By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2024-11-29 08:36:20
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
圣安东尼奥马刺队(San Antonio Spurs) (10胜9负)的四连胜在感恩节前夜化为乌有。洛杉矶湖人队(Los Angeles Lakers) (11胜7负)来到南德克萨斯，以119-101的比分让主队吞下了一场败仗。
马刺队开局不错，但很快他们的进攻就停滞了。第一节结束时，圣安东尼奥队以23-32落后。马刺队组织了几次进攻，尤其是在第三节，但他们始终无法摆脱困境。
数据：马刺 vs. 湖人
马刺 vs. 湖人 – 最终评分
维克多·文班亚马(Victor Wembanyama)
优点：文班亚马两分球11投7中；他的高阶敏捷性在很多得分中都展现得淋漓尽致。他的传球不错，在防守端也做出了不少贡献。缺点：文班亚马的投篮选择值得商榷，尤其是三分球。在篮筐附近，他缺乏强硬度。33分钟0罚球的尴尬数据，准确地描绘了他篮下对抗不足的画面。文班也一反常态地显得笨拙。在很多情况下，他都失去平衡或不像往常那样稳定。
评分：C-
克里斯·保罗(Chris Paul)
本赛季我们很少看到这种情况，但保罗看起来很疲惫。在进攻端，他的组织能力有限，甚至出现了几次他通常不会出现的传球失误。他的四个三分球也全部投丢。在防守端，他的速度慢了一拍，无法在一对一对抗中真正地给任何湖人球员造成麻烦。不过，总的来说，保罗在场上时仍然表现得足够沉着，体现了一定的价值。
评分：C
哈里森·巴恩斯(Harrison Barnes)
优点：巴恩斯6投5中的三分球为他贡献了19分。他的三分出手现在看起来既丝滑流畅，又迅捷如电，他的赛季三分命中率已经高达46.9%。在防守端，他的表现中规中矩。缺点：巴恩斯两分球只有4投1中，他的终结能力还有很多不足之处。他对球的控制也不如往常那样严密，在篮板上也没有提供太多帮助。
评分：B-
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔(Stephon Castle)
卡斯尔在周三晚上的比赛中确实像个新秀。他在得分方面效率低下。我并不喜欢他的整体决策，但值得称赞的是，他确实送出了一些令人印象深刻的传球。在防守端，他很努力，但在这场比赛中他被对手多次碾压。
评分：C
朱利安·尚帕尼(Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼是首发阵容中的亮点。他三分球7投3中，还展现了他日益增长的持球突破能力。在防守端，他个人表现得相当出色，并做出了一些精明的轮转。这位23岁球员相比上赛季的进步是不可否认的。
评分：A-
凯尔登·约翰逊(Keldon Johnson)
没有什么积极的方面可以报道。约翰逊比平时更愿意传球。但是，是的，除此之外，他的表现都很糟糕。他的防守很差，在进攻端基本上就是一个低效的攻城锤。约翰逊真的需要扭转局面，因为这是他职业生涯迄今为止最糟糕的一个赛季。
评分：D
德文·瓦塞尔(Devin Vassell)
瓦塞尔从最近的伤病中复出，在21分钟内得到14分。他的投篮效率很高。他在防守端也表现得不错。话虽如此，瓦塞尔并没有真正帮助到他的队友。他的单打太多，而且他的失误又加剧了这个问题。瓦塞尔需要在比赛的各个方面都更加犀利和果断。
评分：C+
特雷·琼斯(Tre Jones)
现在可能还不是对琼斯的进攻敲响警钟的时候——但已经快了。他本赛季的投篮命中率只有28.6%。对阵湖人的比赛，情况依然如此。他在执行战术和防守上都很努力——但他无法得分，这限制了其他所有人的空间。此外，他在防守端缺乏体型，这让他在面对像湖人这样高大强壮的球队时很吃亏。
评分：C
扎克·科林斯(Zach Collins)
优点：科林斯在11分钟的出场时间里，跑动积极，没有失误或犯规。缺点：湖人在防守端直接碾压了他。科林斯在篮板上也没有做出太多贡献。
评分：C
布雷克·韦斯利(Blake Wesley)
在对阵爵士的比赛中表现出色之后，韦斯利只获得了大约两分钟的非垃圾时间。
评分：Inc. （未评级）
米奇·约翰逊(Mitch Johnson)
约翰逊应该为这场失利承担很大一部分责任，因为他的替补阵容表现太差了。随着瓦塞尔的回归，他把韦斯利和马穆克拉什维利移出了轮换阵容——结果就是一支毫无生气的替补阵容。战术的布置也缺乏创造力。
评分：D+
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Los Angeles Lakers – Game #19
Grades: San Antonio Spurs vs. Los Angeles Lakers – Game #19
The San Antonio Spurs (10-9) saw their four-game winning streak go up in smoke on Thanksgiving Eve. The Los Angeles Lakers (11-7) came to South Texas and delivered a convincing 119-101 loss to the home team.
The Spurs came out of the gates playing well but soon their offense stalled. By the end of the first quarter, San Antonio trailed 32-23. The good guys put together a couple runs, most notably in the third quarter, but the Spurs never could climb out of the hole.
Stats: Spurs vs. Lakers
Spurs vs. Lakers – Final Grades
Victor Wembanyama
The good: Wembanyama was 7-for-11 from two-point range; his next-level agility was on display on many of those scores. His passing was decent and he made more than his fair share of plays on the defensive end. The bad: Wembanyama’s shot-selection was suspect, particularly from three-point range. Near the basket, he lacked toughness. Zero free throw attempts in 33 minutes accurately paint the picture of his lack of physicality in the paint. Wembanyama was also uncharacteristically clumsy. In many situations, he was off-balance or otherwise not as stable as usual.
Grade: C-
Chris Paul
We haven’t seen it much this season but Paul looked fatigued. Offensively, his playmaking was limited and he actually missed a few passes he typically makes. He also missed all four of his three-point attempts. Defensively, he was a step slow and wasn’t able to really bother any of the Lakers in one-on-one matchups. Overall, though, Paul played with enough poise that he still had value when he was on the court.
Grade: C
Harrison Barnes
The good: Barnes hit 5-of-6 three-pointers on his way to 19 points. His three-point stroke looks both silky smooth and lightning quick right now and he has his percentage on the season all the way up to 46.9%. Defensively, he was average. The bad: Barnes was only 1-for-4 from two-point range and his finishing left a lot to be desired. He was also looser with the ball than usual and didn’t help much on the boards.
Grade: B-
Stephon Castle
Castle actually looked like a rookie on Wednesday night. He was inefficient when it came to scoring the basketball. I didn’t love his decision-making as a whole but, to his credit, he did have a handful of extremely impressive passes. Defensively, the effort was there but he got bulldozed quite a bit in this contest.
Grade: C
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie was the bright spot of the starting lineup. He hit 3-of-7 three-pointers and also showed off his burgeoning ability to drive to the rim off the dribble. Defensively, he was actually pretty darn good individually and made a few savvy rotations. The 23-year-old’s improvement over last season is undeniable.
Grade: A-
Keldon Johnson
Not many positives to report. Johnson was a more willing passing than usual. But, yeah, otherwise, he wasn’t good at all. His defense was poor and he was basically an ineffective battering ram on offense. Johnson really needs to turn things around because this has been the worst season of his career so far.
Grade: D
Devin Vassell
Vassell returned from his latest injury absence and scored 14 points in 21 minutes. He did so on efficient shooting from the field. He was also decent on the defensive end. That said, Vassell wasn’t really helping his teammates out there. There was too much one-on-one ball from him and he compounded that issue by being sloppy. Vassell needs to get sharper and more decisive in all areas of the game.
Grade: C+
Tre Jones
It might not be time to sound the alarm on Jones offensively — but it’s getting close. He’s shooting 28.6% from the field this season. Against the Lakers, it was more of the same. He’s running the sets right and trying on defense — but his inability to score is cramping the court for everyone else. Moreover, his lack of size defensively hurts him against big, physical teams like L.A.
Grade: C
Zach Collins
The good: Collins ran the court with purpose and finished without a turnover or foul in 11 minutes. The bad: The Lakers powered right through him on the defensive end. Collins also didn’t do much on the boards.
Grade: C
Blake Wesley
After a really good outing versus the Jazz, Wesley only got about two minutes of non-garbage time.
Grade: Inc.
Mitch Johnson
Johnson deserves a healthy serving of blame for this loss due to how bad his bench played. With the return of Vassell, he took Wesley and Mamukelashvili out of the rotation — and the result was a lifeless reserve unit. The playcalling also lacked creativity.
Grade: D+
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk