By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2024-11-12 18:05:12
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
圣安东尼奥马刺队面对天赋异禀的萨克拉门托国王队时并不被看好，但最终他们以116-96的比分取得了胜利。是的，国王队在昨晚比赛后疲惫不堪，但这对马刺队来说仍然是一场非常棒的胜利。
在上半场的大部分时间里，圣安东尼奥都没能拉开比分。但圣安东尼奥在上半场结束前连得7分改变了局面。中场休息过后，好戏继续上演，这波攻势延续到了下半场。最终，圣安东尼奥打出了一波22-6的进攻高潮，打破了比赛僵局，萨克拉门托此后再也没能真正构成威胁。
这场胜利使马刺队的战绩提升至5胜6负，而国王队的战绩则下降至6胜5负。
数据：马刺对阵国王
马刺对阵国王 - 最终评分
维克托·文班亚马(Victor Wembanyama)
好的，这才是我们熟悉和喜爱的，具有统治力的文班亚马。他在攻防两端无所不在，几乎参与了每一次进攻和防守。在进攻端，文班亚马连续第二场投进6记三分球。重要的是，他找到了在三分线内得分的方法，两分球10投7中。他的传球非常出色，并且减少了很多失误。在防守端，他在外线非常活跃，在内线则是一股不可阻挡的力量。希望文班亚马能够保持这样的竞技状态，因为如果他一直这样打，马刺队将很难被击败。
评分：A
克里斯·保罗(Chris Paul)
保罗已经不在巅峰期了，但他仍然是一位杰出的控球后卫。今晚他的决策几乎完美无缺。从挡拆到突破分球，他无所不能。即使是像放弃球权让队友有机会掌控比赛这样简单的事情，保罗在组织进攻方面也做得非常出色。除了11次助攻外，他还贡献了12分来拉开场上空间，并且在防守端也表现得非常坚决。
评分：A-
哈里森·巴恩斯(Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯在面对老东家时似乎格外有活力。他早期的侵略性帮助马刺队走上正轨。随着比赛的进行，巴恩斯的强度有所下降，但他的整体表现不错。他的防守比平时更好，在进攻端也很高效。
评分：B+
朱利安·尚帕尼(Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼表现不错。他通过在外线投篮成功地拉开了防守。最终，国王队不得不重视他的存在。他在跳投时的果断令人欣喜。在防守端，尚帕尼抢篮板积极，并且在外线的脚步移动也很出色。
评分：B+
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔(Stephon Castle)
伙计，这孩子。他已经是一个非常有趣的球员了。卡斯尔一直在做出聪明的选择。在进攻端，他的传球——尤其是在移动中——已经成为他的强项。他视野开阔，可以瞬间送出传球。对于一个20岁的球员来说，卡斯尔在进攻篮筐时的技巧和耐心简直是超凡脱俗的。在防守端，他的一对一防守很好，而且更擅长阅读传球路线。哦，卡斯尔还投进了两个远距离三分球。如果他能持续命中三分球……哇，他会非常出色。
评分：A-
凯尔登·约翰逊(Keldon Johnson)
优点：约翰逊打球的热情显而易见。他在攻击篮筐时的强壮为他赢得了几次得分机会。他在防守端的努力也是一个加分项。缺点：决策能力仍有待提高。约翰逊在突破到篮下时本可以多传几次球。讽刺的是，他也因为不必要的传球而错失了几次空位上篮的机会。总的来说，约翰逊在进攻端在阅读比赛和做出正确反应方面仍在努力改进。
评分：B-
德文·瓦塞尔(Devin Vassell)
瓦塞尔的状态不如赛季首秀时火热，但他在21分钟的出场时间里完成了自己的任务。他投进了三个三分球，最终得到了12分。他的投篮选择有时有些 questionable，但他投进了足够多的跳投来证明自己的努力。瓦塞尔的组织能力以及他与文班亚马的化学反应是非常宝贵的特质。在防守端，他仍然有些生疏。
评分：B
桑德罗·马穆克拉什维利(Sandro Mamukelashvili)
马穆克拉什维利出场16分钟，充分利用了他在场上的时间。他投进了三个三分球，其中有几个是关键时刻的进球。当他没有投三分时，他就在攻防两端飞奔。和瓦塞尔一样，马穆似乎和文班亚马之间有很好的化学反应——这从来都不是坏事。如果他继续这样打下去，很难把他排除在轮换阵容之外。
评分：B+
扎克·科林斯(Zach Collins)
科林斯打了13分钟，表现平平。他投进了一个三分球，并完成了一次重要的盖帽，但他剩余的表现乏善可陈。他在内线对抗中处于下风，没有抢到篮板，也没有在传球方面做出任何显著贡献。科林斯今年有一些不错的比赛，但这场不是其中之一。
评分：D+
布雷克·韦斯利(Blake Wesley)
韦斯利理论上出场了11分钟，但是，呃，他没能发挥作用——说得委婉一点。在进攻端，他放弃了投篮机会，也没有为他人创造机会。他出现了几次失误，但这几乎就是他在场上所有贡献的全部。在防守端，他偶尔施加压力，但总的来说，他几乎没有什么值得注意的表现。
评分：D+
米奇·约翰逊(Mitch Johnson)
约翰逊作为主教练看起来越来越得心应手。当球员犯错时，他不羞于表达自己的不满。他通过增加三分球出手次数，出色地完成了马刺队进攻的现代化改造。对阵国王的比赛中，约翰逊设计了许多战术让文班亚马在三分线内接球——这出于多种原因至关重要。
评分：A-
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Sacramento Kings – Game #11
Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Sacramento Kings – Game #11
The San Antonio Spurs were the underdogs against a talented Sacramento Kings squad but the good guys ended up sprinting to a 116-96 victory. Yes, the Kings were tired after playing last night but this still classifies as a very good win for the Spurs.
For much of the first half, San Antonio couldn’t get any separation. That changed when San Antonio scored the final seven points of the half. After intermission, the good times continued as the run carried into the second half. When the smoke cleared, San Antonio’s 22-6 run broke the game open and Sacramento was never able to truly threaten again.
The win improved the Spurs to 5-6 on the season, while the Kings dropped to 6-5.
Stats: Spurs vs. Kings
Spurs vs. Kings – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
Alright, now this is the dominant Wembanyama that we know and love. He was all over the place on both ends of the court and seemingly had a hand in every possession. Offensively, Wembanyama drained six three-pointers for the second consecutive game. Importantly, he was able to find ways to score inside the arc, finishing 7-for-10 from two-point range. His passing was excellent and he cleaned up a lot of his sloppiness. Defensively, he was active on the perimeter and an indomitable force on the interior. Let’s hope Wembanyama can bottle this level of play going forward because the Spurs will be hard to beat if he performs like this.
Grade: A
Chris Paul
Paul is no longer in his prime but he’s still a brilliant point guard. His decision-making was nearly flawless tonight. From pick-and-rolls to drive-and-kicks, he was doing it all. Even the simple things like giving up the ball to allow a teammate to have a turn at running the show, Paul was on top of his game in the playmaking department. To go along with his 11 assists, he chipped in 12 points to space the court and also played a very determined brand of defense.
Grade: A-
Harrison Barnes
Barnes seemed to have some extra pep in his step going up against his former team. His early aggression helped get the Spurs on track. Barnes’ intensity waned a bit as the game progressed but he played well overall. His defense was better than usual and he was efficient on the offensive end.
Grade: B+
Julian Champagnie
Good stuff from Champagnie. He successfully spread out the defense by hitting shots from the perimeter. Eventually, the Kings were forced to account for him. His lack of hesitation on his jumpers was great to see. On defense, Champagnie rebounded and moved his feet well out on the perimeter.
Grade: B+
Stephon Castle
Man, this kid. He’s a really fun player to watch already. Castle just makes smart play after smart play. Offensively, his passing — particularly on the move — is already a strength. He sees the court well and can deliver passes in an instant. Castle’s craft and patience when attacking the rim is otherworldly for a 20-year-old. Defensively, he’s good man-to-man and is even better at reading passing lanes. Oh, and Castle knocked down a pair of long three-pointers. If he can knock down threes consistently … dang, he’s going to be good.
Grade: A-
Keldon Johnson
The good: Johnson played with a palpable amount of enthusiasm. His burliness when attacking the lane resulted in a few baskets. His effort was a plus on the defensive end. The bad: Decision-making remains a work in progress. Johnson could have mixed in a couple more passes when driving to the rim. Ironically, he also passed up a couple wide open layups by needlessly passing. Basically, Johnson is still trying to piece things together on the offensive end when it comes to reading and reacting correctly.
Grade: B-
Devin Vassell
Vassell wasn’t as hot as he was in his season debut but he more than did his part during his 21 minutes. He dropped three three-pointers on his way to accumulating 12 points. His shot-selection was iffy at times but he made enough of his jumpers to justify his endeavors. Vassell’s playmaking and his chemistry with Wembanyama were really valuable traits. Defensively, he’s still quite rusty.
Grade: B
Sandro Mamukelashvili
Mamukelashvili played 16 minutes and made the most of his time on the court. He connected on three three-pointers, a couple of which were momentous makes. When he wasn’t hitting threes, he was flying around the court on both ends. Like Vassell, Mamu seems to have quite a bit of chemistry with Wembanyama — and that is never a bad thing. If he keeps playing like this, it’ll be difficult to keep him out of the rotation.
Grade: B+
Zach Collins
Collins played 13 forgettable minutes. He hit a three-pointer and had a big block but the rest of his evening was a dreary one. He was getting overpowered in the paint, he wasn’t rebounding and wasn’t making any notable difference in the passing game. Collins has had some good games this year but this wasn’t one of them.
Grade: D+
Blake Wesley
Wesley was technically on the court for 11 minutes but, uh, he failed to make an impact — to put it gently. Offensively, he was passing up shots while also not creating for others. He turned the ball over a couple times but that was about the extent of what he was up to during his minutes. Defensively, he applied pressure here and there but, net-net, he did very little of note.
Grade: D+
Mitch Johnson
Johnson is looking more and more comfortable as the head coach. He’s not shy about voicing his displeasure when players make mistakes. He’s doing a great job of modernizing San Antonio’s offense by focusing more on the volume of three-pointers attempted. Against the Kings, Johnson had numerous plays to establish Wembanyama inside of the arc — and that’s vital for a variety of reasons.
Grade: A-
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk