By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-02-08 17:21:22
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
圣安东尼奥马刺队(San Antonio Spurs) (22胜27负) 在周五晚上遭遇了一场令人失望的失利，败给了夏洛特黄蜂队(Charlotte Hornets) (13胜36负)。马刺队将于周六重返赛场，客场挑战奥兰多魔术队。
在夏洛特对阵黄蜂队的比赛中，马刺队开局非常缓慢。在一个糟糕的首节比赛结束后，马刺队以34-22落后。黄蜂队一直保持着对马刺队的舒适领先优势，直到第四节末段。
在比赛末段奋力追赶后，圣安东尼奥队终于在还剩42秒时将比分扳平。在还剩8秒时，马刺队取得了领先。遗憾的是，迈尔斯·布里奇斯在还剩1秒时命中一记三分球，使黄蜂队以一分领先。德阿隆·福克斯在蜂鸣器响起后命中一记三分球，夏洛特队以117-116险胜。
虽然马刺队永不放弃并一路追回比赛值得赞扬，但输给像黄蜂队这样一支糟糕的球队，无论如何都是一场不幸的比赛。
数据：马刺队 vs 黄蜂队
马刺队 vs 黄蜂队 – 最终评分
维克托·文班亚马(Victor Wembanyama)
文班亚马的进攻效率不够高。他的三分球9投1中，需要20次投篮才能得到16分。他只获得了一次罚球机会，他的传球也没有什么特别之处。如果文班亚马不能在进攻端发挥积极作用，马刺队很难获胜。在对阵黄蜂队的防守中，这位法国人表现稳健。他有5次盖帽，篮板抢得很好，并且在需要的时候积极移动脚步。文班亚马在攻防两端都没有犯太多错误，但他的投篮问题掩盖了他的优点。
评分：C-
德阿隆·福克斯(De’Aaron Fox)
福克斯不负众望，展现了他极其关键的时刻能力。他投中了扳平比分的球，然后在还剩8秒时投中了让马刺队领先的球。福克斯随后看似用压哨球赢得了比赛，但他出手稍微晚了一点。除了他的关键表现外，福克斯表现也很出色。他投篮命中率很高，传球聪明，并且在没有失误的情况下完成了比赛。他在防守端的努力值得称赞，尽管结果好坏参半。
评分：B+
德文·瓦塞尔(Devin Vassell)
优点：瓦塞尔的三分球7投4中。他在34分钟内只有一次失误。我喜欢他的防守努力。缺点：瓦塞尔的两分球6投1中。他在弧内的投篮选择非常不稳定。随着福克斯的加入，他需要意识到他不需要经常独自完成进攻。
评分：B-
克里斯·保罗(Chris Paul)
即使福克斯承担了更多的控球后卫职责，保罗仍然在寻找创造价值的方法。这位39岁的老将命中了两个三分球，并送出了全队最高的7次助攻。保罗没有失误，并且可以依靠他做出明智的决定。在防守端，马刺队试图隐藏他，但黄蜂队还是有几次利用了他的身高。
评分：B
哈里森·巴恩斯(Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯的所有四次三分球尝试都未能命中，但他的两分球5投4中。他的突破很有用，他的传球比平时更好。他在进攻篮板方面表现出色，但在防守篮板方面几乎没有帮助。巴恩斯在防守端的总体努力程度可以更高。
评分：C+
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔(Stephon Castle)
哇，卡斯尔在夏洛特展现了他巨大的潜力。这位新秀的三分球5投3中，但更令人印象深刻的是，他在禁区内完成进攻时像个怪物。当他没有利用他的运动能力在篮筐得分时，他会获得罚球机会，并进行了11次尝试。我喜欢卡斯尔的防守，特别是他积极的手。这位新秀表现的唯一问题是他没有很好地保护球。他的组织能力受到了他的四次失误的限制，其中包括几次代价高昂的失误。总而言之，卡斯尔贡献了职业生涯最高的33分，如果没有他，马刺队将被彻底击溃。
评分：A
杰里米·索汉(Jeremy Sochan)
我不能抱怨索汉的表现。他以极高的水平竞争。在24分钟内抢下12个篮板是非常出色的表现，特别是因为他必须为大多数篮板而战。索汉还利用他的强硬和运动能力在篮筐完成进攻，得到11分。我喜欢他的传球，他在防守端也有很多精彩的时刻。
评分：B+
朱利安·尚帕尼(Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼有几次不错的传球，并在转换进攻中完成了一次漂亮的跳投，但他在19分钟内未能命中三分球。他的防守也很平庸。尚帕尼需要做得更多才能保持他在轮换阵容中的关键位置。
评分：C-
凯尔登·约翰逊(Keldon Johnson)
我还不知道这是否是一个巧合，但随着福克斯的加入，约翰逊的触球机会可能会减少。他在周五晚上并没有做太多。在进攻端，约翰逊只是投丢了三分球。在防守端，他基本上是一个旁观者。
评分：D+
米奇·约翰逊(Mitch Johnson)
约翰逊在关键时刻将球交给了福克斯，这个决定得到了回报。也就是说，约翰逊需要为文班亚马创造更轻松的投篮机会。在整个比赛中更好的战术安排可能会有所帮助。在我看来，整个比赛的轮换都是有意义的。
评分：B-
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Charlotte Hornets – Game #49
Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Charlotte Hornets – Game #49
The San Antonio Spurs (22-27) suffered a disappointing loss to the Charlotte Hornets (13-36) on Friday night. The Spurs will be back in action on Saturday when they travel to play the Orlando Magic.
Against the Hornets in Charlotte, the good guys came out of the gates very slowly. At the end of an ugly first quarter, the Spurs were down 34-22. The Hornets were able to stay comfortably ahead of the Spurs until late in the fourth quarter.
Scratching and clawing late in the game, San Antonio finally tied the game with 42 seconds remaining. With eight seconds left, the Spurs took the lead. Sadly, Miles Bridges hit a three-pointer with a second remaining to give the Hornets a one-point lead. De’Aaron Fox hit a three-pointer just after the buzzer sounded and Charlotte escaped with a 117-116 victory.
While the Spurs do deserve some credit for never giving up and climbing all the way back into the game, losing a game to a bad team like the Hornets makes this an unfortunate outing no matter how you slice it.
Stats: Spurs at Hornets
Spurs at Hornets – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
Wembanyama simply wasn’t efficient enough offensively. He was 1-for-9 from three-point range and needed 20 field goal attempts to score 16 points. He only got the line once and his passing was nothing special. The Spurs will struggle to win if Wembanyama isn’t a positive force on the offensive end. Defensively against the Hornets, the Frenchman was solid. He had five blocks, he rebounded well and he moved his feet when it was needed. Wembanyama didn’t have many mistakes on either side — but his struggles shooting-wise overshadowed his positives.
Grade: C-
De’Aaron Fox
Fox lived up to his reputation for being extremely clutch. He hit the shot to tie the game and then he hit the shot to give the Spurs a lead with eight seconds remaining. Fox then seemingly won the game with a buzzer-beater — but he released it just a hair late. Beyond his clutchness, Fox was good. He shot the ball well, made smart passes and finished without a turnover. His effort on defense was commendable, although the results were mixed.
Grade: B+
Devin Vassell
The good: Vassell was 4-for-7 from three-point range. He only had one turnover in 34 minutes. I liked his defensive effort. The bad: Vassell was 1-for-6 from two-point range. His shot-selection inside of the arc was very iffy. With the addition of Fox, he needs to realize he doesn’t need to make plays on his own too often.
Grade: B-
Chris Paul
Paul is still finding ways to produce even though Fox is handling more of the point guard duties. The 39-year-old hit a pair of three-pointers and handed out a team-high seven assists. Paul didn’t turn the ball over and could be relied upon to make smart decisions. Defensively, the Spurs tried to hide him but the Hornets were able to exploit his size a handful of times.
Grade: B
Harrison Barnes
Barnes missed all four of his three-point attempts but was 4-for-5 from two-point range. His drives were useful and his passing was better than usual. He was strong on the offensive glass but didn’t help much at all on the defensive glass. Barnes overall effort level could have been higher on defense.
Grade: C+
Stephon Castle
Wow, Castle showed off his vast potential in Charlotte. The rookie hit 3-of-5 three-pointers but, more impressively, he was a monster finishing in the paint. When he wasn’t using his athleticism to score at the rim, he was getting to the free throw line for one of his 11 attempts. I liked Castle’s defense, particularly his active hands. The only issue with the rookie’s performance was the fact that he didn’t take care of the ball well enough. His playmaking was limited by his four turnovers, including a couple costly ones. All in all, though, Castle poured in a career-high 33 points and the Spurs would have been annihilated without him.
Grade: A
Jeremy Sochan
I can’t complain with how Sochan played. He competed at an extremely high level. Pulling down 12 rebounds in 24 minutes was great work, especially because he had to fight for most of the caroms. Sochan also utilized his toughness and athleticism to finish at the rim on his way to 11 points. I liked his passing and he had many fine moments on the defensive end.
Grade: B+
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie had a couple good passes and a nice layup in transition but he failed to hit a three-pointer in his 19 minutes. His defense was also lackluster. Champagnie needs to do more in order to keep his key spot in the rotation.
Grade: C-
Keldon Johnson
I don’t know yet if it’s a coincidence but Johnson’s touches might be the touches that dry up with the addition of Fox. He didn’t do a whole lot of Friday night. On offense, Johnson just missed threes. On defense, he was mostly a spectator.
Grade: D+
Mitch Johnson
Johnson put the ball in Fox’s hands down the stretch — and that decision paid dividends. That said, Johnson needed to create easier shots for Wembanyama. Better playcalling throughout the game could have helped in that regard. The rotation made sense to me throughout the game.
Grade: B-
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk