马刺 vs 尼克斯 95 - 105 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2026-06-04 07:23:07
圣安东尼奥马刺在第一场比赛的大部分时间里都保持领先，领先优势一度扩大到14分。遗憾的是，马刺在比赛末段崩盘，纽约尼克斯最终以105-95取得胜利，在总决赛中大比分1-0领先。
第四节过半时，马刺还落后8分，但随后他们打出一波9-0的高潮重夺领先。然而就在此时，杰伦·布伦森 (Jalen Brunson) 抢下前场篮板并命中一记三分。接下来的两次进攻中，马刺先是达龙·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox) 投篮不中，随后维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama) 出现失误。转瞬之间，尼克斯便以一波11-0的攻势收割比赛，锁定胜局。
数据统计：马刺对阵尼克斯
马刺对阵尼克斯 – 最终评分
维克托·文班亚马
表现确实不够好。文班亚马全场21投仅6中，其中三分球9投2中。他出现了6次失误，却只送出了2次助攻。这样的数据显然无法赢得总冠军。当然，比赛中也不乏亮点：他罚球13罚12中，抢下12个篮板，并送出3次盖帽。在第四节，他在进攻端吹响了马刺反击的号角，帮助球队重回比赛。但归根结底，文班亚马必须在进攻端打得更好。防守端，他在大部分时间里表现得非常出色，但在外线防守卡尔-安东尼·唐斯 (Karl-Anthony Towns) 时本可以做得更好。希望他在第二场比赛中能有所调整。
评分：D
达龙·福克斯
我们知道福克斯并非处于100%的健康状态，但这绝对是一场失准的发挥。他全场13投仅3中，其中三分球4投0中，罚球2罚1中。他送出全队最高的5次助攻，但也出现了3次失误。福克斯的防守尚可，但并没有什么亮眼之处。在文班亚马挣扎的时候，如果马刺这位速度极快的控卫能在进攻端接管比赛那就太棒了——然而，他反而让局面雪上加霜。
评分：D-
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle) 的基础数据看起来勉强过得去，但他绝对也加入了“挣扎大军”。他全场16投7中，其中三分球5投1中，仅仅获得了2次罚球机会。虽然他只被记录了2次失误，但他在控制球时显得有些松懈。他的运球和传球都比平时显得更加生涩。再加上低效的投篮，卡斯尔必须打得更好，马刺才能迎来反弹。对他而言，唯一的慰藉显然是他的防守表现。无论是个防还是协防，他都做得非常出色。但即便是这一亮点也留有遗憾，因为尼克斯能够成功利用掩护制造换防，并在关键时刻让卡斯尔远离球权。
评分：C-
德文·瓦塞尔
好的一面：德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell) 二分球5投3中。他抢下了9个篮板，其中有几个是在拼抢中拿下的。防守端，他的表现也是利大于弊。坏的一面：瓦塞尔三分球6投仅1中。我不喜欢他的出手选择，他强投了几个本可以传导出去的球。在无形资产（精神面貌）方面，瓦塞尔似乎没有展现出他平时那种标志性的自信与霸气。
评分：C-
朱利安·尚帕尼
对朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie) 来说，这场比赛可谓是冰火两重天。他在上半场三分球6投5中，他神准的枪法是马刺在半场结束时能领先7分的主要原因。遗憾的是，他的火热手感在下半场未能延续。尚帕尼在下半场仅得1分，三分球4投0中。防守端，他的表现时好时坏。有时他显然是马刺场上防守最差的点，而有时他又显得能够胜任防守任务。好消息是，尚帕尼没有气馁，继续拼抢篮板（最终抢下10个篮板）并保持拼劲。
评分：B-
迪伦·哈珀
这个孩子简直不可思议。第一节比赛中，迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper) 砍下10分一马当先。这位新秀在首节弹无虚发，打得浑然天成。虽然随后他的得分势头有所放缓，但他依然极具影响力。他抢下了8个篮板，而且每一次似乎都是在人群中硬生生拼下来的。他只出现了一次失误，防守也在水准之上。如果要对哈珀吹毛求疵的话，我会说他应该在整场比赛中都保持极强的侵略性。在这场他可能是马刺发挥最好的一员的比赛中，他有些过于退让了。
评分：A-
哈里森·巴恩斯
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes) 上场了12分钟。他没有得分，但贡献了2个篮板和1次助攻。在努力程度方面，我很欣赏他的表现。巴恩斯比平时展现了更多的身体对抗，防守端的表现也优于常态。我们能够看到他展现出的老将风骨。话虽如此，如果能有更多实质性的数据产出，对球队的帮助会更大。
评分：B-
卢克·科内特
没有文班在场的阶段再次成为问题，卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet) 需要承担部分责任。在他上场的10分钟里，马刺输了7分。这样的滑坡实在太严重了，尤其是在文班亚马表现挣扎的比赛中。科内特没有任何进球，仅抢下一个篮板。我觉得他在防守端开局表现挺强硬，但随着比赛的进行逐渐力不从心。
评分：C-
凯尔登·约翰逊
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson) 仅上场了8分钟。他犯规过多，且在进攻端有些强打。虽然拼劲十足，但他看起来有些心神不宁。约翰逊失去了一些他平时的上场时间，但我无法因此责怪教练组的决定。展望未来，希望他能表现得足够好，重新赢回更多的出场时间。
评分：D+
卡特·布莱恩特
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant) 在防守端全力以赴，但效果不佳。布伦森面对他时游刃有余，而且布莱恩特本可以在拼抢篮板或争夺地板球时做得更多。进攻端，布莱恩特罚球不中，唯一的运动战出手也偏出。可以理解，他在场上显得有些紧张。
评分：暂无评分
米奇·约翰逊
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson) 教练在今年的季后赛中执教得非常出色，但在第一场比赛中，他似乎做出了一些错误的决策。首当其冲的是，第四节没有让哈珀留在场上是一个糟糕的决定。这位新秀看起来完全能够胜任，但米奇教练却在最关键的几分钟里让他坐在板凳上。事实上，我认为在决胜时刻应该让哈珀掌控球权。考虑到在对阵俄克拉荷马雷霆 (OKC) 的第七场决战中，米奇教练正是这么做的，今晚他甚至没有让哈珀上场，这实在令人意外。进攻端的战术布置本可以更犀利一些，过多的单打破坏了进攻流畅度。防守战术相当不错，但在第四节的关键时刻功亏一篑。
评分：D
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Playoff Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. New York Knicks – Game 1
Playoff Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. New York Knicks – Game 1
The San Antonio Spurs led for the majority of Game 1 and saw their lead grow to as large as 14 points. Regrettably, the Spurs collapsed down the stretch and the New York Knicks were able to take a 1-0 lead in the NBA Finals with a 105-95 victory.
Trailing by eight points midway through the fourth, the Spurs went on a 9-0 run to reclaim the lead. But that’s when Brunson hit a three-pointer off of an offensive rebound. The Spurs saw Fox miss and Wembanyama turn it over on their next two possessions. Before you could blink, the Knicks were ending the game on an 11-0 run to seal the win.
Stats: Spurs vs. Knicks
Spurs vs. Knicks – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
Just not good enough. Wembanyama finished 6-for-21 from the field, including 2-for-9 from three-point land. He turned the ball over six times and dished only two assists. Those numbers right there won’t win championships. Sure, there were bright spots: He was 12-for-13 at the line. He pulled down 12 rebounds. He blocked three shots. He spurred San Antonio’s fourth quarter run on the offensive end that got them back in the game. But, at the end of the day, Wembanyama has to play better offensively. Defensively, he was really good for a lot of the game but he could have been better guarding KAT on the perimeter. Let’s hope he cleans it up in Game 2.
Grade: D
De’Aaron Fox
We know Fox isn’t 100% healthy but this was definitely a substandard performance. He was 3-for-13 from the field, including 0-for-4 from deep and 1-for-2 from the line. He led the Spurs with five assists but turned it over three times. Fox’s defense was decent but nothing to write home about. With Wembanyama struggling, it would have been great if San Antonio’s speedy point guard had been able to take over the game offensively — but instead he just added to the woes.
Grade: D-
Stephon Castle
Castle’s raw numbers look okay-ish but he definitely joined the strugglefest. He was 7-for-16 from the field, including 1-for-5 from downtown. He only got to the free throw line for two attempts. While he was only charged with two turnovers, he was sloppy with the ball. Both his ball-handling and passing were more creaky than usual. Add in inefficient shooting and Castle will have to play better for the Spurs to recover. The silver lining for him was clearly his defensive play. He was really good individually and team-wise. But even that silver lining comes with a caveat because the Knicks were able to successfully use screens to cause switches and keep Castle away from the ball when they needed to.
Grade: C-
Devin Vassell
The good: Vassell was 3-for-5 from two-point range. He pulled down nine rebounds including a few of the contested variety. Defensively, there was more good than bad. The bad: Vassell was 1-for-6 from three-point territory. I didn’t love his shot-selection; he forced a couple that he could have swung the ball. When it came to intangibles, it didn’t appear as if Vassell was playing with his usual amount of bravado.
Grade: C-
Julian Champagnie
It was a tale of two halves for Champagnie. He was 5-for-6 from three-point range in the first half. His marksmanship is the main reason why the Spurs held a seven-point lead at halftime. Sadly, his hot shooting didn’t continue after intermission. Champagnie scored only one point in the second half and was 0-for-4 from three-point land. Defensively, it was hit-or-miss. Sometimes he was clearly the worst defender on the court for the Spurs and at other times he looked up to the task. The good news was that Champagnie kept his head up, kept rebounding (he finished with ten boards) and kept playing hard.
Grade: B-
Dylan Harper
This kid is ridiculous. In the first quarter, Harper led the way with ten point. The rookie didn’t miss a shot in his opening quarter and looked like a natural. His scoring rate slowed down but he remained impactful. He grabbed eight rebounds and all of them seemed to be in a crowd. He turned it over only once and his defense was above average. If I were to nitpick Harper, I’d say he should have remained uber aggressive for the duration of the affair. He deferred too much in a game in which he might have been the best thing going for the Spurs.
Grade: A-
Harrison Barnes
Barnes played 12 minutes. He didn’t score but he was able to total two rebounds and one assist. Effort-wise, I liked what I saw. Barnes was more physical than usual and he held up defensively better than normal. We were able to witness some of his veteran gumption on display. That said, more actual production could have helped matters.
Grade: B-
Luke Kornet
The non-Wemby minutes were again an issue and Kornet takes some of that blame. In the ten minutes he played, the Spurs were outscored by seven points. That’s just too much of a letdown, particularly in a game in which Wembanyama is struggling. Kornet didn’t have a basket and only registered one rebound. I thought he started off pretty strong defensively but faded as the game went along.
Grade: C-
Keldon Johnson
Johnson only played eight minutes. He was fouling too much and he was forcing things offensively. The effort was there but it looked like he was out of sorts. Johnson lost some of his minutes he usually gets but I can’t blame the coaching staff for that decision. Going forward, let’s hope he does well enough to earn back more playing time.
Grade: D+
Carter Bryant
Bryant gave it his all on defense but the results were lacking. Brunson didn’t have any issues dealing with him and he could have done more on the glass or in loose ball situations. Offensively, Bryant missed a free throw and his only shot from the field. Understandably, he looked nervous out there.
Grade: Inc.
Mitch Johnson
Coach Mitch has coached really well in these playoffs but it felt like he made some wrong moves in Game 1. First and foremost, not having Harper in the game in the fourth quarter was a poor decision. The rookie looked more than capable but Coach Mitch had him on the bench during the most important minutes. In fact, I thought Harper should have had the ball in his hands during money time. Considering that’s exactly what Coach Mitch did in Game 7 against OKC, it was surprising he didn’t even have him on the floor tonight. The offensive gameplan could have been sharper; too much isolation hurt the flow. The defensive gameplan was pretty good but failed at big moments in the fourth.
Grade: D
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk