🎧 Spurs Insider️ 播客: 为尚帕尼喝彩,文班伤病惊魂

Spurs Insider Podcast, 2026-01-08 08:51:00

专栏作家迈克·芬格 (Mike Finger) 与随队记者杰夫·麦克唐纳 (Jeff McDonald) 和汤姆·奥斯本 (Tom Orsborn) 共同探讨了朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie) 对阵尼克斯队的惊艳表现,以及他为何成为本赛季球队最不可或缺的球员之一。

备注:本周播客的初次上传被一期旧节目中途打断。我们对该错误深表歉意,问题现已修复。请继续收听本期节目的剩余部分。

推荐阅读:

马刺队尚帕尼揭秘制造跳投犯规的秘诀

马刺队的维克托·文班亚马在全明星球迷投票中排名如何?

为何说特雷·杨和马刺队的案例证明,最好的交易往往是那些没做的交易

马刺队教练米奇·约翰逊如何惊艳全联盟

以下为播客文字稿:

旁白 :来自遍布北美的绝密地点所组成的高度安全网络,这里是《马刺内幕》新年特辑。2024年,我们首次与您见面。

迈克·芬格 :我是迈克·芬格,像往常一样,和我在一起的还有《快报新闻》的马刺随队记者汤姆·奥斯本和杰夫·麦克唐纳,他正从比尔街(Beal)附近走来,步履轻快,他正身处一个安全地点,离球馆不远,而圣安东尼奥的一位高个子球员——维克托·文班亚马,可能就要复出了。等到《马刺内幕》的听众们听到这期播客时,他可能已经复出了,也可能没有。在一个美丽的周二早晨,杰夫正要过去一探究竟。呃,但是,维克托·文班亚马的状态,我记得是在新年前夜,呃,我们都看到他的腿伸直了,明显的膝盖超伸。整个南德州都为之一颤,而就在一两天前,同样的事情也发生在尼古拉·约基奇 (Nikola Jokic) 身上。他可能会没事的,杰夫。你马上就要去了解情况了,但他应该会没事的。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :嗯,我的猜测,这将是我的猜测,嗯,他们会看看他热身情况如何,然后,呃,在那之后再做决定。我想这就是他们在投篮训练时会告诉我们的。

迈克·芬格 :所以那些像往常一样在周三早上和孩子们围着播客机收听的听众们,他们到时就已经知道了。但总的来说,马刺队这次似乎又躲过了一劫。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :是的,就像你说的,我们在新年前夜看到了那一幕,嗯,当时霜冻银行中心球馆的观众们都陷入了一片沉寂,因为他没有马上站起来。他在疼痛中用四肢爬行了一小段距离,看起来情况很糟。然后,维克托单脚跳着离开了场地,并且,呃,该怎么说呢?不是哄劝观众,而是激励观众。是的,那一下引来了一阵不错的欢呼声。但是,嗯,听起来情况本可能更糟。我想他的柔韧性可能救了他。你知道,我们经常谈论,我是说,这听起来有点傻,但这小伙子做了多少拉伸,他一生都在这么做。他有一整套流程来保持身体的柔韧和灵活,我认为正是这种柔韧性可能避免了,我是说,我不是医生,我们都知道,但我认为这可能避免了一些韧带损伤。听起来,就算他不对阵孟菲斯——他已经随队出征了——就算他不打这场,听起来他离重返赛场也已经不远了。要知道,我觉得在新年前夜那天,这看起来似乎是不可能的。

迈克·芬格 :尤其是,汤姆,当那件事发生时,就像我之前提到的,嗯,我们这几个月一直在讨论NBA里的小腿伤病,然后突然之间,你看到一个MVP级别的球员,一个拿过MVP、赢得过总冠军、世界上最好的球员之一,因为膝盖超伸而倒下,紧接着同样的事情发生在了维克托·文班亚马身上,而尼古拉(约基奇)要缺阵一个月。所以那天晚上,当你看到维克托遭遇同样的伤病时,人们担心他也要缺阵一个月,这是可以理解的。但听起来,我们大家能再次看到他打球的时间会比那快得多。

汤姆·奥斯本 :首先,迈克,我刚才是不是听你说“围在播客机旁”?

迈克·芬格 :啊哈,家人们听播客的时候就是这么做的。

汤姆·奥斯本 :我理解“围着”,但是“播客机”,这个词……

迈克·芬格 :嗯,我不想说得太具体。可能是一台收音机,可能是一台唱片机,也可能是一台电视。呃,收听播客的方式有很多种。你都是怎么听播客的,汤姆?

汤姆·奥斯本 :什么?你是怎么听播客的?

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :嗯,用手机。

迈克·芬格 :啊,真无聊。电话机。太无聊了。他用电话机。把它接到房间角落的大收音机上,就像汤姆还是个孩子的时候,在20世纪中叶,孩子们会围在客厅里的那台机器旁,听着像阿华田的广告,还有,呃,你知道的,《小孤女安妮》和《独行侠》之类的节目。你没这么做过吗,汤姆?

汤姆·奥斯本 :我对罗斯福总统的炉边谈话记忆犹新。

迈克·芬格 :是的。

汤姆·奥斯本 :还有布莱基·谢罗德 (Blackie Sherrod)。我以前也听过布莱基·谢罗德的播客。

迈克·芬格 :布莱基·谢罗德的播客。既然你提到了,最早的播客不就是罗斯福的炉边谈话吗?那就像是第一个播客。那家伙还挺有创意的。

汤姆·奥斯本 :是啊,他也有赞助商。他整个风格就是压倒右派一头,那是他的拿手好戏,你知道的,呃,你做播客,然后压倒右派。他就是这么干的。如果你在纽约,你会听拉瓜迪亚市长。他也有一些很棒的播客。

迈克·芬格 :总之……

汤姆·奥斯本 :他过去常常给孩子们读漫画,是的。

迈克·芬格 :这期播客可能会获奖的,汤姆。而且,你知道,我们得选出哪期播客去参评。所以我们得稍微回到正轨。现在是颁奖季。确保这一期可能会被提名。现在是颁奖季,冲着“播客奖”去。

汤姆·奥斯本 :好吧,呃,维克托,是的,嗯,那确实是……是的,我是说,那是一个紧张的时刻,但很快就被朱利安·尚帕尼一记又一记又一记又一记又一记的三分命中给冲淡了。那场表现,你知道,马刺和尼克斯的这些比赛正在变得,我是说,你必须得有票。你必须得看那些比赛。他们打的比赛从不沉闷,尤其是在圣安东尼奥。

迈克·芬格 :嗯,维克托对尼克斯得了60分,对吧汤姆?

汤姆·奥斯本 :我知道,没错。

迈克·芬格 :那是对很久以前某个可怜的家伙说的老梗了,当时汤姆和我在,那是什么地方来着,拉斯维加斯的那个……反乌托邦?有人问维克托对尼克斯砍下60分的事,他说:“我干了什么?”呃,维克托并没有对尼克斯得60分,但很多人对过去几年马刺和尼克斯的这些比赛记忆犹新,以至于这些记忆已经在我们脑海中被夸大了。是的,确实有一些非常精彩的比赛。朱利安·尚帕尼将他的名字加入了对阵尼克斯的伟大表现史册,他投中了马刺队史单场最多的三分球,超越了查克·“神枪手”·珀森 (Chuck “The Rifleman” Person)。呃,这简直令人震惊,在2024年,任何一支球队的三分球纪录,任何一支球队的三分球纪录竟然能追溯到20世纪。嗯,但它确实如此,直到朱利安·尚帕尼做到了。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :你让他听起来像查克·康纳斯 (Chuck Connors),而不是查克·珀森 (Chuck Person)。

迈克·芬格 :嗯,汤姆,这个绰号不就是这么来的吗?

汤姆·奥斯本 :是的。是的,来自《神枪手》电视剧,顺便说一句,查克·康纳斯曾被选中,我相信,或者说他在波士顿凯尔特人队打过短工,他还是个非常优秀的棒球运动员。我想他……我想他打过球,在美国职业棒球大联盟有过出场时间,可能是在布鲁克林队,以及在NBA的凯尔特人队。

迈克·芬格 :他简直就是丹尼·安吉 (Danny Ainge),一个多项运动的明星。是的。

汤姆·奥斯本 :他在这两项运动中都没待太久,但是……

迈克·芬格 :我们这期播客真是紧跟时代潮流,提的都是最前沿的话题。继续吧。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :我没查过,但我估计在那晚之前,在2023年新年前夜之前,马刺队可能是唯一一支……

迈克·芬格 :还有其他球队。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :……纪录还停留在个位数的球队?

迈克·芬格 :哦,个位数。嗯,我以为你要说的是纪录还停留在20世纪的球队。还有几支,但不多,纪录是个位数且追溯到上一个千年的球队不多。嗯,而且……

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :朱利安那晚手感热得发烫,兄弟。看他打球很有趣。

迈克·芬格 :我们这些年经常谈论他,但可能从未在一期播客的头十分钟里专门讨论朱利安·尚帕尼。嗯,但在你可能经历了本世纪最差的一次选秀,马刺队史上最差的选秀之一的那一年,签下这样一个人。马刺队有过很多非常好的选秀。但那一次尤其不怎么样,你有三个首轮签,而且你可能很快就会和这三个人分道扬镳。嗯,那份(尚帕尼的)合同可能是全NBA最值的合同了。

嗯,一年300万美元,马刺队连续四年拥有球队选项。你看看周围,首发后卫能拿2000万美元,角色球员拿1000万,而能以这样的价格得到那种产出,我是说,这只占工资帽的1%、2%,年复一年。明年,他们有权以300万美元续约他的第四年。现在大学里有20个球员的收入都会比他高。呃,也许更多,因为根据新秀工资标准,去年第20顺位的新秀就拿了300万美元。明年可能是第21、22顺位。而且你知道,你感觉……我跟他聊过,嗯,本播客的朋友迈克尔·C·莱特 (Michael C. Wright) 最近在某个更衣室里,可能是在拉斯维加斯,我们和他谈论他的合同,以及马刺队如何每年都执行选项,我们和朱利安开着玩笑,他对此心态很好。他说,嘿,你知道,事情就是这样。当我还是自由球员的时候,我能拿到什么就拿什么。你知道,当时没有其他人想要他,马刺给了他那份合同。那看起来是能改变人生的钱,也确实是。一年300万美元不是小数目,但他的价值远不止于此,马刺队管理层在那方面做得非常出色,锁定了这份合同,因为他……他打破三分纪录并不仅仅是一夜之间的昙花一现。他为球队打出好表现已经有一段时间了,是他们在攻防两端所做事情的关键部分。呃,他从一个我原以为肯定会在某个时候被放弃的球员,变成了一个你可能会思考,他是否是未来一部分的球员。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :而且他挽救了你刚才说的那届选秀。在某种程度上,他成为了他们2022届的选秀成果,嗯,尽管他不是选秀球员,但仍然在球队名单上。这……这是一个非常了不起的故事,也是……这是联盟里那种我喜欢的故事,我昨天还和别人聊到这个。就是那些不知从哪里冒出来、本来看似没有职业生涯,然后突然之间你看到他们开窍了,并且拥有了职业生涯的球员的故事。我是说,我想到的老例子是丹尼·格林 (Danny Green),他也是凭空出现,甚至被裁掉过几次,在G联赛打过球,然后最终,你知道,丹尼·格林成为了那些总决赛球队的关键部分。朱利安的道路让我想起了很多那样的故事,尽管朱利安似乎比丹尼更快地站稳了脚跟。

迈克·芬格 :去年春天,朱利安非常友善地来参加了《快报新闻》高中体育奖的颁奖典礼,他在那里,呃,利用他的休息时间,为大约100名当地高中运动员颁发了奖杯,并且,嗯,在舞台上接受了《快报新闻》某个无名小卒的采访,嗯,在维特博物馆,我们举办颁奖典礼的地方,他给出了很棒的鼓励之词。嗯,那天他讲了他在情人节被裁掉的故事,被谁裁的?他之前在哪支球队?费城。他说他那天晚上带他当时的女朋友出去吃饭,晚餐还是得吃,但他在情人节被裁了,不知道自己还能不能再回到联盟。结果他不仅回到了联盟,还在马刺队找到了一个明确的家。他一直是球队的关键成员,而且《快报新闻》上周左右还有一篇报道,讲他如何成为了米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson) 手下的人,我相信在这之前他是格雷格·波波维奇 (Gregg Popovich) 手下的人,一个在马刺队因伤需要人手一两晚时,可以顶上首发阵容的填补者。我把话题交给你们,来解释一下为什么他能那么好地胜任这个角色。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :首先,我想回到情人节那个故事,因为我有点设身处地地为朱利安着想。你基本上是在情人节晚餐前被解雇了。就像……你……你会告诉你的约会对象吗,你知道,比如,“我们今晚不点龙虾了好吗?”或者“我们不吃甜点了吧”,或者“我们的预订现在改成了汉堡王”之类的。把自己放在他的位置上,真的真的为他感到难过,因为他不知道……他讲了一个类似的笑话。我就是刚才提到的那个站在人群前的无名小卒,他讲了一个关于那件事的精彩故事。他说,你知道,他必须去。我们必须去。我不想去,但你不能错过情人节。

迈克·芬格 :但为什么朱利安是填补首发的完美人选?并不是每个人都能做到,因为这会让你的角色来回变化。为什么他能那么好地适应那个摇摆角色?

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :部分原因是他能和很多不同类型的球员搭档。我是说,当你是一个……他不需要球在手里来创造机会。就像你看到的其他后卫,达龙·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)、斯蒂芬·卡斯尔、迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper),他们在场上时需要大量的触球。朱利安的触球只是在比赛的自然流动中发生的,所以他几乎可以和任何人一起打球。他角色的一个重要部分,即使他没有得到投篮机会,没有投进球,也仅仅是拉开场上空间。然后在另一端,是防守部分,他……你知道,他不是一个最佳防守阵容级别的球员,但他绝对是一个……一个能够守住自己位置、拥有位置优势并且能在防守端站得住脚的球员。所以他比球队里可能任何其他人更适合那种摇摆人的角色。比如你不能把杰里米·索汉 (Jeremy Sochan) 扔进去。在目前这个阶段,你不想让迪伦·哈珀首发,你希望他的角色保持不变。而且就像我提到的,那三个高使用率的后卫同时在场上时,有时候很难都得到满足。所以当你把他们错开一些时,你能获得更大的效益。朱利安就是一个能做到这一点并且……让很多不同阵容都能运转的球员。而且,他是个年薪300万美元的球员,当需要他回到替补席时,他不会抱怨。对吧,这不会让他陷入任何情绪低谷之类的。他只是很高兴能在这里做出贡献。

汤姆·奥斯本 :而且就像你提到的,杰夫,如果他三分投不进,他仍然会防守和抢篮板。抢篮板,没错。这是个好观点。他是个相当不错的篮板手。嗯,回到情感方面,嗯……说到在新年前夜做得很好的人,有一位杰夫·麦克唐纳,我认为那次采访做得非常棒,堪称采访大师课,试图超越比赛本身,挖掘出……你知道,我们一直在谈论的那些好素材。杰夫从朱利安那里引出了他哭了的故事,如果我没记错的话,他在落选时哭了。嗯,他当时在纽约,选秀在布鲁克林,当他没被选中时,他度过了一个泪流满面的夜晚。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :是的,他提前离开大学,结果却没被选中,你知道的。

汤姆·奥斯本 :而且就像你说的,我认为我在圣约翰大学的大学生涯相当不错。

迈克·芬格 :你知道,我们讨论过,我猜不是我们这个播客,而是报道篮球的“我们”这个泛指,经常会拿那些过早参选却认为自己是潜力股但实际上不是的球员开玩笑。他们某种程度上成了笑柄,对吧?就像那个家伙,为什么这家伙认为他可以提前参选并被选中?他没被选中。他本该回到学校的。你永远不知道这些球员在听什么样的建议,他们从球队那里得到的反馈可能不是百分之百坦诚的。这其中有很多因素。但对于一个球员来说,经历了成为笑柄的体验,就像朱利安·尚帕尼那样,然后挺过来,并且……拥有了他迄今为止的职业生涯,而且看起来还会持续一段时间,这是一个非常有趣的故事。而且,你知道,杰夫,我不认为那是杰夫第一次在采访中引出关于眼泪的话题了。他们……他们经常哭着想逃离。但是,是的,杰夫……杰夫做得非常棒。那是在《快报新闻》上的一篇很棒的报道。本周的纸质版和Express-news.com上有很多很棒的报道。呃,我已经有一段时间没有做官方宣传了。新年新气象,我得把这个任务完成一下。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :关于朱利安有趣的是,下一场比赛,他在印第安纳,什么都投不进。什么都投不进。嗯,而且在印第安纳那场,甚至不是那种……涮筐而出或者说他瞄得很准。他投的球都砸到篮板侧面之类的。所以这很有趣。这只是提醒我们他不是斯蒂芬·库里 (Steph Curry),如果他是,你也不可能用300万美元得到他。是的。

迈克·芬格 :嗯,我们……我们想不想深入聊聊,你提到了那个名字,我们通过选秀间接提到了一个名字。这是过去一周的一个进展,维克托·文班亚马缺阵,德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell) 也缺阵。10人轮换、9人轮换、5人首发阵容中出现了一些空缺,给那些通常打不上球的球员机会。嗯,那些通常打不上球的球员包括上场时间越来越多的卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant),嗯,凯利·奥利尼克 (Kelly Olynyk),嗯,还有一个没被提到的名字是杰里米·索汉。我觉得值得谈谈这个事实,我几周前在一个播客上提到过,你只要看比赛,你就能理解情况。现在比以往任何时候都更明显,他已经不是这支球队当下计划的一部分了,而且……我们想不想在距离交易截止日还有一个月的时候,谈谈这支球队的未来?

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :就贡献而言,他的前景看起来……我要用“黯淡”这个词。很明显,他已经不在轮换阵容中了,而且似乎也没有一个非常合理的 scénario 能让他回到轮换。你会觉得,如果他们真想强行让他回来打几分钟,那应该是在像现在这样的时机,但并没有发生。我认为很大一部分原因是卡特·布莱恩特,不是说布莱恩特打得……你知道,打得风生水起,但我认为越来越明显的是,他们希望……他们把卡特·布莱恩特视为未来那个杰里米·索汉的角色。所以他们现在就想培养他来扮演那个角色,他会得到那些本该给索汉的上场时间,尽管索汉可能确实有更多的NBA经验。所以我认为他们……我是说,我不想代表管理层说话,但仅仅从我们作为旁观者的角度来看事情的发展,确实感觉他们在杰里米·索汉这件事上已经向前看了,就他作为这支球队未来关键一员而言。

迈克·芬格 :他的合同情况,他这个休赛期是受限制自由球员,这意味着,嗯,我们的听众足够博学和见多识广,知道那意味着什么。但基本上,马刺队将有权匹配其他任何球队为他开出的报价。看起来,如果他……如果他在轮换中的地位就是现在这样,他们对匹配报价的兴趣不会太大。他会是那样一个球员吗,杰夫总经理,汤姆总经理,你们准备好在下个月交易截止日前和他分道扬镳吗?如果那份700万美元的合同能给你换来一个更能为马刺本赛季阵容做出贡献的人,如果它能给你换来一个,A,射手,B,一个能增加你季后赛经验的老将,考虑到这支球队今年几乎肯定会进入季后赛。嗯,700万美元可能不是一对一的交易。呃,你可能需要加上一些薪水,你知道,取决于你的目标是谁。嗯,但是,你们会毫不犹豫地说“是”吗,在经历了这一切之后,杰里米·索汉这个月可以被交易?

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :我是说,如果……如果你能得到一个你想要并且能帮助你的球员,而你阵容里一个打不上球的球员不会成为阻碍。所以……当然了。是的。如果这能让一笔对你有意义的交易成功,你当然会把他加进去。我仍然不知道那样的交易是否存在。嗯,我……我不知道……

迈克·芬格 :让我举个例子,我不是说……你知道,别断章取义。这只是一个例子,因为菲尼克斯最近打得很好,他们可能在补强而不是削弱。所以我不是说这有可能发生,但这是一笔在薪金空间规则下合法的交易,而且这……这正是我认为马刺队本月在一笔涉及杰里米·索汉的交易中可能觉得合理的氛围。呃,罗伊斯·奥尼尔 (Royce O’Neale),一个3D型球员,可以无缝衔接,给你带来一些那种坚韧,那种老将的经验。就像罗伊斯·奥尼尔防守维克托·文班亚马一样,他是联盟里防得最好的人之一。是的,他做到了。嗯,那个薪水差不多能匹配上。我……我不认为这会发生,因为我不认为菲尼克斯会卖掉他。但是,嗯……对我来说,那种类型的交易,把杰里emi送到一支可以……投资他未来的球队,认为也许他们能修复他,认为也许他们能……匹配任何在受限制自由球员市场上开出的报价,留住他;而马刺队这边,得到一个……一个老将防守者,一个能投进空位球的球员。我想罗伊斯·奥尼尔的三分命中率在40%左右。嗯,那是我认为我会为索汉考虑的那种交易。我……我不确定是否存在其他类似这样的匹配,但对我来说,那是你会为杰里米·索汉做的那种交易。嗯,那将代表着马刺队进入了一个新时代,他们变成了老将的买家和年轻球员的卖家。嗯,但是……

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :是的,你可能还得在交易里搭上个选秀权之类的。

迈克·芬格 :可能得搭上个选秀权。而且……那将是你做的那种交易。嗯,我不确定这个是否可行,但就像凯尔·安德森 (Kyle Anderson) 前几天为犹他队得了22分,我们的老朋友凯尔·安德森。这支球队有他的位置吗?我不知道。但那些是……我猜这是在过渡到一个更广泛的关于交易截止日的讨论。你是去做个大交易,就随便举个名字,特雷·墨菲 (Trey Murphy),他薪水很高,会要求你付出更多,还是你在边缘地带寻找像罗伊斯·奥尼尔、凯尔·安德森这类球员,他们只是……给你增加一点额外的深度?

汤姆·奥斯本 :嗯,我不知道。两个听起来都不错。是的,我是说,你会得到比现在更多的东西。所以,是的,他们显然已经放弃他了。所以……要积极进取。

迈克·芬格 :这太可惜了。因为他确实……我……我感觉还没必要为杰里米·索汉 (Jeremy Sochan) 的圣安东尼奥时代撰写悼词。但我们都清楚他面临的挑战,他被安排在一个他并不擅长的位置上,某种程度上一直没找到自己的角色,但底线是他从未证明自己能投进球,而那……那是……那是他最大的阿喀琉斯之踵。我觉得回到卡特·布莱恩特身上,这很引人注目。嗯,杰夫和汤姆,可以公平地说,马刺队主教练米奇·约翰逊曾多次不遗余力地称赞年轻的卡特·布莱恩特,嗯……他愿意努力打球,即使数据栏没有填满,也愿意在场上做很多事情,他的态度,诸如此类。我……我这样解读是不是错了,他可能是在拿卡特·布莱恩特当榜样,说这个孩子会得到上场时间,因为他正在做我们要求他做的事情。你们……你们从中有没有读出任何与其他球员对比的意味,还是说他只是在不遗余力地称赞卡特·布莱恩特?

汤姆·奥斯本 :可能后者居多。是的。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :我……我认为他们已经决定要培养这个家伙,卡特·布莱恩特,在NBA里成长,所以他们希望他得到NBA的上场时间。所以这有点像在给他打气,也许能提升他的自信心,尽管像你说的,他并没有填满数据栏,而且球并不总是能进网,即使是扣篮。嗯,所以我认为这是一种……保持他自信心的方式,并努力从他那里获得一些有质量的上场时间。我是说,因为他是个年轻人,而且……在这支球队的历史上,曾经有一个时期,像卡特·布莱恩特这样的球员绝对会在G联赛待上一段时间。他们……他们会希望他在G联赛里浸泡一下,在那里建立自信,然后再把他提拔到NBA球队,因为现在NBA球队对他并没有什么迫切的需求。嗯,但他们已经决定……他们似乎已经决定对卡特·布莱恩特采取不同的路线,让他……让他……让他通过高压的上场时间来成长和发展。你知道,时间不多,你知道,他一场可能就打个八分钟左右。所以时间不多,但是……他们似乎发现在NBA级别给他上场时间是有价值的,而不是让他去……在G联赛里当个明星。但要做到这一点,他将会在NBA级别遇到一些挣扎,我认为当你听到米奇那样谈论卡特,非常积极地评价他时,这是一种……在公开场合拍拍他的屁股,给他一点……一点鼓励,拍拍他的背,保持他的精神状态,保持他的专注,保持他……你知道,他的自信心,让他知道他走在正确的轨道上。

迈克·芬格 :我得说,如果卡特·布莱恩特打得更多、打得更好,那对我们这个播客的嘉宾们来说是件好事,因为也许……我2024年最喜欢的一个简短采访就是和他聊的那次,在他……他投失了两个唾手可得的扣篮,那是对哪场比赛来着,一周前对克利夫兰?在全国电视直播的Peacock上,就那么……就那么扣飞了。直接扣飞了。呃,那场比赛后他和我坐下来,基本上就是说,我将成为世界上最好的球员之一,球总有一天会进的,一切都很棒。我为什么要为这事难过呢?就像每个人工作时都会有不顺的日子。那就像是一个七分钟的采访,充满了最积极的态度。你……《马刺内幕》播客有时候以其夸张、荒谬的……乐观的结尾曲目而闻名。我们是。哦,我明白了。我明白了。你懂我意思吧?就像……就像我试图让人们在结尾时兴奋起来的方式,而那显然都像是我自己在吹牛。呃,而且不清楚我是否真的相信。关于卡特·布莱恩特的事情是,他相信那些话,兄弟。他当时在谈论,呃,你知道,他……他拼命训练,而且他会继续拼命训练,仅仅因为他投失了两个扣篮并不意味着他……他不会专注,他会带着他的三条狗回家,在他的iPad应用上反复观看那些扣篮,他会专注于,嘿,我冲在了正确的路线上,我处在正确的位置上。我在那个回合的整个过程中,在整个行动过程中都做了所有正确的事情,让自己处于能够得分的位置。他还说了类似这样的话,是的,我身高6英尺6英寸,垂直弹跳40英寸,我没扣进那些球是很荒谬,但一切都会好起来的。呃,他一度说,我想这个球馆里有多少人?18000人。我敢肯定他们中没人认为比赛节奏对我来说正在变慢,但实际上是的。比赛节奏对我来说正在变慢。那种不屈不挠的积极心态,我想我们都从他在更衣室的互动中看到了。你知道,队友们都喜欢围着他。他们……他们都喜欢卡特·布莱恩特。那天晚上走出去时,达龙·福克斯还在拿他扣篮不进的事开他玩笑。而你不会去开一个你不确定他能承受得起的球员的玩笑。那……那是我认为马刺队……这说明的不仅仅是更衣室的动态。如果一个球员能接受一些玩笑、一些严厉的指导和失败,这就解释了为什么……也许他们愿意让他在NBA里学习一些艰难的教训,而不是,你知道,通过在对阵像什么红蚁队或者里奥格兰德河谷毒蛇队这样的球队时得30分来建立自信。你知道,如果……如果你能在顶级联赛中经受一些艰难的夜晚,而你的精神没有被击垮,我认为那会对你大有裨益。我认为这也解释了为什么他们愿意让他在NBA级别学习那些艰难的教训,而不是把所有时间都花在G联赛里。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :光听你描述他,他就像……他就像NBA界的托尼·罗宾斯 (Tony Robbins)。

迈克·芬格 :是的。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :我是说……

迈克·芬格 :我说的有错吗?你,汤姆,你……你经常在更衣室里。杰夫,就像……你们能看出来一个球员是更衣室的宠儿,还是更像个壁花,对吧?我想我们都会同意,队友们真的很喜欢……

汤姆·奥斯本 :是的。不,赛季初我在更衣室里,不记得是菲尼克斯还是洛杉矶还是哪儿,但他和……哈珀,呃,有点主导了气氛,你知道,他们是赛前更衣室的主角,他们的喋喋不休和一来一往,在赛季初看到那一幕相当引人注目。

迈克·芬格 :我们这些体育记者和播客主持人可能会过度解读这些事情,有些听众在那边对这种陈词滥调翻白眼,随便怎么说吧。但我认为这确实关系到……谁能融入,谁不能,谁有那种自信,谁没有。我不认为卡特·布莱恩特短期内会缺乏自信。你提到了迪伦·哈珀,作为一个过渡,我们看到过一些收官阵容,那三个后卫一起在场,对吧,杰夫?

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :是的。他们在波特兰那场用了吗?我不知道。他们在……对印第安纳那场用了。

迈克·芬格 :我相信他们用了。是的。哈珀、福克斯和卡斯尔作为收官阵容。你对这个阵容有何评价?

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :我……我认为这仍在磨合中,但有很多值得喜欢的地方。嗯,这很有帮助,因为……他们都能防守自己的位置,有时还能防守多个位置。就像有时候当你上一个……后卫为主的……阵容时,其中一个球员在另一端会成为一个错位点,但我认为他们所有人都能守住自己的位置。而且……在那方面,真正让这个阵容奏效的是卡斯尔,因为他能防守很多不同的人。他……他能防守大个子。我是说,他能防守侧翼,他能防守控卫。所以任何他们需要做的换防,嗯,都很难找到针对他们的错位。而其他……对于其他试图同时上很多后卫的球队,你就会去寻找那些错位。而且,这仍然在磨合中。我想他们……他们一起打球的时间大概也就一次两三分钟。但是,我是说,在进攻端,那个……那个潜力是显而易见的。就像你有三个球员,他们都是不断冲击内线、攻击篮筐、为自己和他人创造机会的。当他们都在场上时,这个三人组很难防守。我的天,如果你某个时候再把维克托和他们一起放在场上,我都不知道该怎么防了。而且因为它在防守端也站得住脚,我认为……我认为它在某些情况下可以作为一个收官阵容。

迈克·芬格 :你显然希望第四个在场上的人能投三分,或者第五个。是的。嗯,因为那是……那真的是那个组合唯一的……附带条件,就是你场上有三个都往里冲的球员,你能否让防守方尊重你的三分线。嗯,这三个球员今年都投进过关键三分,但我不认为他们中任何一个是你所认为的……一个查克·康纳斯式的神枪手。嗯,所以如果你有一个哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes) 站在底角,嗯,德文·瓦塞尔,我猜我们需要一个关于他伤病的更新,嗯,朱利安·尚帕尼,他们中的一个。呃,德文接下来的状态如何,杰夫?

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :他缺阵。是的。那将是……那将是我的波波维奇式回答。记得你以前赛前问,他缺阵。

迈克·芬格 :我记得波波。

汤姆·奥斯本 :可能还要缺席好几场比赛。我这么认为,是的。他们不会……是的,我听说他会缺席好几场比赛。他本赛季的开局非常稳健。是的。嗯,他以一种不同于朱利安·尚帕尼的方式提供了相当不错的价值,但就那份合同而言……那份曾让一些人认为德文被高薪低付的合同,我想如果你看看周围其他拿他那种薪水的人,他……他……他履行了他那部分的合同。嗯,我们看看他能否回归。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :他会回来的。是的。他会回来的。他……他哪儿也不去。他只是暂时休战。

迈克·芬格 :我们这周没有深入讨论具体的比赛结果。那场朱利安·尚帕尼的比赛,新年前夜的尚帕尼超新星爆发,带来了对尼克斯的胜利。马刺队客场对阵印第安纳步行者队,最终在本赛季首次输掉了背靠背的第二场比赛。马刺队在主场输给了波特兰开拓者队。所以他们取得了二胜一负,我想这是上周很多人的预测,嗯,在那一周里。当你们听到这个播客时,马刺队可能已经和孟菲斯灰熊队打完了比赛,不管维克托·文班亚马或贾·莫兰特 (Ja Morant) 是否出场。周三晚上在圣安东尼奥有一场重要的背靠背,对阵宿敌湖人队,然后是一个……艰巨的背靠背客场之旅,一个看起来令人生畏的旅程,对阵势头正盛的波士顿凯尔特人队,尽管没有杰森·塔图姆 (Jason Tatum),他们正成为东部最好的球队之一。我觉得乔·马祖拉 (Joe Mazzulla) 可能是个了不起的教练。然后……客场对明尼苏达。所以让我们看看,对阵孟菲斯,主场对湖人,客场对凯尔特人,然后背靠背客场对明尼苏达,在我们再次聚会之前。那是四场比赛,汤姆。你怎么看?

汤姆·奥斯本 :是的,孟菲斯……考虑到接下来的对手,那是他们必须拿下的比赛。嗯,而且孟菲斯也有不少伤病。是的,湖人队……他们客场比主场打得好。凯尔特人势头正盛。我们要去明尼苏达?那是截止点吗?

迈克·芬格 :是的。

汤姆·奥斯本 :好的。好的。

迈克·芬格 :所以我们有两个背靠背。孟菲斯-洛杉矶,波士顿-明尼苏达。

汤姆·奥斯本 :是啊,是啊。嗯……

迈克·芬格 :你觉得能赢两场吗?

汤姆·奥斯本 :是的,也许……也许他们会再次击败湖人,但我不知道。我不知道。这是一个艰难的赛程。嗯……

迈克·芬格 :汤姆,两胜两负。

汤姆·奥斯本 :两胜两负。两胜两负。

迈克·芬格 :两胜两负。

汤姆·奥斯本 :是的。

迈克·芬格 :杰弗里。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :我……我不太相信我们本地这帮球员现在的稳定性,我会说这段赛程是一胜三负。我不知道你有没有注意到,但另外一支和马刺队一起进入……NBA季中锦标赛……决赛和半决赛的球队,我指的是像雷霆和尼克斯,他们现在的表现也算不上惊艳。他们可能……

迈克·芬格 :顺便说一句,这正在成为季中锦标赛的传统。

杰夫·麦克唐纳 :是的。这其中可能有某种原因,就是它会让你精疲力尽,然后你……你知道,打完之后你会看到……那种影响。所以我不知道。嗯,这支球队需要一些休息,有趣的是,他们……马刺队以连续三个背靠背开启新的一年,那很艰难。但他们这个月也有五次……连续休息两天的机会,这是联盟最高的。所以这是一个奇怪的组合,你有休息,也有……背靠背。嗯,我不知道你能不能找到节奏。每个人都喜欢隔天打一场比赛。所以这将是一个奇怪、有趣的赛程,看看他们如何……如何应对这一切。

迈克·芬格 :如果他们能在我们下次录播客前拿下两场胜利,我认为那将构成一个……相当成功的一周。我们看看他们能否做到。在我们下次交流之前,请互相照顾,保持真实。

由生成式 AI 翻译,译文内容可能不准确或不完整,以原文为准。

点击查看原文:A toast of Champagnie and a Wemby injury scare

A toast of Champagnie and a Wemby injury scare

Columnist Mike Finger and beat reporters Jeff McDonald and Tom Orsborn discuss Julian Champagnie’s big game versus the Knicks and why he’s become one of the most integral players this season.

NOTE: The initial upload of this week’s podcast was interrupted midstream by an older episode. We regret the error and it has been fixed. Enjoy the rest of the episode.

Suggested reading:

Spurs’ Champagnie reveals secret to drawing jump-shooting fouls

Where does the Spurs’ Victor Wembanyama rank in fan All-Star voting?

Why Trae Young, Spurs show that the best trades often are the ones not made

How Spurs coach Mitch Johnson is turning heads across the NBA

Here is the transcript of the podcast:

Narrator: From a highly secure network of top secret locations across North America, this is the Spurs Insider, New Year edition. For the first time, we’re coming at you in 2024.

Mike Finger: I am Mike Finger, joined as always by Express News Spurs Beat Writers Tom Orsborn and Jeff McDonald, walking with his 10 feet off of Beal in a secure location not far from the arena where one tall San Antonian, Victor Wembanyama, might be making a return. By the time the listeners of the Spurs Insider hear this podcast, he might not. Jeff’s about to head over there and find out on a beautiful Tuesday morning. Uh, but the the status of Victor Wembanyama who on New Year’s Eve, I believe, uh, we we all saw him his his leg straighten, clear hyperextension. A a a shiver went over South Texas just a couple days, a day or so after the same thing happened to Nikola Jokic. He could be okay, Jeff. You’re about to find out, but he could be okay.

Jeff McDonald: Um, my guess, this is going to be my guess is, um, they’re going to see how he warms up and then uh we’ll make a decision after that. I think that’s what they’re going to tell us at at shootaround.

Mike Finger: So the people who are listening on Wednesday morning as they often do with their children gathered around the podcast machine, they’ll already know, but in general terms, the Spurs dodged another uh another bullet here, it appears.

Jeff McDonald: Yeah, he’s like you said, we saw that on um New Year’s Eve, um and it it was there was a hush that fell over the uh Frost Bank Center crowd because he didn’t get up right away. He kind of bear crawled a little in pain, like it looked bad. And then he hopped off uh the court, Victor did, and um what’s the word? Not cajoled the crowd, but sort of uh exhorted the crowd. Yeah, and that that that uh got a nice little uh roar. But um sounds like it could have been a lot worse. I think his flexibility probably saved him. You know, we we talked a lot a lot about how much, I mean it sounds silly, but how much stretching this guy does, and he’s done it his whole life. He has this whole routine that keeps him limber, keeps him flexible, and I think that flexibility probably saved, I mean, I’m no doctor, we know this, but I think it probably saved some ligament damage there. And it sounds like if he doesn’t play against Memphis, like he made the trip, if he doesn’t play against Memphis, it sounds like he’s not too far uh away from getting back on the floor, which, you know, I think New Year’s Eve that didn’t seem like that was going to be possible.

Mike Finger: Especially Tom, when when that happened, like I mentioned earlier, um, these we’ve been talking about calf injuries for months in the NBA, and then all of a sudden you have a MVP level guy, a guy who’s won the award, a guy who’s won a title, one of the best players in the world go down with the hyperextended knee and then the next thing you know that same thing happens to Victor Wembanyama and Nikola is out for a month. And so it was understandable that night when you see Victor have the same injury that people are worrying about a month there, but it sounds like that we’re that the uh, that we’re all going to be able to see him play again much sooner than that.

Tom Orsborn: First, Mike, did I hear you say huddled around the podcast machine?

Mike Finger: Uh-huh, that’s what families do whenever they uh listen.

Tom Orsborn: I understand the huddling, but the podcast machine, that that uh…

Mike Finger: Well, I didn’t want to be specific. It could be a radio, it could be a record player, it could be a TV. Uh, there’s many ways to access the uh the podcast. How do you listen to your podcast, Tom?

Tom Orsborn: What’s that? How do you listen to your podcast?

Jeff McDonald: Um, on a on a phone.

Mike Finger: Ah. That’s boring. Telephone. That’s boring. He uses a telephone. set that up to the big radio in the corner of the room, like the the the kids uh in the when Tom was a child in the middle of the 1900s. Yeah, they they would huddle around the the machine in the living room and listen to like the Ovaltine ads and and uh you know, the uh Little Orphan Annie and the Lone Ranger and all that kind of stuff. Didn’t you do that, Tom?

Tom Orsborn: I have fond memories of FDR’s fireside chats.

Mike Finger: Yes.

Tom Orsborn: And Blackie Sherrod, too. I listened to Blackie Sherrod’s uh podcast back in the day.

Mike Finger: Blackie Sherrod’s podcast. Now that you mention that, wasn’t that the first podcast, is the FDR Fireside Chats? Like that was that’s the first podcast. He was was inventive that that guy.

Tom Orsborn: Yeah, and he had sponsors too. And he was just like the whole thing was like getting over on the uh that was his thing, you know, uh you know, you do the podcast and get over on the right. That’s what he did. If you were in New York, you listen to Mayor La Guardia. He had he had some great podcasts too.

Mike Finger: Anyway…

Tom Orsborn: He used to read the comics, yeah, to the kids.

Mike Finger: This podcast could be up for an award, Tom. And and I, you know, we’re we’re going to have to choose which of these podcasts we’re submitting for awards. So we need to be a little back on track. It is awards season. Make sure that this one might be a nominee. It is awards season. Going for the poddy.

Tom Orsborn: Okay, well, uh Victor, yeah, um that was uh yeah, I mean yeah, that was a tense moment, but it was soon forgotten with uh Julian Champagnie hitting three after three after three after three after three. That that that performance uh you know, these these Spurs Knicks games are becoming, I mean, you got to have a ticket. You got to see those games. Uh they don’t play dull games, especially here in San Antonio.

Mike Finger: Well, Victor scored 60 against the Knicks, right Tom?

Tom Orsborn: I know, exactly.

Mike Finger: That’s that’s a throwback to whoever that poor gentleman was way back when Tom and I were in the uh what is it, the the uh the the dystopia of Las Vegas. And someone asked Victor about scoring 60 against the Knicks and he said, I did what? Uh Victor didn’t score 60 against the Knicks, but a lot of people uh had such fond memories of these recent Spurs Knicks games over the last couple of years that that the uh the memories are are being already being exaggerated in our heads. Yeah. There have been some really great games. Julian Champagnie adding his name to the lore of great performances against the Knicks with the most three pointers made in a Spurs game ever, surpassing Chuck “The Rifleman” Person. Uh which is just staggering that a that a three-point record in the year 2024 that anybody’s three-point record, any franchise’s three-point record dated back to the 1900s. Um but it did until until Julian Champagnie pulled it off.

Jeff McDonald: You make him sound like Chuck Connors, not Chuck Person.

Mike Finger: Well, isn’t, Tom, isn’t that the source of the nickname?

Tom Orsborn: Yes. Yes, the Rifleman TV series and Chuck Connors, by the way, was drafted, I believe, or I think he had a cup of coffee with the Boston Celtics, and he was also a really good baseball player. I think he had I think he played, he had time both in the major leagues, I think maybe with Brooklyn and uh and in the NBA with the Celtics.

Mike Finger: He was a regular Danny Ainge, multi-sport star. Yeah.

Tom Orsborn: He didn’t last very long in either one, but…

Mike Finger: We’re hitting all the cutting edge references on this podcast. Go ahead.

Jeff McDonald: I didn’t look it up, but I would reckon until that night, until New Year’s Eve 2023, the Spurs had to be maybe the only franchise…

Mike Finger: There are others.

Jeff McDonald: …still remaining in single digits?

Mike Finger: Oh, in single digits. Well, what I what I thought you were going to say is that still had a record dating back to the 1900s. There are a few others, but there’s not many that were that that were in the single digits and were were dating back to the previous millennium. Um, and uh…

Jeff McDonald: Julian got on a heater, man. It was kind of fun to watch.

Mike Finger: We’ve we’ve talked about him a lot over the years, maybe never focused the first 10 minutes of a podcast on Julian Champagnie. Um but to sign a guy the year when you maybe had your worst draft of the century, worst one of the worst drafts that you could you that the Spurs have had. Spurs have had a lot of really good drafts. That one in particular wasn’t great when you have three first round picks and you might soon be a split from all three of those guys. Um that’s what that’s maybe the best contract in the NBA.

Um $3 million a year, the Spurs had an option on it four years in a row. When you look around and like that starting guards make $20 million, role players make 10, and to be able to get that kind of production, I mean like 1%, 2% of the salary cap year after year after year. Next, they have a they have the right to renew next year, his fourth year at $3 million. And there’s going there are 20 players in college right now who are going to make more than him. Uh maybe more because the because the way that the the salary rookie salary scale is is set, the 20th pick in the draft last year made $3 million. Next year it could be the 21st, 22nd pick. But and you know, you you feel I I talked to him, um friend of the podcast Michael C. Wright was in a recent locker room somewhere, it might have been in Vegas, and we were talking to him about his deal and how how um the Spurs just kind of opt in every year and we’re laughing with Julian about it and and he had a good attitude about it. He was like, man, that’s, you know, that’s that’s that’s that’s what you did. I took what I could get whenever I was a free agent. You know, there was nobody else who wanted them and the Spurs offered him that. That seemed like a life-changing money and it is. It is life-changing money. $3 million a year is nothing to sneeze at, but he’s worth a lot more than that and the Spurs did really good work there, front office work to to nail that down because he’s been a, it wasn’t just a one night flash in the pan of him breaking the three-point record. He’s been good for them for a while, key part of what they’re doing at both ends of the floor. And uh he went from a guy who I thought for sure you’re just going to let go at some point after this to a guy who you might think about, is he part of the future?

Jeff McDonald: And he salvaged that draft like you were talking about. It was in a way he was their he he becomes their draft pick from 2022 um that’s still on the roster even though he wasn’t a draft pick. It was it was um it’s a really remarkable story and a really um it’s the kind of stories in the league, I was just talking about this with somebody yesterday. It’s just one of the stories in the league that I like about guys that come out of nowhere and have no career and then all of a sudden you see it click and they have a career. I mean the throwback to me is Danny Green coming in out of nowhere, even getting cut a couple of times, G League stints in there, and then ends, you know, Danny Green ends up being a key part of those finals teams. And and Julian’s path reminds me a lot of that, although Julian seems to have stuck a lot quicker than Danny did.

Mike Finger: Julian was nice enough last spring to come and be a part of the Express News High School Sports Awards and stood up there and uh on his on during his time off uh presented trophies to 100 or so local high school athletes and and um was interviewed by some jabroni uh from the Express News on the stage there um at that at that at the Witte Museum where we had our award ceremony and and gave great words of encouragement. And um, he told the story that day about getting waived on Valentine’s Day by who who who was he with before this? By Philadelphia. And he said he had taken his his girlfriend at the time out to dinner that night and he still had to do the dinner but he was waived on Valentine’s Day and didn’t know if he’d ever be in the league again. And not only was he in the league again, but he’s found a definite home with the with the Spurs. Been a key member for them and there was a story in the Express News just this past week or so about how he has become Mitch Johnson’s guy to play and I think believe he was Greg Popovich’s guy before this, a guy to plug into the starting lineup as the fill in whenever the Spurs need a guy for a night or two for because of injuries and and I’ll I’ll turn it over to you guys to kind of explain why he fills that role so well.

Jeff McDonald: Well first I want to go back to the Valentine’s Day story because I’m kind of putting myself in Julian’s shoes. And you basically get fired right before Valentine’s dinner. Like like do you do you tell your date, you know, like, how about we don’t do the lobster tonight? Or why don’t we why don’t we skip dessert or uh our reservation is now a Burger King or something like that. Like putting myself in his shoes and really really feeling bad for him because he didn’t know he had he had a joke along those lines. I was the aforementioned jabroni who was with the in front of the crowd and he gave he gave a great story about that. He was like, you know, he had to go. We had to go. I didn’t want to be there but you can’t you can’t skip Valentine’s Day.

Mike Finger: But why is Julian the perfect guy as a fill in starter, which not everybody could do because it changes your role back and forth. Why does he fit so well in that in that swing role?

Jeff McDonald: Part of it is because he fits alongside a lot of different kinds of guys. I mean when you’re a guy who’s he doesn’t necessarily need the ball in his hands to create. Like you see those other guards, De’Aaron Fox, Steph Castle, Dylan Harper, they they need a lot of touches when they’re on the floor. Julian’s touches just come in the natural flow and so he can play along side just about anybody. And a big part of his role even if he’s not getting shots, he’s not making shots is just spacing the floor. And then on the other side there’s the the defensive part where he you know, he’s not an all-defensive guy but he’s definitely a um a guy that can hold his own, has has positional size and can hold his own at that at that end of the floor. So he he he fits more as that kind of swing guy than maybe anybody else they have on the roster. Like you couldn’t throw a Jeremy Sochan in there. At this point in time, you don’t want to make, you don’t want to start Dylan Harper, you want his role to stay the same. And like I mentioned, it’s sometimes difficult for all three of those heavy usage guards to all eat when they’re on the floor at the same time. So you get more bang for your buck when they’re staggered a little. Julian’s a guy that can uh do that and and um make a lot of different lineups work. And also, he’s a guy that makes $3 million and he’s not going to complain about going to the bench when it’s time to go to the bench. Right, it’s not going he’s not going to put him in any kind of funk or anything like that. He’s just happy to be here contributing.

Tom Orsborn: And as you mentioned Jeff, if he’s not hitting threes, he still defends and he rebounds. Rebounds. Correct. That’s a good point. He’s a pretty good rebounder. Um back to the, you know, the emotional side of this, um um speaking of people that did good work on New Year’s Eve, one Jeff McDonald, that was a I thought that was a great job, uh a masterclass in interviewing a guy and trying to get beyond what happened in the game to get, you know, that that good material that that we’ve been talking about. And Jeff elicited from uh Julian that he cried uh if I’m remembering this correctly, cried on uh when he didn’t get drafted. Um he was there in New York, the draft was in Brooklyn and and he had a tearful night when he didn’t get picked.

Jeff McDonald: Yeah, he came out of college early to not get picked, you know.

Tom Orsborn: And like you said, I thought I had a pretty good college career at St. Jones.

Mike Finger: That’s the you know, that we we’ve discussed, I guess not we as in this podcast, but the royal we of people who cover basketball often pick on the guys who come out too early and think that they’re a prospect and aren’t. They they sort of become the butt of jokes, right? Like the guy who like why did this guy think he could come out early and get picked? He doesn’t get picked. He should have gone back to school. You never know what kind of advice these players are listening to, what kind of feedback they got from teams that might not have been 100% forthright. There’s a lot that goes into it. But for a player to kind of experience being the butt of the joke, the way that Julian Champagnie was and to come out on the other side and uh and have a career like he’s already had so far and looks like he’ll have for a while, that’s a that’s a pretty fun story. And uh you know, Jeff, I don’t think that was the first time Jeff has elicited something about tears when he interviews people. They they often are crying trying to get away. But uh yeah, Jeff Jeff Jeff does a great job. That was a great great story in the Express News. A lot of great coverage in the dead tree edition and the Express-news.com this week. Uh it’s been a while since I’ve done the official plug. It’s a new year. I needed to get one of those out of the way.

Jeff McDonald: And the funny thing about Julian is like the next game he goes out in Indiana and can’t hit anything. Can’t hit anything. Um and those weren’t even like uh in Indiana, it wasn’t even like in and out and he’s right on target. Like he was hitting the side of the backboard and stuff. So it was funny. It’s just a reminder that he’s not Steph Curry and if he was, you wouldn’t have him for $3 million. Yeah.

Mike Finger: Um, do do we want to get into, you mentioned the name and we obliquely mentioned a name through the draft. It’s one development from the last week where Victor Wembanyama’s been out, Devin Vassell has been out. There there have been openings in that 10-man rotation, nine-man rotation, five-man starting lineup for guys who usually don’t get to play. Um and those guys who don’t usually get to play have been Carter Bryant who’s playing more and more, um Kelly Olynyk, um and one name that hasn’t been mentioned is Jeremy Sochan. And I I think it’s worth getting into the fact that we kind of I I mentioned this on a podcast a few weeks ago that you just watch the games and you understand the situation. Now it’s become more evident than ever that he’s just not part of this team’s present and uh do we want to get into this team’s future a month away from the trade deadline?

Jeff McDonald: It certainly looks, I’m going to say use the word bleak for him in terms of contributing. Like they’re clearly he’s clearly not in the rotation and it doesn’t seem like there’s a there’s a very plausible scenario where he gets there. Like you you would think if they were ever going to force him back in there for some minutes, it would be at a time like this and it’s not it’s not happening. And I think a big part of it is Carter Bryant, not that Bryant has, you know, played like gangbusters, but I think it’s becoming evident they want they see Carter Bryant as that Jeremy Sochan role of the future. And so they want to groom him for that now and he’s going to get those minutes over Sochan, even though Sochan probably has does have more NBA experience. So I think they I think I mean, I don’t want to speak for the organization right now, but just from the outside where we are watching how things are playing out, it does seem like they’re moving on from Jeremy Sochan in terms of a him being a a a key piece of what this team is going forward.

Mike Finger: His contract situation, he is a restricted free agent this offseason, which means that well, well our listeners are educated and informed enough to know what that means. But basically the Spurs would have the right to match any offer that someone else makes for him. It does not seem like if he’s um if he is what he is now in the rotation that that they’d be much interested in making that match. Would he be a guy, Jeff, GM Jeff, GM Tom, who you’re ready to part ways with in the next month before the trade deadline if that $7 million contract gets you someone who can more readily contribute to what the Spurs are putting together this season, if it could get you uh A, a shooter, B, a veteran type guy who adds to your playoff knowhow seeing as how this is a team that’s going to almost certainly be in the playoffs this year. Um, $7 million might not be a one-for-one type of thing. Uh you might need to add some salary, you know, depending on who you target. Um but are are are you at all hesitant to say yes after all this, Jeremy Sochan is available in a trade this this month?

Jeff McDonald: I mean, if there’s if you could get a guy that you want and will help you and like a a player on your roster who’s not playing is not going to be a hold up to that. So like of course. Yeah. Of course you’re going to include him if that makes a deal work that makes sense for you. I still don’t know if that if that deal will be out there. Um I I don’t I what I don’t…

Mike Finger: let me throw a I’m not, you know, don’t aggregate this. This is just an example because Phoenix has been playing really well lately and they might be they they might be adding rather than subtracting. So I’m not saying this is a possibility, but this is a trade that would work legally uh under the the salary cap rules and it’s it’s it’s the vibe of a trade that I I I think could make sense for the Spurs in a Jeremy Sochan deal this month. Uh Royce O’Neale, a three and D type of guy who could slot in and give you some more some of that toughness, some of that veteran knowhow. Like Royce O’Neale guards Victor Wembanyama as well as anybody in the league. Yes, he did. Um that salary sort of matches up. And I and I don’t think this is going to happen because I don’t think Phoenix is selling him. But uh um to me that type of trade of Jeremy to a team that could um invest in his future, could think maybe they could fix him, could think maybe they could uh match whichever salary was offered in restricted free agency, keep him around and coming the other way for the Spurs, get a guy, a veteran defender, a guy who can make an open shot. I think Royce O’Neale is shooting around 40% on threes. Um that’s I think the kind of deal I’d look at for for Sochan. I don’t I’m not sure if any other match up like that exists out there, but to me that’s the kind of deal you would do for Jeremy Sochan. Um which would be which would represent a new era of the Spurs in that they become the buyers of the veteran guy and the sellers of the of the younger guy. Um but…

Jeff McDonald: Yeah, you’d probably have to throw a pick of some sort in there.

Mike Finger: Probably would have to throw a pick in. And um and that that would be the type of deal you do. Um, I’m not sure this works either, but like Kyle Anderson scored 22 points the other day for Utah, our old friend Kyle Anderson. That is there a spot for him on this team? I don’t know. But that those are the I guess this is transitioning into a a broader discussion of the trade deadline. Do you go make the big splash for just to throw out a name, Trey Murphy, who makes a lot of money and would require you to give up more or are you looking at the margins at the Royce O’Neale, Kyle Anderson types who just kind of uh give you a little extra depth?

Tom Orsborn: Well, I don’t know. Both sound good to me. Yeah, I mean, you’d be getting more than what you’re getting now. So yeah, they they’ve clearly moved on from him. So… Be aggressive.

Mike Finger: It’s too bad. It’s because he he did I I I don’t feel the need to do the an obituary of the Jeremy Sochan era in San Antonio yet. But we’re we’re all aware of the challenges he had where he was put in a situation where he was trying to play a position that he wasn’t well suited to play, sort of never found the role, but the bottom line is he never showed he could make a shot and that’s that’s uh that’s that’s that’s been the biggest Achilles heel. And I think it’s been striking to go back to Carter Bryant. Um Jeff and Tom, it’s it’s fair to say Mitch Johnson, the head coach of the Spurs, has gone out of his way multiple times to praise young Carter Bryant’s um willingness to play hard, to do a lot of stuff on the floor even if he’s not filling up the box score, his attitude, that type of stuff. And and am I reading that wrong in that maybe he was making an example of Carter Bryant and saying this kid’s going to play because he’s doing what we’re asking him to do. Did you did did did you read anything else into that as a comparison to other guys or was that just him going out of his way to praise Carter Bryant?

Tom Orsborn: Probably the latter. Yeah.

Jeff McDonald: I I think I think they made the decision that they want to develop this guy, Carter Bryant in the NBA and so they want him to get NBA minutes. And so it’s kind of gassing him up a little and maybe boosting his confidence even though like you say, he’s not filling up the box score and the ball isn’t always going in the net for him even even on dunks. Um so I think it is a way of kind of keeping his confidence up and just trying to get some good minutes out of him. I mean because he is a young guy and there there was there was a uh point in this franchise’s history where a guy like Carter Bryant would absolutely be in the G League for a while. Like they they’d want him to to marinate in the G League, get some confidence there and then bring him up to the to the NBA club because there’s no there was no crying need for him on the NBA club right now. Um but they’ve decided they they appear they’ve decided to go a different route with Carter Bryant and let him um let him let him grow and develop through through through pressure cooker minutes. You know, not a ton of them, you know, he might play eight or something in a game. So not a ton of them, but um they seem to have found value in getting him minutes at the NBA level right now instead of letting him go just be a a stud in the G League. But to do that, he’s going to have some struggles at the NBA level and I think what you’re hearing from Mitch when he’s when he’s talking that way about Carter and being really positive is a way of kind of kind of slapping him on the butt in public and giving him a little little pep um pat on the back and keeping his spirits up and keeping him focused and keeping him um you know, his confidence up, letting him know he’s on the right track.

Mike Finger: I got to say, it’d be good for the the the the panelists on this podcast if if Carter Bryant plays more and plays well because maybe the what one of my favorite short little interviews of 2024 was talking to that kid after he he missed two just give me dunks against what was that game, Cleveland a week ago? On national TV on on Peacock and just blew, just smoked them. Just smoked them. And uh he sat down with me after that game and basically said like I’m going to be one of the best players in the world and the ball’s going to go in one day and everything’s great. And why would I be upset about this? Like everybody has rough days at work. It was just it was like a seven-minute interview of the most positive. You you the Spurs Insider podcast sometimes is known for over the top ridiculous uh upbeat finishing numbers. We are. Oh, I see. I see. You know what I’m saying? Like the way that uh that the way that that I try to get people uh excited at the end and it’s all clearly like sort of blowing smoke myself. And uh it’s unclear whether I actually believe it. The thing about Carter Bryant is he believed that stuff, man. And he was talking about how uh you know, he he he works his butt off and that he’s going to keep working his butt off and just because he missed two dunks doesn’t mean that he’s not going to focus, he’s going to go home with his three dogs and rewatch those dunks over and over again on the app on his iPad and he’s going to focus on how, hey, I was in the right lane, I was in the right position. I did all the all did all the right things during the process of the play, during the process of the action to put myself in position to make it. And he said something along the lines of, yes, I’m 6’6" and I have a 40-inch vertical and it’s ridiculous that I didn’t dunk those, but it’s going to be okay. And uh he said at one point, I think there was how many people are in this arena? 18,000. I’m sure none of them think that the game’s slowing down for me, but it actually is. The game is slowing down for me. And just that relentless positivity is something that I think we’ve all seen from his interplay in the locker room. You know, the guys gravitate to him. They they they love Carter Bryant. And walking out that night, De’Aaron Fox was kind of ribbing him about not being able to dunk. And you don’t rib guys if you’re not sure they can take it. And that and that’s another thing that I think that the Spurs it speaks to more than just the locker room dynamic. If a guy can take some ribbing and take some hard coaching and take failure, this speaks to why uh maybe they’re okay with him learning some tough lessons in the NBA as opposed to building up some confidence, you know, scoring 30 points against the Red ants and the Rio Grande Vipers or whatever. You know, if if you can if you can take some tough nights at the top level and not have your spirit crushed by it, I think that can serve you well. And I think that speaks to why they’re willing to let him learn those tough lessons at the NBA level as opposed to spending all that time in the G League.

Jeff McDonald: Just listening to you describe him, he’s like uh he’s like the NBA’s uh Tony Robbins.

Mike Finger: Yeah.

Jeff McDonald: I mean…

Mike Finger: Am I wrong? You Tom, you’ve you’ve you’re in the locker room a lot. Jeff, like those those you can tell when a guy is a locker room favorite and when he’s more of a wallflower, right? And I think we’d all agree that the guys really gravitate to…

Tom Orsborn: Yeah. No, early in the season I was in the locker room, I don’t know, Phoenix or LA or somewhere, but him and uh Harper, uh, kind of dominated, you know, they were the pregame locker room, they were dominating in there with their chatter and back and forth and that was pretty striking to see that early in the season.

Mike Finger: And we sports writers and podcasters can make too much of that stuff and they’re they’re listeners out there rolling their eyes at this cliche nonsense, what have you. But I think it does play into just just the dynamic of of of who who fits and who doesn’t and and who has that confidence about them and who doesn’t. And I don’t think that Carter Bryant will lack for confidence anytime soon. You mentioned Dylan Harper and as a way to to kind of segue away from that, there have been some closing lineups where we’ve seen the three guards together, right, Jeff?

Jeff McDonald: Yeah. Did they do it in Portland? I don’t know. They did it uh the game Indiana.

Mike Finger: I believe they did. Yeah. Harper Fox and Castle as a closing lineup. What what are your reviews of that?

Jeff McDonald: I I think it’s a work in progress, but there’s a lot to like there. Um and it it helps because um they can all defend their position and sometimes multiple positions. Like sometimes when you get into a a guard heavy um lineup, one of those guys is is a is a mismatch on the other end, but I think all of them can hold their own. And and that in that in that in that vein, it’s really Castle that makes it work because he can guard so many different people. He can he can guard bigs. I mean, he can guard wings, he can guard points. So so any kind of switching they have to do, um it’s hard to find a mismatch against them. Whereas other for other teams trying to play a bunch of guards together, you would just hunt those mismatches. And there said there’s still a work in progress. I think it’s like two or three minutes at a time that they’ve been um playing together. But I mean on the offensive end, the the the upside is obvious. Like you’ve got three guys that are just relentless downhill, rim attacking, playmaking for themselves and others. Like it’s a hard that’s a hard threesome to guard when they’re all on the floor together. And my lord, if you put Victor on the floor with them at some point too, I don’t know how you guard that. And because it holds up on the defensive end, I think I think it works as a closing lineup in certain situations.

Mike Finger: You want the fourth guy to be able to make a three-pointer obviously, or the fifth guy. Yes. Um because that’s that’s really the the only um caveat with that group is do you can you make a defense respect the three-point line with three guys all going downhill. Um and each of those three guys has made a big three-pointer this year, but I don’t think any of those three guys is are what you’d consider the uh a Chuck Connors-like rifleman. Um so if you have a Harrison Barnes on the floor standing in the corner, um Devin Vassell who I guess we’d need an injury update on, um Julian Champagnie, one of those guys. Uh what what what is the status of Devin moving forward, Jeff?

Jeff McDonald: He’s out. Yeah. That’s going to be that’s my that’s my pop answer. Remember you would ask before the game, he’s out.

Mike Finger: I remember Pop.

Tom Orsborn: Probably for quite a few more games too. I would think so, yeah. They’re not going to, yeah, he’s going to be out for several games is what I’m hearing. And he he had a really solid start to the season. Yeah. Um providing pretty good value at in a different way that Julian Champagnie provides value, but for the contract that um made some people think Devon might have been overpaid for a while. I think if you look around at other people who make what he makes, he was he was uh he was he was fulfilling his end of the bargain. Um and we’ll see if he can get back.

Jeff McDonald: He’ll be back. Yeah. He’ll be back. He’s he’s not going anywhere. He’s just on the shelf for a little while.

Mike Finger: We did not get into like individual results this week. The the Julian Champagnie game, the Champagnie Supernova on New Year’s Eve, that resulted in a victory over the Knicks, the the Spurs held serve at the Indiana Pacers, finally lost the back end of a back-to-back for the first time all year. The Spurs lost the back end of a back-to-back against uh the Portland Trailblazers at home. So they went two and one, which I think was a lot of people’s prediction last week um during the week that was. By the time you listen to this, the Spurs might have already played the Memphis Grizzlies with or without Victor Wembanyama, with or without Ja Morant. A big back-to-back against the hated Lakers in San Antonio on Wednesday night, and then a uh formidable back-to-back road trip, an imposing looking looking trip against the surging Boston Celtics who are emerging as one of the best teams in the Eastern conference despite not having Jason Tatum. I think Joe Mazzulla might be a heck of a coach. And uh and at Minnesota. So let’s look at at Memphis, home against the Lakers, at the Celtics, then a back-to-back at Minnesota before we convene again. That is four games, Tom. What do you see?

Tom Orsborn: Yeah, Memphis uh that’s one they got to get, uh with with what’s coming up. Um and Memphis has got its share of injuries. Yeah, the Lakers are they’re better, they’re better on the road than at home. Celtics surging. We’re we’re going up to Minnesota? Is that the cutoff point?

Mike Finger: Yeah.

Tom Orsborn: Okay. Okay.

Mike Finger: So we have two back-to-backs. Memphis LA, Boston, Minnesota.

Tom Orsborn: Yeah, yeah. Um…

Mike Finger: You see two victories?

Tom Orsborn: Yeah, maybe maybe they maybe they beat the Lakers again, but I don’t know. I don’t know. This is a tough, tough stretch. Um…

Mike Finger: Tom, two and two.

Tom Orsborn: Two and two. Two and two.

Mike Finger: Two and two.

Tom Orsborn: Yeah.

Mike Finger: Jeffrey.

Jeff McDonald: I I don’t um I don’t trust the consistency of our local cagers right now and I’m going to say one and three during this stretch. And I don’t know if you’ve noticed but the other team that was in uh the other teams that were in the NBA Cup uh finals and semi-finals along with the Spurs, and I’m speaking of like OKC and New York, they aren’t exactly playing like gangbusters now either. Like they’re maybe…

Mike Finger: That’s becoming an NBA Cup tradition, by the way.

Jeff McDonald: Yeah. There may be something about that is it just wears you out and you kind of take it take it on the, you know, coming out of it you kind of see the um the effects of that. So I don’t know. Um this team could use some rest and it’s interesting, they have they start the uh the Spurs start the new year with three consecutive back-to-backs, which that’s tough. But then they also have five uh five instances this month of two days off in a row, which is a league high. So it’s a weird mix of you get rest and you get uh back-to-backs. Um I don’t know if you get much rhythm though. Like everybody likes to play every other night. So it’s just going to be an a weird, interesting stretch to see how they how they navigate all this stuff.

Mike Finger: If they can get two before we podcast again, I think that would uh constitute a a pretty successful week. We’ll see if they can pull it off. Until we talk to you next time, take care of each other and keep it real.