[PtR] 数据评分:马刺轻取独行侠,斩获赛季第62胜

By Boxscorehistory | Pounding The Rock (PtR), 2026-04-11 16:19:11

以强势表现收官常规赛是再好不过的事情了。在轻松击败独行侠,锁定球队赛季第62胜以及文班亚马的第65场比赛后,马刺似乎正朝着这个目标迈进。虽然还剩一场比赛,但圣安东尼奥在常规赛中已经无欲无求,而他们的最后一个对手(掘金)很可能会为了争夺三号种子而全力以赴。尽管赛场上瞬息万变,但我认为马刺最终以62胜20负战绩收官的可能性极大。

从某些方面来看,这场比赛与马刺近期的许多胜利如出一辙:圣安东尼奥早早取得领先,并最终以近20分的优势获胜。然而,比赛在前两节半的时间里其实是一场异常激烈的拉锯战,直到第三节中段,局势才彻底倒向银黑军团。幸运的是,这些特点的结合造就了一些有趣的数据亮点:

决定比赛的因素

  • 比赛在第一节结束时似乎就已经失去了悬念,当时圣安东尼奥已经取得了11分的领先优势。达拉斯在第二节和第三节初段的复苏让比赛重新有了看点,但马刺在第三节后半段重新掌控了局面,再次演变成一场轻松的大胜。
  • 圣安东尼奥在总篮板球上取得了巨大的整体优势(+13),但达拉斯实际上在进攻篮板上稍占上风(+1)。此外,达拉斯的失误比马刺少4次,这使得他们的投篮出手数多出了6次。而且,独行侠更加依赖三分球,在三分出手数上多出了8次。
  • 对独行侠来说不幸的是,圣安东尼奥的投篮效率极高,投篮命中率和三分命中率分别达到了54.35%和40.63%。这使得马刺在罚球线以外的得分比达拉斯多了8分。
  • 盖棺定论的一击是圣安东尼奥在罚球数量(+8次罚球)和罚球命中率(+17.35个百分点)上的巨大优势,这使得马刺在罚球线上净胜11分。抛开圣安东尼奥在这一领域惊人的效率不谈,达拉斯本场比赛的一个大问题是犯规频率更高(+4次)且犯规时机不佳,这导致了马刺在罚球数量上的领先(也是独行侠投篮次数多于马刺的另一个原因)。

罕见的数据统计

  • 圣安东尼奥成为了过去13个常规赛中,第31支在不超过27次罚球尝试中至少命中26球的球队(无论胜负)。这种表现平均每个赛季出现略多于两次,或者说大约每545场比赛才会出现一次。
  • 马刺也是过去13个常规赛中,第39支投篮命中率、三分命中率和罚球命中率分别达到或超过54.35%、40.63%和96.3%的获胜球队。换句话说,在给定的常规赛中,只有不到3支获胜球队能达到或超越这一投篮命中率表现,大约每433场比赛才会出现一次。
  • 虽然没有体现在球队评分数据表中,但文班在2025-2026常规赛的第65场(也肯定是最后一场)比赛中再次打出了惊人表现。事实上,追溯到1996-1997赛季之初,这是常规赛历史上仅有的四次球员在出场不足27分钟的情况下砍下40+得分的情况之一。这些案例平均分布在仅有的两名球员身上:克莱·汤普森 (Klay Thompson) 和维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)。

什么是球队评分数据表?

简而言之,这些数据表对胜负双方的基础统计数据差值进行评分,评分标准基于获胜球队相对于特定参考周期内其他 NBA 获胜球队的差值。可以将其看作是一份成绩单,用以了解特定获胜球队相对于其他获胜者的表现。所使用的参考周期从2012-2013赛季开始至今,且仅包含相同类型的比赛(即常规赛和季后赛不会进行比较)。

数据来源: 创建这些数据表所使用的基础数据收集自 Basketball Reference 。在所有情况下,数据均在比赛结束后的次日早晨收集。虽然罕见,但数据收集后可能会出现赛后统计修订,并可能影响最终结果。

由生成式人工智能翻译,译文内容可能不准确或不完整,以原文为准。

点击查看原文:Box Grades: Spurs Cruise Past Mavs for 62nd Win of the Season

Box Grades: Spurs Cruise Past Mavs for 62nd Win of the Season

It’s wonderful to end the regular season on a high note, and it would appear that the Spurs are going to do that after securing the team’s 62nd and Vic’s 65th game in an ultimately comfortable win over the Mavs. There’s still one game to go, but San Antonio no longer has anything to play for in this regular season, and their final opponent (the Nuggets) may very well enter than game with the three seed on the line. Anything could happen, but I think a final Spurs record of 62-20 ought to be heavily favored at this point.

In some respects, this game was like many Spurs wins recently, in that San Antonio got up early and ultimately won by nearly 20 points. However, it was also a remarkably seesaw affair for about two-and-a-half quarters, until the game clearly broke the Silver and Black’s way around the middle of the third quarter. Fortunately, this combination of characteristics helped create some interesting box score highlights:

Factors that Decided the Game

  • This game looked like it was well on its way to over at the end of the first quarter, as San Antonio had opened up an 11-point lead. A resurgent 2nd and early 3rd quarter from Dallas made the game interesting, but the Spurs’ reasserted themselves in the latter half of the third, resulting in yet another comfortable blowout.
  • San Antonio secured a sizable overall advantage in total rebounds (+13), but Dallas actually held the edge in offensive boards (+1). In addition, Dallas had four fewer turnovers, which played a role in them having six more field goal attempts. Furthermore, the Mavs leaned much harder into the three-ball, logging a +8 3PA margin.
  • Sadly, for the Mavs, San Antonio was extremely efficient from the field, including FG% and 3P% values of 54.35% and 40.63%. This allowed the Spurs to outscore Dallas by eight outside of the free throw line.
  • The final nail in the coffin was San Antonio’s large advantages in free throw volume (+8 FTA) and FT% (+17.35 percentage points), which allowed the Spurs to achieve a point differential of +11 at the charity stripe. Setting aside San Antonio’s ridiculous efficiency in this area, a big problem for Dallas in this game is that they fouled more often (+4) and at bad times, which drove the Spurs’ edge in free throw volume (and is another reason that the Mavs shot more from the field compared to San Antonio).

Rare Box Score Stats

  • San Antonio became just the 31st team (winner or loser) in the last 13 regular seasons to make at least 26 free throws on no more than 27 attempts. That combination happens a bit more than twice per season, or about once in every 545 games.
  • The Spurs were also just the 39th regular season winner in the last 13 seasons to record FG%, 3P%, and FT% values that were all as good or better than 54.35%, 40.63%, and 96.3%, respectively. In other words, this shooting percentage line is matched or bettered by a bit less than 3 winning teams in a given regular season, or roughly once in every 433 games.
  • Although not captured in the graded team box score, Wemby’s 65th (and certainly final) game of the 2025-2026 regular season was another doozie. In fact, dating all the way back to the start of 1996-1997, this is one of just four regular season instances in which a player scored 40+ points in under 27 minutes. These cases are evenly divided across just two players: Klay Thompson and Victor Wembanyama.

What are Team Graded Box Scores?

Very briefly, these box scores grade winner-loser differentials for basic box score statistics, with the grade being based on the winning team’s differential relative to other NBA winners during a defined reference period. Think of it like a report card for understanding how a given winner performed relative to other winners. The reference period used runs from the start of the 2012-2013 season to the latest date of play, including only games in the same season category (i.e., regular season and playoff games are not compared to each other).

***Data Source:*The underlying data used to create these box scores was collected fromBasketball Reference. In all cases, the data are collected the morning after the game is played. Although rare, postgame statistical revisions after data collection do occur and may affect the results after the fact.

By Boxscorehistory, via Pounding The Rock