By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-01-03 16:51:31
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
圣安东尼奥马刺队以122-86的最终比分大胜洛杉矶快船队，赛季战绩提升至17胜16负。快船队则因这场失利战绩跌至19胜14负。
在主场球迷面前，马刺队在第一节就以31-17领先。从那以后，圣安东尼奥的优势逐节扩大。马刺队最多领先41分，最终以一场酣畅淋漓的大胜告终。总而言之，马刺队对他们的表现一定非常满意。
数据：马刺 vs. 快船
马刺 vs. 快船 – 最终评级
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
对于文班亚马来说，这是一场非常令人鼓舞的比赛。他的三分球没有投开，所以他更加努力地在三分线内寻找高质量的出手机会。结果让我们看到了文班亚马未来的潜力。他在中距离和内线占据统治地位。在仅仅26分钟的出场时间里，他获得了7次罚球机会。他在内线的侵略性也帮助他拿到了5次助攻。在进攻端，文班亚马强硬、顽强且聪明。在防守端，他再次表现出色。他在攻防两端都很少犯错，简直就是统治级的表现。
评级：A
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
优点：瓦塞尔8次两分球出手命中一半。他的投篮选择基本合理，限制了失误，并始终遵循球队的战术理念。在防守端，他比平时更加积极，三次抢断就是证明。缺点：瓦塞尔三分球6投0中。在本赛季初三分球火热开局后，他的三分命中率现在只有36.9%。
评级：B
克里斯·保罗 (Chris Paul)
保罗只打了20分钟，但他在那段时间里的表现非常出色。首先，他在防守端的强度显而易见。他在防守端的投入比进攻端更加积极。保罗抢下了9个篮板，3次抢断，并且完全专注于比赛。在进攻端，他的表现也非常好。他在组织进攻时没有失误，并且明智地分享了控球权。他的投篮也很高效。
评级：A-
杰里米·索汉 (Jeremy Sochan)
不幸的是，索汉只打了15分钟就因背伤下场。希望他不会缺席太长时间。在这15分钟里，他的防守非常出色，积极拼抢篮板，并在进攻端展现了智慧。索汉在减速和做出正确决策方面做得非常好。
评级：B
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯的表现不算惊艳，但很稳健。他4投3中，得到11分。他在篮板球方面的表现比平时更加积极，无论有球还是无球，他的移动都充满活力。在防守端，巴恩斯并没有什么特别之处，但他避免了比赛中大部分环节的失误。
评级：B
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
在一名球员下场后，卡斯尔得到了更多的上场时间。这位新秀充分利用了这个机会。虽然他的三分球三投全失，但他在三分线内5投5中，获得了6次罚球机会，而且他的传球比过去一两周更好。我也非常喜欢他的防守和他整场比赛展现出的整体智慧。这才是那个看起来像个真正最佳新秀候选人的卡斯尔。
评级：A-
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
约翰逊的三分球仍然需要改进，但在其他方面，他对阵快船队的表现非常出色。他在快攻中极具威胁，他在篮下的身体对抗让洛杉矶难以招架。我喜欢他的投篮选择，他没有仓促做出任何决定。约翰逊的防守比平时更好，并且在篮板球方面也提供了帮助。当他这样打球时，他是一个顶级的替补球员。
评级：A-
特雷·琼斯 (Tre Jones)
这是琼斯一系列类似比赛中的又一场。他并不是一个真正的得分威胁，但他能很好地组织球队，通常情况下都是球队的正资产。他能够推快节奏，限制失误，并在防守端努力拼搏。对阵快船队，琼斯帮助确保了替补阵容的正常运转。
评级：B
扎克·科林斯 (Zach Collins)
科林斯显然再次成为了替补中锋。在对阵森林狼队的比赛中表现不佳后，他在对阵洛杉矶的比赛中强势反弹。他的传球是他最大的优势。他在篮板球方面也表现得更好，并为马刺队提供了内线 presence。
评级：B+
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼一上来就火力全开——这是一件好事。对于尚帕尼来说，保持他在替补席上的价值的最好方法就是成为一个高产的三分射手。他对阵快船的比赛中投篮不算很准，但他的贡献足以帮助球队。
评级：B
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
约翰逊干得不错。他的球队打出了顽强的防守和无私的进攻。我喜欢他在新秀卡斯尔对阵森林狼队表现糟糕后给了他更多上场时间。文班亚马早早地在内线拿球，约翰逊也功不可没。
评级：A-
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Los Angeles Clippers – Game #33
Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Los Angeles Clippers – Game #33
The San Antonio Spurs dismantled the Los Angeles Clippers by a final count of 122-86 to improve to 17-16 on the season. With the loss, the Clippers fell to 19-14.
In front of their home fans, the Spurs sprinted to a 31-17 lead after the first quarter. From there, San Antonio simply kept expanding their advantage quarter by quarter. The Spurs led by as many as 41 points in what was ultimately a feel-good blowout win. All in all, the good guys have to be thrilled with how they played.
Stats: Spurs vs. Clippers
Spurs vs. Clippers – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
This was a very encouraging game from Wembanyama. His three-point jumper wasn’t falling so he instead worked extra hard to get quality looks from inside the arc. The result was a glimpse of what Wembanyama can become down the line. He was dominant in the mid-range and in the paint. He got to the line for seven shots in only 26 minutes. His aggression inside also helped him rack up five assists. Offensively, Wembanyama was tough, stubborn and smart. Defensively, he was really good once again. He made few mistakes on either side of the court and was simply dominant.
Grade: A
Devin Vassell
The good: Vassell hit half of his eight two-point attempts. His shot-selection was mostly fine, he limited his miscues and stayed within the team concepts. Defensively, he was more active than usual, as evidenced by his three steals. The bad: Vassell was 0-for-6 from deep. After a red hot start to the season from three-point range, he’s now only at 36.9% for the campaign.
Grade: B
Chris Paul
Paul only played 20 minutes but he was great during that time. First of all, his intensity was palpable on defense. He was more fired up about his efforts on that end than on the offensive end. Paul had nine rebounds, three steals and was totally locked in. Offensively, he was also really good. He had no turnovers while navigating a wise ship. He also shot the ball well while smartly sharing ball-handling duties.
Grade: A-
Jeremy Sochan
Unfortunately, Sochan was sidelined with a back injury after playing only 15 minutes. Hopefully he won’t miss an extended period of time. In those 15 minutes, he played really good defense, was active on the boards and operated with brains on the offensive end. Sochan did a really good job of slowing down and making the right decisions.
Grade: B
Harrison Barnes
Barnes wasn’t spectacular but he was solid. He hit 3-of-4 three-pointers on his way to 11 points. He was more active on the glass than usual and his movements both with and without the ball were vigorous. Defensively, Barnes wasn’t anything special but he avoided errors in most aspects of the game.
Grade: B
Stephon Castle
After Castle exited the game, Castle got some extended playing time. The rookie made the most of it. While he missed all three of his three-point attempts, he was 5-for-5 within the arc, got to the line for six attempts and his passing was better than we’ve seen it in a week or two. I also really liked his defense and the overall intelligence he exhibited throughout. This is the version of Castle who looked like a legitimate Rookie of the Year candidate.
Grade: A-
Keldon Johnson
Johnson still has work to do on his three-point stroke but otherwise he looked really good against the Clippers. He was a menace on the break and his physicality at the rim was difficult for Los Angeles to handle. I liked his shot-selection and he didn’t rush any of his decisions. Johnson’s defense was better than usual and he was helpful on the boards. When he plays like this, he is a top of the line bench piece.
Grade: A-
Tre Jones
This was another in a long line of similar games from Jones. He’s not really a scoring threat but he runs the team well enough that he’s usually a plus. He pushes the pace, limits mistakes and hustles on defense. Against the Clippers, Jones helped ensure that the bench unit was run properly.
Grade: B
Zach Collins
Collins is apparently the backup center once again. After a poor showing against the Timberwolves, he bounced back with a quality outing versus L.A. His passing stood out as his biggest strength. He was also better on the boards and provided the Spurs with an inside presence.
Grade: B+
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie came out gunning — and that’s a good thing. The best way for Champagnie to retain his value off the bench is to be a high volume three-point shooter. He didn’t shoot the straightest against the Clippers but he did enough to aid the cause.
Grade: B
Mitch Johnson
Good stuff from Johnson. He had his troops playing stingy defense and unselfish offense. I liked that he gave Castle more minutes after the rookie’s rough performance against the Timberwolves. Johnson also deserves some credit for Wembanyama taking the ball inside early and often.
Grade: A-
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk