马刺 vs 奇才 139 - 130 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2024-11-14 17:20:21
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
在一场维克托·文班亚马(Victor Wembanyama)砍下50分的比赛中，圣安东尼奥马刺以139-130的比分战胜了华盛顿奇才。文班亚马的50分刷新了其职业生涯得分新高。他还命中了职业生涯最高的8个三分球。
马刺和奇才的比赛直到第三节才真正拉开差距。在该节比赛进行到一半时，比分战成85-85平，随后圣安东尼奥打出一波23-2的攻击波。华盛顿一直在努力追赶，但圣安东尼奥顶住了压力。
马刺本赛季目前的战绩为6胜6负，并列西部第九。
数据统计：马刺 vs. 奇才
马刺 vs. 奇才 – 最终评分
维克托·文班亚马(Victor Wembanyama)
文班亚马面对奇才砍下50分——而且他看起来毫不费力。他大约一半的得分来自三分线外，16投8中。他的跳投看起来很棒，而且出手非常果断。在三分线内，他的力量和手感的结合堪称完美。总而言之，他在进攻端的决策非常出色，有时看起来完全不可阻挡。同样重要的是，文班亚马只有一次失误，这进一步证明了他出色的决策能力。在防守端，他在球场的各个角落都很积极——但有时在篮板或干扰投篮时会显得有些迟缓。但是，是的，这场比赛将成为文班亚马迄今为止职业生涯最佳比赛之一。
评分：A+
克里斯·保罗(Chris Paul)
保罗再次展现了大师级的组织能力。他很早就帮助文班亚马找到了状态，两人之间的挡拆配合极具杀伤力。每当保罗在场上时，球队得到高质量的投篮机会几乎是必然的。他还得到了足够的分数，让防守方不敢掉以轻心。在防守端，保罗像牛皮糖一样难缠，他的身体对抗是圣安东尼奥为数不多的可以依靠的优势之一。
评分：A-
哈里森·巴恩斯(Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯的表现稳如磐石。他在30分钟的出场时间里，防守出色，两记三分全部命中，在篮板上任劳任怨，传球合理，并且没有失误。考虑到他有限的触球次数，没有人可以要求他做得比今晚更多。
评分：B+
朱利安·尚帕尼(Julian Champagnie)
圣安东尼奥今晚的第一粒进球来自尚帕尼的三分球。他在第一节晚些时候又命中一记三分，帮助球队奠定了基调。尚帕尼的无球跑动很出色，而且出手果断。在防守端，他的轮转比平时做得更好，并在篮板上有所贡献。
评分：B+
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔(Stephon Castle)
对于卡斯尔来说，这是一次很好的学习经历。他在防守端非常努力，但今晚的结果大多是负面的。可以肯定的是，这位新秀最终会在防守端找到解决办法，但今晚充满了成长的烦恼。在进攻端，他的表现相当不错，增加了5次助攻和一个三分球。说实话，他的决策并不总是清晰，而且他对球的处理比平时更随意。尽管如此，对于一个20岁的新秀来说，卡斯尔在首发阵容中的表现仍然非常出色。
评分：C+
德文·瓦塞尔(Devin Vassell)
瓦塞尔在24分钟内得到17分，乍一看还不错。然而，事情并非尽如人意。不好的一面：瓦塞尔三分球8投1中。他的投篮选择不是最佳的，而且他太勉强出手了。当他在场上时，进攻显得比较笨拙。在防守端，瓦塞尔仍在努力重新找回节奏。在他复出后，他的进攻还不错，但防守一直是个问题。好的一面：瓦塞尔获得了罚球机会，两分球6投4中，即使在情况不顺的时候也充满了自信。一旦他摆脱了出场时间限制，情况会好起来的。
评分：C+
凯尔登·约翰逊(Keldon Johnson)
约翰逊的表现起起伏伏。他在篮板上表现出色，抢下了多个争抢篮板。他的传球比平时更好，并将失误控制在最低限度。他强硬的突破通常都能取得积极的结果。另一方面，约翰逊的防守出现了多次低级失误。他甚至因为一次比较严重的失误而被换下场。在进攻端，约翰逊仍然需要努力融入体系，而不是在上场时破坏球队的节奏。
评分：B-
扎克·科林斯(Zach Collins)
当轮换阵容中排在你前面的人砍下50分时，你很难闪耀，但科林斯却悄悄地打出了一场非常精彩的比赛。他的传球非常出色，给空切球员的传球时机恰到好处。科林斯在篮板上拼抢，命中一记三分球，并且积极对抗。奇才有时会成功地直接攻击他，但这并不是因为科林斯缺乏努力。
评分：B+
布莱克·韦斯利(Blake Wesley)
韦斯利今天没有太多控球，而是利用这种安排凶猛地冲击篮筐。他拥有在出现一丝空隙时得分的速度，今晚他意识到了这一点。他今晚用扣篮完成进攻，希望这能成为他职业生涯中越来越多使用的一种战术。韦斯利在防守端也极具破坏性，在进攻端，他也能做出正确的传球。
评分：A-
马拉基·布拉纳姆(Malaki Branham)
不好的一面：布拉纳姆的防守还有很多不足之处。他的控球不稳，阅读比赛有时会慢一两拍。好的一面：布拉纳姆两分球5投4中，帮助球队保持了进攻的流畅性。在他从脚踝伤势中复出后，他看起来很有活力，移动也很流畅。
评分：B-
米奇·约翰逊(Mitch Johnson)
约翰逊带来了更多的好消息。他帮助文班亚马早早进入状态。约翰逊要求他的队员们加快节奏，这确实帮助了进攻的流畅性。他五外站位、拉开空间、空切、传球和投三分的理念越来越有效。约翰逊甚至会在球员防守失误后将他们换下——这在他以前并不常见。
评分：A-
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Washington Wizards – Game #12
Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Washington Wizards – Game #12
In a game that will be remembered for Victor Wembanyama unfurling a 50-point effort, the San Antonio Spurs rolled past the Washington Wizards by a final score of 139-130. Wembanyama’s 50 points set a new career-high. He also hit a career-high eight three-pointers.
The Spurs and Wizards were actually locked in a close affair until the third quarter. With the score tied 85-85 midway through the period, San Antonio went on a 23-2 run. Washington kept playing hard and tried to rally but San Antonio was able to withstand.
The Spurs are now 6-6 on the season, which has them tied for ninth in the Western Conference.
Stats: Spurs vs. Wizards
Spurs vs. Wizards – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
Wembanyama dropped 50 points on the Wizards — and he made it look easy. About half of his points came from downtown, as he sank 8-of-16 three-point attempts. His jumper looked great and there was very little hesitation. Within the arc, his combination of power and touch was phenomenal. All in all, his decision-making on offense was great and he looked absolutely unstoppable at times. It’s also important to point out that Wembanyama only had one turnover, which is further evidence of his outstanding decision-making. Defensively, he was active on all corners of the court — but sometimes got caught flat-footed when it came time to rebound or challenge shots. But, yeah, this goes down as one of Wembanyama’s best games of his career to date.
Grade: A+
Chris Paul
It was another masterful performance of running the show by Paul. He’s the one who got Wembanyama going early and the pick-and-roll between those two was deadly. Whenever Paul was on the court, the team getting a quality shot felt like a near guarantee. He also scored enough to keep the defense honest. On the other end of the court, Paul was a pest whose physicality was one of the few traits San Antonio could lean on.
Grade: A-
Harrison Barnes
Barnes was rock solid. He played good defense, nailed both of his three-point attempts, did dirty work on the backboard, made the right passes and finished without a turnover in 30 minutes of play. Given his limited touches, no one could ask for much more than what Barnes delivered tonight.
Grade: B+
Julian Champagnie
San Antonio’s first bucket on the night was a Champagnie three-pointer. He hit another one later in the first quarter to help set the tone. Champagnie moved well without the ball and had an itchy trigger finger. Defensively, he did a better in rotations than usual and cleaned up on the glass.
Grade: B+
Stephon Castle
It was a good learning experience for Castle. He was trying hard on defense but the results were mostly negative on this night. It’s safe to say the rookie will figure things out on that end but tonight was all about the growing pains. Offensively, he was pretty good. Add five more assists to his season total and another made three-pointer. Truth be told, his decision-making wasn’t always crisp and he was sloppier with the ball than usual. That said, Castle continues to look really good for a 20-year-old rookie mixing it up in the starting lineup.
Grade: C+
Devin Vassell
Vassell pouring in 17 points in 24 minutes looks good at first blush. However, things weren’t all rainbows and bluebonnets. The bad: Vassell hit 1-for-8 from three-point range. His shot-selection wasn’t the best and he was forcing things too much. The offense was clunkier when he was on the court. Defensively, Vassell is still trying to rediscover a rhythm. In his return, he’s been fine on offense but defense has been an issue. The good: Vassell got to the free throw line, hit 4-of-6 from two-point range and is brimming with confidence even when things aren’t rolling his way. It’ll be nice once he’s free from his minutes restriction.
Grade: C+
Keldon Johnson
Johnson dealt with ups and downs. He was sublime on the boards, as he pulled down multiple contested rebounds among the trees. His passing was better than usual and he kept his mistakes to a minimum. His hard drives to the rim usual ended in positive outcomes. On the other hand, Johnson’s defense suffered various lowlights. He even got pulled from the game after one of his more egregious mistakes. Offensively, Johnson still needs to work on fitting within the system and not rocking the boat when he enters the game.
Grade: B-
Zach Collins
It’s difficult to shine when the dude ahead of you in the rotation drops a 50 piece but Collins quietly had a really fine outing. His passing was excellent; he was hitting cutters with perfect timing. Collins battled on the boards, knocked down a three-pointer and threw his body around. The Wizards had success going right at him at times but it wasn’t for a lack of effort on Collins’ part.
Grade: B+
Blake Wesley
Wesley wasn’t playing on the ball as much today and took advantage of that alignment by attacking the rim with ferocity. He has the speed to score when given a crack of daylight and he realized that tonight. He was finishing with dunks tonight, which is hopefully a tactic he uses more and more as his career advances. Wesley was also disruptive on defense and he could be relied upon to make the right passes on offense.
Grade: A-
Malaki Branham
The bad: Branham’s defense left a lot to be desired. His ball-handling was wonky and his reads were sometimes a beat or two slow. The good: Branham hit 4-of-5 two-pointers to help keep the offense humming. In his return from an ankle injury, he looked bouncy and seemed to be moving well.
Grade: B-
Mitch Johnson
More good stuff from Johnson. He helped get Wembanyama established early on. Johnson was on his troops to push the pace, which really helped the offensive flow. He five-out, space, cut, dish and shoot three-pointers philosophy is working better and better. Johnson even pulled players after bad defensive plays — which isn’t something we had seen much from him previously.
Grade: A-
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk