马刺 @ 步行者 123 - 113 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2026-01-03 08:22:22
圣安东尼奥马刺队表现稳健，足以击败印第安纳步行者队，赛季战绩提升至25胜9负。反观步行者队，战绩则滑落至6胜29负，为全联盟最差。
这场比赛远谈不上精彩。首节结束时，马刺队以30-31落后。次节，圣安东尼奥队扭转了局势，单节打出41-27的比分，从而掌控了比赛。下半场，马刺队曾有机会拉开比分，但他们未能保持高效的三分命中率，也无法连续打出成功的防守回合。即便如此，他们在通往123-113胜利的道路上从未受到真正的威胁。
数据统计：马刺 vs 步行者
马刺 vs 步行者 – 最终评分
德阿隆·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)
这完全是福克斯又一场带队取胜的典型表现。在文班亚马和瓦塞尔缺阵的情况下，这位明星后卫挺身而出，巧妙地引领马刺队走向胜利。进攻端，尽管他的三分手感不佳，但在内线和中距离区域，他极具爆发力。福克斯打得也很无私，无论有球还是无球都表现出色。防守端，他全神贯注。当他没有压迫持球人时，他总能正确轮转换位并拼抢下篮板。
评分: A-
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
优点：在33分钟内贡献19分、8个篮板和8次助攻，这很难让人挑剔。卡斯尔获得了7次罚球机会，贡献了两次抢断，并且处理球比平时更加谨慎。他还命中了一记三分球。不足：卡斯尔的投篮只有17投6中——这显然是不可接受的效率。他的运球和决策能力仍有待加强。防守端，卡斯尔不像往常那样充满活力。
评分: B
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
在上一场投进创队史纪录的11记三分球后，尚帕尼不幸地从云端跌回现实。本场比赛他13投2中，其中三分线外11投2中。他的投篮选择过于勉强——考虑到他最近一场的表现，这也可以理解。不过说实话，我并不介意他积极主动地寻找投篮机会。当尚帕尼果断出手时，他的作用是最大的。此外，他还在防守和拼抢篮板……这让他投失的三分球变得更容易被原谅。
评分: C
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯显然仍处于低迷状态。他现在无法提供一个可靠的投篮点——这对他来说很不寻常。在21分钟的上场时间里，巴恩斯7投仅1中，其中三分线外6投1中。他在防守端的表现也很糟糕，几次传球错过了处于空位的队友，并且似乎为了帮助球队而打得有些急躁。希望巴恩斯能尽快稳定下来，重新成为马刺可以信赖的球员。
评分: D-
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)
科内特虽不是文班亚马，但他正在证明自己是联盟中一名合格的首发中锋。他能做好所有细节工作，而不去担心自己的数据或成就。面对步行者队，他在内线奋力拼搏，传球出色，并且在寻找得分机会时效率很高。他通过一次空中接力完成了一记势大力沉的扣篮，展现了他被低估的运动能力。科内特的防守本可以做得更好一些，但总的来说，他在防守端也做出了积极贡献。
评分: B+
迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)
这位新秀刚经历了他新秀赛季中最糟糕的比赛之一，但哈珀在本场强势反弹。在29分钟内，他砍下22分，并且在各个距离的投篮命中率都很高。他冲击篮筐的动作一如既往地犀利且充满活力。虽然他的组织能力没有得到展现，但他的得分极具威胁，以至于步行者队不得不时刻提防他。我也很欣赏他的防守努力，以及他将失误控制在最低限度的事实。
评分: A-
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
除凯尔登·怀尔德·约翰逊 (Keldon Wilder Johnson) 之外的马刺球员，三分球合计43投10中（命中率23.3%）。而约翰逊本人，则是三分线外3投3中。除了球队急需的外线火力，约翰逊还带来了内线得分、强悍的篮板拼抢和稳健的防守。尽管在一次重摔后短暂离场，但这位圣安东尼奥队的第六人回归后状态丝毫未受影响。他本赛季的表现非常出色，今晚只是最新的例证。
评分: A-
凯利·奥利尼克 (Kelly Olynyk)
随着科内特被提上首发阵容，奥利尼克获得了替补中锋的出场时间。这一决定立竿见影。他在任何单一技术环节上都不是顶尖的，但他是一位技术非常全面的篮球运动员。在印第安纳，奥利尼克展示了他的三分投射、背身技术和与生俱来的传球能力。防守端，他很好地顶住了压力，并利用自己的身体对抗和篮球智慧制造机会。奥利尼克甚至完成了一记扣篮，证明他油箱里剩下的运动能力比大多数人想象的要多。
评分: A-
林迪·沃特斯三世 (Lindy Waters III)
这是沃特斯本赛季表现较好的比赛之一。他命中的两记三分球看起来如丝般顺滑。他送出了几次聪明的传球，防守很用脑子，并且在推进比赛节奏方面做得很好。沃特斯正在证明自己是一位宝贵的板凳席深度选择。
评分: A-
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)
优点：布莱恩特送出了他职业生涯中第一次高水准的传球。他还完成了一次强硬的终结，并打出了几个极具影响力的防守回合。不足：布莱恩特四次三分出手全部投失，其中前两次远投甚至完全没有碰到篮筐。这位新秀在开阔场地下的动作仍然显得不协调。
评分: C+
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
约翰逊做出了许多明智的决策。他削减了巴恩斯的出场时间，同时给了哈珀更多的上场时间。给沃特斯上场时间最终被证明是一个致胜之举。由于马刺队要打背靠背的比赛，约翰逊也很好地控制了球员们的上场时间，避免了不必要的消耗。具体来说，福克斯只打了32分钟，这对明天的比赛应该会有帮助。
评分: A-
由生成式 AI 翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Indiana Pacers – Game #34
Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Indiana Pacers – Game #34
The San Antonio Spurs did enough to defeat the Indiana Pacers and improve to 25-9 on the season. The Pacers, on the other hand, dropped to an NBA worst record of 6-29.
This game was far from beautiful. The Spurs trailed at the end of the first quarter, 31-30. San Antonio turned things around and grabbed control of the game by winning the second quarter by a count of 41-27. The Spurs had chances to pull away in the second half but they couldn’t hit three-pointers at a high rate or stack defensive stops. That said, they were never truly threatened on their way to their 123-113 victory.
Stats: Spurs at Pacers
Spurs at Pacers – Final Grades
De’Aaron Fox
This was simply another winning performance by Fox. Without Wembanyama or Vassell, the star guard picked up the slack and expertly guided the Spurs to the win. Offensively, while his three-point shot was off, he was dynamite in the paint and in the midrange. Fox was also unselfish and did well both on the ball and away from the ball. Defensively, he was locked in. When he wasn’t pressuring the ball, he was rotating correctly and pulling down rebounds.
Grade: A-
Stephon Castle
The good: It’s tough to complain about 19 points, eight rebounds and eight assists in 33 minutes. Castle got to the line for seven attempts, swiped a pair of steals and was more careful with the ball than usual. He also knocked down a three-pointer. The bad: Castle was just 6-for-17 from the field — that is obviously unacceptable efficiency. He could have still tightened up his dribble and his decision-making. Defensively, Castle wasn’t as amped up as usual.
Grade: B
Julian Champagnie
Coming off of a franchise-record 11 made three-pointers, Champagnie unfortunately came crashing back down to earth. He was 2-for-13 from the field, including 2-for-11 from three-point range. His shot-selection was too ambitious — which was understandable given his most recent performance. Honestly, though, I didn’t mind him being aggressive looking for his shot. Champagnie is most useful when he’s letting it fly. Moreover, he was defending and grabbing boards … and that made his missed threes more forgivable.
Grade: C
Harrison Barnes
Barnes is apparently still in his slump. He’s just not providing a reliable shooting outlet right now — and that’s unusual for him. In 21 minutes, Barnes was just 1-for-7 from the field, including 1-for-6 from three-point territory. He also was poor on the defensive end, missed a few open teammates with passes and seemed to be pressing too much in an effort to aid the cause. Hopefully Barnes will settle down soon and get back to being someone the Spurs can bank on.
Grade: D-
Luke Kornet
Kornet isn’t Wembanyama but he’s proving to be a legitimate starting center in the league. He does all the small things while not worrying about his own numbers or accomplishments. Against the Pacers, he battled in the paint, passed the ball well and was efficient when looking to score. He had a big dunk on an alleyoop that showed off his underrated athletic ability. Kornet’s defense could have been a bit better but he was a plus on that end as well.
Grade: B+
Dylan Harper
The rookie was coming off one of the worst games of his first campaign but Harper was able to bounce back in a big way. In 29 minutes, he poured in 22 points and shot well from every distance. Harper’s moves going to the basket were as fierce and dynamic as ever. While his playmaking didn’t make an appearance, his scoring was so deadly that the Pacers had to account for him at all times. I also liked his defensive effort and the fact that he kept his miscues to a minimum.
Grade: A-
Keldon Johnson
Spurs players not named Keldon Wilder Johnson were 10-for-43 (23.3%) on three-pointers. Johnson, meanwhile, was 3-for-3 from deep. Beyond his much-needed perimeter marksmanship, Johnson brought interior scoring, toughness on the boards and stout defense. Though he left the game for a bit after a hard fall, San Antonio’s sixth man came back and didn’t skip a beat. He’s having a very good season and tonight was just the latest example.
Grade: A-
Kelly Olynyk
With Kornet elevated to the starting lineup, Olynyk got the backup center minutes. That decision paid immediate dividends. He’s not great at any one category but he’s a pretty darn impressive all-around basketball player. In Indiana, Olynyk showed off his three-point shot, post moves and innate ability to pass the ball. Defensively, he held up well and made plays with his physicality and guile. Olynyk even had a dunk that demonstrated that he has more athleticism left in the tank than most would assume.
Grade: A-
Lindy Waters III
This was one of Waters’ better outings of the season. He hit a pair of three-pointers that looked silky smooth. He authored a couple heady passes, defended with smarts and did good work pushing the tempo. Waters is proving to be a valuable deep bench option.
Grade: A-
Carter Bryant
The good: Bryant had his first high level pass of his career. He also had a strong finish and played a handful of really impactful defensive possessions. The bad: Bryant missed all four of his three-pointers, with his first two attempts from downtown missing the rim completely. The rookie also continues to look uncoordinated in open court situations.
Grade: C+
Mitch Johnson
Johnson made a lot of wise decisions. He pulled back on Barnes’ minutes while giving Harper more PT. Giving Waters time ended up being a winning move. With the Spurs playing a back-to-back, Johnson also did well to not play anyone unneeded minutes. Specifically, Fox only playing 32 minutes should be helpful tomorrow.
Grade: A-
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk