By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-01-25 16:02:32
由生成式 AI 翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
文班亚马(Victor Wembanyama)领衔主演，圣安东尼奥马刺队在周四下午迎战印第安纳步行者队。在自己的家乡父老面前，文班在马刺队的大胜中持续惊艳全场。
上半场双方打得十分胶着。然而，下半场马刺队势不可挡。圣安东尼奥在下半场砍下80分，投篮命中率高达66.7%，其中三分球16投10中（62.5%）。
最终，马刺队以140-110的比分大胜步行者队。圣安东尼奥和印第安纳将在周六下午的巴黎再次交锋。我们当然希望马刺队能够再次奉献类似的精彩表现。
数据：马刺 vs. 步行者
马刺 vs. 步行者 – 最终评级
维克多·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
在家乡球迷面前比赛，我们可以理解文班的紧张情绪。但是，这位法国球星的表现非常出色。他不负众望，甚至超出了预期。文班三分球11投4中，两分球10投9中，在32分钟的出场时间里砍下30分。当他不得分时，他展现了出色的传球技巧或令人惊叹的运球能力。在防守端，他如同怪兽一般。一旦他在防守端发力，步行者队就陷入了巨大的麻烦。虽然文班今晚的表现并非完美，但他已经非常接近完美了。他的篮球水平如此之高，有时甚至令人难以置信。
评分：A+
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
在巴黎，瓦塞尔看起来沉着、冷静、自信，是致命的进攻威胁。最值得注意的是，他的三分球6投5中。我喜欢他的投篮选择，而且他的传球也比平时更好。当瓦塞尔聪明地选择出手时机时，他就是一名高水平的篮球运动员。在防守端，他展现了近几周以来最积极的状态。
评分：A
克里斯·保罗 (Chris Paul)
优点：保罗很好地掌控了比赛节奏。他送出7次助攻，只有1次失误，并且经常做出正确的决定。保罗的防守不算出色，但他在篮板球方面表现稳健，这很有帮助。缺点：保罗没有出手两分球，并且在过去的三场比赛中只投过一次两分。在上半场对阵步行者队的比赛中，他有时在防守端很难被隐藏。
评分：B+
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
马刺队在第三节占据了统治地位，巴恩斯在这一节的表现值得称赞。他砍下10分，三分球和两分球均两投两中。当巴恩斯在进攻端积极主动时，一切似乎都变得更加顺利。整场比赛，他10投9中，传球出色，篮板球比平时更好，并且有效地控制了失误。
评分：A
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
卡斯尔有一些精彩的表现，但不幸的是，他的低迷表现更多。他的投篮命中率很低，在24分钟的出场时间里出现了5次失误。在比赛的各个方面做出更好的决策将有助于这位新秀的成长。话虽如此，他的运动能力有时确实很突出，他对比赛的感觉也很明显。卡斯尔需要打得更干净利落，但这并不是一场彻底的失败。
评分：C-
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
约翰逊的表现不错。他最近在处理球方面做出了快速而正确的决定。他的投篮姿势看起来有点古怪，但防守队员正在重视他的投篮，这很重要。约翰逊的防守比平时更好，他的整体活力也很有感染力。
评分：B
杰里米·索汉 (Jeremy Sochan)
索汉的表现相当出色，但却很低调。这位充满活力的前锋从背伤中复出，他的存在感十足。他在进攻端毫不羞于展现自己的影响力，而且他的行动几乎都是积极的。无论是自己完成投篮还是为队友创造机会，他都展现了聪明的进攻手段。索汉的防守非常出色，他在篮板球方面表现强悍，并且在攻防两端都保持着不懈的投入。欢迎回来。
评分：A
特雷·琼斯 (Tre Jones)
我一直期待琼斯能够打出突破性的表现，而这场在巴黎的比赛可能就是他突破的开始。他看起来比本赛季任何时候都更像一个完整的球员。在进攻端，他加快了比赛节奏，为队友创造机会，并且能够有效地得分。他命中了一记三分球，果断地突破，并在保持快节奏的同时限制了失误。在防守端，琼斯在场上飞奔，试图制造混乱。
评分：A
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼在马刺队巴黎的首场比赛中大部分时间都默默无闻，但他的表现不错。他比平时做决定更快，这无疑有助于进攻的流畅性。他为球队带来的空间很有帮助，并且在防守端也表现出色。篮板球也是尚帕尼的另一个强项。
评分：B
桑德罗·马穆克拉什维利 (Sandro Mamukelashvili)
马穆克拉什维利在周四的比赛中获得了一些额外的出场时间，并充分利用了这些时间。他在攻防两端都充满了活力，在球队的战术体系内打球，并且不停地拼抢。马穆克拉什维利完全有理由进入球队的轮换阵容。
评分：B+
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
约翰逊应该把他中场休息时说的话记录下来。我喜欢他使用文班的方式。替补阵容在一段时间以来第一次看起来像一个真正运转的整体。为瓦塞尔设计的战术也立即收到了成效。
评分：A
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Indiana Pacers – Game #42
Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Indiana Pacers – Game #42
With Victor Wembanyama headlining the show, the San Antonio Spurs took on the Indiana Pacers on Thursday afternoon. In his homecoming, Wembanyama wowed the crowd on a consistent basis in San Antonio’s blowout victory.
The first half was a tight back and forth affair. After halftime, though, the Spurs simply couldn’t be stopped. San Antonio scored 80 points in the second half by hitting 66.7% of their shots from the field, including 10-for-16 (62.5%) from three-point range.
When the smoke cleared, the Spurs had an emphatic 140-110 victory over the Pacers. San Antonio and Indiana play again in Paris on Saturday afternoon. The good guys will obviously hope for a similar encore performance.
Stats: Spurs vs. Pacers
Spurs vs. Pacers – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
Playing in front of his hometown fans, we could have forgiven Wembanyama for being nervous. But, instead, the Frenchman was awesome. He lived up to the hype — and then some. Wembanyama was 4-for-11 from three-point land and 9-for-10 from inside of the arc on his way to 30 points in 32 minutes. When he wasn’t scoring, he was showing off his great passing skills or wowing with his dribbling. Defensively, he was a monster. Once he got rolling on that end, the Pacers were in big, big trouble. While Wembanyama wasn’t perfect on this night, he was pretty damn close. He’s so good at basketball it can be unbelievable at times.
Grade: A+
Devin Vassell
Looking calm, cool and confident, Vassell was a lethal offensive threat in Paris. Most notably, he was 5-for-6 from deep. I liked his shot-selection and his passing was better than usual. When Vassell is picking his spots with smarts, he’s a quality basketball player. Defensively, he was as active as we’ve seen him in weeks.
Grade: A
Chris Paul
The good: Paul ran the show really well. He totaled seven assists and only one turnover while routinely making the right decision. Paul’s defense wasn’t awesome but he was sturdy on the boards, which helped. The bad: Paul didn’t shoot a two-pointer and has only shot one two in the last three games. In the first half against the Pacers, he was difficult to hide on defense at times.
Grade: B+
Harrison Barnes
The Spurs dominated the third quarter and Barnes deserves a lot of credit for how San Antonio played in that period. He led the way with 10 points, as he hit both of his threes and both of his twos. When Barnes is aggressive on offense, everything seems to roll better. For the night, he hit 9-of-10 shots from the field, passed the ball well, rebounded better than usual and limited his mistakes.
Grade: A
Stephon Castle
Castle had some highlights but, unfortunately, he had more lowlights. He shot poorly from the field and totaled five turnovers in 24 minutes. Better decision-making in all facets of the game would have helped the rookie’s cause. Then again, his athleticism definitely popped at times and his feel for the game was also obvious. Castle has to play cleaner but this wasn’t a total disappointment.
Grade: C-
Keldon Johnson
Not a bad showing for Johnson. He’s making good, fast decisions with the ball lately. His shooting form looks a bit wonky but defenses are respecting his shot, which is important. Johnson’s defense was better than usual and his overall energy level was contagious.
Grade: B
Jeremy Sochan
Sochan was quietly pretty great. Returning from a back injury, the enthusiastic forward made his presence felt. He wasn’t shy about impacting the proceedings on the offensive end — and his actions were almost all positive. He attacked with smarts, whether finishing shots himself or setting up teammates. Sochan’s defense was really good, he was a beast on the boards and he was relentlessly engaged on both ends of the court. Welcome back.
Grade: A
Tre Jones
I’ve been waiting for something that looks like a breakout performance out of Jones and this game in Paris might have been it. He looked much more like a complete player than he has at any time this season. Offensively, he pushed the tempo, set the table for teammates and was able to efficiently put points on the board. He hit a three, drove with purpose and limited his mistakes even though he was moving at a hectic pace. Defensively, Jones was flying around the court trying to create chaos.
Grade: A
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie mostly hid in the shadows in San Antonio’s first game in Paris but he did well. He was making faster decisions than usual, which definitely helped the flow of the offense. The spacing he brings to the court was helpful and he held up well on the defensive end. Boards were also another strength for Champagnie.
Grade: B
Sandro Mamukelashvili
Mamukelashvili got a few extra minutes on Thursday and took advantage of the time. He played with electricity on both sides of the court, played within the concepts of the team and hustled nonstop. Mamukelashvili has a very real case that he deserves to be in the rotation.
Grade: B+
Mitch Johnson
Johnson should bottle whatever he said at halftime. I liked how he used Wembanyama throughout. The bench looked like an actual functional unit for the first time in a while. Running plays for Vassell also paid immediate dividends.
Grade: A
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk