By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-12-03 19:34:13
凭借在第四节末段的出色执行力，圣安东尼奥马刺队又一次成功拿下一场胜利。在与孟菲斯灰熊队的比赛中，双方比分一直胶着，直到最后几分钟马刺队打出一波12-2的攻击波，为他们奠定了足够的优势，最终以126-119锁定胜局。这场主场胜利将圣安东尼奥的赛季战绩提升至14胜6负。
数据统计：马刺 vs. 灰熊
马刺 vs. 灰熊 – 最终评分
德阿隆·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)
优点：福克斯三分线外8投4中，罚球线上10罚9中。尽管他有几次强行出手三分，但他把握住了空位机会，并且通过频繁站上罚球线提升了个人效率。在31分钟内砍下29分，表现相当出色。防守端，福克斯积极且专注。
缺点：福克斯在两分球区域11投仅4中。他的组织策应能力乏善可陈，决策能力也有待提高。
评分：B+
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
瓦塞尔的防守强度持续令人印象深刻。他在篮板保护方面也做得不错，并且在攻防两端都很好地控制了失误。进攻端，他命中了半数的三分出手，但在三分线内表现挣扎。考虑到他近来中距离投篮几乎弹无虚发，这次投失几球也算是正常起伏。
评分：B-
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
本赛季，巴恩斯已经数次成为决定比赛胜负的关键先生。这场对阵灰熊的比赛就是最新的例证。巴恩斯命中七记三分，全场砍下31分。他在进攻端的果断坚决是圣安东尼奥进攻的钥匙，而他的得分输出则整晚都帮助马刺队紧咬比分。此外，巴恩斯的传球也很出色，尽管身处攻防核心，全场却仅有一次失误。防守端，他在比赛的各个方面都表现稳健。
评分：A
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼连续第二场比赛在三分线外6投仅1中。面对孟菲斯，即便是在投篮不中的情况下，他依然打得非常努力，这一点值得称道。他的篮板表现再次展现出实打实的强度，并且在防守端不遗余力地覆盖外线。希望尚帕尼能尽快找回远投手感，因为当他状态在线时，圣安东尼奥的进攻会运转得流畅得多。
评分：C+
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)
对科内特来说，这是一个充满激烈身体对抗的夜晚。他将“强硬”一词诠释得淋漓尽致，在尝试护筐时，脸部至少被击中了三次。科内特的决心收到了回报，他在28分钟内送出了五次盖帽。进攻端，尽管他的终结能力不如往常可靠，但这位七尺长人送出了极为出色的传球，并且设置了许多高质量的掩护。
评分：B+
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
约翰逊打出了一场充满球商的比赛，因此，他成为球队取胜的关键一环。进攻端，他高效地贡献了11分，并送出了数次精妙的传球。约翰逊在保持攻击性的同时又没有鲁莽行事，这一点做得非常出色。防守端，他总能出现在正确的位置上，其侵略性也显而易见。
评分：B+
迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)
是的，这位新秀真的非常出色。在21分钟的上场时间里，哈珀贡献了15分、6次助攻，并且没有出现失误。令人惊叹的是，自伤愈复出以来的73分钟里，他的失误数为零。哈珀就是拥有与生俱来的球感，并且在持球时能做出无可挑剔的决策。他冲击篮筐的表现非常出色，同时在合适的时机送出正确传球也同样值得信赖。防守端，他贡献良多，在场上几乎从未显得不知所措。
评分：A-
杰里米·索汉 (Jeremy Sochan)
有所好转。索汉投丢了自己唯一一次三分尝试，但他命中了全部五次两分球出手，从而保持了进攻价值。再加上强悍的篮板表现、两次抢断以及更强的凶悍程度，对于眼下急需积极表现的索汉来说，这是一场不错的比赛。
评分：B+
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)
在本赛季个人表现较好的一场比赛中，布莱恩特三分线外3投2中，并打出了强硬的防守。作为一名新秀，他在防守端的沟通和警觉性都非常超前。对阵灰熊时，布莱恩特的防守有几次出现了纪律性问题，但他的努力程度无可指摘。
评分：B
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
这是教练组又一次主导的出色第四节表现。马刺队在末节将灰熊队的得分限制在21分，防守策略功不可没。进攻端，战术布置卓有成效。轮换阵容的安排也非常合理。
评分：B+
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Memphis Grizzlies – Game #20
Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Memphis Grizzlies – Game #20
The San Antonio Spurs were able to pull out another win by executing late in the fourth quarter. It was a close game versus the Memphis Grizzlies until a 12-2 run in the closing minutes gave the Spurs enough momentum to seize a 126-119 victory. The win at home improved San Antonio to a record of 14-6 on the season.
Stats: Spurs vs. Grizzlies
Spurs vs. Grizzlies – Final Grades
De’Aaron Fox
The good: Fox hit 4-of-8 from downtown and 9-of-10 at the line. While he forced up a couple threes, he made the open ones and added to his efficiency by getting to the charity stripe a lot. Pouring in 29 points in 31 minutes is good work. Defensively, Fox was active and engaged. The bad: Fox was only 4-for-11 from two-point range. His playmaking was nothing to write home about and his decision-making could have been crisper.
Grade: B+
Devin Vassell
Vassell’s defensive intensity continues to impress. He also did good work on the boards and limited his mistakes on both ends. Offensively, he hit half of his shots from downtown but struggled inside of the arc. Considering that his midrange shots have been seemingly automatic lately, he was due for a few misses.
Grade: B-
Harrison Barnes
Barnes has been the difference between a win and a loss a handful of times this season. This game against the Grizzlies was the latest example. Barnes buried seven three-pointers on his way to 31 points. His assertiveness on offense keyed San Antonio’s attack and his production kept the Spurs afloat all night long. Barnes also passed the ball well and turned it over only once despite being in the thick of the action. Defensively, he was solid in all aspects of the game.
Grade: A
Julian Champagnie
For the second straight game, Champagnie was 1-for-6 from three-point territory. Versus Memphis, he did a good job of still playing hard even when he missed shots. His rebounding was legitimately strong again and he efforted out on the perimeter on defense. Hopefully Champagnie can get it going from deep soon because San Antonio’s offense runs a lot smoother when he’s on.
Grade: C+
Luke Kornet
This was a rough and tumble night at the office for Kornet. He took being hardnosed literally as he got hit in the face at least three times while attempting to guard the rim. Kornet’s determination paid off as he finished with five blocks in 28 minutes. Offensively, while his finishing wasn’t as reliable as usual, the seven-footer passed the ball extremely well and he was setting smart screens.
Grade: B+
Keldon Johnson
Johnson played a heady brand of basketball and, as a result, he was a vital part of the win. Offensively, he efficiently added 11 points to the total and he authored a number of wise passes. Johnson did a great job of being in attack mode while not being reckless. Defensively, he was reliably in the right spots and his aggression was palpable.
Grade: B+
Dylan Harper
Yep, this rookie is pretty damn good. In 21 minutes of action, Harper totaled 15 points, six assists and didn’t turn the ball over. Amazingly, he has zero turnovers in 73 minutes since returning from injury. Harper simply has a natural feel for the game and makes impeccable decisions with the ball. He looks great going to the rim but he can also be trusted to make the right pass at the right time. Defensively, he did a lot of good and almost never looks overwhelmed on that end.
Grade: A-
Jeremy Sochan
Better. Sochan missed his only three-point try but he was able to retain offensive value by converting all five of his two-point attempts. Add in stout rebounding, two steals and heightened ferocity and this was a good outing for Sochan — who is in desperate need of positives right now.
Grade: B+
Carter Bryant
In one of his better performances of the season, Bryant shot 2-for-3 from three-point land and played strong defense. His communication and alertness on defense are very advanced for a rookie. Bryant was undisciplined a few times on defense against the Grizzlies but it’s difficult to fault the effort.
Grade: B
Mitch Johnson
This was another strong fourth quarter showing engineered by the coaching staff. The Spurs held the Grizzlies to 21 points in the final stanza, with the defensive gameplan playing a role. Offensively, the playcalling was fruitful. The rotation also made a lot of sense.
Grade: B+
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk