By Boxscorehistory | Pounding The Rock (PtR), 2026-03-31 12:30:00
自2月1日以来，圣安东尼奥马刺队取得了25胜2负的战绩，其中很大一部分胜利都是大胜（或接近大胜）。这种结果在近期尤为常见，因为马刺队的赛程中充斥着那些比起赢球更想拿乐透抽签球（乒乓球）的弱旅。刻板印象认为，这种情况容易滋生自满情绪，往往会导致在一场本不该输的比赛中败给实力不足的对手。
我从未真正认为芝加哥公牛队会赢得昨晚的比赛，但第一节的表现至少让人担心上述的前车之鉴会再次上演。除了维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama) 的一些惊艳表现外，马刺在那段时间显得有些脱节、起伏不定，甚至有些“乏味” (bored，我喜欢这个和篮板 board 相关的双关语！)。然而，到了第二节伊始，每个人似乎都步调一致，圣安东尼奥马刺队开始一骑绝尘。这场比赛最终演变成了一场平淡无奇的大胜，马刺在多项数据统计上取得了体面但并不惊人的领先。即便如此，比赛中仍有许多值得关注的亮点：
- 这又是马刺队一场统治级的篮板表现，总篮板 (TRB) 和进攻篮板 (ORB) 的净胜值分别为 +20 和 +9。在过去的五场比赛中，马刺有四场比赛至少比对手多抢了20个篮板，五场比赛的总篮板净胜值达到了 +97。这是自2012-2013赛季开始以来，任何球队在常规赛连续五场比赛中创造的最高总篮板净胜值。此前的纪录由休斯顿火箭队保持，他们在截至2025年3月17日的五场比赛中取得了 +96 的总篮板净胜值。
- 尽管没有对阵密尔沃基雄鹿队时那么惊人，但马刺在本场比赛中又一次展现了出色的犯规控制，比芝加哥公牛队少犯规6次。在过去13个赛季的平均水平下，这通常会转化为大约 +11 的罚球出手数 (FTA) 优势；然而，公牛队的犯规时机似乎掌握得相当好，因为马刺仅多获得了3次罚球机会。由于两队罚球命中率 (FT%) 基本持平，马刺多出的罚球次数转化为了 +2 的罚球命中数 (FTM) 优势。
- 银黑军团终于自3月17日战胜萨克拉门托国王队以来，首次在三分线外得分超过对手，尽管优势微乎其微。与对阵雄鹿的比赛类似，这是因为马刺在三分命中率 (3P%) 上的显著优势（高出11.63个百分点）在很大程度上被公牛在三分出手数 (3PA) 上的优势（多出10次）所抵消。
- 即便如此，马刺还是凭借投篮命中率 (FG%) 的稳健优势（高出4.81个百分点）拉开了比分，再加上投篮出手数 (FGA) 的优势（多出3次），这帮助他们比芝加哥公牛队多投进了6个球。
什么是球队评分统计表？
简单来说，这些统计表是对基础数据统计中的胜负方差值进行评分，评分标准基于获胜球队在特定参考期内相对于其他 NBA 获胜球队的差值。可以将其看作是一份成绩单，用于了解某一获胜球队相对于其他获胜球队的表现。所使用的参考期从2012-2013赛季开始至今，且仅包含相同类型的赛季（即常规赛和季后赛数据不进行相互比较）。
数据来源： 创建这些统计表所使用的基础数据收集自 Basketball Reference 。在所有情况下，数据都是在比赛结束后的次日早晨收集的。虽然罕见，但在数据收集后确实会发生赛后统计修正，并可能对最终结果产生影响。
由生成式 AI 翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Box Grades: Spurs get board(s) and coast to 9th straight win
Box Grades: Spurs get board(s) and coast to 9th straight win
San Antonio is now 25-2 since February 1st, with a good chunk of those wins being blowouts (or at least blowout-adjacent). This latter outcome has been especially common recently, as the Spurs’ schedule has been laden with hapless teams more interested in collecting ping pong balls than wins. The stereotype is that conditions like this breed complacency, often resulting in a disappointing loss to an underqualified opponent.
I never actually thought that Chicago would win last night’s game, but the first quarter at least raised the specter of this cautionary tale. Outside of some spectacular play by Wemby, the Spurs felt a bit disconnected, inconsistent, and bored (I love puns!) during that period. However, by the start of the second everyone seemed to get on the same page, and San Antonio was off to the races. This game ended up being a pretty vanilla blowout in which the Spurs earned several respectable but unspectacular box score margins. Even so, there were a number of notable highlights:
- This was yet another dominant rebounding performance from the Spurs, with TRB and ORB differentials of +20 and +9, respectively. San Antonio has now had at least 20 more rebounds than its opponent in four of the last five games, and amassed a five-game TRB differential of +97. This is the highest 5-game TRB margin that any team has produced in the regular season dating back to the start of 2012-2013. The previous record was held by the Houston Rockets, who achieved a TRB margin of +96 across five games ending on March 17, 2025.
- Although not as spectacular as their performance against Milwaukee, the Spurs put together another excellent foul differential in this game, with six fewer fouls than Chicago. On average over the last 13 seasons, this would have translated to a FTA margin of about +11; however, the Bulls’ fouls appear to have been pretty well-timed, as San Antonio only had three more free throw attempts. With both teams having essentially the same FT%, the Spurs’ extra volume translated to a FTM differential of +2.
- The Silver and Black finally managed to outscore a team from distance for the first time since their win over the Kings on March 17th, albeit by the narrowest margin possible. As in the Milwaukee game, this happened because the Spurs’ significant edge in 3P% (+11.63 percentage points) was largely negated by the Bulls’ advantage in 3PA (+10).
- Even so, the Spurs did manage to pull away using a solid edge in FG% (+4.81 percentage points), which – together with an advantage in FGA (+3) – helped them log six more made baskets than Chicago.
What are Team Graded Box Scores?
Very briefly, these box scores grade winner-loser differentials for basic box score statistics, with the grade being based on the winning team’s differential relative to other NBA winners during a defined reference period. Think of it like a report card for understanding how a given winner performed relative to other winners. The reference period used runs from the start of the 2012-2013 season to the latest date of play, including only games in the same season category (i.e., regular season and playoff games are not compared to each other).
***Data Source:*The underlying data used to create these box scores was collected fromBasketball Reference. In all cases, the data are collected the morning after the game is played. Although rare, postgame statistical revisions after data collection do occur and may affect the results after the fact.
By Boxscorehistory, via Pounding The Rock