By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-12-19 16:22:00
圣安东尼奥马刺队顺利击败华盛顿奇才队，将赛季战绩提升至19胜7负。奇才队一度紧咬比分，但马刺队在第三节拉开差距，并在第四节轻松锁定胜局。此役过后，华盛顿奇才的战绩下滑至4胜21负，为全联盟最差。
数据统计：马刺 vs. 奇才
马刺 vs. 奇才 – 最终评分
维克托·文班亚马 (Victor Wembanyama)
由于上场时间限制，文班亚马直到第二节进行三分钟后才首次登场。这位法国高人总共只打了17分钟。尽管出场时间有限，他的影响力依然惊人。他最终贡献了15分、8个篮板、4次助攻和4次盖帽。防守端，他无处不在，护筐表现堪称完美。进攻端，文班亚马活力十足，决策明智。他还上演了多个“高光时刻”，展现了他外星人般的天赋。尽管文班亚马目前上场时间不多，但他仍然以一种不可思议的水平影响着比赛进程。
Grade: B+
德阿龙·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)
说这场比赛福克斯打得“沉寂”，都算是轻描淡写了。在25分钟内，他投篮8中1，仅得到6分和3次助攻。今晚，可以公正地说，福克斯打得太无私了。他在进攻回合中过早出球，之后也没有积极地寻求重新参与进攻。他的组织串联作用微乎其微，整体活力也显不足。防守端，福克斯有几个亮点，但在攻防两端都没有太多值得称道之处。
Grade: D
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
卡斯尔对阵奇才的表现有很多可圈可点之处。他一开场就打得激情似火——这种活力为比赛定下了基调。虽然他有时处理球有些随意，但卡斯尔在各个方面都做得非常出色。他的防守极具侵略性。进攻端，他凭借极其强硬的身体对抗和精准的进攻时机选择，两分球6投6中。他的传球也是一个加分项。如果三分球能更准一些（5投1中）会更好，但我认为他的出手选择没有问题。
Grade: A-
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
对瓦塞尔而言，这是一场稳如磐石的比赛。他三分球6投3中，两分球6投4中，出手选择比平时更加合理。瓦塞尔的传球相当不错，将失误控制在最低水平，并且在防守端非常努力。当他能够阅读防守、顺势而为，并在另一端倾力防守时，他就是这支球队拼图中非常宝贵的一块。干得漂亮。
Grade: A-
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
显而易见，巴恩斯正处于低迷状态。继在拉斯维加斯三分球12投0中后，本场对阵奇才他又三分4投全失。一反常态地，巴恩斯看起来在投篮上失去了信心。更糟糕的是，他的两次两分球出手也全部偏出，并且在篮板拼抢和整体防守上都没有付出太多努力。希望随着马刺队表现越来越好，巴恩斯在高压情况下投失关键球的名声不会成为一个令人担忧的话题。
Grade: D-
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)
再次以中锋身份首发的科内特表现出色。他在挡拆进攻中是个威胁，尤其是通过空中接力。他设立了高质量的掩护，卡位做得很好，并能保护篮筐。科内特在开阔空间下的防守有时会显得慢一些，但在其他方面，他在攻防两端都很好地完成了自己的任务。他与文班亚马一同在场上打了一段时间，这套阵容再次展现出了潜力。
Grade: B+
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
在与双胞胎兄弟的直接对决中，朱利安的表现胜过了贾斯汀。马刺队的尚帕尼三分球9投4中，并且自信地出手远投。他还贡献了7个篮板，其中许多都是在对抗下抢得的。尚帕尼在场上攻防两端的表现兼具智慧与自信。以他现在的打法，他是一名非常宝贵的板凳球员。
Grade: A-
迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)
我的天，这小子真棒。在过去两场比赛中，他的三分球12投8中。考虑到他已经是一名顶级的突破手，如果哈珀再练出稳定的三分球……那可就不得了了。我非常欣赏他对阵华盛顿时所做的决策。他的终结能力非常出色，投三分前的准备动作堪称完美，并且送出了多次明智的传球。再加上非常出色的防守，哈珀目前看来绝对是一名猛将。
Grade: A
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
对约翰逊来说，这又是一个高效的夜晚。在21分钟内，他命中了一半的投篮，得到9分。他还抢下了8个强硬的篮板，跑动积极，并为球队注入了激情。约翰逊在攻防两端几乎没有犯错，并在比赛几个沉闷的阶段帮助马刺维持了势头。
Grade: B+
杰里米·索汉 (Jeremy Sochan)
重回轮换阵容的索汉，其表现解释了为何他最近总是因教练决定而无法上场（DNP-CD）。他在16分钟内一分未得，并且很少攻击篮筐。他打得毫无自信，还经常在场上碍事。可以理解索汉目前不在节奏上，但他也难以融入本赛季版本的马刺队。防守端，他在篮板或其它方面都无甚建树。索汉需要尽快扭转局面，否则他可能很快就会被永久地按在板凳席上。
Grade: D-
卡特·布莱恩特 (Carter Bryant)
布莱恩特看起来越来越自在了。他的三分出手很流畅，还命中了一记观赏性十足的中距离跳投，其防守端的运动能力持续展现。布莱恩特确实犯了几个错误，体现了他作为新秀的心态——但我喜欢他那种不畏惧挑战和尝试的劲头。
Grade: B+
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
考虑到即将到来的背靠背赛程，约翰逊在限制球员上场时间的同时还能赢下比赛，这一点做得非常出色。在比赛前15分钟雪藏文班亚马是需要勇气的。马刺队本可能在经历了NBA杯的征程后状态下滑，但这并没有发生。
Grade: B+
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Washington Wizards – Game #26
Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Washington Wizards – Game #26
The San Antonio Spurs took care of business against the Washington Wizards to improve to a record of 19-7 on the season. The Wizards kept things close for a while but the Spurs pulled away in the third quarter and cruised in the fourth. The loss dropped Washington to 4-21, the worst mark in the NBA.
Stats: Spurs vs. Wizards
Spurs vs. Wizards – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
Due to his minutes restriction, Wembanyama didn’t step on the court for the first time until three minutes into the second quarter. In total, the tall Frenchman played only 17 minutes. Despite his limited playing time, he was still amazingly impactful. He finished with 15 points, eight rebounds, four assists and four blocks. Defensively, he was all over the place and was fantastic at defending the rim. Offensively, Wembanyama’s energy was high and he was making smart decisions. He also authored a number of wow moments where he flashed his alien-like abilities. Even though Wembanyama isn’t playing much right now, he’s still impacting the proceedings at an insane level.
Grade: B+
De’Aaron Fox
To say this was a quiet game for Fox would be an understatement. In 25 minutes, he totaled only six points and three assists, while hitting 1-of-8 shots from the field. On this night, it’s fair to say Fox was too unselfish. He was getting rid of the ball early in possessions and then didn’t fight to stay involved. His playmaking was minimal and his overall energy level was lacking. Defensively, Fox had a few bright moments but there wasn’t much to write home about on either end.
Grade: D
Stephon Castle
There was a lot to like about Castle’s play against the Wizards. He came out of the gates playing like his hair was on fire — and that vivacity set the tone. While he was a bit loose with the ball at times, Castle did really well in all facets. His defense was intense. Offensively, he was 6-for-6 from two-point range by being ultra physical and picking his spots well. His passing was also a plus. Better three-point shooting (1-for-5) would have been nice but I didn’t have a problem with the attempts.
Grade: A-
Devin Vassell
This was a rock solid outing for Vassell. He hit 3-of-6 from deep, 4-of-6 from two-point territory and his shot-selection was better than usual. Vassell passed it reasonably well, kept his mistakes to a minimum and played hard on the defensive end. When he takes what the defense gives him and plays with effort on the other end, he’s a really valuable piece to this puzzle. Well done.
Grade: A-
Harrison Barnes
It’s clear as day that Barnes is in a funk. After going 0-for-12 from three-point land in Las Vegas, he was 0-for-4 on threes against the Wizards. Uncharacteristically, Barnes looks like he lost confidence on his shot. To make matters worse, he missed both of his two-point attempts and didn’t give much effort on the boards or on defense in general. As the Spurs get better, hopefully Barnes’ reputation of missing shots in high pressure situations doesn’t become a worrisome storyline.
Grade: D-
Luke Kornet
Starting again at center, Kornet did good work. He was a threat in pick-and-rolls, particularly via the lob. He set mean screens, boxed out well and protected the basket. Kornet was sometimes slow defensively in open space but otherwise he did his job on both ends of the court. He played for a bit next to Wembanyama and that alignment once again looked promising.
Grade: B+
Julian Champagnie
Going head-to-head against his twin brother, Julian got the better of Justin. San Antonio’s Champagnie was 4-for-9 from three-point range and let the longballs fly with confidence. He also added in seven rebounds, many of which were contested. Champagnie played with a mixture of smarts and self-assuredness on both sides of the court. The way he’s playing right now, he’s a very valuable bench piece.
Grade: A-
Dylan Harper
Holy crap, this kid is good. Over his last two games, he’s 8-for-12 on three-pointers. Considering he’s already an elite driver, if Harper adds a consistent three-point shot … watch out. I loved his decision-making versus Washington. His finishing was excellent, his shot prep on his threes was picture-perfect and he made a number of wise passes. Add in very good defense and Harper looks like an absolute stud right now.
Grade: A
Keldon Johnson
It was another efficient night at the office for Johnson. In 21 minutes, he hit half of his shots from the field on his way to nine points. He also pulled down eight loud rebounds, ran the court with purpose and added enthusiasm to the mixture. Johnson rarely made a mistake on either end and helped the Spurs keep things going during a few stretches of boredom.
Grade: B+
Jeremy Sochan
Back in the rotation, Sochan exhibited why he has been getting DNP-CD’s lately. He was scoreless in 16 minutes and rarely looked at the rim. He played without confidence and was getting in the way often. Sochan is understandably out of rhythm but he also is having trouble fitting in with this season’s version of the Spurs. Defensively, he didn’t rebound or do much of anything of note. Sochan needs to turn it around ASAP or he might be permanently glued to the bench soon.
Grade: D-
Carter Bryant
Bryant is looking more and more comfortable. His three-pointer looked smooth, he added a visually-pleasing midrange jumper and his athleticism on defense continues to pop. Bryant did have a few mistakes that illustrated his rookie mindset — but I like how he’s not scared to push the issue.
Grade: B+
Mitch Johnson
With a back-to-back on the docket, Johnson did a great job of limiting minutes while still getting the win. It takes guts to not play Wembanyama the first 15 minutes of the game. The Spurs could have suffered a hangover after their NBA Cup run but it didn’t happen.
Grade: B+
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk