By LJ Ellis | SpursTalk, 2025-12-11 08:37:20
圣安东尼奥马刺队以132-119的最终比分摧毁了洛杉矶湖人队，成功晋级NBA杯半决赛。马刺队在第一节就建立起领先优势，并一度领先多达24分。湖人队在第四节发起反扑，但马刺队以非常成熟的方式沉着地扼杀了对手的势头。
尽管马刺本赛季已经取得了多场漂亮的胜利，但这场绝对名列前茅。在客场面对一支星光熠熠的球队，圣安东尼奥的球员们执行到位，打出了他们想要的比赛风格。漂亮。
数据统计：马刺 vs. 湖人
马刺 vs. 湖人 – 最终评分
德阿龙·福克斯 (De’Aaron Fox)
优点：在整场比赛中，福克斯都是马刺队的定海神针。当场上局势变得混乱时，福克斯总能挺身而出，让一切重回正轨。他投三分球的状态是我见过他最好的时候。他能随心所欲地杀入篮下。他能轻松地“军训”那些脚步缓慢的防守者。他能杀入禁区并制造威胁。而且，尽管参与了这么多进攻，福克斯整晚只有一个失误。防守端，他拼劲十足，并保持着极高的积极性。缺点：吹毛求疵的话，福克斯在两分球区域9投仅4中，并且没有获得罚球机会。因此，他的效率算不上多么亮眼。
评分：A-
斯蒂芬·卡斯尔 (Stephon Castle)
天呐，太猛了。在经历了回归后大部分时间表现挣扎的夜晚之后，卡斯尔在洛杉矶找回了状态。毫不夸张地说，他是全场最佳球员。他不知疲倦地冲击篮筐，是马刺队一切战术的关键。当卡斯尔没有在内线用技巧终结进攻时，他就在外线以6投3中的命中率命中三分。这位二年级猛将在篮板球方面的表现确实出类拔萃，防守充满激情，而且他的传球也做得非常出色。卡斯尔越来越像一个天生的组织者了。对阵湖人时，他有时控球有些随意，并且受到了一些犯规困扰……但是，总而言之，这是一场值得掌声的表现，他在短短27分钟内砍下了30分、10个篮板和6次助攻。
评分：A
德文·瓦塞尔 (Devin Vassell)
这是瓦塞尔连续第二场比赛表现沉寂。他全场10投仅2中。他没有得到太多触球机会，而糟糕的投篮选择让情况变得更糟。话虽如此，当他寻找队友时，他的传球比平时要好。我欣赏他本场大部分时间的防守，他没有让进攻端的哑火对比赛的其他方面产生负面影响。
评分：C
哈里森·巴恩斯 (Harrison Barnes)
巴恩斯上半场的进攻输出至关重要。他在半场结束前得到13分，大部分伤害来自三分线外。只要看到篮筐，巴恩斯就果断出手——这帮助球队拉开了场上空间。下半场他手感有所冷却，但在攻防两端依然是一位值得信赖的外线球员。
评分：B+
卢克·科内特 (Luke Kornet)
在脚踝伤势回归后经历了一场表现不佳的比赛后，科内特在对阵湖人时看起来好多了。他篮板抢得很好，并且经受住了在开阔空间防守湖人队超级巨星的艰难考验。他通过出色的护筐和足够的脚步移动来延阻对手的突破，从而完成了任务。进攻端，科内特表现相当不错。他获得了全队最高的9次罚球机会，并命中了其中8球。他掩护质量很高，传球流畅，并且在为队友拉开空间方面做得非常出色。
评分：B+
朱利安·尚帕尼 (Julian Champagnie)
尚帕尼在场上的表现相当不错。他投射三分时的自信心是我前所未见的。虽然通常他不是最优雅的突破手，但他在行进间完成了一些杂耍般的终结。防守端，尚帕尼直面挑战，并且顶住了压力。他还抢下了篮板，同时在各个方面都控制了失误。干得非常棒。
评分：A-
凯尔登·约翰逊 (Keldon Johnson)
约翰逊依然是这支球队的核心与灵魂。第一节还剩四分钟时，马刺队落后四分。就在那时，约翰逊手感火热。他在第一节末段独得13分，包括命中三记三分球。当这波攻势结束后，马刺队带着九分的领先优势进入第二节。马刺队得以利用这股势头控制了比赛的剩余时间。约翰逊在首节爆发后只再得到四分，但他依然保持着攻击模式，篮板抢得很好，并且在防守端格外强硬。
评分：A-
迪伦·哈珀 (Dylan Harper)
很明显，攻击湖人队一众糟糕的外线防守者是圣安东尼奥的策略之一。哈珀在执行这一任务中扮演了主角。他再次展现了出色的突破能力，在20分钟内得到13分。在此过程中，他做出了明智的决策，并且传球到位。再加上高质量的防守，哈珀的表现比任何人能合理想象的都要好。
评分：A-
凯利·奥利尼克 (Kelly Olynyk)
奥利尼克的数据并不亮眼，但我认为他是这场胜利的重要组成部分。进攻端，他总是毫不犹豫地去影响比赛进程。他传球非常出色，迫使湖人队必须对他进行专门布防。防守端，他通过身体对抗和对防守角度的精准判断顶住了压力。
评分：B+
米奇·约翰逊 (Mitch Johnson)
约翰逊是一位年轻的教练，他目前的执教水平非常高。这场比赛是一次完美的展示，向全世界展现了他所打造的这支球队的风格。马刺队从比赛一开始就寻求提升节奏，打得既有身体对抗性，又能在决策上保持明智。防守端，我认为比赛计划非常出色。马刺队大量运用沉退防守，迫使湖人队陷入大量单打。圣安东尼奥最终会进行协防——但协防的时机和位置非常隐蔽。湖人队始终没能找到节奏，这在很大程度上要归功于出色的执教。
评分：A-
由生成式人工智能翻译，译文内容可能不准确或不完整，以原文为准。
点击查看原文：Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Los Angeles Lakers – Game #24
Grades: San Antonio Spurs at Los Angeles Lakers – Game #24
The San Antonio Spurs advanced to the semifinals of the NBA Cup by dismantling the Los Angeles Lakers by a final score of 132-119. The Spurs built a lead in the first quarter and got out in front by as many as 24 points. The Lakers had a rally in the fourth but the Spurs calmly squashed it in a very mature fashion.
While the Spurs have had a lot of really good wins this season, this one was near the top. On the road against a team of stars, San Antonio executed and played the style of game they wanted to play. Bravo.
Stats: Spurs at Lakers
Spurs at Lakers – Final Grades
De’Aaron Fox
The good: Fox was the steadying force for the Spurs throughout the contest. When things got wonky, Fox was there to make things make sense again. He’s shooting threes as well as I’ve ever seen him shoot. He’s getting to the rim on command. He’s cooking slow defenders with ease. He’s getting into the paint and making things happen. And despite all the action, Fox only had one turnover on the night. Defensively, he’s competing and remaining extremely active. The bad: To nitpick, Fox was only 4-for-9 from two-point range and didn’t go to the free throw line. As a result, his efficiency wasn’t anything to write home about.
Grade: A-
Stephon Castle
Well, damn. After a return that saw him struggle for much of the evening, Castle was back to form in Los Angeles. It’s not hyperbolic to state that he was the best player on the court. His relentless drives to the hoop were the key to everything the Spurs were doing. When Castle wasn’t finishing with craft in the paint, he was nailing threes at a 3-for-6 clip. The second year stud was legitimately outstanding on the glass, defended with gusto and he passed the ball very well. Castle is looking more and more like a natural playmaker. He was loose with the ball at times against the Lakers and battled some foul trouble … but, all in all, it was an applause-worthy performance that saw him drop 30 points, ten rebounds and six assists in only 27 minutes.
Grade: A
Devin Vassell
It was the second straight quiet evening for Vassell. He was only 2-for-10 from the field. He didn’t get a ton of touches and made matters worse by having iffy shot-selection. That said, his passing was better than usual when he looked for teammates. I liked his defense for the most part and he didn’t let his lack of offensive fireworks negatively affect other aspects of his game.
Grade: C
Harrison Barnes
Barnes’ offensive production in the first half was vital. He had 13 points before halftime, doing much of his damage from downtown. Barnes was letting it fly whenever he saw the orange glow of the rim — and that helped space the court. He cooled off after halftime but he remained a trustworthy perimeter player on both ends of the court.
Grade: B+
Luke Kornet
After an iffy game in his return from an ankle injury, Kornet looked much better versus the Lakers. He rebounded well and survived a difficult task of defending the Lakers superstars in open space. He did so by protecting the rim well and moving his feet enough to detour drives. Offensively, Kornet was pretty darn good. He got to the line a team-high nine times — and hit eight of them. He screened well, moved the ball well and did an excellent job of staying out of the way.
Grade: B+
Julian Champagnie
Champagnie looked pretty darn good out there. He’s shooting threes with as much confidence as I’ve ever witnessed. While typically not the most graceful driver to the cup, he had some acrobatic finishes on the move. Defensively, Champagnie took on the challenges and held up well. He also rebounded while limiting miscues in all areas. Very good work.
Grade: A-
Keldon Johnson
Johnson continues to be the heart and soul of this team. With four minutes remaining in the first quarter, the Spurs were down four points. That’s when Johnson caught fire. He scored 13 points to end the third quarter, including hitting three three-pointers. When the smoke cleared, the Spurs were up nine points heading into the second period. The good guys were able to use that momentum to control the rest of the game. Johnson only had four more points after his first quarter outburst but he remained in attack mode, rebounded well and was extra physical on the defensive end.
Grade: A-
Dylan Harper
It was obviously part of San Antonio’s strategy to attack the Lakers litany of poor perimeter defenders. Harper played a starring role in that mission. He was once again great going to the rim and had 13 points in 20 minutes. Along the way, he made smart decisions and passed the ball well. Add in quality defense and Harper is looking better than anyone could have reasonably imagined.
Grade: A-
Kelly Olynyk
Olynyk’s numbers don’t jump off the page but I thought he was an important part of this victory. Offensively, he never hesitated to impact the proceedings. He passed the ball very well and forced the Lakers to account for him. Defensively, he held up by being physical and playing the angles well.
Grade: B+
Mitch Johnson
Johnson is a young coach who is currently coaching at a high level. This was the perfect showcase to show the world the type of team he has built. The Spurs came out of the gates looking to push the pace and play physical while making smart decisions. Defensively, I thought the gameplan was awesome. The Spurs mixed in a lot of drop coverage to force the Lakers into a lot of one-on-one actions. San Antonio eventually sent help — but disguised the help well. The Lakers never found a rhythm and a lot of that was due to good coaching.
Grade: A-
By LJ Ellis, via SpursTalk