来像是一个未来的超级巨星，他会在季后赛中提升自己的比赛水准。这或许是整个赛季最重要的看点。
评分：A+
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)
哇，第二部分。看布莱恩特的数据统计，你可能不会觉得有什么了不起。他投篮5投1中，其中三分球4投1中。他还错失了另外几次空位机会。然而，不要被这些数字所迷惑，因为布莱恩特在第三场比赛中的表现棒极了。防守端，他的表现是现象级的。从个人防守到协防再到护筐，他是一个名副其实的比赛改变者。布莱恩特毫无疑问是圣安东尼奥表现最好的防守者。尽管他还是个未经雕琢的新秀，但显然他已经为这个舞台做好了准备——至少在防守端是这样。进攻端，布莱恩特的表现也比统计数据反映的要好。他有时承担起控球和组织任务，这是他在常规赛从未做过的事情。他的传球实际上非常出色。他在前场篮板上的拼抢也扭转了局势。布莱恩特在进攻端的活力和勇气似乎直接促成了球队一半的三分命中。他充满了活力，帮助球队击溃了波特兰。干得漂亮。
评分：A+
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
优点：约翰逊命中了唯一的尝试三分。他抢下了几个强力的篮板。传球比平时更好。防守端，他比平时更加专注，并能做出一些贡献。缺点：约翰逊两分球6投0中。他的“自杀式”突破根本不起作用。我不知道是因为季后赛对抗强度的增加，还是因为开拓者的护筐手，但约翰逊最拿手的进攻手段现在都无功而返。我很想说这是可以解决的，但我并不确定。
评分：C
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯在他上场的6分钟里表现得相当糟糕。有几个篮板球他放弃了争抢，从而引发了开拓者的一波反击。再加上进攻端的零贡献，他的表现不能再差了。总的来说，他在6分钟的出场时间里除了投丢一个三分球外，其他数据全部挂零。
评分：D-
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
米奇教练在这场比赛中展现了出色的执教能力。在哈珀状态火热时重用他并不需要天才的眼光，但重用布莱恩特确实令人印象深刻。在关键时刻让两名新秀留在场上，几乎没有教练敢这么做——但他做到了，而这正是比赛胜负的关键。他还果断弃用了巴恩斯，这是一个必要的操作，而许多教练可能无法做到。米奇教练坚持了比赛计划，在轮换中展现了勇气，并赢得了一场重大的季后赛客场胜利。
评分：A+
由生成式 AI 翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Playoff Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Portland Trail Blazers – Game #3
Playoff Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Portland Trail Blazers – Game #3
The San Antonio Spurs were able to snatch a key road win in Game 3 by a final count of 120-108. With Victor Wembanyama out due to a concussion, the Spurs found themselves down by double-digits in the third quarter. Thankfully, San Antonio dug in, battled back and evened the game heading into the fourth quarter.
In the final stanza, the Spurs locked down on defense and got big shots from Dylan Harper and Stephon Castle specifically. It was a memorable outing and one that could help this team make a run in the postseason.
Stats: Spurs at Blazers
Spurs at Blazers – Final Grades
De’Aaron Fox
It wasn’t the most aesthetically-pleasing game for Fox. He was cold from the field a lot of the game, had trouble handling the ball at times, got into early foul trouble and wasn’t much of a factor on defense. The Spurs were looking to him to guide the ship but he simply couldn’t — Portland’s defense was too difficult for him to handle. Two bright spots: I thought Fox competed at a high level. That fire helped the Spurs survive. Secondly, he hit some shots down the stretch to put the Blazers to bed.
Grade: C-
Stephon Castle
Castle had a pretty darn good outing. He poured in 33 points in 34 minutes and was super efficient from the field (10-for-18) and from the line (10-for-11). Perhaps most importantly, Castle made the Blazers pay for leaving him open by hitting 3-of-4 three-point tries. Defensively, I also thought he was above average. All that said, Castle wasn’t quite as good as those scoring numbers suggest. He only had two boards, his playmaking wasn’t anything special (five assists compared to four turnovers) and he sometimes tried to do too much. Castle put a lot of pressure on his shoulders and he ended up delivering — but the youngster still has to discover the balance between carrying the squad and doing too much. All in all, though, it was a commendable performance.
Grade: A-
Devin Vassell
The good: Vassell was 3-for-7 from deep, pulled down contested boards to finish with seven, passed the ball better than usual and was super active on the defensive end. His level of effort and athleticism has gone up since the start of the playoffs. The bad: Vassell was 1-for-5 inside of the arc, mostly due to questionable shot selection. He also missed his only free throw attempt. While I appreciated his fearlessness on offense, better decision-making would have helped the cause.
Grade: B-
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie hit 2-of-4 three-pointers and is now shooting 60% from deep in the series. That marksmanship has been very much needed. He also rebounded well in Game 3 and his defense was solid. His lack of top tier athleticism has become more noticeable in the playoffs, however. In this series, Champagnie sometimes looks a step slow and, thus, it’s difficult for the coaching staff to keep him out there for long stretches.
Grade: B-
Luke Kornet
With Wembanyama sidelined, Kornet did a great job filling in. He finished with 14 points, ten rebounds, two assists and two blocks in 30 minutes. He also shot and made his first three-pointer of the season. Offensively, his screening, passing, rebounding and rolling to the rim all gave San Antonio real value. Defensively, Kornet is moving his feet well, rebounding well and protecting the rim well. The Spurs would be in a world of hurt without him right now.
Grade: A-
Dylan Harper
Wow. This was one of the best performances I’ve ever seen by a rookie in a Spurs uniform. When things looked bleak in the third quarter, it was Harper who rose up and carried the good guys out of purgatory. He hit 4-of-5 three-point attempts, he was a monster driving to the hole and the depth of his bag was on full display. His quick hands, sneaky athleticism and elite toughness were all on display as he pulled down ten big rebounds. The bottom line is that Harper looked like a future superstar who will elevate his game in the playoffs. That’s perhaps the most important storyline of the entire season.
Grade: A+
Carter Bryant
Wow, part two. You look at Bryant’s line and you wouldn’t suspect much. He was 1-for-5 from the field, including 1-for-4 from downtown. He also passed up another handful of open shots. However, don’t let those numbers fool you because Bryant was awesome in Game 3. Defensively, he was spectacular. From individual defense to help defense to protecting the cup, he was a legitimate game-changer. Bryant was without a doubt San Antonio’s best defender. Even though he’s a raw rookie, it’s clear he’s already ready for this stage — at least on the defensive end. Offensively, Bryant was better than his statistics suggest. He handled point guard and playmaking duties at times, something he never did in the regular season. His passing was actually really damn good. His hustle on the offensive glass was also something that turned the tide. Bryant’s energy and courage on offense seemingly led directly to half of the team’s three-point makes. He was a ball of energy and helped break Portland. Hell of a job.
Grade: A+
Keldon Johnson
The good: Johnson hit his only three-point attempt. He pulled down a few ferocious boards. He passed the ball better than usual. Defensively, he was more locked in than usual and was able to make some plays. The bad: Johnson was 0-for-6 on two-pointers. His kamikaze drives just aren’t working. I don’t know if it’s the increased physicality of playoff basketball or Portland’s rim protectors but Johnson’s bread-and-butter offensive plays are coming up empty. I would love to say it’s fixable but I’m not sure.
Grade: C
Harrison Barnes
Barnes was pretty pathetic in his six minutes. There were a couple rebounds he decided to not fight for that helped spark a run by the Blazers. Add in a goose egg on the offensive end and he couldn’t have played much worse. In total, he finished with nothing other than a missed three-pointer in his six minutes of action.
Grade: D-
Mitch Johnson
Great coaching by Coach Mitch in this one. Leaning on Harper when he had it going didn’t take a genius but leaning on Bryant was really impressive. Two rookies on the court in money time is something almost no coach would do — but he did it and it was the difference in the game. He also put Barnes on ice, which was a needed maneuver that many coaches would fail to do. Coach Mitch stuck to the game plan, exhibited courage in his rotation and got a big playoff win on the road.
Grade: A+
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk