马刺 vs 尼克斯 104 - 105 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2026-06-06 08:03:09
圣安东尼奥马刺队再次痛失好局，目前在2026年NBA总决赛中大比分0-2落后。在第四节中段落后纽约尼克斯队14分后，马刺队打出一波14-0的高潮将比分扳平。凭借维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama) 的一次“2+1”打三分，圣安东尼奥甚至一度取得了两分的领先优势。
遗憾的是，杰伦·布伦森 (Jalen Brunson) 用一记跳投扳平了比分。在两队各自完成一次成功防守后，文班亚马出现失误并对布伦森犯规，让这位尼克斯球星通过罚球帮助纽约重夺领先。随后，文班亚马在终场哨响前错失了可能完成绝杀的机会。
这无疑是一场令人沮丧的失利，甚至可能成为无法逾越的鸿沟。为了给自己争取一线生机，马刺队需要在周一客场进行的第三场比赛中全力争胜。
数据统计：马刺 vs 尼克斯
马刺 vs 尼克斯 – 终极评分
维克托·文班亚马
这场比赛有太多值得剖析的地方。让我们从最后时刻说起。在双方战平的情况下，文班亚马主导了一次精彩的防守……但随后他出现失误并对布伦森犯规，在比赛还剩不到十秒时将对方送上罚球线。在布伦森两罚一中后，这位法国超级巨星错失了压哨绝杀的中投。这真是个难以接受的苦涩结局。在此之前，文班亚马在上半场表现慢热，但下半场打出了统治级的表现。中场休息后，他在进攻端扛起了球队，全场29分中有22分是在下半场砍下的。他在第四节激情澎湃的喊话似乎也激励了队友。然而，唉，人们记住的终究会是最后的结局。总而言之，文班亚马表现不差，但他本可以抢下更多篮板，在控制球上更小心一些，并且在开局阶段打得更有活力。对于这位22岁的年轻人来说，这确实不容易。
评分：C-
达龙·福克斯
在第一场表现不佳之后，达龙·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox) 在第二场迎来了强势反弹。他全场投篮12中8，展现了极高效率，砍下20分，其中三分球2投2中，罚球2罚2中。他还送出了全队并列最高的5次助攻。防守端，他的表现也很扎实。当马刺在第四节发起反扑时，福克斯通常是掌控大局的那个人。如果马刺想在这轮系列赛中实现逆转，他们需要福克斯保持这样的发挥。
评分：A-
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔
对于斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle) 来说，这是一个艰难的夜晚。他两分球10投仅3中，4次罚球也只命中了一半。实际情况比数据反映的还要糟糕。他不仅出现了4次失误，而且在他掌控进攻时，球队的进攻显得十分滞涩。事实上，马刺在第四节发起反扑时，卡斯尔正坐在替补席上。在此之前，他也因为陷入犯规麻烦而不得不坐了一阵板凳。不过，比赛中也有一些亮点。卡斯尔整晚都保持了高质量的防守，他的拼劲令人赞叹。此外，他还在三分线外4投2中。最后时刻，对于文班亚马那记砸在他背上的传球，这位二年级后卫至少也应该承担一小部分责任。
评分：D+
德文·瓦塞尔
对德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell) 无法苛求太多。他打出了能帮助球队赢球的篮球。进攻端，他贡献了13分，其中三分球7中3，两分球2中1，罚球3中3。他还抢下了全队并列最高的9个篮板并送出5次助攻，同时没有出现一次失误。瓦塞尔在防守端的表现也在水准之上，他的拼劲无可挑剔。如果马刺能拿下这场比赛，他绝对是首要功臣之一。
评分：A-
朱利安·尚帕尼
对于朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie) 来说，这是一场相对低调的比赛。在36分钟的出场时间里，他三分球5投2中得到8分。他投丢了唯一一次两分出手，但罚球2罚2中。和瓦塞尔一样，尚帕尼也没有出现失误。他在保护篮板上本可以做得更好，但他的防守是个加分项。在这轮系列赛中，他确实很好地利用了自己的臂展优势。总的来说，我认为他的出手选择没有问题，而且在大多数方面都表现不错——因此这绝对算得上一场及格线之上的表现。
评分：B
迪伦·哈珀
迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper) 继续展现着自己的能力。这位新秀再次展现出了未来之星的潜质，在32分钟内砍下15分。他12次运动战出手命中了一半，罚球4罚3中。哈珀还抢下了6个篮板并送出3次助攻。虽然他偶尔会出现一些失误，但他的技术和无畏精神是马刺能够发起反扑并险些逆转比赛的两大关键。防守端，天哪，作为一个新秀后卫，他真的太棒了。他在最大的舞台上证明了自己……希望这种表现能在纽约继续保持。
评分：A-
凯尔登·约翰逊
在出场的16分钟里，凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson) 显得活力四射。这也是目前你对他所能期望的一切了。他在16分钟里贡献了4个篮板、2次助攻和1次抢断。不过他的投篮表现乏善可陈，全场投篮4中1，三分球2投0中，罚球2中1。约翰逊确实犯了一些错误，但我喜欢他倾尽全力的态度。
评分：B-
卢克·科内特
又是一场非文班在场时间让马刺吃尽苦头的比赛。这一次，在卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet) 上场的8分钟里，马刺净负7分。他表面上看起来并没有那么糟糕，但他的亮眼表现实在是屈指可数。他确实在比赛后期抢下了一个关键篮板，而且我认为他整场比赛都拼尽了全力。
评分：C+
哈里森·巴恩斯
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes) 上场了5分钟，数据栏上完全没有任何进账。他在防守端有几次不错的轮防，但这差不多就是他全部的正面贡献了。在目前这个阶段，我不确定他是否还值得被派上场。不过话又说回来，总决赛的客场比赛可能会让教练组在第三场考虑给这位老将前锋一些上场时间。
评分：C
卡特·布莱恩特
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant) 上场是为了执行“砍米切尔”战术，并对布伦森施加防守压力。在这轮系列赛中，他对布伦森的施压并没有真正收到成效。
评分：暂无
米奇·约翰逊
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson) 在本场比赛中的执教表现有所提升。我喜欢他在攻防两端的战术布置。在第四节让哈珀留在场上被证明是一个正确的决定，这应该是我们在系列赛余下比赛中能够继续看到的画面。在第四节末段让卡斯尔坐板凳是一个大胆的举动，而且这一策略也收到了回报。他应该在文班亚马失误前叫暂停吗？是的，我认为应该。他带领的是一支年轻的球队，那一刻承受着巨大的压力，而且场上并没有明显的优势。叫个暂停，去争取完成最后一击。唉，好吧，我想这也就是事后诸葛亮了。
评分：C
由生成式 AI 翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Playoff Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. New York Knicks – Game 2
Playoff Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. New York Knicks – Game 2
The San Antonio Spurs let another one slip away and now trail 0-2 in the 2026 NBA Finals. After trailing the New York Knicks by 14 points midway through the fourth quarter, the Spurs went on a 14-0 run to tie the game. San Antonio even captured a two-point advantage following a three-point play by Victor Wembanyama.
Sadly, Jalen Brunson tied the game with a jumper. After both teams got a stop, Wembanyama then turned it over and fouled Brunson, allowing the Knicks star to give New York the lead at the free throw line. Wembanyama then missed a potential game-winner as time expired.
This was certainly a disappointing loss that could prove to be insurmountable. To give themselves a chance, the Spurs need to win Game 3 on the road on Monday.
Stats: Spurs vs. Knicks
Spurs vs. Knicks – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
There’s just so much to unpack. Let’s start at the end. With the game tied, Wembanyama spearheaded a great defensive stop … but then turned the ball over and fouled Brunson to send him to the line with less than ten seconds remaining. After Brunson split a pair, the superstar Frenchman missed a potential game-winning jumper at the buzzer. Tough pill to swallow. Prior to that, Wembanyama had a slow first half but then had a monstrous second half. He put the team on his back offensively after intermission, with 22 of his 29 points coming after halftime. His passionate speech in the fourth seemed to spark the good guys. But, alas, the end will be what’s remembered. All in all, Wembanyama wasn’t bad but he could have rebounded better, been more careful with the basketball and played with more pizzazz coming out of the gates. Difficult stuff for the 22-year-old.
Grade: C-
De’Aaron Fox
After a poor showing in Game 1, Fox bounced back with a quality effort in Game 2. He scored 20 points on a super efficient 8-for-12 shooting from the field, including 2-for-2 from beyond the arc and at the line. He also tied for the team lead with five assists. Defensively, he was solid. When the Spurs made their run in the fourth, Fox was typically the one running the show. If the Spurs are going to recover in this series, they’ll need Fox to keep playing like this.
Grade: A-
Stephon Castle
It was a challenging evening at the office for Castle. He hit only 3-of-10 from two-point range and only half of his four free throw attempts. Things were worse than the numbers suggest. Not only did he have four turnovers, the offense looked labored with him at the helm. In fact, the Spurs made their fourth quarter charge with Castle on the bench. He also had to sit for an earlier stretch due to foul trouble. There were, however, some highlights. Castle played quality defense all night long and his effort was incredible. He also hit 2-of-4 from downtown. At the end, on that Wembanyama pass that hit him in the back, the second-year guard deserves at least a smidgen of the blame.
Grade: D+
Devin Vassell
Can’t be too critical of Vassell. He played a winning brand of basketball. Offensively, he scored 13 points and was 3-for-7 on threes, 1-for-2 on twos and 3-for-3 on ones. He also tied for team-highs in rebounds (nine) and assists (five) while not turning the ball over. Vassell played above average defense and his effort was sublime. If the Spurs could have pulled this game out, he would have been one of the leading heroes.
Grade: A-
Julian Champagnie
It was a relatively quiet affair for Champagnie. In 36 minutes, he had eight points on 2-for-5 shooting from three-point range. He missed his only two-point attempt but went 2-for-2 at the line. Like Vassell, Champagnie didn’t have a turnover. He could have been better on the boards but his defense was a plus. He’s really using his length well in this series. Overall, I didn’t have a problem with his shot-selection and he was good in most areas — so this has to be considered an above average performance.
Grade: B
Dylan Harper
Harper continues to show what he can do. Looking like a future star once again, the rookie had 15 points in 32 minutes. He hit half of his 12 field goal attempts and went 3-for-4 at the line. Harper also snatched six rebounds and had three assists. He had a few mistakes here and there but his skill and fearlessness were two of the leading traits that allowed the Spurs to make a run to almost steal the game. Defensively, man, he’s pretty darn amazing for a rookie guard. He’s coming to play on the biggest stage … let’s hope that continues in New York City.
Grade: A-
Keldon Johnson
Johnson was a ball of energy during his 16 minutes on the court. That’s about all you can expect from him right now. He had four rebounds, two assists and a steal in 16 minutes. His shooting was nothing to write home about, though, finishing 1-for-4 from the field, 0-for-2 from three-point territory and 1-for-2 at the charity stripe. Johnson made some mistakes but I like that he was giving it his all.
Grade: B-
Luke Kornet
Another game, another batch of non-Wemby minutes going sour for the Spurs. This time, the Spurs were outscored by seven points in Kornet’s eight minutes. He wasn’t outwardly terrible but his positive plays were few and far between. He did have a key rebound late and I thought the effort was there throughout.
Grade: C+
Harrison Barnes
Barnes was on the court for five minutes and literally didn’t dent the stat sheet. He had a couple quality rotations on defense but that was about the extent of his positive contributions. At this point, I’m not sure he’s worth putting on the court. Then again, a road game in the Finals could cause the coaching staff to look at the veteran forward for some minutes in Game 3.
Grade: C
Carter Bryant
Bryant was used to hack-a-Mitchell and also to pressure Brunson. His pressuring of Brunson isn’t really paying dividends this series.
Grade: Inc.
Mitch Johnson
It was better coaching from Johnson in this game. I liked the schemes on both ends of the court. Leaving Harper on the court in the fourth quarter proved to be the right call and should be something we see the rest of the series. Sitting Castle late in the fourth quarter was bold and also a strategy that paid off. Should he have called a timeout prior to Wembanyama’s turnover? Yeah, I think so. He has a young team, the pressure was extraordinary in that moment and there was no clear advantage. Call the timeout and get the last shot. Ah well, hindsight, I guess.
Grade: C
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk