By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2024-12-02 17:44:50
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
在本赛季最精彩的比赛之一中，圣安东尼奥马刺队以127-125的比分客场击败了萨克拉门托国王队。这是圣安东尼奥本赛季的第三场客场胜利，他们的战绩提升至11胜9负。国王队则遭遇失利，战绩跌至9胜12负。
比赛初期，马刺队的情况看起来很糟糕。国王队在第一节一度领先多达17分。进入第二节时，萨克拉门托以42-28领先。
马刺队直到第三节才缩小了差距。接下来的比赛，双方你来我往。马刺队最终凭借出色的三分球命中率和关键时刻的执行力赢得了比赛。
数据：马刺队对阵国王队
马刺对阵国王 – 最终评分
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
文班亚马打出了职业生涯中最亮眼的数据之一。面对国王队，这位高大的法国人砍下34分、14个篮板和11次助攻。除了三双数据外，他17投11中，其中三分球9投5中。正如数据所示，文班亚马的表现非常出色。他的投篮效率极高；几乎所有的投篮都非常平衡且经过深思熟虑。他在低位和移动中的传球都妙到毫巅。文班亚马在篮板上如同野兽，在防守端也极具威胁。他的失误和犯规有些多——而且他在面对较小的防守者时本可以更有对抗性——但除此之外，他几乎完美。
评分：A
克里斯·保罗 (Chris Paul)
保罗的天赋在萨克拉门托得到了充分展现。在关键时刻，他意识到国王队会换防一切，所以他确保圣安东尼奥每次进攻都能形成错位。国王队有很多经验丰富且擅长关键时刻的球员，但保罗确保马刺队始终保持着明智的打球方式。他还命中了一个至关重要的三分球，打出了强硬的防守，并限制了在攻防两端的失误。
评分：A-
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
在回到萨克拉门托的比赛中，巴恩斯并没有带来太大的影响。他有一些巧妙的慢动作突破上篮，篮板球抢得不错，传球也不错，防守也很努力。但巴恩斯没有投进三分球，有时在防守端看起来慢了一步。总而言之，他没有伤害球队，但我相信巴恩斯希望在回到老东家的比赛中有更惊艳的表现。
评分：B-
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
是的，卡斯尔的表现确实像个新秀。他在比赛的各个方面都相当糟糕。防守端，他不如往常那样 disciplined。进攻端，他有一些难看的三分球投丢，还有一些不明智的移动中投篮，并且在内线缺乏对抗性。卡斯尔精明的传球在这场比赛中消失了，而且他的球风有些随意。
评分：D-
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼实际上是这场胜利中非常重要的一部分。在上半场，当马刺队似乎要崩盘的时候，他的进攻输出让球队保持在了比赛中。半场结束时，尚帕尼得到了16分——主要归功于他三分球6投4中。如果没有他的贡献，马刺队很可能会被打花。除了上半场火热的投篮之外，尚帕尼还通过突破篮下和积极的防守展现了比赛的多样性。
评分：A-
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
约翰逊今晚表现不错。进攻端，他真的很好。他的三分球很准，他的强力突破在比赛胶着时为马刺队得分。他在进攻端的整体决策值得称赞。防守方面，嗯，就没那么好了。委婉地说，约翰逊在个人对位中并不是特别成功。
评分：B+
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
虽然瓦塞尔的出场时间仍然有限，但这并没有阻止他在周日晚上的比赛中产生显著的影响。他的跳投整场比赛看起来都很漂亮。当他出手时，球看起来就像要进一样。瓦塞尔在24分钟内砍下21分，并且似乎随时准备好在马刺队最需要他的时候挺身而出。我喜欢他的传球和耐心——这是我们本赛季很少从瓦塞尔身上看到的两个方面。他的防守需要改进，但在其他方面，圣安东尼奥在这场比赛中对他已经不能要求更多了。
评分：A-
特雷·琼斯 (Tre Jones)
这场胜利的阴影是琼斯遭受的肩伤。希望他不会缺席太多比赛。在他被迫离场之前，琼斯的表现非常出色。他在防守端的预判能力令人惊叹。他一次又一次地打出200 IQ 的表现。琼斯看起来真的很快，并且在他上场的时间里产生了相当大的影响。他的夜晚提前结束真是太糟糕了，因为琼斯打出了他本赛季最好的一场比赛——毫无疑问。
评分：A-
查尔斯·巴塞 (Charles Bassey)
唉。巴塞获得了赢得替补中锋位置的机会——结果却是一场灾难。他上半场打了6分钟，表现糟糕透了。当他没有犯规的时候，他在防守端就找不到位置，或者在进攻端挡路。我喜欢给巴塞一个机会的想法，但结果再糟糕不过了。
评分：D-
扎克·科林斯 (Zach Collins)
科林斯在下半场重新获得了替补中锋的位置。他比巴塞好——但这主要是因为他没有碍事。如果科林斯想保住轮换位置，他就需要打得更好。
评分：C+
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
第四节的策略很棒。我喜欢约翰逊整场比赛对文班亚马的使用方式。我认为轮换阵容安排得很好。给巴塞一个机会是一个不错的举动，即使这个举动事与愿违。约翰逊巧妙地利用暂停来阻止国王队的进攻势头，并在球队表现糟糕时提醒他的队员。
评分：A-
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Sacramento Kings – Game #20
Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Sacramento Kings – Game #20
In one of the most entertaining games of the season, the San Antonio Spurs defeated the Sacramento Kings on the road by a final count of 127-125. This was San Antonio’s third road win of the season and improved their record to 11-9. The loss dropped the Kings to 9-12.
Early on, things looked bad for the Spurs. The Kings led by as many as 17 points in the first quarter. Heading into the second period, Sacramento held a 42-28 advantage.
It took the Spurs until the third quarter to close the gap. The rest of the way, it was a back and forth affair. The Spurs got the win by shooting very well from three-point range and executing down the stretch.
Stats: Spurs at Kings
Spurs at Kings – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
Wembanyama posted one of the sexier lines of career. Against the Kings, the towering Frenchman had 34 points, 14 rebounds and 11 assists. To go along with the triple-double, he was 11-for-17 from the field including 5-for-9 from three-point range. As the numbers suggest, Wembanyama was awesome. He was exceptionally efficient shooting the ball; nearly all of his shots were on-balance and smartly conceived. His passing out of the post and when he was on the move was marvelous. Wembanyama was a beast on the boards and a menace on defense. He had issues with turnovers and fouls — and he could have been more physical against smaller defenders — but, otherwise, he was basically perfect.
Grade: A
Chris Paul
Paul’s genius was at full display in Sacramento. During money time, he realized the Kings were switching everything so he made sure San Antonio got mismatches every time up the court. The Kings have a lot of experienced players who thrive in the clutch but Paul made sure the Spurs kept playing a wise brand of basketball. He also knocked down a momentous three-pointer, played rugged defense and limited his mistakes on both sides of the court.
Grade: A-
Harrison Barnes
In his return to Sacramento, Barnes didn’t move the needle a whole lot. He had some crafty slow motion drives to the hoop, rebounded well, passed the ball well and played hard on defense. But Barnes didn’t hit a three-pointer and sometimes looked a step slow on the defensive end. All in all, he wasn’t hurting the team but I’m sure Barnes hoped for a splashier return to his former team.
Grade: B-
Stephon Castle
Yeah, so Castle definitely played like a rookie. He was pretty darn bad in all aspects of the game. Defensively, he wasn’t as disciplined as usual. Offensively, he had some ugly misses from three-point range, he had some unwise shot attempts on the move and lacked physicality in the paint. Castle’s heady passing was missing in action and he was sloppy with the ball.
Grade: D-
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie was actually a very important part of this win. In the first half, when the Spurs appeared to be circling the drain, his offensive production kept the good guys in the ballgame. At halftime, Champagnie had 16 points — mostly due to his 4-for-6 shooting from three-point range. Without that production, the Spurs probably get blown out. Beyond his hot first half shooting, Champagnie continues to show variety to his game by driving to the rim and playing active defense.
Grade: A-
Keldon Johnson
Good stuff from Johnson tonight. Offensively, he was really good. His three-point shooting was on and his physical drives gave the Spurs points when the going got tough. His overall decision-making on offense was commendable. Defense, well, it wasn’t as good. Johnson wasn’t particularly successful in individual matchups, to put it kindly.
Grade: B+
Devin Vassell
While Vassell’s minutes remain limited, he didn’t let that stop him from having a notable impact on the game on Sunday night. His jumper looked beautiful all game long. When he shot it, it always looked like it was going in. Vassell poured in 21 points in 24 minutes and seemed to be ready to produce when the Spurs needed him most. I liked his passing and patience — two areas we haven’t seen much from Vassell this season. His defense needs work but, everywhere else, San Antonio couldn’t have asked for much more out of him in this game.
Grade: A-
Tre Jones
The dark cloud over this win was the shoulder injury suffered by Jones. Let’s hope he doesn’t end up missing many games. Before he was forced to leave the game, Jones was doing pretty awesome. His anticipation on defense was fabulous. He was making 200 IQ play after 200 IQ play. Jones looked legitimately fast and was making a sizable difference during his time on the court. It’s too bad his night ended early because Jones was having his best game of the season — unquestionably.
Grade: A-
Charles Bassey
Oof. Bassey was given an opportunity to win the backup center job — and it ended up being a disaster. He played six first half minutes and couldn’t have been much worse. When he wasn’t fouling, he was out of place on defense or in the way on offense. I liked the idea of giving Bassey a chance but it couldn’t have gone much worse.
Grade: D-
Zach Collins
Collins reclaimed the backup center gig in the second half. He was better than Bassey — but that’s mostly just because he stayed out of the way. Collins needs to play better if he’s going to keep his spot in the rotation.
Grade: C+
Mitch Johnson
The strategy in the fourth quarter was great. I liked how Johnson used Wembanyama all game long. I thought the rotation was fine. Giving Bassey an opportunity was a good move, even though the move backfired. Johnson smartly used timeouts to halt runs by the Kings and admonish his troops when they were playing poorly.
Grade: A-
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk