马刺 vs 开拓者 114 - 95 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2026-05-01 15:57:24
圣安东尼奥马刺在季后赛首轮稳扎稳打，以大比分 4-1 击败波特兰开拓者，成功晋级。过程并非一帆风顺：马刺在第二场比赛的第四节痛失领先优势，第三场在缺少维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama) 的情况下惊险过关，而在第四场半场结束时还落后 17 分。
但最终，马刺显然是实力更强的一方。他们的防守在关键时刻显著提升，年轻球员们表现沉稳，球队的深度优势也足以压制开拓者，使其始终无法真正掌控局面。
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
文班亚马虽然因脑震荡缺席了第三场比赛，但他依然在这轮系列赛中留下了深刻的烙印。在出战的四场比赛中，他场均贡献 21.0 分、8.8 个篮板、2.0 次助攻和 4.0 次盖帽，投篮命中率 58.3%，三分命中率 53.8%，罚球命中率 91.3%。
他的真实命中率高达 72.2% —— 考虑到开拓者的整个防守计划都是围绕着让他打得难受而制定的，这是一个令人难以置信的数字。作为参考，杰伦·杜伦 (Jalen Duren) 在 2025-26 赛季常规赛以 68.8% 的真实命中率领跑全联盟。
进攻端，他在某些时间段看起来完全无法被防守。同样重要的是，他并不总是试图单枪匹马击败开拓者。当开拓者重兵防守时，他通常能做出聪明的决策，让队友去完成进攻。防守端，他是开拓者最终无计可施的最大原因。当他全神贯注时，开拓者几乎无法冲击篮筐。
只有在少数几次零星的时间段里，他看起来打得有些操之过急，这成了他在职业生涯首个季后赛系列赛中未能获得满分的唯一原因。
评分：A
德阿隆·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)
福克斯在这轮系列赛中的表现是渐入佳境的 —— 尽管有一段时间确实令人担忧。系列赛初期，他看起来并不像马刺所需要的那种核心球员。他在第二场末段打得非常挣扎，第三场表现起伏不定，而且并不总能掌控局面，尤其是在比分胶着的比赛末段。
值得庆幸的是，随着系列赛的进行，福克斯找到了节奏。在第四场和第五场中，他看起来从容得多。教练组在更舒服的位置把球交到他手中，他的进攻更加自信，并开始让开拓者为给其留下喘息空间而付出代价。
整个系列赛，福克斯场均得到 20.2 分和 6.8 次助攻，投篮命中率 50%，三分命中率 37%。他的助攻失误比达到了出色的 3.4 比 1。虽然首轮表现并非完美，但到结束时，福克斯看起来已经是一个能够在最需要时刻稳住阵脚的球员了。
评分：B+
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔的首轮系列赛既有高光时刻，也有一些明显的低谷。他场均贡献 19.8 分、6.0 次助攻和 4.0 个篮板，在他的季后赛首秀中交出了强劲的基础数据。对于一名在 NBA 第二个赛季就承担如此重任的 21 岁球员来说，他做得很好。
最大的亮点是投篮。开拓者的策略是放空卡斯尔，挑战他去投篮。整个系列赛，他在场均 5.4 次尝试中投出了 40.7% 的三分命中率。这是一个重要的进展 —— 如果对手不能无视卡斯尔，马刺的进攻就会变成一个更难解的谜题。
防守端，卡斯尔完成了任务。他在外线防守极具侵略性，并展现了球队所需的身体对抗。他在防守端闪现出了精英级的潜力。
卡斯尔这轮系列赛的不足之处在于打得有些粗糙。他场均出现 3.6 次失误，犯规过多，且在第五场比赛中有些情绪失控。卡斯尔打球充满力量和勇气，但有时会演变成鲁莽。如果这支球队希望成为真正的冠军级球队，这些问题必须得到解决。
总而言之，这是一个充满希望的系列赛。卡斯尔证明了他的球风可以在季后赛环境中立足，甚至大放异彩。
评分：B+
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell) 的数据并不亮眼，但他的影响力比统计数据体现的要好。他场均得到 12.6 分和 5.8 个篮板，但三分命中率仅为 28.6%，所以这绝对称不上是一个出色的进攻系列赛。他的两分球命中率（48.5%）也差强人意。
即便如此，瓦塞尔做了很多有助于赢球的事情。他在争抢篮板时比平时更有活力，防守也更加积极。每当比赛陷入僵局，他总能多次完成关键战术。在第一场和第二场中，有些时间段他看起来是文班亚马之外马刺最重要的球员。
不言而喻，他的投射能力在未来需要提升，尤其是因为如果马刺的外线投篮无法维持，季后赛级别的防守将会疯狂包夹文班亚马、福克斯、卡斯尔和哈珀。尽管投篮失准，但瓦塞尔的努力、防守、传球和及时的组织进攻让这轮系列赛总体上呈现出积极的态势。
评分：B+
迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)
迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper) 的首个季后赛系列赛对马刺来说是一次重大胜利。他在场均 25.4 分钟内贡献 12.6 分，投篮命中率 56.1%，三分命中率 50%。对于一名首次参加季后赛的年轻后卫来说，这样的效率极其出色。
他在第三场的表现是其代表作。在文班亚马缺阵、马刺客场陷入困境的情况下，哈珀打得像个未来的球星。他冲击篮筐，命中关键三分，积极拼抢篮板，帮助马刺偷得一场胜利，从而改变了整个系列赛的走向。在那之后他有一些沉寂的时刻 —— 这对新秀来说是可以预见的 —— 但哈珀的力量、自信、迅捷的抢断能力以及创造进攻的能力都比预期转化得更好。
马刺进入这轮系列赛时，只希望哈珀能顶住压力；而系列赛结束时，他们知道这个孩子身上有着非凡的特质。
评分：A-
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie) 非常出色地完成了他的工作。他场均得到 10.2 分和 5.0 个篮板，投篮命中率 58.6%，三分命中率高达 61.9%。当开拓者放空他去协防时，他总能让对手付出代价。他的真实命中率达到了 80.6%，即便样本量较小，这也是一个惊人的数字 —— 此外，他在场均近 29 分钟的时间里仅有 0.6 次失误，这种近乎零失误的高效表现将使他稳坐首发位置。
尚帕尼在这轮系列赛中表现最棒的一点是他从不贪功。他选择正确的投篮时机，送出正确的传球，打得非常简洁。防守端，他的精英级运动能力欠缺偶尔会暴露出来；开拓者的速度有时让他看起来慢了半拍。但当一名角色球员能投出这种命中率、积极竞争且避免犯错时，他就已经超额完成了任务。
评分：A-
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet) 悄然成为了系列赛中最重要的球员之一。他在场均 19.4 分钟内贡献 8.2 分、7.0 个篮板和 1.6 次助攻，投篮命中率 62.1%。他的进攻篮板 —— 场均 3.4 个 —— 影响力尤为巨大。
当文班亚马在第二场伤退并缺席第三场时，科内特给了马刺最需要的东西。他设置了精明的掩护，顺下果断，传球到位，篮板稳健，并提供了足够的护筐保护，确保了在高大的法国人缺阵时系列赛没有崩盘。他在第三场的表现是圣安东尼奥在失去超级巨星的情况下依然挺过来的重要原因。
第四场显然是科内特的低谷。当文班亚马休息时，他打得很挣扎，无法阻止颓势。但他随后在第五场反弹，且在整个系列赛中大多时候都很可靠。对于一名需要填补巨大空缺的替补中锋来说，这份答卷非常出色。
评分：B+
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson) 的系列赛表现令人失望。他在场均 18.8 分钟内仅得到 6.2 分，投篮命中率 35.5%。他那些冲入人堆的强硬突破 —— 这是他的拿手好戏 —— 大多无功而返。他的防守在整个系列赛中也表现平平。
亮点在于他的能量和篮板。约翰逊在有限的时间内场均抢下 4.4 个篮板，在某些时段他的身体对抗提供了帮助。但总的来说，马刺本可以从这位“年度最佳第六人”身上得到更多。他没有提供持续的得分，没有撕裂开拓者的防守，防守端也不够可靠，无法抵消进攻端的挣扎。他没有拖累马刺……但也没有提供人们预想中的那种助力。
评分：C-
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant) 场均 3.2 分和 2.2 个篮板（出场 9.2 分钟）的数据并不能说明全部。事实上，他贡献了整个系列赛中最令人难忘的个人高光时刻之一。
第三场是他的证明之战。他的防守非常精彩。他在空间防守中表现出色，协助护筐，在篮板球上奋力搏杀，在文班亚马缺阵时为马刺提供了急需的运动能力和无畏精神。他在进攻端也展现出了作为传球手和衔接点的天赋，而这在常规赛中很少见。
不过最终，教练组在第四场和第五场重新启用了老将，限制了布莱恩特继续爆发的机会。尽管如此，当一名新秀能用防守、能量和勇气左右一场季后赛客场比赛时，这绝对是了不起的表现。
评分：B+
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes) 经历了一个糟糕的系列赛，数据也反映了这一点。他场均仅得到 2.2 分和 0.8 个篮板（出场 11.4 分钟），整个系列赛没进过一个三分球。他的篮板球匮乏，防守在平均水平之下，进攻角色也在不断萎缩。
有几次他展现出了老将的稳健，但这些时刻太少，无法产生实质影响。目前看来，很难再为巴恩斯留在轮换阵容中找到理由。马刺不需要他成为球星 —— 他们只需要他偶尔能投进三分球。就目前情况来看，这似乎也是一种奢求。
评分：D
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
米奇教练经历了一个虽有起伏但最终成功的系列赛。他值得称赞的地方在于让马刺在第一场就做好了充分准备，在福克斯开局慢热后及时调整，并帮助这位老将控卫在系列赛进行过程中找到了更好的冲击篮下的方式。
他执教最出色的一晚是第三场。在文班亚马缺阵的情况下，他在客场的关键时刻信任哈珀和布莱恩特，而两人都给了他回报。这需要真正的胆识，大多数教练会选择保守，依赖老将。约翰逊找到了一套充满活力的阵容来扭转系列赛局势，并且坚持使用行之有效的方案。
然而，瑕疵也是客观存在的。第二场第四节的表现很糟糕。随着系列赛的进行，坚持让巴恩斯上场而不是布莱恩特变得越来越难以自圆其说。而且马刺有太多时间段看起来还没准备好投入竞争 —— 这种特质在第二轮开始前必须纠正。
从大局来看，米奇教练相当轻松地赢下了系列赛，妥善处理了文班亚马的脑震荡情况，并让多名年轻球员做出了重要贡献。对于一位从未经历过这些的主教练来说，这是一个高质量的首轮执教表现。
评分：B+
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：First Round Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Portland Trail Blazers
First Round Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Portland Trail Blazers
The San Antonio Spurs took care of business in the first round by defeating the Portland Trail Blazers in five games to advance. It wasn’t always clean. San Antonio lost a fourth quarter lead in Game 2, had to survive Game 3 without Victor Wembanyama and trailed by 17 points at halftime in Game 4.
But in the end, the Spurs were clearly the better team. Their defense tightened in vital stretches, the youngsters didn’t blink and San Antonio’s depth showed up enough to keep Portland from ever truly taking control.
Victor Wembanyama
Wembanyama missed Game 3 with a concussion but still put his fingerprints all over this series. In four games, he averaged 21.0 points, 8.8 rebounds, 2.0 assists and 4.0 blocks while shooting 58.3% from the field, 53.8% from three and 91.3% from the line.
His true shooting percentage was 72.2% — an incredible number considering Portland’s entire defensive gameplan revolved around making life difficult for him. For context, Jalen Duren led the NBA in true shooting percentage during the 2025-26 regular season at 68.8%.
Offensively, he had stretches where he looked impossible to guard. Just as importantly, he didn’t always try to beat the Blazers by himself. When Portland loaded up, he usually made the smart play and let his teammates operate. Defensively, he was the biggest reason Portland eventually ran out of answers. When locked in, the Blazers had very little access to the rim.
A few sporadic stretches where he looked sped up are the only things keeping this from being a perfect grade in his first ever playoff series.
Grade: A
De’Aaron Fox
Fox’s series was a slow build — and a worrying one, for a while. Early on, he didn’t look like the player the Spurs need him to be. He struggled late in Game 2, had an uneven Game 3 and wasn’t always dictating the action, especially late in close games.
Thankfully, Fox found his groove as the series progressed. In Games 4 and 5, he looked far more comfortable. The coaching staff got him the ball in better spots, he attacked with more confidence and he started making Portland pay for giving him room to breathe.
For the series, Fox averaged 20.2 points and 6.8 assists while shooting 50% from the field and 37% from three. His assist-to-turnover ratio was a sterling 3.4-to-1. It wasn’t a perfect first round but, by the end of it, Fox looked like a player capable of steering the ship when it’s needed most.
Grade: B+
Stephon Castle
Castle’s first-round series had real highs and a few pretty obvious lows. He averaged 19.8 points, 6.0 assists and 4.0 rebounds, strong counting stats in his postseason debut. For a 21-year-old in his second NBA season carrying that kind of offensive responsibility, he did well.
The biggest positive was the shooting. Portland’s strategy was to sag off Castle and dare him to fire away. For the series, he hit 40.7% of his three-pointers on 5.4 attempts per game. That was an important development — if opponents can’t ignore Castle, San Antonio’s offense becomes a much harder puzzle to solve.
Defensively, Castle did his job. He aggressively guarded out on the perimeter and brought the needed physicality to the table. He flashed his elite potential on that end of the court.
The downside for Castle in this series was the sloppiness. He averaged 3.6 turnovers, fouled too much and lost his composure in Game 5. Castle plays with force and courage but sometimes that bleeds into recklessness. That needs to be cleaned up if this squad hopes to be a true championship caliber team.
All in all, though, this was a promising series. Castle showed his game can hold up — and even thrive — in a playoff environment.
Grade: B+
Devin Vassell
Vassell’s numbers don’t jump off the page but his impact was better than his statistics. He averaged 12.6 points and 5.8 rebounds but he shot only 28.6% from three-point land, so there’s no way to call this a great offensive series. His two-point percentage (48.5%) also underwhelmed.
That said, Vassell did a lot of winning things. He was more bouncy than usual when going for rebounds. His defense was more active. He repeatedly delivered important plays when contests started to tighten. In Games 1 and 2, there were stretches where he looked like San Antonio’s most important player outside of Wembanyama.
It goes without saying that his marksmanship needs to be better going forward, especially because playoff defenses are going to crowd the paint against Wembanyama, Fox, Castle and Harper if San Antonio’s perimeter shooting doesn’t hold up. Even with the shaky shooting, Vassell’s effort, defense, passing and timely playmaking made this a positive series overall.
Grade: B+
Dylan Harper
Harper’s first playoff series was a major win for the Spurs. He averaged 12.6 points in 25.4 minutes while shooting 56.1% from the field and 50% from three. For a young guard in his first postseason, that’s outstanding efficiency.
His Game 3 was the headliner. With Wembanyama out and the Spurs in trouble on the road, Harper played like a future star. He attacked the rim, hit big threes, rebounded with vigor and helped San Antonio steal a game that changed the direction of the series. There were quiet stretches after that — which is to be expected from a rookie — but Harper’s strength, confidence, quick hands and ability to create offense translated better than anticipated.
The Spurs entered this series hoping Harper could survive it. They leave the series knowing there’s something special inside of this kid.
Grade: A-
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie did his job really well. He averaged 10.2 points and 5.0 rebounds while shooting 58.6% from the field and 61.9% from three. When Portland helped off of him, he punished them. His true shooting percentage was 80.6%, a truly remarkable number even with a small sample size — and his 0.6 turnovers per game in nearly 29 minutes is the kind of mistake-free efficiency that will keep him as an unquestionable starter going forward.
The best thing about Champagnie’s series was he didn’t try to do too much. He took the right shots, made the right passes and kept it clean. Defensively, there were moments where his lack of elite athleticism showed; Portland’s speed sometimes made him look a half-step slow. But when a role player shoots it this well, competes and avoids mistakes, he’s done his job.
Grade: A-
Luke Kornet
Kornet was quietly one of the most important players in the series. He averaged 8.2 points, 7.0 rebounds and 1.6 assists in 19.4 minutes while shooting 62.1% from the field. His offensive rebounding — 3.4 boards per game on that end — was especially impactful.
When Wembanyama went down in Game 2 and missed Game 3, Kornet gave the Spurs exactly what they needed. He set smart screens, rolled with purpose, authored the right passes, sturdily rebounded and protected the rim well enough to prevent the series from slipping away when the towering Frenchman sat. His Game 3 specifically was a huge reason San Antonio survived without its superstar.
Game 4 was the obvious low point for Kornet. He struggled badly when Wembanyama sat and couldn’t stop the bleeding. But he bounced back in Game 5 and was mostly dependable throughout the round. For a backup center with large shoes to fill, this was strong work.
Grade: B+
Keldon Johnson
Johnson’s series was underwhelming. He averaged only 6.2 points in 18.8 minutes and shot 35.5% from the field. His burly drives into traffic — the bread and butter of his game — mostly came up empty. His defense was a mixed bag throughout.
The positives were his energy and rebounding. Johnson averaged 4.4 boards in limited minutes and had stretches where his physicality helped. But, overall, the Spurs could have used more from their Sixth Man of the Year. He didn’t provide consistent scoring, didn’t bend Portland’s defense and wasn’t reliable enough defensively to offset the offensive struggles. He didn’t sink the Spurs … but he also didn’t give them the boost they’ve come to expect.
Grade: C-
Carter Bryant
Bryant’s raw averages — 3.2 points and 2.2 rebounds in 9.2 minutes — don’t tell the story. In reality, he had one of the more memorable individual stretches of the entire series.
Game 3 was his statement. His defense was spectacular. He guarded in space, helped at the rim, battled on the glass, and gave San Antonio a level of athleticism and fearlessness they desperately needed with Wembanyama out. He also showed genuine flashes as a passer and connective offensive piece in a role he’d rarely played during the regular season.
Ultimately, though, the coaching staff went back to veterans in Games 4 and 5, limiting Bryant’s chance to build on his breakout. Still, when a rookie can swing a road playoff game with defense, energy and courage, that’s big time stuff.
Grade: B+
Harrison Barnes
Barnes had a rough series and the numbers reflect it. He averaged 2.2 points and 0.8 rebounds in 11.4 minutes and didn’t make a single three-pointer in the entire round. His rebounding was lacking. His defense was below average. His offensive role kept shrinking.
There were a few moments where his veteran steadiness was visible, but those moments were far too rare to matter. At this point, it’s difficult to justify keeping Barnes in the rotation. The Spurs don’t need him to be a star — they just need him to get hot from three-point range from time to time. As it stands, that looks like it may be too much to ask.
Grade: D
Mitch Johnson
Coach Mitch had an uneven but ultimately successful series. He deserves credit for having the Spurs ready in Game 1, adjusting after Fox’s slow start and helping San Antonio find better ways to get the veteran point guard moving downhill as the series progressed.
His best night was Game 3. With Wembanyama out, he trusted Harper and Bryant in crunch time on the road and both rewarded him. That took real guts. Most coaches play it safe and lean on the veterans. Johnson found a lineup with enough juice to flip the series and didn’t shy away from what was working.
The warts were real, though. The Game 2 fourth quarter was rough. Continuing to play Barnes over Bryant became harder to justify as the series went on. And the Spurs had too many stretches of looking unready to compete — a trait that needs to be cleaned up before the start of the second round.
Big picture-wise, Coach Mitch won the series rather easily, navigated Wembanyama’s concussion and got meaningful contributions from multiple young players. That’s a quality first round showing for a head coach who has never done any of this before.
Grade: B+
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk