By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2026-06-16 05:56:06
谁也没能预料到的黑马之旅就此终结。在霜冻银行中心球馆进行的总决赛第五场较量中，圣安东尼奥马刺队痛失16分的领先优势，最终以90-94不敌纽约尼克斯队。
马刺在2026年总决赛的每一场比赛中都曾建立起巨大的领先优势，但他们始终没能找到在第四节收割比赛的办法。尽管马刺未能抵达终极目的地，但这依然是一段充满乐趣的旅程。
数据统计：马刺 VS 尼克斯
马刺 VS 尼克斯 — 球员评分
维克托·文班亚马
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama) 在上半场表现出色。他在防守端的表现堪称传奇。半场结束时，他便斩获了5次盖帽和9个篮板。遗憾的是，他在下半场的防守威慑力有所下降。尽管中场休息后他在两分球线内6投4中，但三分线外却3投0中。文班亚马在第四节仅得到3分。总的来说，他在进攻端缺乏效率，但防守端的表现本足以帮助马刺赢下这场比赛。只可惜，队友们在进攻端未能提供足够的火力支持来分担重任。
评分：C+
达龙·福克斯
遗憾的是，在圣安东尼奥马刺本赛季的收官之战中，达龙·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox) 遭遇了一场不堪回首的比赛。他全场15投仅3中。更糟糕的是，他在下半场仅得2分，整个第四节更是颗粒无收。对于一位被寄予厚望、要在关键时刻挺身而出的核心球员来说，委婉地讲，这样的表现实在难称合格。我认为福克斯在防守端做得还算不错，在这场高压对决中也仅有1次失误，但毫无疑问，他在进攻端的哑火将成为人们记住的焦点。
评分：D
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔
与福克斯类似，斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle) 在进攻端也打得异常艰难。他全场10投仅1中，其中三分球3投0中。此外，他还出现了3次失误，仅送出4次助攻。防守端，考虑到杰伦·布伦森 (Jalen Brunson) 狂砍45分的爆发表现，卡斯尔显然很难对自己感到满意。这位二年级后卫确实拼尽了全力，但整场比赛并没有太多值得称道的亮点。
评分：D
德文·瓦塞尔
唉，德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell) 真的尽力了。为他令人瞩目的季后赛之旅画上句号的是，他本场8投5中（其中三分球5投2中）高效贡献了12分。现在回想起来，他或许应该承担更多的进攻重任。他的决策非常合理，并且很好地控制了失误。除了最后阶段一次代价高昂的犯规外，我认为瓦塞尔在防守端的表现相当出色。他还抢下了7个篮板，并贡献了全队6次抢断中的2次。表现得非常棒。
评分：A-
朱利安·尚帕尼
与瓦塞尔一样，朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie) 的赛季也以高光表现收尾。他全场9投5中，其中三分球8投4中，砍下14分。他在防守端表现稳健，并抢下了7个篮板（包括几个关键篮板）。尽管尚帕尼出现了全队最高的4次失误，但总体而言，他的发挥足以支撑马刺去赢下这场比赛。
评分：B+
迪伦·哈珀
如果之前有人对迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper) 的潜力有所怀疑，那么他在第五场比赛中将这些质疑一扫而空。当局势陷入绝境、马刺急需一位进攻端的救世主时，正是这位新秀挺身而出，迎接了挑战。他砍下全队最高的25分。全场19投10中，其中三分球4投2中。此外，他还送出了4次助攻，且没有出现任何失误。哈珀在最关键的时刻敢于出手并命中关键球的能力，向世界宣告了他或许就是一颗正在冉冉升起的超级巨星。我认为他在防守端的表现也同样出色。归根结底，这位新秀在最耀眼的舞台上打出了极其精彩的篮球表现。看着哈珀在新秀赛季的成长令人大呼过瘾，让我们期待他继续沿着正确的方向前进，因为他的未来看起来一片光明。
评分：A+
凯尔登·约翰逊
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson) 的季后赛之旅并不算顺利，尤其是在总决赛中表现起伏不定，但嘿，他在第五场比赛中打得相当不错。凭借三分球3投2中的表现，他贡献了7分。约翰逊还尽职尽责地抢下了5个篮板。尽管他在防守端出现了一些失误，但好在并没有造成太严重的后果。
评分：B
卢克·科内特
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet) 在赛前因病被列为出战存疑。在登场的10分钟里，他的表现还算过得去。他很好地镇守了内线。他的篮板球本可以做得更好，但他确实在禁区内干了脏活累活。进攻端，科内特本可以贡献更多，但至少他没有拖后腿。
评分：C+
卡特·布莱恩特
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant) 在上半场获得了6分钟的出场时间。他出现了一次低级失误，但除此之外表现尚可。他抢下了几个篮板，并展现出了极强的拼劲，这似乎提振了全队的士气。对于这位新秀来说，他并没有被这样的大场面所吓倒，这是一个很好的迹象。
评分：B-
米奇·约翰逊
主教练米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson) 始终没能找到让他的弟子们守住大比分领先优势的灵丹妙药。在这场比赛中，他显然尝试让文班亚马得到更多的休息，以观察这是否会有所帮助——不幸的是，这并没有起到实质性的效果。我知道有些球迷希望他把福克斯彻底打入冷宫，但唉，在卡斯尔同样挣扎、且替补席上除了哈珀之外没有其他人真正站出来的情况下，这确实是一个两难的境地。我确信米奇教练会有所遗憾，但对于最终导致圣安东尼奥马刺失利的那些问题，确实没有简单的解决办法。
评分：C-
由生成式 AI 翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Playoff Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. New York Knicks – Game 5
Playoff Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. New York Knicks – Game 5
The run that no one saw coming is over. The San Antonio Spurs blew a 16-point lead and lost to the New York Knicks at the Frost Bank Center in Game 5 by a final count of 94-90.
The good guys built big leads in every game of the 2026 Finals but they could never figure out how to close out fourth quarters. Although the Spurs didn’t reach the ultimate destination, ’twas a fun ride.
Stats: Spurs vs. Knicks
Spurs vs. Knicks — Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
Wembanyama played great in the first half. His work on the defensive end was legendary. At halftime, he had five blocks and nine rebounds. Unfortunately, his defense wasn’t as sharp in the second half. While he was 4-for-6 from two-point range after intermission, he was 0-for-3 from deep. Wembanyama only scored three points in the fourth quarter. All in all, he lacked efficiency offensively but he was good enough defensively for the Spurs to win this game. Alas, not enough of his teammates played well enough offensively to pick up the slack.
Grade: C+
De’Aaron Fox
Sadly, Fox had a game to forget in San Antonio’s final contest of the season. He was 3-for-15 from the field. Even worse, he had two points in the second half and no points in the fourth quarter. For a guy who was looked upon as the team’s go-to clutch player, that’s suboptimal, to put it kindly. I thought Fox played pretty good defense and he had only one turnover in this pressure-packed game but, yeah, his inability to get things going offensively will be what’s remembered.
Grade: D
Stephon Castle
Like Fox, Castle had a rough go of it on the offensive end. He was 1-for-10 from the field, including 0-for-3 from downtown. He also turned it over three times and only had four assists. Defensively, Castle couldn’t have been too satisfied considering Brunson’s 45-point explosion. The second-year guard competed but there wasn’t much positive to write home about.
Grade: D
Devin Vassell
Well, damn, Vassell did what he could. To cap his impressive playoff run, he had 12 points on 5-for-8 shooting from the field, including 2-for-5 on three-pointers. In retrospect, he probably should have carried more of the offensive load. His decisions were good and he limited his mistakes. Other than a late costly foul, I thought Vassell was pretty darn good defensively. He also had seven rebounds and two of the team’s six steals. Job well done.
Grade: A-
Julian Champagnie
Like Vassell, Champagnie’s season ended on a high note. He had 14 points on 5-for-9 shooting from the field and 4-for-8 shooting from three-point territory. He played good defense and pulled down seven rebounds (including a couple big ones). Champagnie did lead the team with four turnovers but, overall, he did well enough for the Spurs to get this win.
Grade: B+
Dylan Harper
If there was any doubt about Harper’s potential, he cleared it all up in Game 5. When the chips were down and the Spurs were looking for an offensive savior, it was this rookie who rose to the challenge. He led the team with 25 points. He was 10-for-19 from the field and 2-for-4 on threes. He also totaled four assists without turning the ball over. Harper’s ability to take and make big shots in the biggest moments told the world he might just be a superstar in the making. I also thought his defense was really good. Net-net, the rookie played a brilliant brand of basketball in the brightest of lights. It was a blast watching Harper as a rookie and let’s hope he keeps building in the right direction because the future looks glorious.
Grade: A+
Keldon Johnson
Johnson didn’t have a very good playoff run and was especially iffy in the Finals but, hey, he did pretty well in Game 5. He scored seven points thanks to him hitting 2-of-3 from three-point range. Johnson also did his job by pulling down five rebounds. There were some mistakes on the defensive end, but they were rarely too damaging.
Grade: B
Luke Kornet
Kornet was questionable heading into this game with an illness. He was okay-ish in his 10 minutes. He held down the fort pretty well. His rebounding could have been better but he got his hands dirty in the paint. Offensively, Kornet could have done more but at least he was rarely in the way.
Grade: C+
Carter Bryant
Bryant got six first half minutes. He had a bad turnover but other than that he played fine. He pulled down a couple rebounds and played with an intensity that seemed to bolster the team. The moment didn’t look too big for the rookie so that was a good sign.
Grade: B-
Mitch Johnson
Coach Mitch could never figure out the formula to allow his troops to hold onto a big lead. In this game he obviously tried resting Wembanyama more to see if that would help — and, unfortunately, it didn’t really make a difference. I know some fans wanted him to send Fox to Siberia but, eh, it was a difficult situation with Castle also struggling and no other bench player truly emerging outside of Harper. I’m sure Coach Mitch has some regrets but there were no easy fixes for what ended up being San Antonio’s downfall.
Grade: C-
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk