By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-01-31 18:13:17
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
圣安东尼奥马刺队在与洛杉矶快船队的比赛后期败下阵来，最终以116-128的比分输掉了比赛。马刺队的战绩下滑至20胜24负，而快船队的战绩则提升至27胜20负。
第一节比赛中，两队都没有获得太大的优势。快船队在第二节开始发力，并在半场结束时取得了5分的领先优势。
洛杉矶快船队在下半场开始后继续保持着势头。在第三节还剩7分钟时，快船队已经领先了16分。但就在这时，圣安东尼奥马刺队在主场球迷面前发起了一场英勇的反击。马刺队一路追赶，甚至在第三节末段取得了领先。
在你来我往的最后一节比赛中，马刺队顽强地坚持着。在比赛还剩5分钟时，马刺队还领先1分。遗憾的是，从那时起，圣安东尼奥马刺队的一切都开始出错。快船队打出了一波13-0的得分高潮，锁定胜局。
总的来说，马刺队在某些时候打得不错，但在真正重要的时刻，他们在攻防两端都未能有效执行。
数据统计：马刺队 vs. 快船队
马刺队 vs. 快船队 – 最终评分
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
文班亚马本场比赛的表现高于平均水平。这不是一个值得纪念的夜晚，但他打出了足够高的水平，足以让马刺队赢得比赛。在进攻端，他在比赛初期就很好地在内线建立了自己的优势。随着比赛的进行，文班亚马增加了外线投篮和传球。他对球的控制相当不错，并且打得很有力量。在防守端，他注意力集中，给快船队制造了不少麻烦。总而言之，这位年轻的法国人完成了自己的任务。
评分：B
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
瓦塞尔的投篮很糟糕，但这悄然朝着正确的方向迈出了一步。他的投篮选择比平时更好，并且在做决定时更加明智。瓦塞尔的防守不算糟糕，但也乏善可陈。
评分：B-
克里斯·保罗 (Chris Paul)
优点：保罗在27分钟内送出了7次助攻。他对阵洛杉矶快船队的组织能力相对有限，但他没有失误值得称赞。缺点：保罗更积极地寻找投篮机会，但他的命中率不高。在防守端，他从开场哨响起就是一个漏洞。
评分：C-
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
有几次，巴恩斯几乎是凭借一己之力让马刺队保持着竞争力。他最终以极高的效率得到了15分，外加赛季最高的7次助攻。巴恩斯的防守并不出色，但他一直在努力。
评分：B+
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
卡斯尔在面对NBA防守球员时，越来越擅长突破篮筐。他的技巧、耐心和力量都是卡斯尔冲击篮筐的显著特点。希望这位新秀的投篮最终能够有所提升。他在对阵快船队的比赛中传球也缺乏亮点。然而，他避免了失误的累积，这在他掌控比赛时尤为重要。
评分：B
杰里米·索汉 (Jeremy Sochan)
优点：索汉的外线防守很稳固。他在篮下完成了一些强有力的终结，他的传球也比平时更好。缺点：26分钟0篮板？是的，这不行。快船队很少防守索汉，而他也没有很好地利用这一点。
评分：C-
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
约翰逊在内线对抗时有一些高光时刻。他还命中了一记及时的三分球。他晚上的其他表现并没有特别值得一提的地方。他的防守一般，组织能力几乎没有，在篮板上也没有做出太多贡献。
评分：C+
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
连续第二场比赛，尚帕尼在控球方面遇到了麻烦。说他控球不稳是轻描淡写。尚帕尼通过令人满意的防守和保持活力，保留了一些自身的价值。
评分：C
特雷·琼斯 (Tre Jones)
当马刺队发起进攻高潮时，琼斯似乎总是身处其中。他快速切入篮下，通常以令人印象深刻的运动能力完成终结。我认为他的防守还可以，但他的拼搏精神很棒。希望琼斯能继续保持这种水平，因为他今晚改变了比赛的走势。
评分：A-
桑德罗·马穆克拉什维利 (Sandro Mamukelashvili)
马穆克拉什维利得到了一些替补中锋的上场时间。他做得不错。我喜欢他在攻防两端不知疲倦的活力。看看他能否继续担任球队的替补中锋将会很有趣。
评分：Inc.
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
事后看来，琼斯应该打更多的时间。在索汉无法抢到篮板，而快船队在篮板上占据统治地位的情况下，让他打26分钟是一个糟糕的决定。我喜欢文班亚马得到的投篮机会，但约翰逊的其他执教表现缺乏亮点。
评分：D+
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Los Angeles Clippers – Game #44
Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Los Angeles Clippers – Game #44
The San Antonio Spurs slipped late against the Los Angeles Clippers and lost by a final score of 128-116. The Spurs dropped to 20-24, while the Clippers improved their record to 27-20.
Neither team got much of an advantage in the first quarter. The Clippers got going a bit in the second quarter and took a five-point lead into halftime.
Los Angeles kept the momentum to start the third period. With seven minutes remaining in the quarter, the Clippers had a 16-point lead. But that’s when San Antonio put together a valiant comeback in front of their home fans. The Spurs came all the way back and even had the lead late in the third quarter.
The good guys hung in during a back and forth final stanza. With five minutes left in regulation, the Spurs had a one-point lead. Sadly, that’s when everything went wrong for San Antonio. The Clippers went on a 13-0 run to ice the game.
Overall, the Spurs played well at times but they failed to execute on either end when things really mattered.
Stats: Spurs vs. Clippers
Spurs vs. Clippers – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
This was an above average performance by Wembanyama. It wasn’t a memorable night at the office but he played at a high enough level for the Spurs to win. Offensively, he did well to establish himself on the inside early in the game. Wembanyama added outside shooting and passing as the game progressed. He kept reasonably good care of the ball and played with force. Defensively, he was attentive and was causing problems for the Clippers. All in all, the young Frenchman did his part.
Grade: B
Devin Vassell
Vassell shot poorly but this was quietly a step in the right direction. His shot-selection was better than usual and he made smarter decisions when making plays. Vassell’s defense wasn’t terrible but it wasn’t anything to write home about either.
Grade: B-
Chris Paul
The good: Paul tallied seven assists in 27 minutes. His playmaking was relatively limited against L.A. but he does deserve credit for not turning the ball over. The bad: Paul was more aggressive looking for his shot but his accuracy was off. Defensively, he was a liability from the opening tip.
Grade: C-
Harrison Barnes
There were a few stretches where Barnes was almost single-handedly keeping the Spurs in it. He ended up with an uber efficient 15 points along with a season-high seven assists. Barnes’ defense wasn’t great but the effort was always there.
Grade: B+
Stephon Castle
Castle is getting better and better at driving to the hoop against NBA defenders. His craft, patience and power are all notable traits when it comes to Castle getting to the hole. Hopefully the rookie’s shooting eventually comes along. His passing against the Clippers was also lacking. However, he did avoid racking up turnovers, which was especially important when he was running the show.
Grade: B
Jeremy Sochan
The good: Sochan’s perimeter defense was solid. He had some strong finishes at the rim and his passing was better than normal. The bad: Zero rebounds in 26 minutes? Yeah, no, that’s not going to get it done. The Clippers rarely guarded Sochan and he didn’t do a good job of making them pay.
Grade: C-
Keldon Johnson
Johnson had some moments when being physical in the lane. He also hit a timely three-pointer. The rest of his evening wasn’t especially noteworthy. His defense was meh, his playmaking was non-existent and he didn’t do much work on the boards.
Grade: C+
Julian Champagnie
For the second straight outing, Champagnie had trouble holding onto the ball. Saying he was loose with the basketball would be an understatement. Champagnie retained some of his value by playing satisfactory defense and keeping his energy up.
Grade: C
Tre Jones
When the Spurs made runs, it seemed like Jones was always in the mix. His quick cuts to the hoop were usually punctuated by an impressively athletic finish. I thought his defense was okay-ish but that his hustle was great. Hopefully Jones keeps playing at this level because he was a difference-maker on this night.
Grade: A-
Sandro Mamukelashvili
Mamukelashvili is getting some backup center minutes. He’s doing fine. I liked his relentless energy that can be felt on both ends of the court. It’ll be interesting to see if he remains the team’s backup center going forward.
Grade: Inc.
Mitch Johnson
In retrospect, Jones should have played more. Playing Sochan 26 minutes when he couldn’t get a rebound and the Clippers were dominating on the glass was a bad decision. I liked the shots Wembanyama was getting but the rest of Johnson’s coaching was lacking.
Grade: D+
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk