By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-04-09 15:59:27
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
圣安东尼奥马刺队在周二晚上的客场比赛中不敌洛杉矶快船队。这场122-117的失利使马刺队的战绩变为32胜47负，而快船队的战绩则提升到47胜32负。
马刺队在上半场紧咬比分。第一节和第二节结束后，快船队仅领先两分。第三节完全被洛杉矶掌控。第四节，马刺队几次试图反击，但最终时间不够。
虽然比赛不像最终比分显示的那样接近，但考虑到具体情况，马刺队表现不错，也让快船队费了一番功夫才拿下比赛。
数据：马刺队对阵快船队
马刺队对阵快船队 – 最终评分
德文·瓦塞尔(Devin Vassell)
瓦塞尔对阵快船队的表现异常安静。他花了一段时间才进入状态，即使进入状态后，也没有真正发挥出来。瓦塞尔三分球5投1中，两分球也只出手了3次。他的失误（3次）也多于助攻（2次）。瓦塞尔在防守端显露出一些活力，但总的来说，他做得不够，不足以让马刺队在客场真正具有竞争力。
评分：C-
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔(Stephon Castle)
卡斯尔在投篮选择方面做得很好。他7投5中，并通过罚球12罚8中拿下19分。我喜欢他的投篮选择以及他冲击篮筐的强硬。卡斯尔的传球非常出色。他展现了广阔的球场视野，并能精准地传球。不幸的是，这位新秀也因为4次失误、在篮板球上缺乏积极性以及在防守端站位过多而降低了他的价值。
评分：B
克里斯·保罗(Chris Paul)
对保罗来说，这是一场奇怪的比赛。他积极地寻找投篮机会，但他的组织能力受到了限制。他只有3次助攻和3次失误。公平地说，部分原因是快船队对他的防守方式。洛杉矶放任保罗投篮——他也确实这么做了。在防守端，这位经验丰富的控球后卫很少产生积极的影响。
评分：C-
哈里森·巴恩斯(Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯又打出了一个精彩的投篮之夜。他三分球8投6中，两分球2投2中，罚球2投2中。他的24分帮助马刺队保持了竞争力，并让首发阵容看起来像一个有能力的整体。我也非常喜欢巴恩斯的防守努力。他有全队最高的3次抢断，并且能看到他努力拼抢和跑动。他在篮板球上的努力也值得称赞。
评分：A
比斯马克·比永博(Bismack Biyombo)
比永博打得很努力。他在篮板球上积极拼抢，并试图在内线稳住阵脚。然而，考虑到伊维察·祖巴茨(Ivica Zubac)为快船队拿下了24分和20个篮板，很难说比永博在防守端是成功的。在进攻端，他有几个不错的表现，但更多的时候是在碍事，而不是一股真正的积极力量。
评分：C+
布雷克·韦斯利(Blake Wesley)
最近韦斯利很少被要求进行组织，但他提醒了所有人他有能力做到这一点。在23分钟里，他有7次助攻，没有失误。他利用自己的速度为队友创造了空当，并送出及时的传球。在得分方面，韦斯利表现尚可。他有几次扣篮，并且在过掉防守者并完全突破到篮下时，看起来比平时更好。
评分：B+
桑德罗·马穆克拉什维利(Sandro Mamukelashvili)
马穆克拉什维利在23分钟里得到8分，但对这位大个子来说，这基本上是一个令人难忘的夜晚。他的投篮手感不是特别好，但他真正让球队失望的地方在于防守端。他在篮板球上表现乏力，并且无法在内线或外线跟上对手。马穆的脚步非常缓慢，并且缺乏必要的身体对抗。
评分：D+
凯尔登·约翰逊(Keldon Johnson)
好的方面：约翰逊9投6中得到12分。他只投丢了一个两分球，并且只有1次失误。他还以6个篮板领衔替补阵容。不好的方面：约翰逊的传球真的很糟糕。他多次错过了空位的队友。即使他传球了，通常也很慢。在防守端，约翰逊也还有很多需要改进的地方。
评分：C-
朱利安·尚帕尼(Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼是另一位想要忘记这场比赛的球员。他三分球7投2中，并且在弧线内投丢了几个简单的投篮。在防守端，尚帕尼不算糟糕，但他无法弥补他在进攻端失去的分数。
评分：C
马拉基·布兰纳姆(Malaki Branham)
布兰纳姆继续为自己争取更多的上场时间。虽然他只在垃圾时间出场，但值得注意的是，他在短短的4分钟内就得到了9分。他现在的投篮看起来很流畅，并且在突破到篮下时表现出了技巧。
评分：Inc.
乔丹·麦克劳克林(Jordan McLaughlin)
麦克劳克林现在看起来能投进每一个空位三分球。
评分：Inc.
大卫·杜克(David Duke Jr.)
杜克在比赛末段命中了一记艰难的三分球，使比分看起来体面了一些。
评分：Inc.
哈里森·英格拉姆(Harrison Ingram)
英格拉姆没有投篮，但他在外线防守端通过了目测考验。
评分：Inc.
米奇·约翰逊(Mitch Johnson)
我不介意这个轮换。也许布兰纳姆应该获得真正的上场时间——但仅此而已。总的来说，约翰逊让他的球员们与一支季后赛球队展开了竞争。 不错。
评分：B
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Los Angeles Clippers – Game #79
Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Los Angeles Clippers – Game #79
The San Antonio Spurs dropped a road game on Tuesday night against the Los Angeles Clippers. The 122-117 loss has the Spurs sitting with a record of 32-47, while the Clippers improved to 47-32.
The Spurs kept it close in the first half. After both the first quarter and the second quarter, the Clippers only led by two points. The third quarter was dominated by Los Angeles. In the fourth quarter, the Spurs made a couple runs but ultimately ran out of time.
While the game wasn’t as close as the final score would indicate, the Spurs played well given the circumstances and made L.A. gut it out.
Stats: Spurs at Clippers
Spurs at Clippers – Final Grades
Devin Vassell
Vassell was uncharacteristically quiet against the Clippers. It took him a while to get started and even after he got started, he never got going. Vassell was 1-for-5 from three-point land and only attempted three two-pointers. He also had more turnovers (3) than assists (2). Vassell showed signs of life on the defensive end but, all in all, he didn’t do enough for the Spurs to truly compete on the road.
Grade: C-
Stephon Castle
Castle picked his spots well shooting-wise. He was 5-for-7 from the field but was able to put 19 points on the board by going 8-for-12 from the free throw line. I liked his shot-selection and his toughness going to the rim. Castle’s passing was excellent. He displayed expansive court vision and delivered passes on the mark. Unfortunately, the rookie gave away some of his value by turning the ball over four times, not giving much effort on the boards and standing around too much on defense.
Grade: B
Chris Paul
It was a strange outing for Paul. He aggressively looked for his shots but his playmaking was limited. He had only three assists to go with three turnovers. To be fair, though, part of that was due to how the Clippers were defending him. L.A. laid off of Paul and wanted him to shoot — and he did. Defensively, the veteran PG rarely made a positive impact.
Grade: C-
Harrison Barnes
Barnes put together another magnificent shooting night. He was 6-for-8 from three-point range, 2-for-2 from two-point range and 2-for-2 at the free throw line. His 24 points kept the Spurs afloat and helped make the starters look like a capable unit. I also really liked Barnes’ defensive effort. He had a team-high three steals and could be found making a hustle play or running the court. His effort on the boards was also noteworthy.
Grade: A
Bismack Biyombo
Biyombo played hard. He efforted on the boards and tried to hold down the fort on the interior. However, considering that Ivica Zubac had 24 points and 20 rebounds for the Clippers, it’s difficult to say Biyombo was successful on the defensive end. Offensively, he had a couple good plays but was more in the way than he was a legitimate force for good.
Grade: C+
Blake Wesley
Wesley hasn’t been asked to make plays much recently but he reminded everyone that he’s able to do just that. In 23 minutes, he had seven assists and no turnovers. He utilized his speed to create daylight for his teammates and he delivered timely passes. Scoring-wise, Wesley was fine. He had a couple dunks and looked better than usual at turning the corner and getting all the way to the rim.
Grade: B+
Sandro Mamukelashvili
Mamukelashvili scored eight points in 23 minutes but it was mostly a night to forget for the big man. He didn’t shoot especially well but where he really let the team down was on the defensive end. He was anemic on the boards and he couldn’t hang on the perimeter or on the interior. Mamu’s feet were extra slow and he lacked the necessary amount of physicality in the paint.
Grade: D+
Keldon Johnson
The good: Johnson had 12 points on 6-for-9 shooting from the field. He missed only one two-point attempt and only turned it over once. He also led the reserve unit with six rebounds. The bad: Johnson’s passing was really bad. He missed open teammates on multiple occasions. Even when he made a pass, it was usually slow. Defensively, Johnson also left a lot to be desired.
Grade: C-
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie is another player who will want to forget this outing. He was 2-for-7 from three-point land and missed a couple of easy shots inside of the arc. Defensively, Champagnie wasn’t terrible but he wasn’t able to make up for the points he gave away on the offensive end.
Grade: C
Malaki Branham
Branham continues to make a case for an expanded role. While he only played in garbage time, it’s worth noting that he had nine points in just four minutes. His shot looks smooth right now and he’s scoring with craft on drives to the rim.
Grade: Inc.
Jordan McLaughlin
McLaughlin looks like he’ll make every open three-pointer right now.
Grade: Inc.
David Duke Jr.
Duke hit a difficult three-pointer late to make the score look respectable.
Grade: Inc.
Harrison Ingram
Ingram didn’t shoot but he passed the eye-test on the defensive end out on the perimeter.
Grade: Inc.
Mitch Johnson
I didn’t mind the rotation. Perhaps Branham deserves real minutes — but that’s about it. Overall, Johnson had his players competing against a playoff team. Not bad.
Grade: B
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk