马刺 vs 黄蜂 134 - 145 技术统计 | 视频集锦
By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-03-15 14:40:06
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
一支状态火热的夏洛特黄蜂队在霜冻银行中心以145-134的比分击败了圣安东尼奥马刺队。 事实上，最终比分并不能真正描述马刺队今晚被彻底统治的程度。
圣安东尼奥的防守从一开始就毫无抵抗力。 黄蜂队仅在上半场就命中了18个三分球，最终46投26中（56.5%）。 在黄蜂队展现出怜悯之心，并在垃圾时间放松之前，他们的得分几乎要达到160分。
马刺队，战绩27胜38负，这是自从得知德阿隆·福克斯(De’Aaron Fox)因手指手术将缺席本赛季剩余比赛后，他们参加的第一场比赛。 但是，是的，这显然不能成为球队今晚表现如此糟糕的令人满意的借口。
数据统计：马刺队 vs. 黄蜂队
马刺队 vs. 黄蜂队 – 最终评分
德文·瓦塞尔(Devin Vassell)
瓦塞尔在上半场得到了全队最高的14分，以避免马刺队在中场休息时被完全羞辱。 他今晚的投篮表现令人印象深刻，我对他的投篮选择没有任何意见。 他在防守端什么也没做——但他的任何队友也没有。
评分：B+
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔(Stephon Castle)
卡斯尔的原始数据看起来非常好。 然而，老实说，这位新秀并没有像数据暗示的那样出色。 他在控球方面很草率——无论是在运球方面还是在不明智的传球方面。 卡斯尔的投篮不错，但他投了一些值得怀疑的出手。 他的组织进攻和防守都没有发挥作用。
评分：C
克里斯·保罗(Chris Paul)
克里斯·保罗确实像他的数据所显示的那样安静。 在18分钟内得到3分和3次助攻是无法完成任务的。 他在进攻端也容易犯错，在防守端是一个主要的负担。 事实上，他可能是球队在防守端最大的累赘。 保罗的亮点在于他的沟通——无论是在场上还是场下。 尽管比分悬殊，但他的领导力始终清晰可见。
评分：D
哈里森·巴恩斯(Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯的状态有所降温，但在进攻端仍然表现不错。 他有目的地突破，并以精准的触感投射外线投篮。 在防守端，巴恩斯绝对是问题的一部分。
评分：C+
比斯马克·比永博(Bismack Biyombo)
比永博在防守端很活跃。 他无法改变防守端的局面，但他是少数几个表现得像想要阻止黄蜂队点燃记分牌的人之一。 在进攻端，比永博没有提供太多的帮助。 他没有尝试投篮，并且出现了两次失误。 尽管如此，他的挡拆和传球表现还算不错。
评分：B-
布雷克·韦斯利(Blake Wesley)
韦斯利看起来像是本赛季初提供无限活力的那个韦斯利。 在进攻端，他很好地利用了自己的速度。 在防守端，他的努力从未停止，并且能够做出当晚一些比较好的防守表现——当然，这并不能说明太多。
评分：B
凯尔登·约翰逊(Keldon Johnson)
约翰逊的进攻效率很低，这值得注意，因为自从全明星赛之后，他的投篮一直很好。 我喜欢约翰逊的传球和他在篮板方面的工作。 在防守端，他加入了无数身穿银黑战袍，无精打采的防守者行列。
评分：C
朱利安·尚帕尼(Julian Champagnie)
很高兴看到尚帕尼在他最近的低迷之后能够稳定投篮。 他在面对一些不利于他的糟糕判罚时仍然坚持战斗，这让我印象深刻。 在他的许多队友未能竞争的夜晚，尚帕尼的拼搏精神引人注目。
评分：B+
桑德罗·马穆克拉什维利(Sandro Mamukelashvili)
好的一面：马穆克拉什维利在17分钟内贡献了13分。 他出手了很多，但足够精准，避免了批评。 马穆也应该为他的3个进攻篮板，2次抢断和2次盖帽鼓掌。 正如这些数据所显示的那样，他在攻防两端都非常积极和活跃。 不好的一面：马穆没有抢到任何防守篮板。 他在防守端的表现，在一些回合中看起来非常糟糕。
评分：B
杰里米·索汉(Jeremy Sochan)
有一段时间，索汉的得分是圣安东尼奥队唯一能做的事情。 他在16分钟内得到14分。 他在油漆区表现得很强硬，并且，与此相关，他获得了6次罚球机会。 索汉抢下了4个进攻篮板，但像马穆一样，没有抢到任何防守篮板。 他的整体防守表现平平。
评分：B-
哈里森·英格拉姆(Harrison Ingram)
在垃圾时间打了7分钟，英格拉姆得以投进他的第一个NBA进球。 这位二轮秀在防守端很努力，但在这两个方面都没有真正做出任何不寻常的事情。
评分：不评分
乔丹·麦克劳克林(Jordan McLaughlin)
麦克劳克林的跳投看起来不错。 他的传球似乎也是一项优势。
评分：不评分
马拉基·布兰纳姆(Malaki Branham)
布兰纳姆在垃圾时间投进了几个三分球，这总是值得高兴的。
评分：不评分
米奇·约翰逊(Mitch Johnson)
约翰逊无法逃脱如此糟糕的防守表现的指责。 他的球队显然没有做好在防守端比赛的准备。 在进攻方面没有什么可抱怨的，但这必须被认为是球队历史上最糟糕的防守表现之一。
评分：D
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Charlotte Hornets – Game #65
Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Charlotte Hornets – Game #65
A red-hot Charlotte Hornets squad ran away from the San Antonio Spurs in the Frost Bank Center by a final score of 145-134. In reality, the final score doesn’t truly describe how thoroughly dominated the Spurs were on this night.
San Antonio’s defense was powerless from the opening tip. The Hornets hit 18 three-pointers in the first half alone and finished 26-for-46 (56.5%) from beyond the arc. Charlotte was on pace for damn near 160 points before the Hornets showed mercy and let up during garbage time.
The Spurs, 27-38, were playing their first game since learning that De’Aaron Fox would miss the rest of the season due to finger surgery. But, yeah, that’s obviously not a satisfactory excuse for how poorly the good guys played tonight.
Stats: Spurs vs. Hornets
Spurs vs. Hornets – Final Grades
Devin Vassell
Vassell put up a team-high 14 points on the board in the first half to keep the Spurs from being totally embarrassed by halftime. His shotmaking was impressive tonight and I didn’t have an issue with his shot-selection. He didn’t do anything defensively — but neither did any of his teammates.
Grade: B+
Stephon Castle
Castle’s raw numbers look really good. Honestly, though, the rookie wasn’t as sublime as the numbers suggest. He was sloppy with the ball — both in terms of wonky ball-handling and ill-advised passes. Castle shot the ball well but he hoisted a few questionable attempts. His playmaking and defense were attributes that were missing in action.
Grade: C
Chris Paul
Paul was indeed as quiet as his statistics suggest. Three points and three assists in 18 minutes won’t get the job done. He was also mistake-prone on offense and a major liability on defense. In fact, he may have been the team’s biggest liability on D. The silver lining for Paul was his communication — both when he was on and off the court. His leadership was palpable throughout despite the lopsided score.
Grade: D
Harrison Barnes
Barnes cooled off but was still pretty good on the offensive end. He drove with purpose and launched perimeter shots with touch. Defensively, Barnes was definitely part of the problem.
Grade: C+
Bismack Biyombo
Biyombo was active on defense. He wasn’t able to move the needle on that end but he was one of the few who acted like he wanted to stop Charlotte from lighting the scoreboard on fire. Offensively, Biyombo wasn’t too helpful. He didn’t attempt a shot and turned it over twice. That said, he was screening and passing relatively well.
Grade: B-
Blake Wesley
Wesley looked like the Wesley who supplied boundless electricity early in the season. Offensively, he used his speed well. Defensively, the hustle never stopped and he was able to make a couple of the better defensive plays of the night — which, of course, isn’t saying a whole.
Grade: B
Keldon Johnson
Johnson was inefficient offensively, which is noteworthy because he’s been shooting great since the All-Star break. I liked Johnson’s passing and his work on the glass. Defensively, he joined the countless number of listless defenders wearing Silver and Black.
Grade: C
Julian Champagnie
It was great to see Champagnie shoot it straight following his recent slump. I was also impressed that he battled through a few bad calls that went against him. Champagnie’s will to scratch and claw was notable on a night where many of his teammates failed to compete.
Grade: B+
Sandro Mamukelashvili
The good: Mamukelashvili poured in 13 points in 17 minutes. He shot a lot but was accurate enough to avoid criticism. Mamu also deserves applause for his three offensive rebounds, two steals and two blocks. As those numbers show, he was very aggressive and lively on both ends. The bad: Mamu didn’t get a defensive rebound. His defense looked painfully bad on a handful of possessions.
Grade: B
Jeremy Sochan
There was a stretch when Sochan scoring was the only thing San Antonio had going. He finished with 14 points in 16 minutes. He was physical in the paint and, on a related note, shot six free throws. Sochan pulled down four offensive rebounds but, like Mamu, went without a defensive rebound. His defense on the whole was underwhelming.
Grade: B-
Harrison Ingram
Playing seven minutes of garbage time, Ingram was able to score his first NBA basket. The second round pick hustled on defense but didn’t really do anything out of the ordinary on either end.
Grade: Inc.
Jordan McLaughlin
McLaughlin has a good looking jumper. His passing also appears to be a strength.
Grade: Inc.
Malaki Branham
Branham hit a couple three-pointers in garbage time, which is always good to see.
Grade: Inc.
Mitch Johnson
Johnson doesn’t escape blame for a defensive showing this bad. His troops were obviously not ready to play on that end of the court. There’s not much to complain about offensively but this has to go down as one of the worst defensive performances in franchise history.
Grade: D
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk