🎧 Spurs Insider️ 播客: 圣安东尼奥马刺队能否保持竞争力?

Spurs Insider Podcast, 2025-01-15 06:27:00

由生成式人工智能翻译,译文内容可能不准确或不完整,以原文为准。

在马刺队本赛季对阵湖人队取得最令人印象深刻的胜利之一后,专栏作家迈克·芬格(Mike Finger)和随队记者杰夫·麦克唐纳(Jeff McDonald)以及汤姆·奥斯本(Tom Orsborn)讨论了斯蒂芬·卡斯尔(Stephon Castle)的进步、克里斯·保罗(Chris Paul)的影响,以及维克托·文班亚马(Victor Wembanyama)和圣安东尼奥马刺队能否在接下来的艰难赛程中保持季后赛竞争力。

推荐阅读:

在艰难的环境下,克里斯·保罗继续带领年轻的马刺队:

马刺大胜湖人队的三个要点

当马刺队对抗人性时,文班亚马学会了变得强硬


以下是播客的文字记录:

迈克·芬格:这里是来自北美各地高度安全的绝密网络的马刺内幕消息。我是迈克·芬格,和往常一样,与我们《快报新闻》的马刺随队记者杰夫·麦克唐纳和汤姆·奥斯本一起。这是不寻常的一周。汤姆身处其中。自从我们上次见面以来,我们进行了两场比赛;我们原本预计有三场。汤姆和当地球员在西海岸待了四个晚上,我想我没记错。我想先从你开始,先说说你对马刺队昨晚在湖人队取得一场巨大而令人印象深刻的胜利的印象,以及之前发生的一切。但请告诉我,在圣安东尼奥的我们都在为洛杉矶地区火灾中的人们担忧的情况下,那里的篮球情况是什么样的?

汤姆·奥斯本:你知道,我得先说,我认为波波维奇教练做得非常出色。你知道,昨天我问克里斯·保罗的时候,他也提到了这一点。从周六我第一次和他进行日常交流开始,他就表达得非常到位。他指出,无论他们面临什么挑战,无论他们是否会在周一晚上比赛的不确定性,他们面临的后勤问题,更换酒店,克里斯·保罗的家人被迫从家中撤离,他所经历的一切,正如波波维奇教练所说,与洛杉矶地区这么多人的经历相比都显得微不足道。所以我认为他从一开始就定下了正确的基调。然后让他们在周六和周日上训练场,让他们暂时忘记这些事情,也做一些真正有益的工作。他们进行了两次非常好的训练和一次冗长的录像分析会议。我认为这在一定程度上帮助他们解决了连败期间遇到的一些问题。所以,你知道,我只是觉得,然后,你知道,波波维奇教练在昨晚比赛前发表了一份非常真挚的声明。你可以看出这是他的肺腑之言,而不是公关人员写的或什么的。他在斯坦福大学上学,他妈妈住在圣巴巴拉;谢天谢地,她没事,那个地区没有火灾。但他对加州也有感情,他说的每一句话都恰到好处。我认为他做得很好。

迈克·芬格:这场比赛本身让你几乎忘记了马刺队正处于三连败的末尾。他们从上周三杰夫报道的密尔沃基比赛到这个周一。正如汤姆刚才提到的,在某种程度上进行了一次重置,让大家回到训练场。你知道,这支球队现在有动力了吗?在……汤姆,你提到波波维奇教练说过这是他们今年打得最好的一场比赛,类似这样的话,之后一切是否都好了?

汤姆·奥斯本:尤其是在进攻方面。他们扭转了局面。我的意思是,他们最近在比赛后期一直很挣扎。他们在下半场表现出色,得了70多分,在第四节以37-13的比分超过了湖人队。所以,是的,我的意思是,你知道,谁知道这是否会延续下去,但那天晚上确实是这样的情况,而且相当令人印象深刻。那套首发阵容打得很好。凯尔登替补出场表现出色。斯蒂芬·卡斯尔,你知道,你只是又一次看到他在未来几年将会取得的成就。所以,是的。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:我在家看那场比赛时,被那支在大约五分钟的时间里完全崩溃的球队震惊了,那就是经验丰富的洛杉矶湖人队。我的意思是,他们只是,那是一场失误盛宴。而马刺队则利用了这一点。所以,19胜19负,胜率又回到50%。似乎每次我们见面,无论如何,马刺队在进入可能是更艰难的赛程部分时,胜率都是50%。今天早上我看到了一份对NBA剩余赛程的分析。马刺队在高级数据,高级赛程强度方面排名前五。所以,而且大多数西部联盟球队都排在前面,大多数东部联盟球队都排在后面。但关键是,这并不能保证;在接下来的比赛中保持50%的胜率并不容易。但在经历了这样一周之后,在密尔沃基的艰难一周,杰夫,我们可以谈谈,以他们那样的方式反弹击败湖人队是他们需要做的。但如果我们想倒带回到密尔沃基,杰夫,那是另一场备受期待的文班亚马和字母哥的对决,而字母哥赢得了这场比赛。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:我想和马刺队一样,我们都想忘记那场比赛曾经存在过。我甚至不记得去过密尔沃基。

汤姆·奥斯本:我在密尔沃基?

杰夫·麦克唐纳:我想我们是。我不记得了。

迈克·芬格:我想那里有点冷。

汤姆·奥斯本:是的,还不错。我们就在球馆对面,所以还不错。

迈克·芬格:是的,这是一场文班亚马……就像如果你真的想重温它一样。我的意思是,在那场比赛之前,尤其是在密尔沃基周围的所有讨论,如果你读了当地的报纸……

杰夫·麦克唐纳:嗯哼。

迈克·芬格:他们回顾了文班亚马和字母哥唯一一次交锋,那是在AT&T中心,或者说是在霜冻银行中心,对不起,去年一月,上个赛季。他们上赛季只有一次交锋。文班亚马在新秀赛季的密尔沃基之旅中没有上场。那场比赛就像一场你来我往的比赛。我想字母哥得了44分,但文班亚马,那对他来说是一场重要的亮相,与字母哥针锋相对;他在那场比赛中得了30多分。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:那也是一场TNT直播的比赛。

迈克·芬格:那是一场TNT直播的比赛。每个人都记得那个重要的时刻,字母哥试图欺负文班亚马得分,而文班亚马直接拒绝了他。那真的是一个夜晚,即使马刺队输了,即使从数据上看字母哥在那晚的表现超过了文班亚马,那真的是维克托新秀赛季的那些时刻之一,你必须站起来注意并说,并说,他已经在那里了。他已经与现在联盟中的许多伟大球员并驾齐驱,而他当时只有20岁。所以你快进到今年;密尔沃基的每个人都期待着这场复赛,而这却有点令人失望。令人失望的原因是因为字母哥确保了它的失望。他完全占据了主导地位。而文班亚马只是有点,有点普通,只是有点普通。开局不错,但没有,你知道,没有真正完成比赛。马刺队被痛扁了,这场比赛有点名不副实,让我们都怀疑我们到底在密尔沃基干什么。

迈克·芬格:什么是,不要太深入地探讨遥远的过去,但在那个时候,杰夫,马刺队已经三连败了,几个晚上前在芝加哥输给了公牛队。对于那支球队,对于当地球员前往洛杉矶来说,他们担心的事情清单是什么?这是赛季中的一个节点吗?这仍然是赛季中的一个节点,你觉得如果他们想留在附加赛和季后赛的竞争中,需要解决一些弱点吗?

杰夫·麦克唐纳:我的意思是,如果这很重要,你想看看现在的马刺队,比如他们,你知道,密尔沃基的比赛不是一个好例子,但在之前的两场比赛中,都出现了这样的现象:每次维克托在场上的时候,马刺队都表现得很好,但一旦他下场,天哪,对于对方球队来说,就像一条通往篮筐的自由之路,对方的内线球员都疯了。所以如果你正在寻找某种小的升级,他们可以在替补中锋位置上得到一些帮助。他们在这一点上并没有得到太多的产出。现在我不知道他们是否真的会出去做些什么,因为正如我们之前谈到的,我认为这对他们来说不像是一个“凯蒂关上门,我们必须进入季后赛”的那种赛季。但我认为如果有办法在那里升级,他们不考虑一下就是失职。所以如果这就是你所说的,那就是我对这个问题的回答。

迈克·芬格:你总是直接谈论那些,那些点击式的交易之类的东西。我只是在谈论他们需要加强的东西。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:我不知道。我不是教练。对吧,有人吗?我不是教练。你必须更好地执教。他们必须做什么才能做得更好?我的意思是,他们必须变得更好。当文班亚马不在场上的时候,他们必须更好地坚守阵地。

迈克·芬格:好的。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:所以这是一件事。你知道,很多呃,我们上次讨论了很多,当你领先的时候,要保持住。不要,不要认为如果你丢掉了领先优势,你还能把它拿回来。密尔沃基的比赛有点例外,因为它只是一场彻底的溃败,正如波波维奇教练在那场比赛后指出的那样。他还指出,我们没有,作为马刺队,我们最近没有经常被痛扁。就像那是很长一段时间以来的第一次,在这方面他是对的。所以我愿意把那场比赛作为一个反常现象抛诸脑后。遇到了一支更好的球队,那天晚上,而且可能总体上是一支更好的球队。我认为伤病与此有很大关系,但密尔沃基今年的表现确实低于预期。就像在纸面上,他们应该是一支可能不如凯尔特人队,但在东部排名前列的球队,至少在争夺东部决赛的席位,而他们在面对马刺队时胜率在50%左右。开局不好。但我认为我们总是说你是你的记录所说的样子,但我认为在这个时候,密尔沃基的表现比他们的记录所说的要好。而且这是一支比那更好的球队。马刺队遇到了这种情况,只是被,只是被狠狠地教训了一顿。

迈克·芬格:关于你提到的可能交易的有趣之处在于,如果马刺队想升级呃,替补中锋,看起来他们现在最具交易价值的资产是扎克·科林斯。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:因为其他希望升级替补中锋的球队可能会将扎克·科林斯视为一次升级。这是一个奇怪的动态。

迈克·芬格:一个奇怪的动态,确实如此。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:你也可以只把科林斯的薪水用作筹码,并附上一个选秀权。

迈克·芬格:是的。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:你知道,就像你可能真的只是用选秀权买人,而科林斯让薪金空间变得可行。再说一次,我们只是在这里随意讨论。我们没有任何,你知道,我们没有爆料任何新闻。

迈克·芬格:是的。但你之前问到关于湖人队的比赛,以及它是否像建立了势头。我心想,当然没有。这是一支年轻的球队。几乎没有势头可言。就像你认为他们已经弄明白了,而且他们看起来真的很棒的时候,他们就会去,然后他们就会有三连败,他们在芝加哥丢掉领先优势,在密尔沃基被痛扁。然后接下来的赛程,接下来的赛程也不利于任何形式的势头。比如这周你要在主场打两场对阵孟菲斯的比赛。然后你就要去迈阿密打客场,我想那可能是一场可以赢的比赛。这可能是吉米·巴特勒的复出之战,尽管可能不是。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:可能,是的。

迈克·芬格:我不知道这对马刺队来说是好事还是坏事。我知道。然后你去巴黎,我不知道我是什么,我的意思是,我们现在不需要预览所有这些,但我不知道如何看待这些比赛。比如对一支年轻的球队来说,分心因素是否会很高,而且在对阵步行者队的比赛中很难赢球,或者他们会得到整个法国的支持,就像主场比赛一样,他们会乘风破浪?我不知道。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:最后那部分的答案是肯定的。那将是两场主场比赛,但不是在他们主场球馆的主场比赛。那将会,那将会像奥斯汀的比赛。我希望我希望步行者队能拿到很多钱,在一群充满敌意的观众面前打一场主场比赛。

迈克·芬格:因为其中一场比赛,其中一场比赛算作印第安纳的主场比赛。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:是的,确实是。

迈克·芬格:但他们因此获得了一次巴黎之旅。我相信他们会玩得很开心。当他们以一分的差距错过季后赛时,多么,多么,多么可惜的交易,多么可惜的交易。他们可以赢得一面库珀旗作为安慰奖。当他们以一分的差距错过季后赛时。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:只是一线希望。

迈克·芬格:不,呃,我想从湖人队的比赛中谈到的是,呃,年轻的新秀斯蒂芬·卡斯尔首发了那场比赛,汤姆。是不是只有我一个人这么觉得,他似乎在首发阵容中比替补出场表现得更好。我想听听你的看法。

汤姆·奥斯本:是的,我认为你完全正确。他,你知道,他在第三节非常有侵略性,得到14分。他说他只是在做他该做的,只是努力保持侵略性。这不是防守的问题,你知道,湖人队,呃,你知道,他找到了漏洞;他只是,他只是很有侵略性。我认为当他首发时,他更容易找到节奏。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:他还和克里斯·保罗和文班亚马一起打球;这可能也有帮助。

汤姆·奥斯本:是的。当德文像昨晚那样打球时,这是值得期待的。看,你知道,说到势头,如果他能复制,你知道,或者即使接近于持续这样做,那也是一件相当,相当令人印象深刻的事情。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:我的理论是,当你首发并打首发球员的分钟数时,你有更长的容错空间。就像你如何,你可以搞砸,然后从中吸取教训,而如果你替补出场,就更容易像,如果你有糟糕的四分钟,教练下次会换上别人。或者,或者如果你有几次糟糕的四分钟,教练下次会换上别人。对我来说,斯蒂芬替补出场和首发的区别很大,只是上场时间自然减少和机会减少。我认为当你看到他首发时,他,你知道,他有更多的容错空间去犯那些他每场比赛都会犯的错误,并且仍然可以从中吸取教训,留在场上,并有机会弥补自己,而替补出场时,他并不总是有这样的机会。

迈克·芬格:杰夫·麦克唐纳,这真是有趣的心理学。这其中可能有一些道理。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:哦,闭嘴。我不想听你说。

迈克·芬格:我要试着通过一些冲突来提高播客的收视率,并说这,这有99%的原因是因为能和克里斯·保罗和文班亚马一起打球。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:是的。

迈克·芬格:和那些人一起打球。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:是的,这只是另一个原因,笨蛋。

迈克·芬格:好的,其中百分之一是因为杰夫所说的,99%。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:但你表现得好像他替补出场时,就从来不和维克托·文班亚马和克里斯·保罗一起打球。他会的。

迈克·芬格:他不和那个阵容一起打球。和那个阵容。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:当然。

迈克·芬格:是的。是的。当然。而且,呃,你知道,我,我认为展望未来,这是一个值得思考的有趣问题,比如,我并不是想制造任何交易谣言,但斯蒂芬·卡斯尔和杰里米·索汉(Jeremy Sochan)现在有点适合同一个位置,和那套首发阵容,和你的顶级阵容。我现在看不到这两个人,他们对圣安东尼奥马刺队的短期和长期未来都非常重要,能融入同一套阵容的情况。如果我们想在这里进行一场辩论,比如这对你来说意味着什么?这是个问题吗?

杰夫·麦克唐纳:是的,他们不能同时出现在同一套阵容中,所以其中一个必须替补出场。就像永远一样,可能。除非,除非一个……

迈克·芬格:所以这是个问题吗?除非你的两个顶级球员不能一起打球。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:除非其中一个,而且在这个时候,我可能会把赌注押在斯蒂芬·卡斯尔身上,练出一手跳投。

迈克·芬格:是的。那会改变,那会改变一切。这是个问题吗?

杰夫·麦克唐纳:可能是。本赛季可能不是,但随着你构建这个阵容,可能是。我不介意让他们俩都在球队名单上,只要其中一个可以替补出场,你可以用另一种方式填补呃,首发阵容,但是,我可以看出你哪里有两个功能重复的球员,然后你想交易掉一个。

迈克·芬格:需要说明的是,你,他们都不能和克里斯·保罗和哈里森·巴恩斯一起融入这套首发阵容。也许如果你在其他两个位置上增加,不同类型的球员,也许他们俩都能更好地融入,除非斯蒂芬·卡斯尔练出三分球。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:这是关键。我,我,我认为在这个时代,你可以让一个你不用在三分线外防守的球员上场,但你不能让两个这样的球员上场。这就是问题所在。这是最大的问题。

迈克·芬格:所以,而且这使得我们,我们不是一个,一个讨厌杰里米·索汉的播客。我多次说过;本赛季有些时候,他如果不是他们最好的球员,也是他们的第二好的球员。就像他健康的时候,他度过了一个非常好的赛季。但最近,他一直没有保持健康。而且,呃……

杰夫·麦克唐纳:你知道他坐在板凳上时的球队战绩吗?

迈克·芬格:更好。当他因伤缺席比赛时,球队的战绩比他不打球时更差。这有点像,我的意思是,这是挑选数据,但……

杰夫·麦克唐纳:确实如此,确实如此。

迈克·芬格:我只是认为,这样做的原因是,当杰里米·索汉不打球时,你会得到一个更好的斯蒂芬·卡斯尔。所以,这是值得关注的。我不知道答案是什么。我认为马刺队很高兴拥有这两个球员,因为他们,他们做着重要的事情。他们俩都拼尽全力防守。呃,他们俩都传球、篮板,诸如此类。嗯……

杰夫·麦克唐纳:是的,答案是卡斯尔的三分球会变得更好。我认为这会发生。

迈克·芬格:可能需要这样。你认为,斯蒂芬·卡斯尔是一个长期的,假设是2027年,他是打控球后卫,还是打小前锋?

杰夫·麦克唐纳:什么?听众都惊呆了。

迈克·芬格:比如我不知道。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:控球后卫。

迈克·芬格:可能。想这样做,有这样做的技术,会做得更好,就像投篮一样。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:如果他,如果他这样做,并且他的三分球命中率达到,比如说35%,那么这对马刺队来说可能真的很好。因为那样你就可以让索汉打三号位或四号位。我,我,实际上你会想让索汉打四号位。而且,呃,在2027年获得某种侧翼球员,最好是一个射手,和德文·瓦塞尔一起打球,然后你就有一支球队了。然后你就有一锅汤了,正如一位智者曾经说过的那样。嗯……

杰夫·麦克唐纳:但是44岁的克里斯·保罗适合这一切吗?

迈克·芬格:你觉得,呃,我之前在这里提到过,但如果他们没有完成一笔大交易,如果你没有,如果你没有在今年六月选中一个即战力控球后卫,就像我,我,我不排除明年41岁的克里斯·保罗回归的可能性。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:我的意思是,如果他愿意在那种情况下以1000万美元的价格回来,当然可以。

迈克·芬格:汤姆,我不知道你,你没有看电视直播,我不记得你坐在斯台普斯中心或加密货币网球场的哪一边,但他昨晚传给德文·瓦塞尔在底角的那个球,简直是克里斯·保罗的史诗级助攻。你有没有看到那个,或者你有没有欣赏到这个鞭子,鞭子传球?

汤姆·奥斯本:是的。是的。呃,是的。克里斯·保罗,你知道,他想在进攻端更具侵略性,但他仍然是那个传球,昨晚10次助攻。是的,他,你知道,这对他来说也是艰难的一周。赛后他非常激动,主要谈到把他的球衣送给JJ·雷迪克的儿子,他和文班亚马,他的声音哽咽了。这对他来说是艰难的一周,你知道,但他,呃……

迈克·芬格:是的。

汤姆·奥斯本:是的。

迈克·芬格:你说他想变得更具侵略性,比如克里斯·保罗,侵略性并不意味着投篮。他会成为一个,他可以在不投篮的情况下积极地接管比赛。而他投进的所有球,今年他已经为马刺队投进了一些关键球,都是锦上添花。但是,我正在看我们,我们的朋友雅各布·托比和肖恩·埃利奥特昨晚解说了那场比赛,他们做得很好。然后有人在网上发布了,呃,湖人队版本的克里斯·保罗传给德文·瓦塞尔的助攻,你听到湖人队的解说员在那之前就在谈论克里斯·保罗如何完全控制了这场比赛,因为马刺队正在追分。克里斯·保罗把球送到了它需要去的地方,就像上了发条一样,就在湖人队的解说员做出这一评论的同时,他把球传给了德文。这就像,当他谈到想变得更具侵略性时,我知道他也在谈论他的投篮,但当他像那场比赛那样进入内线时,当他把防守撕裂,然后可以传球给别人投篮时,这也是一种侵略性。那是马刺队真正处于最佳状态的时候。你知道,他们昨晚有三个20分以上的得分球员;克里斯·保罗不是其中之一。你有文班亚马和一个我们可能需要更多谈论的德文·瓦塞尔,一场精彩的德文·瓦塞尔的比赛,还有斯蒂芬·卡斯尔。他们三个都超过了20分。但克里斯·保罗绝对在那场比赛中留下了他的印记,就像汤姆说的,一次艰难的回家之旅。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:关于克里斯·保罗的事情,这也不是什么新闻,是他知道球应该传到哪里。

迈克·芬格:是的。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:比如球员提到那真的是一个和文班亚马的挡拆,也许一个更年轻的控球后卫会有点专注于文班亚马。比如他是掩护人,他有七尺三寸高。但是,呃,我不知道是哪个防守球员,但是那个应该,呃,你知道,在底角防守德文的人在协防文班亚马的掩护。这就是克里斯像四分卫一样读懂比赛的地方。所以球去了底角,而不是传给在人群中的掩护人。然后你知道,斯蒂芬·卡斯尔那样打;他可能会尝试把球高吊给文班亚马,也许会成功,但也可能不会。克里斯,克里斯现在39岁的技能就是知道球应该在哪里,而且可能比场上任何人都更清楚地看到这一点。

迈克·芬格:他确实如此。他能看懂比赛。呃,这又是一个,这不是一个深刻的观察,但这对于把这支球队变成一支,一支季后赛竞争球队来说非常重要。说到季后赛竞争,就像附加赛的竞争变得更加混乱了。国王队还没有死。我们上周的播客部分时间都在讨论交易得到达龙·福克斯的可能性。就像上周看起来不太可能;现在看起来更不可能了,因为国王队又回到了竞争行列。道格·克里斯蒂显然在那里创造了奇迹。国王队还在竞争;太阳队还没有死。呃,为了那第10名的位置,会有一场争夺战。然后一直到第七、第六、第五。呃,只是我们快要到赛季中期了。在再次见面之前,他们即将打完第,我想他们会在再次见面之前打完第40场比赛,也许是第41场,那将是赛季中期。你仍然认为马刺队会一直坚持到最后吗,或者当这些,呃,当这些比赛开始变得更加困难,客场之旅开始堆积时,他们会在某个时候掉队吗?

杰夫·麦克唐纳:是的,我总是那个悲观的人,我想,但我认为他们会有点掉队,原因你提到了;赛程很艰难。你现在胜率正好是50%。二月份会很艰难,伙计。就像就旅行而言,而且我认为,呃,进入,呃,我想是,这次客场之旅,这最后一次本应是四场比赛的客场之旅变成了三场比赛。我看到的统计数据是,在接下来的50天里,马刺队在50天里只有5个主场比赛。如果我没记错的话,有两个……

迈克·芬格:在霜冻银行中心的五场比赛还是五场……

杰夫·麦克唐纳:现在,你没让我说完。如果我没记错的话,我相信其中两场包括在奥斯汀的比赛。所以他们不会在主场花太多时间,让一支年轻的球队在这种情况下坚守阵地,呃,这是一个很高的要求。就像如果他们做到了,那将是……

迈克·芬格:我不认为这是准确的,杰夫,因为我现在正在看,而且我认为……

杰夫·麦克唐纳:好吧,闭嘴。

迈克·芬格:我认为他们没有把在巴黎对阵印第安纳的比赛算进去,也没有把在奥斯汀的比赛算进去。有,有五,二,好吧。所以你说在50天里只有5个主场比赛。哦,没关系。是的,他们会进入季后赛的。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:然后你必须把这里的补赛挤进去。

迈克·芬格:是的。对阵湖人队的补赛。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:只有两个可能的位置适合两队的赛程。这将,这将增加另一个失去的休息日,而那里没有多少休息日。

迈克·芬格:是的。几乎没有时间在家里的床上睡觉。这将会变得很艰难。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:如果,如果他们能,如果他们能熬过剩下的1月和2月,并且仍然在,在竞争行列中,那么也许他们还有机会,因为3月份有很多主场比赛。

迈克·芬格:3月份你真的会得到,得到好的赛程。3月份有很多主场比赛。所以如果他们能保持现状,抓住绳子,无论你想用什么陈词滥调,那么他们,他们还有机会。如果他们在牛仔竞技表演之旅结束后落后7场,那么,你知道……

迈克·芬格:希望的部分,如果你希望马刺队继续争夺季后赛席位,希望的部分是残酷的2月牛仔竞技表演之旅,大部分比赛都在东部联盟,这比另一种选择更好。然后当你,呃,在奥斯汀的比赛结束后回来,再次踏上客场之旅时,你会对阵鹈鹕队打两场比赛,他们是西部联盟的绝对垫底球队。所以至少,是的,你在客场待了一个月,至少你没有和,你知道,明尼苏达、俄克拉荷马城和,和丹佛以及西部最强的球队交手。你知道,那里有一些波士顿,就像东部有一些强队。但是,呃,你确实有一些机会,不会在客场完全沉沦。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:是的,你的,你的牛仔竞技表演之旅的部分,对阵孟菲斯、奥兰多、波士顿和休斯顿……

迈克·芬格:是的。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:可能,可能是个问题。但也许,也许你可以拿下其他一些比赛。

迈克·芬格:你在华盛顿有一些。

杰夫·麦克唐纳:是的,不要输给华盛顿。夏洛特变得更好了,但不要输给夏洛特。去击败亚特兰大。

迈克·芬格:呃,是的,这,这将是马刺队的一个关键月份。在我们到达那里之前,我们还有一周的时间,包括,正如杰夫提到的,两场主场对阵孟菲斯灰熊队的比赛,对我来说,他们莫名其妙地,呃,继续排在西部榜首。不,我的意思是贾·莫兰特不在MVP的讨论范围之内;他没有一个MVP赛季。他是他们的球星。小贾伦·杰克逊打得很好,但就像这支球队在你想到NBA总决赛竞争者时,并没有让你印象深刻。而且,呃,呃,在你谈论NBA的强队时,他们也没有让你印象深刻,但他们一直是一支非常,非常好的球队。让他们在霜冻银行中心打两场比赛,我想你只是希望赢下一场。然后你去迈阿密。呃,我想那是吉米·巴特勒禁赛结束的日期。他会在那天回到球场吗?谁知道迈阿密发生了什么乱七八糟的事情。那,那很疯狂。但是,呃,这是马刺队在我们再次见面之前要打的

点击查看原文:Can San Antonio stay in the race?

Can San Antonio stay in the race?

After one of the Spurs’ most impressive victories of the season against the Lakers, columnist Mike Finger and beat writers Jeff McDonald and Tom Orsborn discuss Stephon Castle’s progress, Chris Paul’s impact, and whether Victor Wembanyama and San Antonio will be able to remain in playoff contention even through a rugged upcoming schedule.

Suggested reading:

Under difficult circumstances, Chris Paul continues to lead young Spurs:

Three takeaways from Spurs’ romp over Lakers

As Spurs fight human nature, Victor Wembanyama learns to get mean

\

Here is the transcript of the podcast:

Mike Finger: From a highly secure network of top secret locations across North America, this is the Spurs Insider. I’m Mike Finger, joined as always by our Express-News panel of Spurs beat writers, Jeff McDonald and Tom Orsborn. It’s been an unusual week. Tom has been in the middle of it. We had two games since the last time we met; we expected to have three. Tom spent four nights, I believe, on the West Coast with the local cagers. And I just want to start with you and just get your impressions of, first of all, everything that led into a pretty huge, impressive victory for the Spurs at the Lakers last night. But just tell me what that’s been like at in a situation where we all back in San Antonio are thinking of the people involved in the Los Angeles area fires. It’s a tough situation, but what was the basketball situation like?

Tom Orsborn: You know, I gotta start off by saying I thought Mitch did a wonderful job. He, you know, Chris Paul chimed in yesterday when I asked him about it. He hit all the right notes from the first time I had a daily availability with him Saturday. He pointed out that no matter what challenges they faced, the uncertainty of whether they were going to play Monday night, the logistical issues they faced, changing hotels, Chris Paul going through what he went through with his family being forced to evacuate from their home. You know, as Mitch said, it paled in comparison with what so many people were experiencing in the LA area. So I thought he set the right tone right from the start. And then getting them on the practice court Saturday and Sunday to get their minds off of it and also to do some really good work. They had two really good practices and a lengthy film session. And I think that played a part in them ironing out some of the wrinkles they experienced during the losing streak. So, you know, I just thought and then, you know, Mitch had a really heartfelt statement before the game last night. You could tell it was coming from him; it wasn’t written by the PR staff or anything. He went to school at Stanford, his mom lives in Santa Barbara; she, thank goodness, was okay, no fires in that area. But he’s got, you know, an affinity for California also, and he just hit all the right notes. Did a great job, I thought.

Mike Finger: The game itself was one where you almost forgot that the Spurs were at the end of a three-game losing streak. They went from last Wednesday at Milwaukee, Jeff covered, to this Monday. As Tom sort of alluded to there, there was a bit of a reset where you get back to the practice court. You know, does this team have momentum now? Is all right with the world after a… Tom, you mentioned that Mitch had said it was the best game they played all year, something along those lines.

Tom Orsborn: Especially offensively. They flipped the script. I mean, they had struggled of late, late in games. They were outstanding in the second half, scored 70-plus points, outscored the Lakers 37-13 in the fourth. So, yeah, I mean that, you know, who knows if that carries over, but it certainly was the case that night, and it’s pretty impressive. That starting lineup played great. Keldon was great off the bench. Stephon Castle, you know, you just you’re seeing him show once again what will come for him in the coming years. So, yeah.

Jeff McDonald: I was struck watching that game from home about the team that just completely fell apart for about a five-minute stretch and it was the veteran laden Los Angeles Lakers. I mean, they just it was a turnover frenzy. And the Spurs were there to take advantage of it. So, 19 and 19, 500 again. Seems like every time we meet, no matter what, the Spurs are 500 heading into what could be a tougher part of the schedule. I saw an analysis of the remaining NBA schedules this morning. The Spurs are up there top five in terms of the advanced stats, the advanced power of schedule strength. So, and most of the Western Conference teams are on the top of that, most of the Eastern Conference teams are on the bottom. But the point is, it’s no guarantee; it’s not going to be easy to stay 500 the rest of the way. But after a week like this, tough one in Milwaukee, Jeff, we can get into that, to bounce back against the Lakers the way they did is what they needed to do. But if we want to rewind and go back to Milwaukee, Jeff, that was another expected Victor Wembanyama, Giannis showdown, and Giannis got the best of this one.

Jeff McDonald: I think like the Spurs, we all just want to forget that game ever existed. I don’t even remember being in Milwaukee.

Tom Orsborn: I was in Milwaukee?

Jeff McDonald: I think we were. I don’t remember that.

Mike Finger: I think it was sort of cold.

Tom Orsborn: Yeah, it was alright. We were just right across the street from the arena, so it was okay.

Mike Finger: Yeah, it was a Wembanyama… like that if you really want to rehash it. I mean, going into that game, especially the all the talk around Milwaukee, if you read the local newspapers…

Jeff McDonald: Uh-huh.

Mike Finger: They were flashing back to the only other time Wembanyama and Giannis had ever met, which was at the AT&T Center, or the Frost Bank Center, excuse me, last January, last season. They only had one meeting last season. Wembanyama did not play in his trip to Milwaukee as a rookie. And that game was like a back-and-forth. Like Giannis had 44, I think, but Wembanyama, it was a big coming-out thing for Wembanyama to go toe-to-toe with Giannis; he had 30 something in that game.

Jeff McDonald: It was a TNT game, too.

Mike Finger: There was a TNT game. There was the big moment that everyone remembers where Giannis tried to bully Wembanyama for a basket, and Wembanyama just rejected him. And it really was one of those nights, even though the Spurs lost, even though statistically Giannis outplayed Wembanyama that night, it really was one of those moments from Victor’s rookie season where you had to stand up and take note and say, and say like, he’s right there. He’s right there with a lot of the greats in the league right now, and he’s only at the time 20 years old. So you flash forward to this year; everyone was everyone in Milwaukee was looking forward to the rematch, and it was it was kind of a dud. And the reason it was a dud is because Giannis made sure it was a dud. He just dominated. And Wembanyama was just kind of kind of average, just kind of average. Had a good good start but didn’t, you know, didn’t didn’t finish really. And the Spurs got blown out, and it kind of did not live up to billing that game and made us all wonder what the heck we were doing in Milwaukee.

Mike Finger: What were the not to delve too deeply into the distant past, but at that at that time, Jeff, the Spurs had lost three in a row, had blown that lead to the Bulls a couple nights earlier in Chicago. What were the list of what was the list of concerns for that team for the for the local cagers heading to Los Angeles? Was that a point in the season? Is this still a point in the season where you feel like there are are weaknesses that need to be addressed if they want to stay in this play-in playoff race?

Jeff McDonald: I mean, if that’s important and you want to look at the Spurs now, like they uh, you know, the Milwaukee game’s not a good example, but in both in both of the previous games, there was that phenomenon where like the Spurs are doing great every time Victor’s on the floor, but as soon as he leaves, like boy howdy, it’s a it’s a like a free run to the to the rim for the opposing team, and the opposing bigs are going crazy. So if you’re looking for like some kind of like minor upgrades, they could they could use some help at the backup five. They’re not getting much a whole lot of production there at this point in time. Now I don’t know if they’ll really go out and do something because as we talked before, I don’t think this is like a Katie bar the door we have to make the playoffs kind of season for them. But I think if there’s a way to upgrade there, they they would be remiss not to look at it. So if that’s what you’re talking about, that’s that’s my answer to that question.

Mike Finger: You always you always go straight to like the the the click-happy like trade stuff. I was just talking about stuff they need to shore up.

Jeff McDonald: I don’t know. I’m not a coach. Right, somebody? I’m not a coach. You’re going to have to coach better. What do they have to do better? I mean, they have to get better. They have to hold the fort better when Wembanyama’s off the floor.

Mike Finger: Okay.

Jeff McDonald: So that’s one thing. Um, you know, a lot of the uh, we kind of talked about it a lot of this last time, when you get a lead, hold on to it. Don’t don’t don’t think that if you blow the lead, you can get it back. The Milwaukee game was sort of an outlier from all of that because it was just a complete butt-kicking, as Mitch Johnson pointed out after that game. And also pointed out like we haven’t we as the been in the Spurs haven’t got our butts kicked a lot lately. Like that was the first one in a long time, and he was right about that, too. So I’m willing to throw that one out there as an anomaly. Um, ran into a just a better team that night and probably a better team overall. I think injuries have had a lot to do with it, but Milwaukee has definitely underachieved this year. Like on paper, they should be a team that’s probably not as good as the Celtics but is up there at the top of the East, um, fighting for, you know, at least a shot a spot in the Eastern Conference Finals, and they they were right around 500 when they faced the Spurs. Got off to a bad start. But I think we always talk about you are what your record says you are, but I think at this point in time, Milwaukee was playing better than their record said they were. And it’s a better team than that. And Spurs ran into that and just got just got manhandled.

Mike Finger: What’s the interesting part about the transaction possible transaction that you mentioned is if the Spurs want to upgrade at the uh, the backup five, it seems like their most tradeable asset right now is Zach Collins.

Jeff McDonald: Because other teams that are looking to upgrade at backup five might see Zach Collins as an upgrade. It’s a weird dynamic.

Mike Finger: A weird dynamic, that is.

Jeff McDonald: You also might just use Collins as salary and attach a pick.

Mike Finger: Yeah.

Jeff McDonald: You know, like you might be really just buying somebody with picks, and Collins makes the salary work. And again, we’re just spitballing here. We don’t have any, you know, we’re not breaking news.

Mike Finger: Yep. But you asked earlier about about the Lakers game and if it like establishes momentum. I’m like, of course not. This is a young team. Like there’s almost no such thing as momentum. Like just when you think they’ve got a figure it out and boy they look really good, then they go and they have a three-game losing streak where they’re blowing leads in Chicago and getting blown out in Milwaukee. And then the sched the immediate schedule coming up is not lending itself to any kind of momentum, too. Like you got to play Memphis twice this week at home. And then you go on the road to Miami, which maybe that’s a winnable game, I suppose. It could be the return of Jimmy Butler, although probably not.

Jeff McDonald: Probably, yeah.

Mike Finger: And I don’t know if that’s a good thing or a bad thing for the Spurs. I know. Um, and then you go to to Paris, and I don’t know what what I mean, we don’t need to preview all that right now, but I don’t know what to make of those games. Like is is the distraction factor for a young team going to be high, and it’s going to be hard to win those games against the Pacers, or are they going to have the entire country of France on their side and it plays like home games, and they ride that wave? I don’t know.

Jeff McDonald: The answer the answer to that last part is yes. Those are going to be two home games, but they’re not home games in their home arena. It’ll be uh, it’ll be like Austin games. I hope the I hope the Pacers are getting paid a lot of money to play a home game with a hostile crowd.

Mike Finger: Because one of those games is one of those games counts as a home game for Indiana.

Jeff McDonald: Yes, it does.

Mike Finger: But they get a trip to Paris out of it. I’m sure they’ll have a lovely time. And when they miss the playoffs by one game, what a what a what a what a trade, what a deal. They can win a Cooper flag as their consolation. When they miss the playoffs by one game.

Jeff McDonald: Just a ray of sunshine.

Mike Finger: No, the uh, the thing that I wanted to get into from the Lakers game is that uh, young rookie named Stephon Castle started that game, Tom. And is it just me, but he seems to fare better in the starting lineup than he does coming off the bench. And I wanted to get your take on that.

Tom Orsborn: Yeah, I think you’re exactly right. He, you know, he he was very aggressive that third quarter, 14 points. Um, he said he was just kind of doing what he does, just just trying to stay aggressive. It wasn’t a case of the defense, you know, the Lakers, uh, you know, him finding cracks; he just he just was aggressive. And I think he gets into a better rhythm when he starts.

Jeff McDonald: He’s also playing alongside Chris Paul and Victor Wembanyama; that probably helps, too.

Tom Orsborn: Does. And when when Devin’s playing like he did last night, that’s something to look forward to. Look, you know, speaking of momentum, if he can just duplicate, you know, or even come close to just doing that consistently, it’s a pretty pretty impressive deal.

Jeff McDonald: My theory is when you start and play starter minutes, you have longer leash. Like you how you can you can mess up and and play through it, whereas if you’re playing coming off the bench, it’s easier to like if you have a bad four-minute stretch, the coach goes to somebody else next time. Or or if you have a couple of bad four-minute stretches, the coach goes to somebody else next time. I got a lot of it to me a lot of it to me with Steph coming off the bench versus starting is just a a a natural downtick in minutes and an opportunity. And I think when you see him start, he’s you know, he’s he’s got more leash to kind of make those mistakes that he’s going to make game to game and still play through them and stay on the floor and have a chance to redeem himself, whereas coming off the bench, he doesn’t always have that opportunity.

Mike Finger: That is fun psychology, Jeff McDonald. There might be something to it.

Jeff McDonald: Oh, shut up. I don’t want to hear from you.

Mike Finger: I’m going to try to increase the podcast ratings here with some conflict and say it it has ever it has 99% to do with getting to play with Chris Paul and Victor Wembanyama.

Jeff McDonald: Well, yeah.

Mike Finger: Play alongside those guys.

Jeff McDonald: Well, yeah, it was giving just another reason, dufus.

Mike Finger: Okay, one one percent of it is because of what Jeff said, 99% of it.

Jeff McDonald: But you act like when he comes off the bench, he never plays with Victor Wembanyama and Chris Paul. He does.

Mike Finger: He doesn’t play with that group. With that group.

Jeff McDonald: Sure.

Mike Finger: Yep. Yep. Sure. And uh, you know, I I think that moving forward, it’s an interesting question to ponder as to like, and I’m not trying to start any trade rumors here, but Stephon Castle and Jeremy Sochan right now sort of fit into the same spot with that starting group, with your top group. I don’t see a scenario right now where those two guys who are very important pieces to the San Antonio Spurs short and long-term future fit into the same lineup. Um, and if we want to get into like a debate here, like what what does that mean to you? Is that a problem?

Jeff McDonald: Well, yeah, they can’t both play in the same lineup, so one of them has to come off the bench. Like in in perpetuity, probably. Unless unless one…

Mike Finger: So is that a problem? Unless two your top guys can’t play together.

Jeff McDonald: Unless one of them, and probably at this point, I would put my money on Stephon Castle, develops a jump shot.

Mike Finger: Yeah. That would change that would change things. Is that a problem?

Jeff McDonald: Um, could be. Could be not this season, but as you build this thing out, could be. I don’t mind having them both on the roster as long as one of them can come off the bench, and you can fill out the uh, starting lineup in another way, but um, you know, I could see where you have two guys that are redundant, and you look to move one.

Mike Finger: And to be clear, you you they don’t both fit into this starting lineup with Chris Paul and Harrison Barnes. Maybe if you add uh, different kinds of players at those other two positions, um, maybe they they both can fit better except for Stephon Castle develops the three-point shot.

Jeff McDonald: That’s that’s the key. I’m I I I think you can get by in this day and age playing one guy, you don’t have to guard at the three-point line, but you can’t play two. That’s the issue. That’s the biggest issue.

Mike Finger: So, um, and and it makes we’re not we’re not a uh, a Jeremy Sochan hating podcast. I’ve I’ve said many times; there’s been times this season when he’s been if not their best player, their second-best player. Like he’s had a really good season when he’s been healthy. But lately, he hasn’t been healthy. And uh…

Jeff McDonald: Do you know their record when he is on the bench?

Mike Finger: It’s better. Well, their record whenever he is sidelined plays is worse than when he does not play. Which is kind of a I mean, that cherry-picked type deal, but…

Jeff McDonald: It is, true. It is.

Mike Finger: And I just think that the reason for that is that you get a better Stephon Castle when Jeremy Sochan doesn’t play. So, it’s something to watch. And I I don’t know what the answer is. I think that the Spurs are really happy having both those guys on the team because they they do important stuff. Both of them guard like crazy. Uh, both of them pass, rebound, all that type of stuff. Um…

Jeff McDonald: Yeah, the answer is Castle’s going to become better as a three-point shooter. I think it’s going to happen.

Mike Finger: Well, probably needs to. Do you see um, Stephon Castle as a long-term uh, let’s just say 2027, is he playing point guard, or is he playing small forward?

Jeff McDonald: What? The the the audience is stunned.

Mike Finger: Like I don’t know.

Jeff McDonald: Point guard.

Mike Finger: Probably. Wants to do it, has the skills to do it, will get better at it, just like the shooting.

Jeff McDonald: If he’s if he’s doing that and he’s making three-pointers at like, let’s say a 35% clip, then that’s probably really good for the Spurs. Because then you can play Sochan at three or four. I I I actually you’d want to play Sochan at four. And uh, and in 2027 have acquired some type of wing player, preferably a shooter, to play alongside Devin Vassell, and then you got you got a group. Then you got a soup going, as a wise man once said. Um…

Jeff McDonald: But where does where does 44-year-old Chris Paul fit into all this?

Mike Finger: What do you think about uh, I’ve I’ve mentioned it on here before, but if if they don’t pull off a big trade, if you don’t if you don’t draft they uh, help you now point guard in in the in the this in June, like I I I’m not ruling out a return of 41-year-old Chris Paul next year.

Jeff McDonald: I mean, if he’s willing to come back for $10 million again under that under those circumstances, sure.

Mike Finger: Tom, I don’t know if you you weren’t watching the TV broadcast, and I can’t remember which end of the of the Staples Center or the Crypto.com Arena you were sitting on, but that pass to Devin Vassell in the corner last night was just an all-time Chris Paul assist. Did you get a good view of that or did you appreciate that this the whip whip across?

Tom Orsborn: Yes. Yes. Uh, yes. Chris Paul, um, you know, he he wanted to be more aggressive offensively, but it’s still the passing that 10 assists last night. Um, yeah, he was, you know, it was a tough week for him, too. He was pretty emotional after the game, um, talking mainly about giving his jersey to JJ Redick’s sons him and Wembanyama, and his voice choked up. It was a tough week for him, you know, but he uh…

Mike Finger: Yeah.

Tom Orsborn: Yeah.

Mike Finger: Well you talk about him wanting to be aggres like Chris Paul, aggression does not mean taking shots. He would be a he can aggressively take over a game without taking a shot. And and all the shots that he makes, which he’s made a bunch of big ones for the Spurs this year, are kind of gravy. But um, you know, I was watching the our our friends Jacob Tobey and Sean Elliot call that game last night, and they do a great job. And then someone posted online the uh, the Lakers version of that Chris Paul to Devin Vassell assist, and you hear the Lakers announcers talking right before that happens uh, about how Chris Paul is in complete control of this game because the Spurs are on a run. Chris Paul is getting the ball exactly where it needed to be and just like clockwork, just right on cue as as the Lakers announcers make that observation, he makes that pass to Devin. And it’s just like when when he talks about wanting to be aggressive, I know that he’s talking somewhat about his shot, but when he gets into the lane like he did on that play, when he kind of dices defenses apart and then can make the pass that leads to a shot for somebody else, that is a version of aggression, too. And that’s when the Spurs are really at their best. You know, they had three 20-point scorers last night; Chris Paul was not one of them. You had Wembanyama and a really we need to probably talk more about Devin Vassell, a great Devin Vassell game, and Stephon Castle. All three of them were above 20. But Chris Paul definitely put his imprint on that game on on like Tom said a tough trip to his home city.

Jeff McDonald: The thing with Chris Paul, and this isn’t breaking news either, is he knows where the pass is supposed to go.

Mike Finger: Yep.

Jeff McDonald: Like the player referencing that was really that was really a pick-and-roll with Wembanyama, and maybe a younger point guard would be kind of laser in on Wembanyama. Like he’s the roll man, he’s seven three. Um, but uh, I don’t know which defender it was, but the guy that was supposed to be uh, you know, on Devin in the corner was cheating over to help on the Wembanyama roll. And that’s what Chris read like a quarterback. So the ball goes to the corner, not to the roll into traffic. And then you know, Stephon Castle runs that; he might try to throw that lob to Wembanyama, and maybe it works out, but probably it doesn’t. Chris Chris’s skill right now at 39 years old is really just knowing where the ball is supposed to be and probably seeing that better than than anybody on the floor even now.

Mike Finger: He does. He can see the game. Uh, and that has been again, this is not a trenchant observation, but that has been just so huge in turning this into a a playoff contending team. Talking about playoff contention, like the things are starting to get even more jumbled up there in the play-in race. The the Kings are not dead yet. We spent part of last week’s podcast talking about a possible trade for De’Aaron Fox. Like that’s looking last week it was not likely; it’s looking way less likely now that the the Kings are in the middle of this again. Doug Christie has apparently been doing wonders there. The the Kings are in it; the Suns are not dead yet. Uh, there’s there’s going to be a bit of a fight there for that 10th spot. And then all the way up to seventh, sixth, fifth. Uh, just we’re kind of nearing a halfway point. They’re about to play their they’ll play I think they’ll play their 40th game before we meet again, maybe the 41st, before we meet again that’ll be the halfway point. Do you still see the Spurs staying in this all the way to the end or is there going to be a fade at some point when these uh, when these games start getting more difficult, the road games start piling up?

Jeff McDonald: Yeah, I’m always the negative Nelly, I guess, but I’m banking on a fade a little bit for the reasons you mentioned; the schedule is tough. You’re right there at 500 right now. Um, February’s going to be rough, man. Like just in terms of travel, and I think uh, going into uh, I think it was um, this last road trip, this last that was supposed to be a four-gamer but was a three-gamer. I think the stat I saw was over the next 50 days, the Spurs were getting five home games in 50 days. And if I’m not mistaken, two…

Mike Finger: Five games at the five games at the Frost Bank Center or five games…

Jeff McDonald: And now well you didn’t let me finish. And if I’m not mistaken, I believe that two of those include games in Austin. So they’re not spending a lot of time on their home floor, and asking a young team to hold the fort through that kind of thing is uh, that’s a tall ask. Like if they do it, it’ll be something…

Mike Finger: I don’t think that’s accurate though, Jeff, because I’m looking at it now, and I think…

Jeff McDonald: Alright, shut up.

Mike Finger: I think they weren’t counting the Indiana game at Paris, and they weren’t counting the Austin games. There are there are two five two Okay. So you’re saying five games on their home floor in 50. Oh, never mind. Yeah, they’re going to make the playoffs.

Jeff McDonald: And then you got to squeeze in the makeup game out here.

Mike Finger: Yep. Makeup game against the Lakers.

Jeff McDonald: There are only like two possible spots that it fits into the two-team schedule. It’s going to be it’s going to add another just lost day of rest there where there aren’t many days of rest.

Mike Finger: Yeah. Hardly any days at the in their home beds. It’s going to get tough.

Jeff McDonald: If if they can if they can survive the rest of January and February and still be in in it, then maybe they have a chance because it’s a lot of home games in March.

Mike Finger: March you really get the the the good part of it. A lot of home games in March. So if they can just tread water, hold on to the rope, whatever cliché you want to use, then then they they have a chance. If they’re like seven games out of it when they get out of the Rodeo trip, then, you know…

Mike Finger: The hopeful part of the the hopeful part of it, if you’re looking for the Spurs to continue to compete for playoffs, is that brutal February Rodeo trip, most of it is in the Eastern Conference, which is preferable to the alternative. And then when you uh, uh, come back after those Austin games and go back on the road, you get two against the Pelicans, which is the absolute bottom of the Western Conference. So at least, yes you’re on the road for a month, at least you’re not playing, you know, Minnesota and Oklahoma City and and Denver and the the cream of the crop in the West. You know, there’s some Bostons in there, like there’s good teams in the in the East. But uh, you do have some opportunities to to not completely drown on the road.

Jeff McDonald: Yeah, your your the Rodeo trip part with Memphis and Orlando and Boston and Houston…

Mike Finger: Yeah.

Jeff McDonald: Might might be a problem. But maybe maybe you can pick off some of the other ones.

Mike Finger: You got some at Washington’s.

Jeff McDonald: Yeah, don’t lose at Washington. Charlotte’s better, but don’t lose at Charlotte. Go beat Atlanta.

Mike Finger: Uh, yeah, it’s it’s uh, that’s going to be a telltale month for the Spurs. Before we get there, we have a week including, as Jeff alluded to, two home games against the Memphis Grizzlies, who inexplicably to me, uh, continue to be at the top of the West. No, I mean Ja Morant isn’t, and no one’s talking about him in the MVP race; he’s not having an MVP season. He’s their star. Jaren Jackson Jr. has played really well, but like this isn’t the team that sticks out at you when you think about NBA Finals contenders. And uh, uh, really doesn’t stick out to you when you talk about powerhouses in the NBA, but they’ve been a really really good team. And having them at the Frost Bank Center for two games, I think you’re just hoping to get one. And then you go to Miami. Uh, I think that is the date when the Jimmy Butler suspension ends. Will he return to the court that day? Who knows what a mess is going on in Miami. That’s that’s wild. But uh, those are the three games that the Spurs will play before we meet again. Tom Orsborn, need a prediction.

Tom Orsborn: Two and one.

Mike Finger: Two and one.

Tom Orsborn: Yeah.

Mike Finger: Including a win at uh, in Miami, you think?

Tom Orsborn: Yes, I do. I think uh, yeah, they’ll they’ll they’ll… Yeah, I don’t know. I just think from what I saw last night, I know we talked about momentum not carrying over, but I think they they, you know, discovered some stuff out here. Uh, you know, like Devin said it was a vacation nobody wanted, but they they, you know, put in a lot of good work over the weekend. I think they figured some things out. You know, he he certainly, you know, he had one of his best games of the season, not just scoring, but he did a lot of stuff and he seemed comfortable and at ease. And I don’t know, but the big question is, can he continue that?

Mike Finger: We mentioned this on the podcast last week, uh, Jeff, the conversation we had with him in Chicago and how he’s starting to feel more and more like himself and learning how to play alongside this new version of uh, of Victor Wembanyama. And we’ve really started to see that, especially last night. That’s a that’s a cool development for the Spurs.

Jeff McDonald: I looked it up after the Milwaukee game, wrote about it a little bit, but uh, after the Milwaukee game, which is one game ago, he started January 24th of 67.

Mike Finger: Mhm.

Jeff McDonald: So he’s had one game. I don’t want to like throw water on it; maybe there’s some momentum there, but let’s let’s see, you know, that’ll give him some encouragement to stack them up, stack up some good ones. But it was a really probably I I haven’t asked him this, but probably over that period of time, probably the longest shooting slump that he’s ever endured as a professional. So it was good to see him break it, and we’ll see if he can continue it. As for my prediction, um…

Mike Finger: Yep.

Jeff McDonald: Little reason for optimism, like the Spurs are red-hot against the Grizzlies. I don’t know if you know this. They have a they have a one-game winning streak against the Grizzlies.

Mike Finger: Um, at the end of the history of that uh, history of that series, the recent history of that series did not look as rosy before that one-game winning streak.

Jeff McDonald: Yes, they won the final meeting last year at Memphis by a pretty handy margin, and that snapped their 13-game losing skid against the Grizzlies. So…

Mike Finger: That is pretty remarkable. I I want I want to say the Spurs have a one-game winning streak against the Grizzlies, but if you want to be all negative about it and say they’ve lost the last 14, then I guess you that’s also accurate. But uh…

Jeff McDonald: Yeah, I don’t know if they’re going to beat the Grizzlies in uh, in those games. I don’t know. I’m going to give them one and two.

Mike Finger: I’m going to give them one and two. You know, they win one of them either they win one of the Memphis games, or they win in Miami, but I’ll give them one and two.

Mike Finger: That Miami game is like the ultimate look-ahead game.

Jeff McDonald: Yeah.

Mike Finger: Like that could be a real… First of all, I’m not sure the last time they won in Miami either. Like well this this Spurs team is not, let’s just like there there aren’t James Hardens on this Spurs team. And uh, people who know a little bit about James Harden might know what I’m talking about. You don’t necessarily worry about like the Victor Wembanyamas of the world going crazy on South Beach. But South Beach always is an issue for any NBA team when you play there. Uh, you worry about the the next day.

Jeff McDonald: And then you probably… I worry more about the beat writers.

Mike Finger: There you go. Tom will be there. I don’t worry about Tom at all. If that was a Jeff trip, I’d worry about the beat writers, but I think Tom’s just going to have a nice quiet meal. I’m sure Yardley has the places planned, maybe a Cuban restaurant. Um…

Jeff McDonald: But how about Il Gabiano?

Mike Finger: Portoro… Maybe Il Gabiano. Um, but you back to my point, you there’s always the South Beach hangover factor in effect for visiting NBA teams in Miami. And then you throw in the fact that they fly immediately to one of the world’s great cities, Paris, France. Like is there any look ahead to that?