By Greg Luca, Staff Writer | San Antonio Express-News (SAEN), 2026-06-11 17:02:57
*2026年6月10日，星期三，纽约麦迪逊广场花园，在NBA总决赛第四场第四节中，圣安东尼奥马刺队中锋维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama) (1) 在纽约尼克斯队前锋OG·阿奴诺比 (Og Anunoby) (8) 的防守下强攻篮下。尼克斯队以107-106击败马刺队，系列赛大比分3-1领先。*
在马刺队落后1分且比赛还剩大约1分钟时，后卫斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle) 试图沿着底线强行突破上篮。
当卡斯尔在对抗中承受了乔什·哈特 (Josh Hart) 的身体接触时，裁判吹哨并判定卡斯尔踩线出界，导致了一次失误。然而，在NBA周四公布的最后两分钟裁判报告中，这一回合被指出是一次误判：卡斯尔从未踩线出界。
尽管马刺队在这场107-106不敌尼克斯队的比赛中惨遭29分大逆转（创下了NBA总决赛历史上的最大逆转纪录），其中还有许多其他环节出了问题，但针对卡斯尔的这次判罚依然代价惨重，直接抹杀了马刺队最后阶段的一次关键进攻机会。
从这个角度很难看出卡斯尔当时是否真的踩线出界了 pic.twitter.com/GnVeoDTDFS
— Rate the Refs (@ Rate_the_Refs) 2026年6月11日
这虽然不会让马刺球迷心里好受点，但卡斯尔那次被判出界并导致关键失误的底线突破？他其实根本没有踩线出界
pic.twitter.com/I8iZXmqZT6
— BBALLBREAKDOWN (@ bballbreakdown) 2026年6月11日
第四场比赛收官阶段的其他几次备受争议的判罚，包括达龙·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox) 的最后一次上篮尝试，以及尼克斯队豪塞·阿尔瓦拉多 (Jose Alvarado) 潜在的回场违例，均被判定为判罚正确。
联盟指出的唯一另一处误判是，在比赛还剩1分26秒时，马刺队中锋文班亚马本应被吹罚防守三秒违例。根据联盟的复盘，文班亚马的右脚在三秒区内停留，而他当时并未“积极防守对手”。不过，纽约的杰伦·布伦森 (Jalen Brunson) 在该回合中依然突破并抛投得分。
福克斯的上篮尝试发生在最后几秒双方争抢地板球之后，当时马刺队以106-105领先。福克斯在罚球线附近拿到球权，并在比赛还剩12秒时直奔篮下，意在建立3分的领先优势，而不是消耗比赛时间。阿奴诺比从身后协防将球扇出，联盟判定这一回合为正确的未吹罚，尽管阿奴诺比与福克斯的手臂发生了接触。
“阿奴诺比（尼克斯）合法地尝试封盖福克斯（马刺）的投篮，并在发生附带的手臂接触之前，已经将球从其控制中拍落，”联盟在复盘中写道。
就在他完成补篮绝杀、帮助尼克斯队完成创NBA总决赛纪录的29分大逆转之前……OG·阿奴诺比在防守端送出了一记关键封盖。
攻防两端的影响力尽显无遗
https://t.co/IcOqBvvOyh pic.twitter.com/CWmlQVckuA
— NBA (@ NBA) 2026年6月11日
阿尔瓦拉多潜在的回场违例发生在随后的篮板球争抢中。当他沿着球场左侧运球推进时，他的双脚都已踏入前场，但球从未越过中线，这使他能够合法地转身回撤以避开包夹。
“尽管阿尔瓦拉多（尼克斯）双脚都踏入了前场，但他并未获得前场球权状态，因为他没有将球带过中线，”联盟写道。
这怎么就不是回场违例？？ pic.twitter.com/B8gN16f91r
— Jacob (@ Jacobtheclipper) 2026年6月11日
NBA会发布“最后两分钟裁判报告”，对第四节最后两分钟内分差在3分以内的比赛中做出的每一次裁判判罚进行复盘。
根据联盟官方网站的说法，“必须有清晰且确凿的视频证据，才能认定某次判罚存在失误。”
由生成式 AI 翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：NBA admits incorrect call on Spurs’ Castle in Game 4 loss
NBA admits incorrect call on Spurs’ Castle in Game 4 loss
San Antonio Spurs center Victor Wembanyama (1) goes up to the basket alongside New York Knicks forward Og Anunoby (8) during the fourth quarter of Game 4 of the NBA Finals at Madison Square Garden in New York, Wednesday, June 10, 2026. The Knick defeated the Spurs 107-106, leading the series 3-1.
With the Spurs trailing by a point and about a minute remaining, guard Stephon Castle attempted to muscle his way toward the basket along the baseline.
As Castle absorbed contact from Josh Hart, an official blew the whistle and ruled that Castle had stepped out of bounds, resulting in a turnover. But when the NBA released its Last Two Minute Report on Thursday, the play was highlighted as an incorrect call: Castle never stepped out of bounds.
Although much else had to go wrong for the Spurs to allow the largest comeback in NBA Finals history, blowing a 29-point lead in a 107-106 loss to the Knicks, the call against Castle was costly, wiping out one of the Spurs’ final possessions.
It’s very hard to tell from this angle if Castle actually stepped out here pic.twitter.com/GnVeoDTDFS
— Rate the Refs (@ Rate_the_Refs) June 11, 2026
This won’t make Spurs fans feel any better but that Castle baseline drive that was ruled out of bounds and a key turnover? He never stepped out of bounds
— BBALLBREAKDOWN (@ bballbreakdown) June 11, 2026
Other scrutinized plays from the closing stretch of Game 4, including De’Aaron Fox’s final layup attempt and a potential backcourt violation by the Knicks’ Jose Alvarado, were deemed to have been called correctly.
The only other incorrect ruling the league highlighted was a defensive three-second violation that should have been whistled against Spurs center victor Wembanyama with 1:26 to play. Wembanyama’s right foot lingered in the paint while he was not “actively guarding an opponent,” according to the league’s review. New York’s Jalen Brunson drove and scored a floater on the play, regardless.
Fox’s layup attempt followed a scramble for a loose ball in the closing seconds, with the Spurs leading 106-105. Fox picked up possession near the free-throw line and drove to the basket with 12 seconds remaining, aiming to build a three-point cushion rather than running time off the clock. OG Anunoby crashed in from behind to swat away the attempt, and the league ruled that the play was a correct no-call, even though Anunoby made contact with Fox’s arm.
“Anunoby (NYK) makes a legal attempt to block Fox’s (SAS) shot and dislodges the ball from his control before making incidental arm contact,” the league wrote in its review.
Just before his game-winning putback to complete the Knicks’ NBA Finals-record 29-point comeback… OG Anunoby delivered a CLUTCH block on the other end.
TWO-WAY IMPACT ON DISPLAY
— NBA (@ NBA) June 11, 2026
Alvarado’s potential backcourt violation came on the ensuing rebound. As he dribbled up the left side of the floor, he planted both feet in the frontcourt but never moved the ball past the midcourt line, allowing him to legally reverse course to avoid a trap.
“Although Alvarado (NYK) steps into the frontcourt with both feet, he does not gain frontcourt status because he does not bring the ball across the midcourt line,” the league wrote.
HOW IS THIS NOT A BACKCOURT VIOLATION?? pic.twitter.com/B8gN16f91r
— Jacob (@ Jacobtheclipper) June 11, 2026
The NBA releases a “Last Two Minute Report” reviewing every official decision made during the final two minutes of games that were within a three-point margin at that point in the fourth quarter.
Per the league’s website, “there must be clear and conclusive video evidence in order to make a determination that a play was incorrectly officiated.”
By Greg Luca, Staff Writer, via San Antonio Express-News