[SpursTalk] 圣安东尼奥马刺对阵萨克拉门托国王 – 第23场比赛评分

By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2024-12-08 04:53:49

由生成式人工智能翻译,译文内容可能不准确或不完整,以原文为准。

文班亚马(Victor Wembanyama)连续第二场缺席比赛,圣安东尼奥马刺的防守也连续第二场陷入困境。在上一场比赛丢掉139分之后,圣安东尼奥以113-140的比分输给了萨克拉门托国王。

德文·瓦塞尔(Devin Vassell)在背靠背的第二晚轮休,与文班一起作壁上观。这场失利使马刺队的赛季战绩跌至11胜12负。

马刺队开局强势,但随后防守崩溃。在第三节初期的一波进攻之后,马刺队就再也没能真正地将比赛拉回正轨。国王队在圣安东尼奥的最后一节砍下40分,让马刺队显得毫无招架之力。

数据统计:马刺 vs. 国王

马刺 国王

马刺 vs. 国王 – 最终评分

克里斯·保罗(Chris Paul)

保罗竭尽全力带领马刺队走向胜利。他对于进攻的掌控令人惊叹。他基本上是在喂饼给所有队友,并利用他篮球方面的天赋来创造得分机会。保罗投进了足够多的球来牵制防守,并且竭尽全力去对抗和限制国王队。有时他身高上的劣势在防守端会让他吃亏,但除此之外,他真的非常非常出色。

评分:A-

哈里森·巴恩斯(Harrison Barnes)

对巴恩斯来说,这只是又一次表现平平的比赛。越来越明显的是,如果他没有得到足够的球权,他很快就会变得默默无闻。巴恩斯在防守端表现糟糕,在进攻端也没有为球队做出足够的贡献。

评分:D

朱利安·尚帕尼(Julian Champagnie)

尚帕尼几乎凭借一己之力维持了球队的进攻火力。他得到了职业生涯最高的30分,其中包括6记三分球和罚球8罚8中。尚帕尼投篮自信,出手速度比以往任何时候都快。在他找到手感后,他扩展了自己的进攻手段,试图扛起球队。他的防守不算特别好,但看起来比大多数身披银黑战袍的球员要好。

评分:A

斯蒂芬·卡斯尔(Stephon Castle)

优点:卡斯尔在防守端有一些亮点。他的脚步移动出色,预判也很棒。在进攻端,他的传球是一个亮点,他还命中了两记三分球。缺点:卡斯尔三分球7投仅2中,两分球8投3中。他掌控进攻的能力远不如保罗。总的来说,卡斯尔需要在攻防两端更好地利用每一次球权。

评分:C

扎克·科林斯(Zach Collins)

科林斯顶替文班亚马首发出任中锋。在他上场的九分钟里,除了犯规之外,他几乎没有做任何贡献。然后他领到两次技术犯规,对裁判竖起了中指,随后被罚出场。通常情况下,科林斯被罚下场并不是什么大事。然而,在文班缺席的情况下,这场比赛他被罚下场的影响就很大了。

评分:D-

查尔斯·巴塞(Charles Bassey)

从数据上看,巴塞似乎打了一场好球。他得到了7分、7个篮板和3次盖帽。但实际上,他的表现相当糟糕。他在攻防两端都缺乏比赛感觉。在防守端,他很好地保护了篮筐,但在其他方面都慢了一步。在进攻端,他经常碍事,而且他的动作比平时慢。

评分:C-

凯尔登·约翰逊(Keldon Johnson)

约翰逊对阵国王的三分球6投仅1中,本赛季他的三分球命中率只有29.2%。如果没有可靠的三分球,他的价值就会大打折扣。约翰逊能够完成一些强硬的突破上篮,但他的组织能力很有限。在防守端,他更多的是一个累赘而不是一个资产。

评分:C

杰里米·索汉(Jeremy Sochan)

索汉在周五晚上的比赛中格外卖力。很高兴看到球队中有人展现出一些拼搏精神,但说实话,索汉的努力并没有对国王队的进攻造成多大阻碍。在进攻端,他的投篮命中率不错,并展现出了一些组织能力。在防守端,索汉很努力,但效果并不显著。

评分:C+

桑德罗·马穆凯拉什维利(Sandro Mamukelashvili)

马穆凯拉什维利替补出场后立即命中一记三分球。然而,在那之后,他的影响力并不大。他在防守端难以应对萨克拉门托的运动能力。在进攻端,他的罚球6罚3中,最后两次三分球出手也未能命中。不过,他的拼劲还是值得肯定的。

评分:C

马拉基·布拉纳姆(Malaki Branham)

布拉纳姆得到了他一段时间以来的第一次真正意义上的出场时间。在对阵国王的比赛中,他的表现并没有为自己争取到更多出场时间。他的进攻效率低下,防守糟糕,并且犯了各种各样的错误。

评分:C-

米奇·约翰逊(Mitch Johnson)

布拉纳姆的试验失败了。约翰逊也应该早点放弃巴塞。但是,教练组的确面临着困境,他们在这一晚没能拿出太多有效的解决方案。

评分:C-

点击查看原文:Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Sacramento Kings – Game #23

Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Sacramento Kings – Game #23

For the second straight game, the San Antonio Spurs played without Victor Wembanyama. For the second straight game, the Spurs struggled defensively. After giving up 139 points in their previous game, San Antonio lost to the Sacramento Kings by a final count of 140-113.

Devin Vassell, resting on the second night of a back-to-back, joined Wembanyama on the sidelines. The loss dropped the Spurs to 11-12 on the season.

The good guys started strong but then the defense imploded. After an early run in the third quarter, the Spurs were never truly able to make a game of it. The Kings ended their night in San Antonio with a 40-point fourth quarter that made the Spurs look powerless to stop them.

Stats: Spurs vs. Kings

spurs kings

Spurs vs. Kings – Final Grades

Chris Paul

Paul did all he could to lead the Spurs to victory. His running of the offense was amazing. He was basically spoon-feeding all his teammates and using his basketball genius to locate buckets. Paul hit enough shots to keep the defense honest and was doing all he could to compete and slow down the Kings. Sometimes his lack of height hurt him on the defensive end but otherwise he was really, really good.

Grade: A-

Harrison Barnes

It was just another lukewarm outing for Barnes. It’s becoming clear that he is quick to fade into obscurity if he doesn’t get enough touches. Barnes was bad on the defensive end and didn’t do enough offensively to aid the cause.

Grade: D

Julian Champagnie

Champagnie almost single-handedly kept the offense above water. He scored a career-high 30 points, highlighted by six three-pointers and an 8-for-8 showing at the line. Champagnie shot with confidence and his trigger was quicker than ever. After he got it going, he expanded his repertoire in an attempt to carry his teammates on his back. He wasn’t especially good defensively but looked better than most of the other players in Silver and Black.

Grade: A

Stephon Castle

The good: Castle had his moments on the defensive end. He moved his feet well and his anticipation was great. Offensively, his passing stood out as a positive and he hit a pair of three-pointers. The bad: Castle was only 2-for-7 from deep and 3-for-8 from two-point range. His running of the offense wasn’t nearly as crisp as when Paul was running the show. Overall, Castle needs to do a better job of valuing each possession on both ends.

Grade: C

Zach Collins

Collins started at center in place of Wembanyama. He didn’t do much in his nine minutes other than foul. Then he picked up a pair of technical fouls, gave a digital salute to the ref and went to the locker room. Normally, it’s not a huge deal if Collins gets ejected. However, with Wembanyama on the sidelines, this was not the game to get tossed.

Grade: D-

Charles Bassey

Statistically, it appears as if Bassey had a good game. He finished with seven points, seven rebounds and three blocks. But in actuality, he was pretty bad. His feel for the game was lacking on both sides of the court. Defensively, he protected the hoop well but was a step late everywhere else. Offensively, he was too often in the way and his movements were slower than usual.

Grade: C-

Keldon Johnson

Johnson hit only 1-of-6 three-point attempts against the Kings and is shooting only 29.2% from deep on the season. Without a reliable three-point shot, he’s a much less valuable player. Johnson was able to finish some rugged drives to the cup but his playmaking was minimal. Defensively, he was more often a liability than an asset.

Grade: C

Jeremy Sochan

Sochan was extra scrappy on Friday night. It was good to see someone on the team showing some fight but, truthfully, Sochan’s antics did little to slow down the Kings attack. Offensively, he shot it straight enough and flashed some playmaking ability. Defensively, Sochan was efforting but the results weren’t notable.

Grade: C+

Sandro Mamukelashvili

Mamukelashvili entered the game and promptly nailed a three-pointer. After that shot, though, he wasn’t especially impactful. He had trouble dealing with Sacramento’s athleticism on the defensive end. Offensively, he was only 3-for-6 at the line and missed his final two attempts from three-point range. The hustle was there, though.

Grade: C

Malaki Branham

Branham got his first real minutes in quite a while. Against the Kings, he didn’t help his case for getting more minutes in the future. He was inefficient offensively, poor defensively and was making mistakes all over the place.

Grade: C-

Mitch Johnson

The Branham experiment didn’t work. Johnson also should have gone away from Bassey sooner. But, yeah, the coaching staff was dealt a difficult hand and they weren’t able to come up with many solutions on this night.

Grade: C-

By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk