By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2026-01-07 21:29:03
在一场跌宕起伏的拉锯战中，圣安东尼奥马刺队最终以105-106的比分惜败于孟菲斯灰熊队。此役过后，马刺队的赛季战绩来到25胜11负。圣安东尼奥开局手感火热，在第一节结束时以31-21领先。灰熊队则在第三节凭借强势表现扭转了局势。
尽管第四节的形势一度看起来不妙，但马刺队奋起直追，并确实为自己创造了赢球的机会。遗憾的是，在比赛的收官阶段，马刺队在最关键的回合中屡屡无功而返，而灰熊队则命中了几记关键投篮，最终拿下了胜利。
数据统计：马刺 vs 灰熊
马刺 vs 灰熊 – 最终评分
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
从轻微的膝伤中回归后，文班亚马在他出场的21分钟里几乎无人可挡。在这些出场时间里，他投篮20中10，三分球6中3，罚球8中7。正如这些数据所示，他几乎在每一次进攻中都扮演了攻击手的角色。我欣赏他的侵略性，但我感觉文班亚马本可以争取更高质量的出手机会。（不过话说回来，批评一个21分钟内砍下30分的球员也挺荒谬的。）在防守端和篮板方面，这位法国球员本可以做得更好一些。他的协调性有些不稳，这主要影响了他在防守端的表现。但总而言之，在出场的21分钟里，文班亚马展现出了超级巨星般的统治力。
评分：A-
德阿隆·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)
对福克斯来说，这是一场如过山车般的比赛。比赛伊始，他表现糟糕，前12次出手仅命中1球。然后，在第四节末段，他一度4投3中，英雄般地为马刺队创造了赢球的机会。不幸的是，在比赛的最后时刻，福克斯在最关键的时候投失了几个球。纵观全场，我认为他的防守显然低于水准，组织进攻也显得太过随意。福克斯需要提升他的比赛强度，尤其是在文班亚马不在场的时候。
评分：C-
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
优点：卡斯尔三分球4投2中，并且篮板球保护得非常出色。他在防守端的努力值得称赞，在进攻端也无畏地冲击篮筐。缺点：卡斯尔的两分球10投仅3中，在将突破转化为得分方面举步维艰。在组织进攻方面，他表现不佳。他太频繁地尝试大包大揽，结果是交出了4次助攻和5次失误的负助攻失误比。
评分：C-
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼再次打出了相当不错的表现。上半场，他几乎凭一己之力扛起了球队。半场结束时，尚帕尼已经得到19分。虽然下半场他的得分势头有所放缓，但他仍然吸引了大量的防守注意力。他最终仅用11次出手就得到了23分。防守端，尚帕尼的表现堪称卓越。他不仅总能出现在正确的防守位置上，还凭借着出色的防守纪律性，堪称瓦解对手战术的大师。他在防守篮板上的贡献更是锦上添花。
评分：A
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯目前的状态之差令人不忍直视。他在三分线外的出手选择不佳，投篮时的脚步也乱了套，突破时远不像往常那样具有控制力。防守端，他很努力，但效果甚微。在瓦塞尔缺阵的情况下，马刺队非常需要巴恩斯通常能提供的空间，但他最近没能做到这一点。
评分：D-
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)
科内特本场比赛的影响力不如以往。进攻端，他难以找到空间。他的掩护效果不佳，并且比平时更容易造成禁区拥堵。篮板方面，科内特本可以做得更好。灰熊队抢到了很多通常会被他收入囊中的篮板球。科内特通过他的传球和护筐能力保留了一些价值，但总的来说，这是他需要尽快忘记的一个夜晚。
评分：C-
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
约翰逊试图挺身而出填补得分空缺，但最终结果低于平均水平。他13次出手仅得到13分，主要原因是他过于依赖三分球。虽然他没有失误，但如果能更多地传球，对球队的帮助会更大。亮点在于，约翰逊的防守比平时要好一些。
评分：C
迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)
哈珀今晚状态不佳。他全场7投仅2中。他的三分球投篮弧度很平，突破篮下的效果也不理想。当哈珀持球移动时，灰熊队给他制造了相当大的麻烦。更糟糕的是，这位新秀有时开始变得犹豫不决。在防守端，他几乎没能改变局势。
评分：D+
卢克·索汉 (Luke Sochan)
索汉在孟菲斯得到了拯救这支死气沉沉的马刺队的机会……但我认为他并没能通过自己的表现赢得未来的出场时间。我欣赏他在篮板上的拼抢，但在其他方面他难以拿出有成效的贡献。灰熊队在防守端基本放空了他在外线的投篮，但索汉仍然投丢了全部三次三分出手。他在防守端很努力，但没有太多实质性的成果。然而，主要问题依然是，索汉近来在进攻端手感冰冷，以至于除非他持球站在篮下，否则对手根本不会注意他。
评分：C-
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)
显然，哈珀已经撞上了新秀墙，而布莱恩特似乎也正在经历自己的瓶颈期。他的外线投篮看起来不再那么流畅，突破也显得很仓促。他的运动能力也不如赛季初那般耀眼。
评分：D+
凯利·奥利尼克 (Kelly Olynyk)
奥利尼克在他出场的九分钟里表现挣扎。除了一个篮板和一次抢断外，他有很多负面表现。他通常是一个能够串联进攻的球员，但在对阵灰熊的比赛中我们没有看到这一点。防守端，他移动能力不足的弱点暴露无遗。
评分：D
乔丹·麦克劳克林 (Jordan McLaughlin)
由于教练组希望寻找场上的火花，麦克劳克林得到了一些出场时间。他命中了一记三分球，并在进攻端完成了几次成功的处理球。除了在移动中的一次失误外，他似乎为球队注入了正确的能量。
评分：B
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
我喜欢约翰逊本场比赛的执教方式。唯一值得商榷的决定是他如何使用文班亚马。理想情况下，他本应以一种能让他的超级巨星在比赛收官阶段留在场上的方式来管理出场时间限制。然而现实是，文班亚马在关键时刻只能无助地在场边观战。但除此之外，我欣赏约翰逊在阵容中不断尝试，寻找能点燃球队的火花。这最终没能带来一场胜利，但在今晚，我不会将失利归咎于教练。
评分：B+
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Memphis Grizzlies – Game #36
Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Memphis Grizzlies – Game #36
In a back and forth affair, the San Antonio Spurs fell to the Memphis Grizzlies by a final score of 106-105. The Spurs are now 25-11 on the season. San Antonio came out hot and led 31-21 at the end of the first quarter. The Grizzlies got back into the game with a strong performance in the third quarter.
Things looked bleak in the fourth quarter but the Spurs battled back and actually put themselves in position to get the win. Sadly, down the stretch, the good guys came up empty in the game’s biggest possessions while the Grizzlies hit a couple big shots to get the W.
Stats: Spurs at Grizzlies
Spurs at Grizzlies – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
In his return from a minor knee injury, Wembanyama was basically unstoppable in his 21 minutes on the court. In that playing time, he was 10-for-20 from the field, 3-for-6 on threes and 7-for-8 at the line. As those numbers suggest, he was attacking almost every time down the court. I liked the aggression but I felt like Wembanyama could have battled for high quality shots. (Then again, it’s pretty ridiculous to criticize someone who had 30 points in 21 minutes.) Defensively and on the boards, the French could have been a bit better. His coordination was a bit wonky, which mostly impacted him on that end of the court. But, all in all, Wembanyama looked like a dominant superstar in his 21 minutes.
Grade: A-
De’Aaron Fox
It was a roller coaster ride for Fox. To begin the game, he was bad. Of his first 12 field goal attempts, he hit only one shot. Then, late in the fourth, there was a stretch where he hit 3-of-4 shots to heroically give the Spurs a chance to win the game. Unfortunately, at the end, Fox missed a couple shots when it mattered most. Throughout the affair, I thought his defense was clearly sub par and his playmaking was too nonchalant. Fox needs to turn up the intensity, particularly when Wembanyama is off the court.
Grade: C-
Stephon Castle
The good: Castle was 2-for-4 from three-point range and rebounded the ball extremely well. His effort on defense was commendable and he was fearlessly driving on the offensive end. The bad: Castle was only 3-for-10 on two-pointers and struggled to convert his drives into points. Playmaking-wise, he didn’t have it. He tried to do too much too often, which resulted in him finishing with a negative ratio of four assists to five turnovers.
Grade: C-
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie was pretty darn good once again. In the first half, he was carrying the good guys on his shoulder. At halftime, Champagnie had 19 points. While his scoring slowed in the second half, he was still drawing a ton of defensive focus. He finished with 23 points on only 11 shots. Defensively, Champagnie was excellent. He was not only in the right spots, he was masterful at blowing up plays with his defensive discipline. The cherry on top was his work on the defensive glass.
Grade: A
Harrison Barnes
Barnes is so out of sorts that it’s painful to watch right now. He’s not picking his three-point attempts well. His footwork on his shot is out of whack. His drives aren’t nearly as under control as usual. Defensively, he’s trying but the results are lacking. Without Vassell, the Spurs really could use the spacing Barnes typically provides but he’s not doing that these days.
Grade: D-
Luke Kornet
Kornet was less impactful than normal. Offensively, he had trouble finding space. His screens weren’t as useful and he was clogging the lane more than usual. Rebounding-wise, Kornet could have been better. The Grizzlies were able to grab a lot of boards that he usually vacuums up. Kornet retained some value with his passing and rim defense but, all things considered, this was a forgettable night at the office.
Grade: C-
Keldon Johnson
Johnson tried to step up into the scoring void but the end result was below average. He scored only 13 points on 13 shots, mostly due to his overreliance on three-pointers. While he didn’t turn the ball over, he could have helped the cause by passing more. The bright spot was that Johnson’s defense was a bit better than usual.
Grade: C
Dylan Harper
Harper didn’t have it. He was only 2-for-7 from the field. His three-pointers were flat and his drives to the rim weren’t as fruitful. The Grizzlies were able to bother Harper quite a bit when he was on the move. To make matters worse, the rookie started hesitating from time to time. Defensively, he rarely moved the needle.
Grade: D+
Luke Sochan
Sochan got a chance to rescue a listless Spurs team in Memphis … but I don’t think he won any future minutes with his play. I liked his work on the boards but otherwise he struggled to produce. The Grizzlies basically didn’t guard him on the perimeter but Sochan still missed all three of his three-point attempts. He efforted on defense but there weren’t many tangible results. But the main problem remains that Sochan is so cold on the offensive end these days that other teams don’t pay attention to him unless he’s standing under the hoop with the ball.
Grade: C-
Carter Bryant
While it’s clear that Harper has hit the rookie wall, it looks like Bryant is also experiencing his own wall. His outside shot doesn’t look as smooth and his drives to the hoop look rushed. His athleticism is also not popping as much as it was earlier in the season.
Grade: D+
Kelly Olynyk
Olynyk struggled in his nine minutes. Outside of his rebound and steal, there were a lot of negative plays. He’s usually a connective offensive player but we didn’t see that against the Grizzlies. Defensively, his lack of mobility stuck out like a sore thumb.
Grade: D
Jordan McLaughlin
With the coaching staff looking for a spark, McLaughlin got some minutes. He hit a three-pointer and made a couple plays offensively. Other than a turnover on the move, he seemed to get the energy flowing in the right direction.
Grade: B
Mitch Johnson
I liked how Johnson coached this game. The only questionable decision was how he utilized Wembanyama. Preferably, he would have managed the minutes restriction in a way where his superstar could have been on the court down the stretch. Instead, Wembanyama was helplessly observing from the sidelines during crunch time. But, other than that, I liked how Johnson searched up and down the roster for a spark. It ultimately didn’t result in a win but I wouldn’t blame coaching on this night.
Grade: B+
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk