[PtR] 数据评分:马刺大胜灰熊,再创多项疯狂数据

By Boxscorehistory | Pounding The Rock (PtR), 2026-03-26 12:30:00

既然我现在负责撰写这些战报,像这样的大胜有时会让人感到有些无奈。原因在于,随着下半场比赛的进行,我看着数据表会想:“哇,如果马刺真想这么做,他们能把灰熊的得分限制在70分,运动战进球限制在20个。但因为他们领先了快40分,最后15分钟的比赛纯粹只是在履行程序。”换句话说,我预见到了一份近些年罕见的、充满各种统计组合的华丽数据表,但内心深处知道,随着第四节时间的流逝,这些纪录终将化为泡影。

幸运的是,这些自私的念头很快就消失了,取而代之的是马刺轻松取胜的喜悦,而且灰熊似乎也乐见其成,所以整场比赛对各方来说都是一场皆大欢喜的胜利。更重要的是,昨晚的比赛确实产生了一些惊人的统计亮点,如下文所述:

  • 圣安东尼奥再次展现了卓越的篮板统治力,总篮板(TRB)和进攻篮板(ORB)分别净胜对手26个和10个。在自2012-2013赛季以来进行的16,759场常规赛中,这仅是第50次出现获胜球队在总篮板和进攻篮板净胜数上达到或超过这一水平。
  • 在过去的三场比赛中,马刺共净胜对手73个篮板,这是自2012-2013赛季以来常规赛连续三场比赛中取得的第二高净胜值。第一名是休斯顿火箭在2025年3月14日至3月17日期间创下的+74个,当时他们连续三场的篮板净胜值分别为+33、+18和+23。
  • 本场比赛另一个有趣的地方在于两队进攻机会的均衡程度。例如,马刺在投篮出手数(FGA)和罚球出手数(FTA)上仅略占优势(分别多出3次和2次),但在三分出手数(3PA)上略逊一筹(少4次)。
  • 由于进攻机会大致平衡,这场比赛最终由效率决定,而圣安东尼奥占据了大部分关键优势。特别是,马刺在投篮命中率(FG%)上领先了12.15个百分点,从而在投篮命中数(FGM)上净胜12个。由于圣安东尼奥和灰熊都投进了16个三分球,这意味着马刺在运动战得分上净胜灰熊24分。
  • 与最近的一些比赛不同,马刺未能通过罚球线显著扩大领先优势。尽管灰熊的罚球次数少了2次,且罚球命中率仅为70%(20罚14中),但马刺68.18%的罚球命中率甚至更糟,因此他们在罚球线上仅比灰熊多得1分。自2012-2013赛季开始以来,只有92支常规赛获胜球队在罚球命中率不高于68.18%且罚球次数达到22次以上的情况下,仍能净胜对手25分以上。

什么是球队数据评分表?

简而言之,这些数据表根据获胜方与落败方在各项基础统计数据上的差值进行评分。评分标准是基于获胜方在特定参考期内相对于其他NBA获胜球队的表现。可以将其看作是一份成绩单,用于了解某一获胜球队相对于其他获胜者的表现。所使用的参考期从2012-2013赛季开始至今,且仅包含同类赛季的比赛(即常规赛和季后赛不会进行跨类别比较)。

数据来源: 用于制作这些数据表的基础数据收集自 Basketball Reference 。在所有情况下,数据均在比赛结束后的次日早晨收集。虽然罕见,但数据收集后可能会出现赛后统计修正,这可能会影响最终结果。

由生成式人工智能翻译,译文内容可能不准确或不完整,以原文为准。

点击查看原文:Box Grades: Spurs Produce more crazy stats in dominant win over Grizzlies

Box Grades: Spurs Produce more crazy stats in dominant win over Grizzlies

Now that I’m writing these recap articles, blowouts like this can be a little frustrating. The reason is that I find myself looking at the box score as the second half progresses and thinking things like, “Wow, the Spurs could hold Memphis to 70 points on 20 field goals if they really wanted to, but — because they’re up by almost 40 — the last 15 minutes will only be ‘played’ in the most literal sense of the word.” In other words, I see the possibility of a glorious box score littered with statistical combinations that haven’t occurred in recent history, but know deep down that those gems will turn to dust as the fourth quarter unwinds.

Fortunately, these selfish moments quickly give way to the realization that the Spurs won easily, and that Memphis wanted them to, so this whole event was one big victory for all parties involved. What’s more, last night’s game did manage to produce some stunning statistical highlights, as I will outline below:

  • San Antonio put together another exceptional rebounding performance, logging TRB and ORB differentials of +26 and +10, respectively. In the 16,759 regular season contests played since the start of 2012-2013, this is just the 50th occasion that a winning team has put together TRB and ORB margins as good or better.
  • In their last three games, the Spurs have outrebounded their opponents by a total of +73, which is the second highest three-game differential achieved in the regular season since 2012-2013. First place is +74, recorded by Houston in 2025 between March 14th and March 17th, with successive TRB differentials of +33, +18, and +23.
  • Another interesting thing about this game is how balanced the offensive opportunities were across the two teams. For example, the Spurs held minor edges in FGA and FTA (+3 and +2, respectively), but faced a minor disadvantage in 3PA (-4).
  • Because offensive opportunity was roughly balanced, this game was ultimately decided by efficiency, and San Antonio had most of the critical advantages. In particular, the Spurs achieved a 12.15 percentage-point advantage in FG%, resulting in a +12 FGM margin. Because San Antonio and Memphis both made 16 threes, this means that the Spurs outscored the Grizzlies by 24 from the field.
  • In contrast to some recent games, the Spurs were not able to extend their lead meaningfully at the free throw line. Despite the fact that Memphis has two fewer attempts and shot just 70% from the charity stripe (14-of-20), the Spurs’ 68.18% FT% was even worse, so they only managed to outscore the Grizzlies by one at the line. Since the start of 2012-2013, only 92 other regular season winners have managed to outscore an opponent by 25+ points while shooting no better that 68.18% from the line on 22+ attempts.

What are Team Graded Box Scores?

Very briefly, these box scores grade winner-loser differentials for basic box score statistics, with the grade being based on the winning team’s differential relative to other NBA winners during a defined reference period. Think of it like a report card for understanding how a given winner performed relative to other winners. The reference period used runs from the start of the 2012-2013 season to the latest date of play, including only games in the same season category (i.e., regular season and playoff games are not compared to each other).

***Data Source:*The underlying data used to create these box scores was collected fromBasketball Reference. In all cases, the data are collected the morning after the game is played. Although rare, postgame statistical revisions after data collection do occur and may affect the results after the fact.

By Boxscorehistory, via Pounding The Rock