By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-01-29 16:25:00
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
在巴黎的首场比赛大胜印第安纳步行者之后，圣安东尼奥马刺在第二场却遭遇了惨败。圣安东尼奥以98-136输掉了比赛，战绩跌至20胜23负，而印第安纳则提升至25胜20负。
比赛初期，步行者多次发起攻势，但马刺都顽强地反击。半场结束时，马刺落后15分，但他们再次奋起追赶，并在第三节还剩4分钟时反超1分。不幸的是，就在那时，马刺的攻势戛然而止。
泰瑞斯·哈利伯顿(Tyrese Haliburton)手感火热，带领步行者打出一波11-0的攻击波，从此一路领先。在最后一节，马刺似乎已经耗尽了体力，单节得分仅为12分，而步行者则砍下38分。
总的来说，圣安东尼奥的表现并不像最终比分显示的那么糟糕，但在经历了如此难看的崩盘后，他们肯定不会对这场比赛感到满意。
数据：马刺 vs. 步行者
马刺 vs. 步行者 – 最终评分
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
文班亚马的篮球天赋如此出众，即使在表现不佳的情况下，他依然能得到20分和12个篮板。在巴黎的第二场比赛中，这位法国球星在攻防两端都没有找到感觉。在防守端，他在内线和外线都慢了一拍。他在36分钟内只送出1次盖帽，并且随着比赛的进行，他的防守表现越来越差。在进攻端，他的表现稍好一些，但也只是稍好而已。他的投篮效率低下，投篮选择不佳，传球也低于平均水平。文班亚马的球风也有些随意，并且经常缺乏对抗性。总而言之，考虑到他在第一场比赛中的出色表现，我会认为他的巴黎之旅是成功的——但这第二场比赛的表现令人难忘，却又希望尽快忘掉。
评分：D+
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
虽然文班的表现明显低于预期，但瓦塞尔的表现更糟。在33分钟的出场时间里，他的负面作用远大于正面作用。他基本上只投三分球，组织进攻寥寥无几，防守也很糟糕，而且他的所有决定都显得仓促。当瓦塞尔这样打球时，他会拉低整支球队的水平。这进一步证明了他需要弄清楚如何在球队的体系中发挥作用。
评分：D-
克里斯·保罗 (Chris Paul)
保罗的表现足够出色，让圣安东尼奥能够与对手抗衡。他积极寻找得分机会，这使得印第安纳的防守不敢松懈。他的传球也很好，并将失误控制在最低限度。在防守端，保罗也很努力，尽管他很难在防守端产生积极的影响。
评分：B
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
如果不是巴恩斯表现如此出色，马刺的处境会更加艰难。在29分钟的出场时间里，他砍下了全队最高的25分。他果断地突破篮下，积极寻找外线投篮机会，并通过全队最高的7次罚球提高了得分效率。巴恩斯的篮板球也比平时更好，并且在防守端也很专注。他比平时略显毛躁，但这些问题大多与他拼命想让马刺留在比赛中有关。
评分：A-
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
优点：卡斯尔的传球很好，承担了大量的组织进攻任务，并且从不畏惧攻击篮筐。他还值得称赞的是控制了失误，这最近一直是他的一个问题。他在篮板球方面的工作值得称道，并且在防守端也有很多不错的表现。缺点：卡斯尔可以增加传球次数。在他职业生涯的这个阶段，他不应该领衔全队的投篮出手次数。卡斯尔的投篮命中率很低，这仍然是一个非常令人担忧的方面。
评分：B
特雷·琼斯 (Tre Jones)
琼斯在防守端被对手完爆。说他在防守端是一个漏洞一点也不为过。在进攻端，琼斯比平时更积极地寻找得分机会——但这并没有取得很好的效果。他只有一次助攻，这准确地描绘了他缺乏组织进攻能力的现状。琼斯在几乎所有方面都表现异常糟糕。
评分：D-
杰里米·索汉 (Jeremy Sochan)
在背伤复出后再次替补出场，索汉的表现非常令人失望。在14分钟的出场时间里，他5投1中，4次失误，3次犯规。希望这只是一个小插曲，因为索汉看起来很糟糕，我甚至担心他的背伤是否痊愈。
评分：D-
桑德罗·马穆克拉什维利 (Sandro Mamukelashvili)
马穆克拉什维利获得了一些真正的出场时间，并且表现还不错。他的活力令人耳目一新。他只得了3分，但他的积极性帮助了球队在攻防两端的表现。防守永远不会是他的强项，但马穆克拉什维利继续展现出令人印象深刻的多样性。
评分：B
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
数据并不能体现出来，但尚帕尼的表现很笨拙。他经常会掉球或在场上踉踉跄跄。
评分：C-
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
在这场一边倒的比赛中，约翰逊只打了11分钟。他的表现不算特别糟糕，但也并没有做太多帮助圣安东尼奥保持竞争力的事情。
评分：C+
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
在球队崩盘期间，约翰逊束手无策。他让一些已经失效的阵容组合在场上停留了太长时间。更多的调整和更少的无奈旁观会对比赛有所帮助。
评分：D+
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Indiana Pacers – Game #43
Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Indiana Pacers – Game #43
After blowing out the Indiana Pacers in the first game in Paris, the San Antonio Spurs were the ones who got blown out in the rematch. San Antonio’s 136-98 loss dropped their record to 20-23, while Indiana improved to 25-20.
Early on, the Pacers made runs but the Spurs were able to rally back. At halftime, the Spurs were down 15 points but, once again, the good guys battled back and led by a point with four minutes remaining in the third quarter. Unfortunately, that’s when the wheels fell off.
Tyrese Haliburton caught fire to spark an 11-0 run and the Pacers never looked back. In the final stanza, the Spurs looked to be out of gas and they were outscored 38-12.
Overall, San Antonio wasn’t as bad as the final score would suggest — but they can’t feel too good about this game after the ugly collapse.
Stats: Spurs vs. Pacers
Spurs vs. Pacers – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
Wembanyama is so good at basketball that he can put up 20 points and 12 rebounds even when he’s playing bad. In the second game in Paris, the Frenchman never got it going on either end. Defensively, he was a step slow both on the inside and outside. He only tallied one block in 36 minutes and got worse on that end as the game progressed. Offensively, he was better — but not a whole lot better. He was inefficient shooting-wise, his shot-selection wasn’t great and his passing was sub par. Wembanyama was also loose with the ball and lacked physicality too often. All in all, I’d label his homecoming to Paris as a success due to how well he played in the first game — but this one was forgettable.
Grade: D+
Devin Vassell
While Wembanyama clearly underperformed, Vassell was way worse. In 33 minutes, he did a lot more harm than good. He was basically only shooting three-pointers, his playmaking was minimal, his defense was poor and he was rushing all of his decisions. When Vassell plays like this, he brings down the level of the entire team. This was further evidence that he needs to figure out how to play within the framework of the team.
Grade: D-
Chris Paul
Paul played well enough for San Antonio to compete. He was actively looking to score, which helped keep Indiana’s defense honest. He was passing the ball well and kept his miscues to a minimum. Defensively, Paul competed — though he did struggle to have a positive impact on that end.
Grade: B
Harrison Barnes
The Spurs would have been in even hotter water if Barnes didn’t play so well. In 29 minutes, he poured in a team-high 25 points. He drove the ball to the hoop with chutzpah, he was aggressive looking for his shots from the perimeter and he helped his efficiency by getting to the line a team-high seven times. Barnes was also better on the boards than usual and he was attentive on the defensive end. He was a bit sloppier than normal but most of those issues were related to him desperately trying to keep the Spurs in it.
Grade: A-
Stephon Castle
The good: Castle passed the ball well, handled a healthy amount of playmaking and was never shy about attacking the rim. He also deserves credit for limiting his turnovers, which has been a problem lately. His work on the boards was commendable and there were a lot of good possessions on the defensive end. The bad: Castle could have mixed in even more passes. At this point of his career, he shouldn’t be leading the team in field goal attempts. Castle shot poorly, which remains an area of extreme concern.
Grade: B
Tre Jones
Jones got roasted quite a bit on the defensive end. To say he was a liability on that end would be an understatement. Offensively, Jones was looking to score more than usual — and that didn’t work out too well. His one assist paints an accurate picture of his lack of playmaking. Jones was uncharacteristically poor in just about every area of the sport.
Grade: D-
Jeremy Sochan
Playing off the bench again after returning from a back injury, Sochan couldn’t have been much more underwhelming if he tried. In 14 minutes, he was 1-for-5 from the field, turned it over four times and fouled thrice. Let’s hope this was just a bump in the road because Sochan looked bad enough that I was concerned about the health of his back.
Grade: D-
Sandro Mamukelashvili
Mamukelashvili got some real minutes and did okay. His hustle was a breath of fresh air. He only scored three points but his activity helped his squad on both ends of the court. Defense will never be a strength but Mamukelashvili continues to show an impressive amount of diversity to his game.
Grade: B
Julian Champagnie
The stats don’t show it but Champagnie had a clumsy outing. He could usually be found fumbling the ball or otherwise bumbling around the court.
Grade: C-
Keldon Johnson
Johnson only played 11 minutes in this blowout. He wasn’t especially bad — but he also wasn’t doing much to help San Antonio stay afloat.
Grade: C+
Mitch Johnson
Johnson had no answers during the collapse. He ran too long with dying combinations. More tinkering and less helplessly watching the ship sink would have helped matters.
Grade: D+
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk